SpringerLink
Log in

Pyrolysis kinetics and combustion characteristics of local firewood species and charcoal produced by slow pyrolysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firewood and charcoal are relatively abundant in sub-Saharan Africa and have low cost of production, hence their continued dominance as an energy source. However, very few studies have documented any information on pyrolysis kinetics and combustion performance characteristics for firewood and charcoal in sub-Saharan Africa. This information is needed to develop environmentally friendly combustion reactors suitable for these firewood species and charcoal as well as guide policy decisions on fuels appropriation for different purposes. Therefore, this study seeks to identify the thermo-chemical conversion characteristics of five local commonly used firewood species, namely Dichrostachys cinerea, Morus lactea, Piliostigma thonningii, Combretum molle, and Albizia grandibracteata and their charcoals produced after slow pyrolysis. Firewood was characterized by a fibrous network, while charcoal showed a dentritic network structure with micropores. The pyrolysis process resulted in a significant increase in lignification in the process of charcoal formation with highest lignin values recorded for Albizia grandibracteata. The lowest rate of lignification was observed for Morus lactea firewood species. Peak temperatures for firewood species and charcoal ranged between 515.4–621.7 °C and 741.6–785.9 °C. Activation energy of Morus lactea was 16.3 kJ/mol, which was the lowest among firewood species. Activation energy of Piliostigma thonningii was the highest among firewood species at 29.5 kJ/mol. For charcoal, activation energy was highest for both Morus lactea and Dichrostachys cinerea (35.9 kJ/mol). Piliostigma thonningii charcoal had the lowest combustion performance results with maximum burning rate at 0.68%/min, flammability index at 0.18 × 10−5%/min °C, and combustion characteristic index at 0.02 × 10−8%/min2°C3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bamwesigye D, Kupec P, Chekuimo G, Pavlis J, Asamoah O, Darkwah SA, Hlavackova P (2020) Charcoal and wood biomass utilization in Uganda: the socioeconomic and environmental dynamics and implications. Sustainability 12:8337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bär R, Reinhard J, Ehrensperger A, Kitema B, Mkundu T, Wymann von Dach S. The future of charcoal, firewood, and biogas in Kitui County and Kilimanjaro Region: scenario development for policy support. 2021; 150: 112067

  3. Owen M, van der Plas R, Sepp S (2013) Can there be energy policy in sub-Saharan Africa without biomass? Energy Sustain Dev 17:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Protásio T, Scatolino MV, Caxito de Araújo ACC, Fernandes de Oliveira C, Rodrigues de Figueiredo IC, Reis de Assis M, Trugilho PF. Assessing proximate composition, extractive concentration and lignin quality to determine appropriate parameters for selection of superior eucalyptus firewood. BioEnergy Research. 2019; 12: 626–641

  5. Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Mukome FND, Machado S, Nyamasoka B (2015) Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties. J Environ Manage 150:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima MDR, Patricio EPS, Junior UB, Silva RC, Bufalino L, Numazawa S, Hein PRG, Protásio T (2021) Colorimetry as a criterion for segregation of logging wastes from sustainable forest management in the Brazilian Amazon for bioenergy. Renewable Energy 163:792–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kedir MF (2021) Pyrolysis bio-oil and bio-char production from firewood species for energy and carbon storage in rural wooden houses of southern Ethiopia. In: Leal FW, Oguge N, Ayal D, Adeleke L, da Silva I (eds) African handbook of climate change adaptation. Cham, Springer, pp 1313–1329

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelouahed L, Leveneur S, Vernieres-Hassimi L, Balland L, Taouk B (2017) Comparative investigation for the determination of kinetic parameters for biomass pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 129:1201–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Blasi C (2008) Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:47–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bridgwater AV (2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 91:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nabukalu C, Giere R (2019) Charcoal as an energy resource: global trade, production and socioeconomic practices observed in Uganda. Resources 8(4):183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azeez AM, Meier D, Odermatt J (2011) Temperature dependence of fast pyrolysis volatile products from European and African biomasses. J Anal Appl Pyrol 90:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mamvura TA, Pahla G, Muzenda E (2018) Torrefaction of waste biomass for application in energy production in South Africa. S Afr J Chem Eng 25:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nyoni B, Duma S, Shabangu SV, Hlangothi P (2020) Comparison of the slow pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of coal, wood and algae at high heating rates. Nat Resour Res 29:3943–3955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mafu LD, Neomagus WJP, Everson RC, Strydom CA, Carrier M, Okolo GN, Bunt JR (2017) Chemical and structural characterization of char development during lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis 243:941–948

