Log in

Global Knowledge Flows: Impact of Pay Reference Points in a Knowledge-Driven Economy

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional compensation studies grounded in agency theory have produced inconclusive findings regarding their influence on employee job performance. In order to resolve this discrepancy, we incorporate prospect theory and reference point theory to introduce the notion of employee pay reference points and their impact on perceptions of fairness and job performance. This study aims to quantify the impact of pay reference points on job performance across three specific dimensions: level, vertical, and current. Furthermore, we investigate whether the existence of knowledge employees influences or regulates this association. To test our hypotheses, we conduct regression analysis on a panel dataset consisting of 25,545 annual records from 3352 firms listed on China A-share market between 2010 and 2020. The findings demonstrate a noteworthy and favorable influence of employee pay reference points on job performance across all three dimensions. Moreover, knowledgeable employees enhance this favorable connection, emphasizing their vital role in maximizing pay-driven motivation. We also detect indications of loss aversion, indicating that employees are more responsive to decreases in pay below their reference point as opposed to increases above it. The findings indicate that using employee pay reference points can be an effective strategic management tool to boost employee motivation and ultimately meet organizational performance goals. Companies can utilize this knowledge to create compensation systems that take into account benchmark values, particularly in industries that rely heavily on knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ambrosius, J. (2018). Strategic talent management in emerging markets and its impact on employee retention: Evidence from Brazilian MNCs. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baktash, M. B., Heywood, J. S., & Jirjahn, U. (2022). Worker stress and performance pay: German survey evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 201, 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P., & Belardinelli, P. (2018). Prospect theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizjak, J., Lemmon, M., & Nguyen, T. (2011). Are all CEOs above average? An empirical analysis of compensation peer groups and pay design. Journal of financial economics, 100(3), 538–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J., & Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being?. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47(3), 355-389.d reference wages: evidence for a develo** country. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1493–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, M. A., Nawaz, F., Hussain, S., Sousa, M. J., Wang, M., Sumbal, M. S., & Shujahat, M. (2019). Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: The implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 25, 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., & Malmendier, U. (2007). Behavioral economics of organizations. Behavioral economics and its applications, 235, 235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. S., Yu, C. C., & Hu, J. S. (2018). Constructing performance measurement indicators to suggested corporate environmental responsibility framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, T. S., & Chou, T. N. (2009, May). Hybrid classifier systems for intrusion detection. In 2009 Seventh Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (pp. 286–291). IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Nong, H., Zhu, H., & Zhu, R. (2021). Compensating for academic loss: Online learning and student performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. China Economic Review, 68, 101629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A., Fehr, E., Herrmann, B., & Schneider, F. (2014). Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, F. L., Cooper, B., Bartram, T., Wang, J., & Mei, H. (2019). Map** the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: A study of the banking industry in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1239–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowherd, D. M., & Levine, D. I. (1992). Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 302–320.

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faleye, O., Reis, E., & Venkateswaran, A. (2013). The determinants and effects of CEO–employee pay ratios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3258–3272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkender, M., & Yang, J. (2010). Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faupel, S., & Süß, S. (2019). The effect of transformational leadership on employees during organizational change–An empirical analysis. Journal of Change Management, 19(3), 145–166.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., & Schendel, D. (1996). Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D. (2019). Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1097–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkestad, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Teamwork for innovation: A content analysis of the highly read and highly cited literature on innovation. Advances in Develo** Human Resources, 12(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraumeni, B. M., & Liu, G. (2021). Summary of World Economic Forum, ‘The Global Human Capital Report 2017—Preparing people for the future of work’. In Measuring Human Capital (pp. 125–138). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, I. S., & Shaw, J. D. (2018). Person-based differences in pay reactions: A compensation-activation theory and integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, S., & Thöni, C. (2010). Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair wage–effort hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(3), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani, M., Liao, Y., Çayköylü, S., & Chand, M. (2013). Guilt, shame, and reparative behavior: The effect of psychological proximity. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gope, S., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2018). The effect of HRM practices on knowledge management capacity: A comparative study in Indian IT industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3), 649–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabner, I., & Martin, M. A. (2021). The effect of horizontal pay dispersion on the effectiveness of performance-based incentives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 88, 101174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H. P., Rottler, M., & Wallmeier, F. (2021). The influence of external reference price strategies in a nonprofit arts organization’s ‘pay-what-you-want’ setting. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 26(1), e1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, N., Conroy, S. A., & Delery, J. E. (2012). The many faces of pay variation. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., & Moore, J. (2008). Contracts as reference points. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. M., & Schaefer, S. (2009). CEO pay and the Lake Wobegon effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D., & Martelli, A. (2019). The transition to the knowledge economy, labor market institutions, and income inequality in advanced democracies. World Politics, 71(2), 236–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, E., Saeida Ardekani, S., Sabokro, M., & Salamzadeh, A. (2022). The study of knowledge employee voice among the knowledge-based companies: The case of an emerging economy. Revista de Gestão, 29(2), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010). The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 278.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, T., Deutsch, Y., Laamanen, T., & Maula, M. (2023). Temporal dynamics in acquisition behavior: The effects of activity load on strategic momentum. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 38–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kengatharan, N. (2019). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: Nexus of intellectual capital, productivity and firms’ performance. International Journal of Manpower, 40(6), 1056–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kifle, T. (2014). Do comparison wages play a major role in determining overall job satisfaction? Evidence from Australia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 613–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Kensbock, J. M., & Peschl, A. (2020). What satisfies younger versus older employees, and why? An aging perspective on equity theory to explain interactive effects of employee age, monetary rewards, and task contributions on job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 59(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbiegel, K., Maertens, M., & Wollni, M. (2018). The role of fairtrade certification for wages and job satisfaction of plantation workers. World Development, 102, 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshman, C., Rai, S., & Lakshman, S. (2022). Knowledge sharing, organizational commitment and turnover intention among knowledge workers: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(5), 768–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, I., Pierce, L., & Gino, F. (2012). The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1194–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Garboua, L., Montmarquette, C., & Simonnet, V. (2007). Job satisfaction and quits. Labour Economics, 14(2), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. (2023). Adapting legal education for the changing landscape of regional emerging economies: A dynamic framework for law majors. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–30.

  • Li, Z., Daspit, J. J., & Marler, L. E. (2022). Executive pay dispersion: Reconciling the differing effects of pay inequality and pay inequity on firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(15), 3056–3084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E. (2018). Social pay reference point, external environment, and risk taking: An integrated behavioral and social psychological view. Journal of Business Research, 82, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E. N. (2015). The role of reference point in CEO restricted stock and its impact on R&D intensity in high-technology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 872–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Lattemann, C., **ng, Y., & Dorawa, D. (2019). The emergence of collaborative partnerships between knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) and product companies: The case of Bremen, Germany. Regional Studies, 53(3), 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, M., & Martin, D. (2019). Executive compensation and employee remuneration: The flexible principles of justice in pay. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmrud, S., Falkenberg, H., Eib, C., Hellgren, J., & Sverke, M. (2020). Just what I see? Implications of congruence between supervisors’ and employees’ perceptions of pay justice for employees’ work-related attitudes and behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2069.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Massingham, P. R. (2018). Measuring the impact of knowledge loss: A longitudinal study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 721–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayneris, F., Poncet, S., & Zhang, T. (2018). Improving or disappearing: Firm-level adjustments to minimum wages in China. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 20–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehralian, G., Nazari, J. A., & Ghasemzadeh, P. (2018). The effects of knowledge creation process on organizational performance using the BSC approach: The mediating role of intellectual capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 802–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero, R., & Vásquez, D. (2015). Job satisfaction and reference wages: Evidence for a develo** country. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1493–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, G., & Ali, N. (2019). Rewards, autonomous motivation and turnover intention: Results from a non-Western cultural context. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1676090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, P. T., Yandi, A., & Mahaputra, M. R. (2020). Factors that influence employee performance: motivation, leadership, environment, culture organization, work achievement, competence and compensation (A study of human resource management literature studies). Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 1(4), 645–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockenfels, A., Sliwka, D., & Werner, P. (2015). Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Science, 61(7), 1496–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, K., & Lu, C. S. (2018). Organizational motivation, employee job satisfaction and organizational performance: An empirical study of container ship** companies in Taiwan. Maritime Business Review, 3(1), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. J., & Kohlmeyer, J. M., III. (2005). Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(4), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, A., & Gore, J. (2015). Behavioral agency theory: New foundations for theorizing about executive compensation. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1045–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H. E., & Weatherby, K. (2018). The global teaching profession: how treating teachers as knowledge workers improves the esteem of the teaching profession. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 113–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pu, B., Sang, W., Yang, J., Ji, S., & Tang, Z. (2022). The effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employees’ tacit knowledge sharing in start-ups: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 137–149.

  • Rasheed, M. I., Jamad, W. N., Pitafi, A. H., & Iqbal, S. M. J. (2020). Perceived compensation fairness, job design, and employee motivation: The mediating role of working environment. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(2), 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayton, B. A., & Seaton, J. S. (1999). The size of employee stakeholding in large UK corporations. Managerial and Decision Economics, 20(5), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohim, A., & Budhiasa, I. G. S. (2019). Organizational culture as moderator in the relationship between organizational reward on knowledge sharing and employee performance. Journal of Management Development, 38(7), 538–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N., Irani, Z., & Sharif, A. M. (2017). Big data in an HR context: Exploring organizational change readiness, employee attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 70, 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science, 16(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieweke, J., Köllner, B., & Süß, S. (2017). The relationship between employees’ objective internal and external pay standing and their job performance: A within-person analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., & Ramdeo, S. (2020). Leading organizational development and change: Principles and contextual perspectives. Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K., Mazzucchelli, A., Vessal, S. R., & Solidoro, A. (2021). Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: Role of social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Magalhães, L., Zancul, E., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A. (2018). Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: An empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamolampros, P., Korfiatis, N., Chalvatzis, K., & Buhalis, D. (2019). Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in high contact services: Insights from Employees’ Online reviews. Tourism Management, 75, 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. R., Yates, J. F., & Parker, A. M. (1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(4), 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, M. I. (2018). Mediating effect of work performance and organizational commitment in the relationship between reward system and employees’ work satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 37(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukder, M. F., & Wang, H. (2023). Analyzing the impact of stock options on talent retention and knowledge product generativity at knowledge intensive firms. International Journal of Manpower, 44(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2022-0411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tazhitdinova, A. (2018). Reducing evasion through self-reporting: Evidence from charitable contributions. Journal of Public Economics, 165, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: The role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 679–730). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 89(1), 839–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulfsdotter Eriksson, Y., Larsson, B., & Adolfsson, P. (2019). Implementing and integrating policies on performance-based pay: Coordinating the ‘one-employer approach’ in a Swedish Municipality. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(12), 985–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Brake, H. J., Walter, F., Rink, F. A., Essens, P. J., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2018). The dynamic relationship between multiple team membership and individual job performance in knowledge-intensive work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1219–1231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. B., O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Pollock, T. G. (2006). Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organization Science, 17(5), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Tang, Y., Chen, Y., & Wang, K. (2021). Be a better boss. Employee treatment, trust level and family business innovation: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, E. T., Ganegoda, D. B., Arvey, R. D., Wiley, J. W., & Budd, J. W. (2012). Is there fire? Executive compensation and employee attitudes. Personnel Review, 41(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Tartari, V., Huang, K. G., Di Lorenzo, F., & Bercovitz, J. (2018). Knowledge worker mobility in context: Pushing the boundaries of theory and methods. Journal of Management Studies, 55(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., Gao, F., Yin, Y., Guo, D., Zhao, P., Lu, Y., et al. (2019). Precise diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage and subtypes using a three-dimensional joint convolutional and recurrent neural network. European Radiology, 29, 6191–6201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zamir, E. (2015). Law, psychology, and morality: The role of loss aversion. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Chun, D. (2022). The effect of knowledge sharing on ambidextrous innovation: Triadic intellectual capital as a mediator. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Q., Wan, L., Wang, S., Wang, C., & Fang, W. (2021). Does ecological compensation have a spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from China based on a multi-stage dynamic DID approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 112934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund project “Risk Identification and Investor Attention Research Based on Financial Technology” (23YJA630014), the Humanities and Social Sciences Project of Anhui Province’s Higher Education Institutions “The Impact of Employee Pay Reference Effect on Job Performance” (SK2021A0232), and the Social Science Planning Project of Anhui Province “Research on the Mechanism and Effect of Government Implicit or Contingent Liabilities Based on Local State-owned Enterprises” (AHSKY2021D14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yadong Wen: conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Yan Chen: conceptualization, methodology, and supervision. **shuang Cui: writing—review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yadong Wen or Yan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, Y., Chen, Y. & Cui, J. Global Knowledge Flows: Impact of Pay Reference Points in a Knowledge-Driven Economy. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01853-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01853-9

Keywords

Navigation