Log in

Improving assessment of groundwater sustainability with analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method: a case study of the Hohhot Plain, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test indicators and improve the assessment of groundwater sustainability by using a synthetic method. An indicator system of groundwater sustainability was constructed under the framework of driver–pressure–state–impact–response, and a method for the assessment of groundwater sustainability was developed by using analytic hierarchy process together with information entropy theory. This method was used to calculate the weight of each indicator. And then, the sustainability scale was determined by the indicator zoning methods. The assessment results of a case study in Hohhot Plain, China, demonstrated that the method greatly reduced the randomicity and anthropogenic influence on the determination of weight of indicators; and gave a quantitative classification on sustainability scale which produced a rational result on the assessment of groundwater sustainability in Hohhot Plain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley WM, Reilly TE, Franke OL (1999) Sustainability of ground-water resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186

  • Biswas AK (1988) Sustainable water development for develo** countries. Water Resour Dev 4(4):232–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bithas K (2008) The sustainable residential water use: sustainability, efficiency and social equity, the European experience. Ecol Econ 68:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves HML, Alipaz S (2007) An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custodio E, Kretsinger V, Llamas MR (2005) Intensive development of groundwater: concepts, facts and suggestions. Water Policy 7:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon PJ (2005) Future management of aquifer recharge. Hydrogeology 13:313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein J, Krause S, Hannah DM, Boano F (2010) Groundwater-surface water interactions: new methods and models to improve understanding of processes and dynamics. Adv Water Resour 33(11):1291–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster S (2006) Groundwater-sustainability issues and governance needs. Episodes 29(4):238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirata R, Suhogusoff A, Fernandes A (2007) Groundwater resources in the State of São Paulo (Brazil): the application of indicators. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 79(1):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2009) Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecol Econ 68(7):1963–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juwana I, Perera BJC, Muttil N (2009) Conceptual framework for the development of West Java water sustainability index. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns

  • Kuzmana MK, Groˇselja P, Ayrilmis N et al (2013) Comparison of passive house construction types using analytic hierarchy process. Energy Build 64:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamba´n LJ, Martos S, Rodrı´guez-Rodrı´guez M, Rubio JC (2011) Application of groundwater sustainability indicators to the carbonate aquifer of the Sierra de Becerrero (Southern Spain). Environ Earth Sci 64:1835–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavapuro M (2008) Groundwater sustainability indicators testing with Finnish data. Boreal Environ Res 13:381–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Xu J, Wang W (2011) A method of water quality assessment based on biomonitoring and multiclass support vector machine. Proc Environ Sci 10:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Rich K, Zheng C (2008) Sustainability analysis of groundwater resources in a coastal aquifer, Alabama. Environ Geol 54:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, Gladwell JS (1999) Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz A, Thomas JM, Pohll G, Keita M, McKay WA (2008) Sustainability of groundwater in Mali, West Africa. Environ Earth Sci 58:1441–1450

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development: a report to the Balaton. The Sustainability Institute, Balaton Group

  • Menon S (2007) Groundwater management: need for sustainable approach. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archieve) paper

  • Palme U, Tillman AM (2008) Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities? J Clean Prod 16:1346–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey VP, Shrestha S, Chapagain SK, Kazama F (2011) A framework for measuring groundwater sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 14:396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policy Research Initiative (2007) Canadian water sustainability index. PRI Project Report on Sustainable Development

  • Rijsberman FR (2006) Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agric Water Manag 80:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeology 10:18–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma BR (1999) Regional salt and water-balance modeling for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Agric Water Manag 40:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Lipponen A (2007) Groundwater resources sustainability indicators. IHP-Viseries on groundwater no. 14

  • Zhang GH (2009) Theory and methodology of regional groundwater function and sustainable utilization assessment in China. Geology Pressing House, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Wang P (1996) Parameter structure identification using tabu search and simulated annealing. Adv Water Resour 19(4):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported of the China Geolgoy Survey, Grant No. 1212010913010. Constructive suggestions and comments on the manuscript from the reviewers are very much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongyu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Improving assessment of groundwater sustainability with analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method: a case study of the Hohhot Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 73, 2353–2363 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3583-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3583-0

Keywords

Navigation