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeguirim M, Bikai J, Elmay Y, Limousy L, Njeugna E (2014) Thermal characterization and pyrolysis kinetics of tropical biomass feedstocks for energy recovery. Energy Sustain Dev 23:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heidari A, Stahl R, Younesi H, Rashidi A, Troeger N, Ghoreyshi AA (2014) Effect of process conditions on product yield and composition of fast pyrolysis of Eucalyptus grandis in fluidized bed reactor. J Ind Eng Chem 20:2594–2602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Misse SE, Brillard A, Mayandyshev P, Brihac J-F, Obonou M (2020) Comparative pyrolysis, combustion, and kinetic modeling of twelve Cameroonian woody biomass. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00808-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell SH, Turrion-Gomez JL, Meredith W, Langston P (2017) Increased charcoal yield and production of lighter oils from slow pyrolysis of biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol 124:536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sait HH, Hussain A, Salema AA, Ani FN (2012) Pyrolysis and combustion of date palm biomass using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresources Technology 118:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lubwama, M., Yiga, V. A., Ssempijja, I., & Lubwama, H. N. (2021). Thermal and mechanical characteristics of local firewood species and resulting charcoal produced by slow pyrolysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 1–16.

  22. Olupot PW, Candia A, Menya E, Walozi R (2016) Characterization of rice husk varieties in Uganda for biofuels and their techno-economic feasibility in gasification. Chem Eng Res Des 107:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis B (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74(10):3583–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yiga VA, Pagel S, Lubwama M, Epple S, Olupot PW, Bonten C (2020) Development of fiber-reinforced polypropylene with NaOH pretreated rice and coffee husks as fillers: mechanical and thermal properties. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 33(9):1269–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubwama M, Yiga VA (2017) Development of groundnut shells and bagasse briquettes as sustainable fuel sources for domestic cooking applications in Uganda. Renewable Energy 111:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lubwama M, Yiga VA (2018) Characteristics of briquettes developed from rice and coffee husks for domestic cooking applications in Uganda. Renewable Energy 118:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coats AW, Redfern JP (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201:68–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park S-W, Jang C-H (2012) Effects of pyrolysis temperature on changes in fuel characteristics of biomass char. Energy 39:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Masnadi MS, Habibi R, Kopyscinski J, Hill JM, Bi X, Lim CJ, Ellis N, Grace JR (2014) Fuel characterization and co-pyrolysis kinetics of biomass and fossil fuels. Fuel 117:1204–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu J, Jiang X, Cai H, Gao F (2020) Study of combustion characteristics and kinetics of agriculture briquette using thermogravimetric analysis. ACS Omega. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuanyuan Z, Yanxia G, Fangqin C, Kezhou Y, Yan C (2015) Investigation of combustion characteristics and kinetics of coal gangue with different feedstock properties by thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochim Acta 614:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao D, Zhang J, Wang G, Conejo AN, Xu R, Wang H, Zhong J (2016) Structure characteristics and combustibility of carbonaceous materials from blast furnace flue dust. Appl Therm Eng 108:1168–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen G-B, Li J-W, Lin H-T, Wu F-H, Chao Y-C (2018) A study of the production and combustion characteristics of pyrolytic oil from sewage sludge using the Taguchi Method. Energies 11:2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muvhiiwa R, Kuvarega A, Llana EM, Muleja A. Study of biochar from pyrolysis and gasification of wood pellets in nitrogen plasma reactor for design of biomass processes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2019; 7: 103391

  35. Trubetskaya A, Jensen PA, Jensen AD, Steibel M, Spliethoff H, Glarborg P, Larsen FH (2016) Comparison of high temperature chars of wheat straw and rice husk with respect to chemistry, morphology and reactivity. Biomass Bioenerg 86:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L, Skreiberg Ø, van Wesenbeeck S, Gronli MG, Antal MJ (2016) Experimental study on charcoal production from woody biomass. Energy Fuels 30:7994–8008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ilnicka A, Lukaszewicz JP (2015) Discussion remarks on the role of wood and chitin constituents during carbonization. Frontiers in Materials 2:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Astika IM, Negara DNKP, Kencanawati CIPK, Nindhia TGT, Hidajat F. Proximate and morphology properties of swat bamboo activated carbon carburized under different carbonization temperature. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/539/1/012010

