1 Introduction

For decades, utilization of energy has increased remarkably all over the world. Significant efforts were carried out by most of the develo** countries to mitigate and minimize the impact of climate change through the optimization of energy use [1]. Moreover, owing to the large combustion of fossil fuels, large quantities of greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) are being released into the atmosphere, which increases the risks of global warming and climate change. Whereas the energy generation of fossil fuels is obtained with only 30–40% of efficiency [2], thus, more than half of the energy is lost as waste heat, which has a detrimental impact on the economy and environment.

Nowadays, the urgent need for alternative energy sources is to cut down the total energy consumption of fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions as a result of increasing energy demand. However, global total energy demand increased by about 160% from 1990 to 2017, increasing 1.6 times in 27 years [3]. Thus, continuous efforts and studies focus on a more attractive energy technology that enhances the performance, economic aspect, and climate change with a common strategy adopted by several countries [4]. Moreover, renewable energy sources are crucial and important for the industrial and commercial sectors to run appliances at homes or offices and to run factories [5]. Figure 1 shows the consumption energy rate of fossil fuels and renewable energies in 2017 [6].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Global energy consumed from the primary sources in 2017 [6]

Sustainable energy sources, including solar energy, geothermal, tidal energy, hydropower, biomass, and wind power, generated approximately 12–14% of the world's energy demand [7,8,9,10,11]. Among the families of these renewable energy sources, wind power is the most advantageous and effective alternative energy source, which has grown rapidly over the past decades in most develo** countries [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, wind energy is a hot topic that has been actively discussed in academic and political sectors to explore its potential mitigation of climate change problems [1]. Wind energy offers several benefits, such as being inexpensive, uninterrupted, environmentally friendly, and globally abundant. The energy generated in any form contributes to environmental impacts to some extent, besides, wind energy has negligible environmental impacts compared to conventional energy sources [5].

The growth in wind energy harnessing mainly depends on the energy policy, geographical location, local wind characteristics, and the wind turbine. Among them, the performance of wind turbines has a major influence on wind energy generation. Several factors affect the performance of a wind turbine, including operating wind speed, blade length, tower height, casing design, and surrounding environmental factors such as weathering, icing, and birds and insect collisions [16]. The performance of a wind turbine is prone to the aerodynamics of the blade. Furthermore, a collision of birds and insects alters the aerodynamic shape of the blade, and this leads to an increase in aerodynamic drag, as a result, power generation is decreased by up to 50% [17]. On top of that, the surface is also altered due to ice accumulation; as a result, power generation can be decreased by 20% to 50% [17]. In normal conditions, the performance of wind turbine is directly associated with the profile wind speed at a particular location. The variations occurring in wind speed profiles significantly affect turbine performance.

The reliability of a wind turbine needs to be maximized, as it also determines the other challenges such as maintenance. Referring to statistics on malfunctioning of the turbine, more than 20% of failures in large wind turbines occur due to malfunctioning of the gearbox [18]. Among the other elements, the drivetrain gearbox is the most crucial element associated with failure in large wind turbines. In direct drive type of wind generators, the multistage gearbox is not installed to control the complexity of the shaft speed; this also results in increased failures and excessive wear [19, 20]. The parameters that affect the performance of vertical axis wind turbines include the airfoil shape of the blade, structural design, and Reynolds number, orientation of each blade, number of blades, aspect ratio, chord-to-rotor radius ratio, the blade coning angle, blade pitch angle, height-to-radius ratio, and tower design [21]. All of these parameters have a significant contribution to the turbine’s overall efficiency. The decrease in the angle of attack at the blade tip creates turbulence in the wind flow behind the blade tip vortex. This circulation can increase vortex shedding, ultimately increasing the fatigue load and resulting in structural damage. Furthermore, the number of blades for a vertical axis wind turbine is case-dependent, and it determines the efficiency and structural stiffness of the turbine [22].

Therefore, it is crucial to study all the parameters that affect wind turbine performance and to discuss their remedies. Wind turbines are a promising remedy to meet future sustainable energy demands, among which the vertical axis wind turbine is an attractive technology for converting wind into some useful form of energy such as electricity. The latest offshore vertical axis turbine has a 20% less cost of energy than the horizontal axis wind turbine [23]. However, vertical axis wind turbine technology is still not mature to fully replace commercial offshore HAWT installed in shallow waters. The parameters related to aerodynamics and the study on VAWTs have obtained limited attention and referring to a study by Sutherland et al. [22] the best optimal design is yet an open debate. The current review study provides an understanding of the important parameters that need to be considered for designing the wind turbine, and the recommendation on the areas of future study. This can be a great motivation for researchers working on the optimization of the wind turbine, and especially on aerodynamic performance improvement for VAWT. Furthermore, the process of the current review is explained in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flowchart of review process

This paper is structured as follows, after this introduction. Section 2 deliberates the energy consumption. In Sect. 3, the wind turbine is discussed. The parameters involved in the performance of wind turbines are discussed in Sect. 4. In Sect. 5, the environmental impacts of wind turbines are illustrated. We finish in Sect. 6 with the conclusions. The aim of this paper is to illustrate and elaborate on the principle parameters affecting wind turbines, and the environmental impacts of wind energy harnessing.

2 Energy Consumption

World energy consumption has increased rapidly in recent years as a result of population growth, urbanization, and development. Researchers have been focusing on the environmental impacts of the huge utilization of energy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Due to current economic growth and industrial development, experts predict that the global energy requirement by 2050 will be about ~30 TW [24], while at the end of the twenty-first century, it could increase up to ~46 TW [25]. As mentioned in International Energy Agency (IEA) report, global electricity is generated primarily from coal (41.5%), natural gas (20.9%), hydraulic power (15.6%), nuclear energy (13.8%), petroleum products (5.6%), and from other resources is 2.6% [7]. Among the other countries, China was observed to be the country having the largest economy and energy consumption rate in global energy [26, 27]. The energy consumption of China was 571.44 MTCE in the year 1978, which was then increased by 7.9 times by the year 2017, consuming 4490 MTCE, due to rapid industrialization and urbanization [26]. Considering the rapid growth rate in the energy consumption of China, it is predicted to increase to 4957.343 MTCE in the year 2021. As shown in Fig. 3, China had the largest primary energy growth in the world in 2018, followed by the USA [28], whereas Fig. 4 highlights the world’s primary energy consumption increased by 2.9% in the same year [28]. The largest amount of energy consumption was based on fossil fuels, which were more than 80% of global energy utilization [29]. The utilization of coal, natural gas, and petroleum as sources of energy leads to an increase in global greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Since China is leading in global primary energy consumption, it has become one of the largest CO2 emitter countries, thereby contributing 27.6% of global emissions in 2017 [27]. However, to reduce its share in the world’s GHG emissions, China has established the goal to increase its energy consumption to 20% of renewable energy sources by the year 2030 [30]. This can significantly reduce CO2 emissions per unit GDP (Gross Domestic Product) by 60 to 65% [30, 31].

Fig. 3
figure 3

World’s primary energy growth in 2018 [28]

Fig. 4
figure 4

World's primary energy consumption (million tons oil equivalent) [28]

Additionally, due to the increase in global energy consumption, wind energy has been noted as the most promising green energy source, among other sources of electricity generation [32]. It is a large-scale power generation source, relatively cheap, and can mitigate environmental pollution. Over several decades, many researchers and engineers have suggested the installation of wind turbines for electricity generation in high wind energy density areas such as coastal and plateau regions. This is due to the lower installation cost, higher efficiency of a wind turbine, higher reliability, handiness to the powerhouse, cost-effective operation, and the increased prices of oil production [33]. Apart from this, the worldwide perspective of wind power density is enormous, which is estimated to be 630,720 to 1,489,200 TWh/year [34]. Considering this, the US Department of Energy has set a goal for the country to generate 20% of its total energy consumption from wind by 2030 [35]. While the total wind-based energy generation rate in the country was 5.5% in the year 2016, in which Iowa had the highest share of 36.6% [35]. Such a policy to encourage wind energy harnessing can be a great support for the stakeholders to invest in the installation of the wind turbine. The early-stage development in wind energy was much lower compared to solar energy generation. The main reason for this was poor aggregate policy support, both in terms of wind energy development and wind energy usage. Wind energy development and installed capacity are only higher in develo** countries such as China and the USA. It is therefore important to ensure that wind energy is harnessed to its maximum from the installed wind turbines, as this helps to gain the attention of policymakers for wind energy development.

