SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of the Design of Pressure Vessels on Performance and Hydrodynamic Parameters in Two-Pass Seawater Reverse Osmosis Systems

  • Research Article-Chemical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of different designs of pressure vessels on hydrodynamic parameters and the performance of seawater RO systems are investigated using computer simulations. Simulation results showed that designs using pressure vessels with four membranes in two-pass RO systems have a lower energy consumption, 5.29 and 0.33 kWh/m3 for the first and second passes, respectively, than those with two or three membranes. Also, designs No. 4 and No. 10 were the most efficient, 41 and 56% for the first and second passes, respectively, compared to other ones. The first and second passes required a lower permeate and feed pressure when using designs No. 3, No. 6, No. 9, and No. 12 where pressure vessels with two membranes were used. In addition, hybrid designs of two-pass RO systems were found to have the best efficiency and the lowest energy consumption among various other designs. Findings showed that in two-pass RO systems, the first pass consumes more energy than the second pass. Thus, the efficiency of the second pass in all designs of two-pass RO systems is more than the first pass. The results presented in this paper can be used to optimize the design of two-pass RO systems to ensure the optimum operation of such systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BWRO:

Brackish water reverse osmosis

ED:

Electrodialysis

ERD:

Energy recovery device

FO:

Forward osmosis

GFD:

Gallons per square foot per day

GPM:

Gallons per minute

MSF:

Multi-stage flash distillation

MED:

Multi-effect distillation

NDP:

Net driving pressure

RO:

Reverse osmosis

SEC:

Specific energy consumption

SWRO:

Seawater reverse osmosis

TDS:

Total dissolved solids

VC:

Vapor compression

References

  1. McGinnis, R.L.; Elimelech, M.: Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(23), 8625–8629 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/es800812m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altaee, A.: Computational model for estimating reverse osmosis system design and performance: part-one binary feed solution. Desalination 291, 101–105 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaidi, S.J.; Fadhillah, F.; Khan, Z.; Ismail, A.: Salt and water transport in reverse osmosis thin film composite seawater desalination membranes. Desalination 368, 202–213 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J.; Li, G.: Marine reverse osmosis desalination plant—a case study. Desalination 174(3), 299–303 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayyaadi, H.; Saffari, A.: Thermoeconomic optimization of multi effect distillation desalination systems. Appl. Energy 87(4), 1122–1133 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, K.P.; Arnot, T.C.; Mattia, D.: A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. J. Membr. Sci. 370(1–2), 1–22 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiffler, M.: Perspectives and challenges for desalination in the 21st century. Desalination 165, 1–9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Park, K.; Kim, J.; Ryook, Y.D.; Hong, S.: Towards a low-energy seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant: a review and theoretical analysis for future directions. J. Membr. Sci. 595, 117607 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alabduljalil, S.; Alotaibi, S.; Abdulrahim, H.: Techno-economic evaluation of different seawater reverse osmosis configurations for efficient boron removal. Desalin. Water Treat. 168, 65–76 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altaee, A.; Zaragoza, G.; van Tonningen, H.R.: Comparison between forward osmosis-reverse osmosis and reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination 336, 50–57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. A. Mustaqimah; M. Alghoul; P. Poovanaesvaran; A. M. F. F. Annisa; K. Sopian (2013) “Comparison of one stage and two stage-brackish water reverse osmosis system: a simulation study”, Comput. Methods Sci. Eng.

  12. Joseph, A.; Damodaran, V.: Dynamic simulation of the reverse osmosis process for seawater using LabVIEW and an analysis of the process performance. Comput. Chem. Eng. 121, 294–305 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Obaidi, M.A.; Alsarayreh, A.A.; Al-Hroub, A.M.; Alsadaie, S.; Mujtaba, I.M.: Performance analysis of a medium-sized industrial reverse osmosis brackish water desalination plant. Desalination 443, 272–284 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearson, J.L.; Michael, P.R.; Ghaffour, N.; Missimer, T.M.: Economics and energy consumption of brackish water reverse osmosis desalination: innovations and impacts of feedwater quality. Membranes (Basel) 11(8), 616 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh, H.-J.; Hwang, T.-M.; Lee, S.: A simplified simulation model of RO systems for seawater desalination. Desalination 238(1–3), 128–139 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilf, M.; Klinko, K.: Optimization of seawater RO systems design. Desalination 138(1–3), 299–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghourejili, S.; Vahidfard, V.; Mousavi, Y.; Babapoor, A.; Faraji, M.: Effect of temperature on energy consumption and recovery rate of the reverse osmosis brackish systems in a different arrangement. Sci. Iran. 29(6), 3167–3178 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fritzmann, C.; Löwenberg, J.; Wintgens, T.; Melin, T.: State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 216(1–3), 1–76 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamed, O.A.: Overview of hybrid desalination systems—current status and future prospects. Desalination 186(1–3), 207–214 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solutions, D.W.: Filmtec™ reverse osmosis membranes. Tech. Man. Form 399(609–00071), 1–180 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gullinkala, T.; Digman, B.; Gorey, C.; Hausman, R.; Escobar, I.C.: Desalination: reverse osmosis and membrane distillation. Sustain. Sci. Eng. 2, 65–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Altaee, A.: Theoretical study on feed water designs to reverse osmosis pressure vessel. Desalination 326, 1–9 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoek, E.M.; Allred, J.; Knoell, T.; Jeong, B.-H.: Modeling the effects of fouling on full-scale reverse osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci. 314(1–2), 33–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J.; Hong, S.: A novel single-pass reverse osmosis configuration for high-purity water production and low energy consumption in seawater desalination. Desalination 429, 142–154 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lenntech. "Reverse osmosis demineralization." https://www.lenntech.com (accessed 2022).

  26. Ghourejili, S.; Valizadeh Harzand, F.; Yaghoubi, S.; Babapoor, A.: Investigation of the effects of temperature on net driving pressure and pressure drop in different configurations of the reverse osmosis system using computer simulations. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-07841-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghourejili, S.; Yaghoubi, S.; Valizadeh Harzand, F.; Mousavi, Y.; Babapoor, A.: Effects of total dissolved solids on pressure drop and net driving pressure in different designs of brackish and seawater reverse osmosis systems. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 48(7), 8785–8799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07393-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, J.; Hong, S.: Optimizing seawater reverse osmosis with internally staged design to improve product water quality and energy efficiency. J. Membr. Sci. 568, 76–86 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P.O. Box 179, Ardabil, Iran

    Shamsedin Ghourejili, Sina Yaghoubi, Yousef Mousavi & Aziz Babapoor

Authors
  1. Shamsedin Ghourejili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sina Yaghoubi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yousef Mousavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aziz Babapoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aziz Babapoor.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghourejili, S., Yaghoubi, S., Mousavi, Y. et al. Effects of the Design of Pressure Vessels on Performance and Hydrodynamic Parameters in Two-Pass Seawater Reverse Osmosis Systems. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 8011–8020 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08621-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation