Log in

Improving Inner Quality in Continuous Casting Rectangular Billets: Comparison Between Mechanical Soft Reduction and Final Electromagnetic Stirring

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparison between the mechanical soft reduction (MSR) and final electromagnetic stirring (FEMS) on center carbon macrosegregation and v-segregation has been investigated in order to improve the inner quality of high carbon 82A steel with a section of size 180 mm × 240 mm. A heat transfer calculation model by using C++ programming language is developed and applied to calculate the appropriate casting speed of continuous casting during the FEMS and MSR processes. The calculated action zone of FEMS and MSR is at the location with a solid fraction of 0.28–0.41 and 0.30–0.90, respectively. The industrial results show that the effects of MSR in improving the center carbon segregation, reducing the shrinkage cavity and suppressing the V-segregation are more effective than FEMS. The mean center carbon segregation degree reduces from 1.19 to 1.15 with FEMS and decreases from 1.19 to 1.07 with MSR. Besides, compared with FEMS, MSR can eliminate shrinkage cavity and V-segregation but may generate center negative segregation and transverse cracks subjected to reduction pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flemings M C, ISIJ Int 40 (2000) p 833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhary S K, and Ganguly S, ISIJ Int 47 (2007) p 1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raihle C M, and Fredriksson H, Metall Trans B 25 (1994) p 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung P K, PoirierD R, Yalamanchili B, and Geiger G H,Ironmak Steelmak 17 (1990) p 424.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludlow V, Normanton A, Anderson A, Thiele M, Ciriza J, Laraudogoitia J, and Knoop W V, Ironmak Steelmak 32 (2005) p 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredriksson H, andSvensson I, Metall Trans B 7 (1976) p 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engstrrm G, Fredriksson H, and Rogberg B, Scand J Metall 12 (1983) p 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fredriksson H, Can Metall Q 30 (1991) p 235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raihle C M, Sivesson P, Tukiainen M, and Fredriksson H, Ironmak Steelmak 21 (1994) p 487.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oh K S, Park J K, and Chang S H, Steelmaking in Conf Proc (1995) p 301.

  11. Wang W J, Hu X G, Ning L X, Bulte R, and Bleck W, Int J Miner Metall Mater 13 (2006) p 490.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oh K S, and Chang Y W, ISIJ Int 35 (1995) p 866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. **ao C, Zhang J M, and Wu L, J Iron Steel Res Int 20 (2013) p 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han Z W, Chen D F, Feng K, and Long M J, ISIJ Int 50 (2010) p 1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakaki G S, Kwong A T, and Petozzi J J, Steelmaking in Conf Proc (1995) p 295.

  16. Thome R, and Harste K, ISIJ Int 46 (2006) p 1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogibayashi S, Kobayashi M, Yamada M, and Mukai T, ISIJ Int. 31 (1991) p 1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji C, Luo S, and Zhu M Y, ISIJ Int 54 (2014) p 504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas B G, and Zhang L, ISIJ Int 41 (2001) p 1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brimacombe J K, Can Metall Q 15 (1976) p 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choudhary S K, and Mazumdar D, Steel Res Int 66 (1995) pp 199.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwerdtfeger K J,The Casting Volume of the 11th ed. of the Making, Sha** and Treating of Steel, The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh (2003) p 18.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yim C H , Park J K, Oh K S, and Nam S H, Steelmaking in Conf Proc (1998) p 309.

  24. Mao B, Zhang G F, and Li A W, Theory and Technology of Electromagnetic Stirring for Continuous Casting, Metallurgical industry press, Bei**g (2012) p 162.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Domitner J, Wu M, Kharicha A, Ludwig A, Kaufmann B, Reiter J, and Schaden T, Metall Trans A 45 (2014) p 1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Y K, Feng F A, Lin K J, and Sediako D, Steelmaking in Conf Proc (1996) p 505.

  27. Li X B , Ding H, Tang Z Y, and He J C, Int J Miner Metall Mater 19 (2012) p 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cabrera-Marrero J M, Carreno-Galindo V, Morales R D, and Chavez-Alcala F, ISIJ Int 38 (1998) p 812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, J., Chen, W., Wang, Q. et al. Improving Inner Quality in Continuous Casting Rectangular Billets: Comparison Between Mechanical Soft Reduction and Final Electromagnetic Stirring. Trans Indian Inst Met 69, 1623–1632 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0742-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0742-2

Keywords

Navigation