3 Wind Energy Generation

The utilization of the energy generated from greener sources of wind, solar, and ocean energies mitigates CO2 emissions to the environment. Among them, wind energy technology is the most promising, popular, cheapest, and most attractive renewable energy source [35]. Furthermore, numerous countries have been rapidly investigating the feasibility of installing wind turbines for electrical power generation over the last two decades, because of the higher costs of fossil fuels and unpredictable petroleum supplies from OPEC countries. Studies carried out by research scholars in the field of energy industry have concluded that wind and solar energy sources offer the cleanest and most cost-effective electricity generation [33, 36,37,38]. Wind turbines are the fastest growing energy generation technologies that offer zero greenhouse effects compared to other renewable energy technologies, including solar cells, tidal energy converters (TEC), hydrogen fuel cells, and the technology involved in power generation biodiesel, and biomass [33].

Wind turbine installation has increased rapidly in most develo** countries due to significant reductions in installation costs, which are much lower compared to fossil fuel-based power generation [39]. Moreover, the total installed wind power in the year 1998 was 7600 MW, which was then increased to 364,270 MW by the year 2014 [40]. Afterward, 167 GW of power generated from renewable energy sources was included worldwide in the year 2017 [41]. The installed capacity of 167 GW has a wind power share of 47 GW, including 4 GW generated from offshore wind sources [42]. According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), worldwide wind energy installations accomplished 591 GW in 2018, and it appears to add 330 GW of wind power to the global energy market from 2019 to 2023, bringing total capacity to over 900 GW [43]. In the year 2019, 59.7 GW of power generated from the newly installed turbines was added to achieve the worldwide capacity of 650.8 GW as shown in Fig. 5 [44]. The major contribution to this addition from the USA and China by generating 9.1 and 27.5 GW, respectively [44]. However, in 2020, markets were slowing down due to Coronavirus crisis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Worldwide cumulative wind installed capacity [44]

Energy consumption based on renewable energy generation is estimated to increase by 32% in the European Union (EU) by the year 2030. However, it is also estimated that utilization of renewable energy will be increased to 55% to 75% by the year 2050 [45]. In this regard, the IEA report predicted that worldwide energy generation by wind sources will be increased by up to 18% by the year 2050 [40]. Another study expected that over 20% of global electrical energy demands will be from wind energy by 2050 [

Fig. 6
figure 6

The share of top ten countries in the global wind energy [50]

3.1 Mathematical Models for a Wind Turbine

A wind turbine consists of blades that are linked to the shaft of the rotor. The blades capture the kinetic energy of the upstream wind and transform it into the mechanical energy of the shaft. It is linked to the electrical generator to generate electricity. The amount of power output from a wind turbine depends on the speed of the upstream wind, wind turbine size, and the swept area. The maximum extractable kinetic energy from a wind turbine is limited to 16/27 ≈ 59.3% of the available wind power [51]. This is commonly known as Betz limit, referring to Albert Betz in 1919, and it yields the maximum limit of aerodynamic efficiency that a turbine can achieve. The energy yield of a wind turbine is directly related to the air density ρ and the cube of wind velocity \(v\) (air density at standard temperature and altitude above sea level is equal to 1.225 kg/m3), as follows [42]:

$${P}_{v}=\frac{1}{2}\rho A{v}^{3}$$
(1)

where Pv is power (W), A = πR2 denotes swept area, and \(v\) stands for wind speed. The cut-in and cutoff speed limits of a turbine are set at 3 m/s and 25 m/s, respectively [52]. The mathematical model of the mechanical power (Pm) output or rotor shaft power is computed by the following relation [53, 54]:

$${P}_{m}={C}_{p}{P}_{v}$$
(2)
$${P}_{m}=\frac{1}{2}\rho A{v}^{3}{C}_{p}(\lambda , \beta )$$
(3)

where Cp is the coefficient of performance or the turbine efficiency, which is a nonlinear function of tip speed ratio λ and the blade pitch angle β (0 ≤ CP ≤ 1). The relationship between the power coefficient (Cp) and the torque coefficient (CT) is given by Eq. (4) [55]:

$${C}_{p}={C}_{T}\lambda $$
(4)

The tip speed ratio, \(\lambda ,\) can be computed by Eq. (5) as:

$$\lambda =\frac{R .{ \omega }_{m}}{v}$$
(5)

In the Eq. (5), R stands for blade length (i.e., radius of swept area) and ωm denotes angular speed. Since the mechanical power of the rotor shaft is transferred to the electrical generator via a gearbox, the resultant power relies on the efficiency of the gearbox (\({\eta }_{m}\)) and generator (\({\eta }_{g}\)). The resultant output power (P) can be computed using Eq. (6) [33]:

$$P=\frac{1}{2}\rho A{v}^{3}{C}_{p}{\eta }_{m}{\eta }_{g}$$
(6)

Because wind speed is variable with time, wind turbines operating at its rated speed are very rare [56]. In this case, the capacity factor is useful to estimate the average power generated by the turbine. The dimensionless CF is expressed as [57]:

$$\mathrm{CF}=\frac{{P}_{e,\mathrm{avg}}}{{P}_{r}}= {\int }_{{V}_{i}}^{{V}_{R}}{P}_{n}f\left(V\right)\mathrm{d}V+ {\int }_{{V}_{R}}^{{V}_{0}}f\left(V\right)\mathrm{d}V$$
(7)

The performance of VAWT is mainly exhibited by the coefficient of torque (Ct) and power (Cp). Following Eqs. (8) and (9) are useful to compute Ct and Cp of the Darrieus-type VAWT [43]:

$${C}_{t}=\frac{T(t)}{0.5\rho A{{v}_{\infty }}^{2}R}$$
(8)
$${C}_{p}=\frac{P(t)}{0.5\rho A{{v}_{\infty }}^{3}}$$
(9)

where T(t) shows the instantaneous torque, P(t) stands for the power produced by the turbine. Further, ρ denotes air density, V denotes the free-stream velocity, and swept area is computed by A = DH [11, 43, 57].

The manufacturers in the wind energy industry always focus to design the turbine that performs with better efficiency for a longer period. To help manufacturers with this aim, researchers always investigate the characteristics that are associated with wind turbine performance during shorter and longer periods [58]. One of the methods to improve its performance is the maximizing annual energy production, generally expressed as [59]

$$\mathrm{AEP} \left(\mathrm{KWh}\right)={P}_{e,\mathrm{avg}}\times \mathrm{time}={P}_{e,\mathrm{avg}}\left(\mathrm{KW}\right)\times 8760 (\mathrm{h})$$
(10)

The AEP can be normalized to compute from the mean yearly produced wind, given as:

$${W}_{M}=\frac{1}{2}\rho A{V}_{M}^{3}$$
(11)

The total cost of the wind turbine can be computed using the NREL model, given as:

$$\mathrm{Cost}=\mathrm{FCR} \times \mathrm{ICC}+\mathrm{AOE}$$
(12)

In Eq. (12), “Cost” means the total turbine cost, “ICC” stands for an initial capital cost of the turbine, “FCR” means fixed charge rate, and “AOE” means the annual operating expenses of the turbine [60].

3.2 Categories of Wind Turbine

Wind turbines generate electricity by using the kinetic energy of the wind speed to drive the rotor shaft linked to a generator. The size of turbines varies from small, having generating capacities up to 10 kW, to large, having generating capacities up to 10,000 kW. The blade length is the key factor in assessing the electrical power generation capability of the turbine, as shown in Fig. 7. The main classification of wind turbines is (a) horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) and (b) vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) [61, 62]. There are several types of VAWT, such as (i) Darrieus, (ii) Savonius, (iii) Straight-bladed, (iv) Troposkien, and (v) Helical-type as displayed in Fig. 8 [64]. Additionally, the classification of wind turbines can be based on the driving force, i.e., lift-type and drag-type wind turbines. An example of lift-type is a horizontal axis wind turbine and an example of drag type is Darrieus turbine [63].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Growth in the size of commercial wind turbines [63]

Fig. 8
figure 8

Types of vertical wind turbines based on driving force a S-Shaped Savonius, b Straight-Bladed, c Troposkien, and d Helical-Shaped Darrieus wind turbine [64]

Choosing the type of wind turbine depends upon the intended scale of energy generation, for large-scale wind power harnessing, HAWTs are installed, while VAWTs are preferred for stand-alone or small-scale wind power. Preferring VAWT has several merits over a HAWT, such as minimum complexity due to smaller size, effortless installation, and independence of wind direction. The maintenance of VAWt is also much easier as it operates at comparatively lower heights, with an efficiency of above 70% [61]. The absence of a yaw mechanism makes VAWTs more suitable in terms of reduced structural complexity and easier power production. However, the main drawback of VAWT includes the absence of self-start-up ability and smaller aerodynamic performance [65,66,67,68]. The merits that attract interest in installing VAWT are summarized as [69,70,71,72,73]:

  • Absence of yaw mechanism: it does not depend on the direction of the wind when generating the power.

  • Minimum noise: as it operates at a low tip speed ratio.

  • Minimum cost of manufacturing: the smaller size, absence of yaw mechanism, and ordinary profile of the blade reduce the cost of manufacturing.

  • Minimum installation cost: the smaller height of the tower reduces installation and maintenance costs.

  • Scalability: there is a lower effect of tower height on turbine performance.

  • Minimum shadow flickering.

  • Environmental safety: environmental safety in terms of minimum bird death rates.

  • Visually appealing.

A typical horizontal axis is paramount in the wind power industry, having the design identical to the windmill. It can be classified based on several parameters. One of the classifications considering the power rating and the diameter of the turbine swept area is shown in Table 1 [61]. The generator is located inside the casing at the top of the tower; it is linked to a rotor shaft. The rotor of the wind turbine needs to face the direction of the wind for better performance; therefore, a yaw mechanism is installed in the HAWTs and a vane in the small HAWTs to direct them in line with the wind direction [74]. Inside the casing, there is also a gearbox to speed up shaft rotations so that the electric generator receives enough rpm required for power generation. The gearbox can be auto-controlled employing a servomotor, which is linked to a wind sensor. In this way, the turbine is capable of generating electricity from high wind speeds [39]. During high wind speed, turbulence can occur due to the turbine tower; therefore, the rotor is placed in front of the tower. The blades of wind turbines are also made rigid to withstand the load caused by high winds [74]. Although the tower creates turbulence during high winds, some turbines are still made by installing the rotor behind the tower, as it does not require an extra mechanism to change the direction. Moreover, the blades of the turbine bend during high winds, so the swept area is decreased and hence the wind load during high winds is also decreased.

Table 1 Classification of horizontal axis wind turbine based on turbine swept area and power rating [61]

There are several advantages of HAWTs such as:

3.2.1 High Operating Wind Speed

A horizontal axis wind turbine is most suitable to install on sites that are observed to have high wind speeds. Since the amount of energy generated by a turbine is related to its swept area and upstream wind speed, large-scale wind turbines are installed at those sites. Many of the offshore wind sites experience wind speed up to 20 m/s [75]. At such wind speed, VAWT is not suitable to install, whereas the HAWT can generate appreciable power. Furthermore, increasing the height of the tower will enable the turbine to receive high wind speed. Moreover, wind speed and power can increase by 20% and 30%, respectively, with increasing the tower height of 10 m. Under extreme wind conditions, the wind turbine rotates extremely fast, which can damage the turbine [76, 77]. Therefore, the wind turbine is designed at certain cut-in and cutoff speed. The cutoff velocity for the HAWT is always higher than the VAWT, thus indicating a higher energy yield. Depending on the wind profile at a particular location, the HAWT can be designed as a variable and a fixed-speed generator. Fixed-speed generators have higher efficiency if the turbine operates at its rated wind speed. While variable wind speed generators can operate at different upstream wind velocities and hence capture more energy, as the wind speed is variable in a real-life scenario [78].

3.2.2 High Efficiency

The blades of HAWT rotate perpendicular to the direction of the upstream wind; it allows extracting maximum energy from wind, along with whole rotation. HAWTs have the highest efficiency; they can convert 40% to 50% of receiving wind power into electricity [79]. The theoretical efficiency for HAWT is about 60% [39]. Despite the fact that the efficiency of HAWT is higher, they need high maintenance because of the additional parts installed on the turbines.

3.2.3 High Power Production

HAWT works in the same of a windmill; however, it is modernized. The modern HAWT is equipped with sensors to record real-time wind speed and direction, and a special yaw mechanism to direct it in the correct direction. The pitch of the blades is also variable; hence, the maximum power can be produced from wind [80].

3.2.4 High Reliability

The HAWT has been paramount in the wind power industry for decades. A lot of research has already been carried out on different aspects of the manufacturing, installation, and operation of a HAWT. Hence, the HAWT is more mature compared to other types of wind turbines [77].

The drawbacks of HAWTs are:

  • The HAWTs have higher construction costs; a strong foundation is required to withstand the weight of the turbine rotor and casing

  • Wind turbines are unappealing and disrupting the appearance of the landscape.

  • Heavy machinery is needed to lift the turbine components

  • HAWTs require an additional yaw control mechanism

  • Cyclic stresses and vibration

3.3 Materials Used in the Manufacturing of Wind Turbine

Generally, composite materials are used in the blades; nacelles are made mostly from steel and copper, and the towers are manufactured from steel and concrete [40]. The blades are the most important part of a turbine. Historically, in 1941, wind turbine blades were made from steel in Vermont in the USA; however, a few hundred hours later, one of the blades failed [49]. The next, three composite blade wind turbine was installed in Denmark in 1956–1957. The turbine produced power for eleven years, and its blades were manufactured with steel spars, containing aluminum shells fitted on the wooden ribs. Following the 1970s, wind turbine manufacturing began production containing composite blades [49].

Nowadays, research has been focused on improving the individual wind turbine components. The materials of wind turbines are being recycled by conventional methods; however, the recycling of composite materials is still a challenge to researchers [39]. The main advantages of using composite materials are having the best mechanical properties and being light in weight. Wind turbine blades have the highest cost component of a turbine [40, 49], and an average of ten kg of blade material is needed per one kW of power generation [81]. The performance of the blade mainly depends upon its geometry and the type of airfoil [82]. Several research studies mainly focus on investigating the type of material to be used in the manufacturing of blades. The proper physical and mechanical properties of materials are studied thoroughly while manufacturing a wind turbine blade. These properties include lightweight, high strength, greater fatigue resistance, and greater stiffness [83]. The main focus for blade manufacturers remains to get a better material that will be beneficial in terms of performance, weight, and cost. The paramount challenge to enhance the manufacturing and performance of wind turbine blades is to get the material that has a higher recycling ability, simple processing, cost-effective, and it can last longer. Moreover, several types of materials employed during the manufacturing of blades are as follows:

3.3.1 Glass Fiber

The glass fibers are prepared from the mixture of silicon dioxide and aluminum oxide, which also contain some impurities in trace quantities to improve its strength. The diameter of fibers is kept at 5–10 µm while the desired strength is ensured by setting up the suitable density and stiffness. Apart from glass fibers, the blade of a wind turbine is also made from aramid and basalt fibers, natural fibers, polyester, or hybrid composites [84]. Numerous studies focus on the manufacturing of fibers that have higher strength compared to E-glass fiber, such as modified glass fiber compositions (i.e., S and R types of glass fiber), carbon, basalt, and aramid types of fibers. The S-type of glass fiber was first introduced in the 1960s, having greater tensile (40%) and compressive (20%) strengths when compared to the E-type of glass fiber [85]. However, the price of S2-type glass fiber is around 10 times higher than that of E-glass.

Apart from high strength glass fibers, natural fibers are becoming popular due to their benefits like low cost, fairly mechanical properties, high specific strength, nonabrasive, biodegradable, and eco-friendly characteristics [83]. However, some disadvantages of these fibers include the flexible quality, increased moisture, and lower thermal stability [49].

Glass-reinforced plastic (GRP) is widely used in Chinese-made D61250 models. Such turbines are three-bladed, having blade length and pole height of 32 m and 68 m, respectively [86]. Moreover, the most suitable type of composites to manufacture the blades of a wind turbine are hybrid composites. Hybrid reinforcements like E-glass and carbon, and e-glass and aramid are promising substitutes for pure carbon and glass reinforcements. The research focus on these types of composites is predominant when considering the lightweight demand for wind turbine blades. To this end, Westphal et al. [87] analyzed the properties of hybrid composites consisting of glass and carbon in the application of the blade manufacturing scope of carbon glass hybrid composites in wind turbine blade applications by comparing the properties of carbon and glass laminates with hybrid laminates. It was concluded that the hybrid laminates showed favorable behavior in static tensile and fatigue loading conditions. However, their main concern is the compromise on the properties of high carbon fibers such as stiffness, fatigue, and stiffness. Furthermore, Thomas and Ramachandra [83] demonstrated that the full replacement of the pure glass reinforcements to hybrid composites will result in an 80% weight saving and a 150% expenditure increment, whereas a partial (i.e., 30%) replacement in a turbine with 8 m blades would benefit from a 90% increased expenditure and 50% reduction in weight [9]. The wind turbine manufactured by LM wind power is an example of a hybrid composite consisting of carbon and glass, the turbine having the largest rotor (i.e., 80.4 m long) [49].

3.3.2 Carbon Fiber

An optimistic substitute for glass fiber is carbon fiber (CFs), having favorable mechanical characteristics in terms of strength and quality. Carbon fibers have greater anisotropy in higher stiffness and thermal expansion [84]. Compared to glass fibers, CFs have advantageous attributes in terms of maximum stiffness and minimum density. Despite that, blades manufactured from CFs possess very minimum damage tolerance, compression strength, and higher strain. Besides, the cost of CFs is also very high, compared to E-glass fibers [49]. The recycling of carbon fibers depends upon economic as well as environmental factors. Both the materials, i.e., CFs and GFs, possess a higher ability to recycle in terms of environmental and economic perspective, which makes them energy-intensive when manufacturing. There exist different methods to recycle the CFs; they can be classified as mechanical, chemical, and thermal recycling. Adopting any of these methods depends upon the feasibility at the industrial and laboratory scale, setup costs, and more importantly, on the quality of the composites. Considering these limitations, researchers are more attracted to the hybrid method. The current hot topic in hybrid recycling research is microwave-supported chemical recycling [88].

3.3.3 Thermoplastic Composite

Nowadays, thermoset polymers are widely employed in the manufacturing of wind blades due to the beneficial properties of stiffness and strength, and easiness in the manufacturing process. However, the emission of styrene during the manufacturing process and the dum** of the blade are promising challenges. The important feature of thermoplastic polymers is the phase change property due to an increase in temperature; that is why they are easy to recycle and repair. The comparative analysis on the mechanical characteristics of fiber-reinforced polypropylene (FRP) and fiber-reinforced epoxy was conducted by [6]; the final results showed the higher strength (7 to 8 times) of thermoplastic FRP compared to thermoset FPR. Whereas the strength of alternative thermoplastic FRP is even higher, these alternative materials include polyetherimide (PEI), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Apart from this, the widely required to manufacture a turbine blade is anionic polyamide-6 (APA-6), and it has enhanced static and fatigue characteristics. Moreover, it is also economically efficient to use in wind turbine blades as the expenses of resin and recycling processes are comparatively lower [83].

The wind turbine blades are manufactured from fiber-reinforced polymer composites to provide resistance to physical loads such as gravity. The current composites used for manufacturing are able to give partial support against such physical loads. Therefore, the scientists are researching alternative composites that are environmentally friendly, easy to recycle, stronger, and have the greatest damage resistance. One such example is the advancement of epoxy resins, which give a maximum wetting of the fibers. After the wind blade is manufactured, the composite fibers are applied as surface sizing, for the protection of fibers and to increase the bonding strength. Sizing comprises the aqueous suspension having 3 to 10% solid material [89]. There are several advantages of sizing such as making the fibers homogenous, an increase in fiber-matrix interaction, reduced void content, and decreasing the fuzzy behavior. Furthermore, the desired materials chosen for manufacturing of blades should be selected based on features such as lower cost, fair mechanical properties, high specific strength, nonabrasive, biodegradable, eco-friendly features, moderate density, high stiffness to ensure stability, longer life, higher performance, easiness in processing, and the ability to recycle [88].

Wind energy installations are growing dramatically and becoming globalized. The growth of wind energy installations creates tough competition for manufacturers to become dominant. In the previous year 2020, 24.6 billion USD was invested in the USA for the installation of new wind projects [90]. Due to a significant increase in investment for the installation of the wind turbine, Denmark-based company Vestas was the biggest manufacturer of wind turbines in 2020, installing a total wind power capacity of 9.6 GW [91]. However, other companies are shown in Fig. 9 [90].

Fig. 9
figure 9

Top ten wind turbine manufacturers by installations in the year 2020 [90, 92]