  39. Yang Z, Deng Y, Li J (2019) Preparation of porous carbonized woods impregnated with lauric acid as shape-stable composite phase change materials. Appl Therm Eng 150:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oyedun AO, Tee CZ, Hanson S, Hui CW (2014) Thermogravimetric analysis of the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of plastics and biomass blends. Fuel Process Technol 128:471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. **ao R, Yang W, Cong X, Dong K, Xu J, Wang D. Thermogravimetric analysis and reaction kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. Energy. 2020; 201: 117537

  42. Costa VJ, Viera RM, Girotto SBFT, Simioni FJ (2016) Pyrolysis and thermogravimetry of blended and non-blended residues of pine and eucalyptus forestry woods. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 35:1521–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang W-L, Ren X-Y, Che Y-Z, Chang J-M, Gou J-S (2013) Kinetics and FTIR characteristics of the pyrolysis process of poplar wood. For Sci Pract 15:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Awang AN, Mohamed AR, Salleh NHM, Hoo PY, Kasim NN (2019) Torrefaction of Leucaena Leucocephala under iso-thermal conditions using the Coats-Redfern method: kinetics and surface morphological analysis. React Kinet Mech Catal 128:663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ali S, Hussain SA, Tohir MZM, Nuruddin A. Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis kinetics of Malaysian wood species. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 811: 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/811/1/012003

  46. Garcia-Maraver A, Perez-Jimenez JA, Serrano-Bernardo F, Zamorano M (2015) Determination and comparison of combustion kinetics parameters of agricultural biomass from olive trees. Renewable Energy 83:897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yorulmaz SY, Atimtay A. Investigation of combustion kinetics of five waste wood samples with thermogravimetric analysis. In: Gökçekus H, Türker U, LaMoreaux JW, editors. Survival and sustainability. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2010. P. 511–520

  48. Wu Y, Dollimore D (1998) Kinetic studies of thermal degradation of natural cellulosic materials. Thermochim Acta 324:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ding Y, Ezekoye OA, Lu S, Wang C, Zhou R. Comparative pyrolysis behaviors and reaction mechanisms of hardwood and softwood. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 102–109

  50. Naqvi SR, Ali I, Nasir S, Taqvi SAA, Atabani AE, Chen W-H. Assessment of agro-industrial residues for bioenergy potential by investigating thermo-kinetic behavior in a slow-pyrolysis process. Fuel. 2020; 118259

  51. Ekinci Z, Civan M, Yurdakal S (2020) Effects of particle size on oxidative thermal decomposition kinetics and mechanisms of selected waste wood samples. Chem Eng Commun. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2020.1817743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Technical support from Yosevi Engineering Services Limited, www.yosevi.com, and the Materials and Metallurgy Laboratory at Busitema University Tororo, Uganda, is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, www.nexteinstein.org, with financial support from the Government of Canada, provided through Global Affairs Canada, www.international.gc.ca, and the International Development Research Centre, www.idrc.ca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Michael Lubwama & Vianney Andrew Yiga

  2. Africa Center of Excellence in Materials, Product Development and Nanotechnology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Michael Lubwama

  3. Yosevi Engineering Services Limited, Kampala, Uganda

    Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga & Harriet Nalubega Lubwama

  4. Faculty of Applied Science and Technology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda

    Silagi Wanambwa & Denis Bbosa

Authors
  1. Michael Lubwama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vianney Andrew Yiga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silagi Wanambwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Denis Bbosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Harriet Nalubega Lubwama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga; Methodology: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga, Silagi Wanambwa, Denis Bbosa, Harriet Nalubega Lubwama; Formal analysis and investigation: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga; Writing—original draft preparation: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga, Harriet Nalubega Lubwama; Writing—review and editing: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga, Silagi Wanambwa, Denis Bbosa, Harriet Nalubega Lubwama; Funding acquisition: Michael Lubwama; Resources: Michael Lubwama, Vianney Andrew Yiga; Supervision: Michael Lubwama.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lubwama.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lubwama, M., Yiga, V.A., Wanambwa, S. et al. Pyrolysis kinetics and combustion characteristics of local firewood species and charcoal produced by slow pyrolysis. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 12679–12688 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02050-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02050-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation