Log in

Possibilistic Bayesian inference based on fuzzy data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Bayesian approach in the possibilistic environment is introduced, when the available data of the underlying statistical model are fuzzy. In this approach, based on a possibilistic model and a prior possibility distribution, the possibilistic posterior distribution is defined, when the available data are fuzzy. While the probabilistic Bayesian approach is suitable when we have stochastic uncertainty in the underlying model and available information, the proposed possibilistic Bayesian approach is proper when we come across the possibilistic uncertainty which is related to the notions of compatibility and consistency. A few numerical examples and a couple of applied examples in the field of concept learning are presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alcalde C, Burusco A, Fuentes-Gonz\({\rm {\acute{a}}}\)lez R (2005) A characterization for residuated implications on \({\cal {J}}[{\text{0,1 }}]\). Application to the L-fuzzy concept theory. Mathware Soft Comput 12:155–167

  2. Beliakov G (2005) Fitting triangular norms to empirical data. In: Logical, algebraic, analytic and probabilistic aspects of triangular norms. Elsevier, Boston, pp 262–272

  3. Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YY (1995) Statistical inference based on the possibility and belief measures. Trans Am Math Soc 347:1855–1863

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciaramella A, Tagliaferri R, Pedrycz W (2004) Ordinal sums by using genetic algorithms. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, FUZZ-IEEE, Budapest, pp 641–646

  6. Cui Y, Guo R, Guo D (2013) Probabilistic DEAR models. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory. Plenum Press, New York

  8. Dubois D, Prade H (1997) Bayesian conditioning in possibility theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 92:223–240

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fodor JC, Roubens M (1994) Fuzzy preference modeling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fr\({\rm \ddot{u}}\)hwirth-Schnatter S (1993) On fuzzy Bayesian inference. Fuzzy Sets Syst 60:41–58

  11. Gil MA, Corral N, Gil P (1985) The fuzzy decision problem: an approach to the point estimation problem with fuzzy information. Eur J Oper Res 22:26–34

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hareter D, Viertl R (2004) Fuzzy information and Bayesian statistics. In: Lopez-Diaz M et al (eds) Soft methodology and random information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 392–398

  13. He YL, Wang R, Kwong S, Wang XZ (2014) Bayesian classifiers based on probability density estimation and their applications to simultaneous fault diagnosis. Inf Sci 259:252–268

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hisdal E (1978) Conditional possibilities independence and noninteraction. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:283–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang L, Cai Z, Wang D, Zhang H (2013) Bayesian citation-KNN with distance weighting. Int J Mach Learn Cybern doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0152-x

  16. Katagiri H, Uno T, Kato K, Tsuda H, Tsubaki H (2014) Random fuzzy bilevel linear programming through possibility-based value at risk model. Int J Mach Learn Cybern doi:10.1007/s13042-012-0126-4 (to appear)

  17. Klir GJ, Folger TA (1988) Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey

  18. Lapointe S, Bobee B (2000) Revision of possibility distribution: a Bayesian inference pattern. Fuzzy Sets Syst 116:119–140

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw Hill, New York

  20. Okuda T, Tanaka H, Asai L (1978) A formulation of fuzzy decision problems with fuzzy information using probability measures of fuzzy events. Inf Control 38:135–147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smets P (1982) Possibilistic inference from statistical data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World conference on mathematics at the service of man, Las Palmas, pp 611–613

  22. Subrahmanya N, Shin YC (2013) A variational Bayesian framework for group feature selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4(6):609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taheri SM, Behboodian J (2001) A Bayesian approach to fuzzy hypotheses testing. Fuzzy Sets Syst 123:39–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Taheri SM, Behboodian J (2006) On Bayesian approach to fuzzy testing hypothesis with fuzzy data. Ital J Pure Appl Math 19:139–154

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Taheri SM, Zarei R (2011) Bayesian system reliability assessment under the vague environment. Appl Soft Comput 11:1614–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka H, Okuda T, Asai K (1979) Fuzzy information and decision in a statistical model. In: Gupta MM et al (eds) Advances in fuzzy set theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 303–320

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trillas E, Alsina C, Pradera A (2004) On MPT-implication functions for fuzzy logic. Rev R Acad Cien Ser A Math 98:259–271

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Viertl R (2011) Statistical methods for fuzzy data. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Viertl R (1997) On statistical inference for non-precise data. Environmetrics 8:541–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Viertl R, Hareter D (2004) Fuzzy information and stochastics. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 1:43–56

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Watada J (2013) Capacitated two-stage facility location problem with fuzzy costs and demands. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang XZ, He YL, Wang DD (2014) Non-naive Bayesian classifiers for classification problems with continuous attributes. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh LA (1968) Probability measures of fuzzy events. J Math Anal Appl 23:421–427

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zadeh LA (1995) Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics 37:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their thanks to the referees for valuable comments which improved the paper. They would like to thank Professor Radko Mesiar (at Bratislava University of Technology) for reading the manuscript and for his valuable comment and suggestion which is considered in Remark 9. Also, they express their thanks to Dr. M.M. Pedram (at Kharazmi University) for introducing and providing some necessary reference books. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of University of Tehran for this research under grant number 30005/1/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mahmoud Taheri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arefi, M., Taheri, S.M. Possibilistic Bayesian inference based on fuzzy data. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 7, 753–763 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0291-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0291-8

Keywords

Navigation