Log in

The Evaluation of Different Bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. with Activity Against Staphylococcus spp. and Their Beneficial and/or Hazardous Properties

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this project was to screen for bacteriocinogenic Bacillus strains with activity versus Staphylococcus spp. with future application in formulation of pharmaceutical antimicrobial preparations. Putative bacteriocinogenic strains, isolated and pre-identified as Bacillus spp. were selected for future study and differentiated based on repPCR and identified as Bacillus subtilis for strains ST826CD and ST829CD, Bacillus subtilis subsp. stercoris for strain ST794CD, Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii for strain ST824CD, Bacillus velezensis for strain ST796CD, and Bacillus tequilensis for strain ST790CD. Selected strains were evaluated regarding their safety/virulence, beneficial properties, and potential production of antimicrobials based on biomolecular and physiological approves. Expressed bacteriocins were characterized regarding their proteinaceous nature, stability at different levels of pH, temperatures, and the presence of common chemicals applied in bacterial cultivation and bacteriocin purification. Dynamic of bacterial growth, acidification, and cumulation of produced bacteriocins and some aspects of the bacteriocins mode of action were evaluated. Based on obtained results, isolation and application of expressed antimicrobials can be realistic scenario for treatment of some staphylococcal associated infections. Appropriate biotechnological approaches need to be developed for cost effective production, isolation, and purification of expressed antimicrobials by studied Bacillus strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated by this project is available upon request.

References

  1. Favaro F, Basaglia M, Casella S, Hue I, Dousset X, Franco BDGM, Todorov SD (2014) Bacteriocinogenic potential and safety evaluation of non-starter Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from home-made white brine cheese. Food Microbiol 38(1):228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.09.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chikindas ML, Weeks R, Drider D, Chistyakov VA, Dicks LM (2018) Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Todorov SD, Ivanova IV, Popov I, Weeks R, Chikindas ML (2022) Bacillus spore-forming probiotics: benefits with concerns? Crit Rev Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2021.1983517.Inpress

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar V, Tiwari SK (2017) Activity-guided separation and characterization of new halocin HA3 from fermented broth of Haloferax larsenii HA3. Extremophiles 21(3):609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-017-0930-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimina M, Babich O, Prosekov A, Sukhikh S, Ivanova S, Shevchenko M, Noskova S (2020) Overview of global trends in classification, methods of preparation and application of bacteriocins. Antibiot 9(9):553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abriouel H, Franz CM, Ben Omar N, Gálvez A (2011) Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35(1):201–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakano MM, Zuber P (1990) Molecular biology of antibiotic production in Bacillus. Crit Rev Biotechnol 10(3):223–240. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559009038209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amin A, Khan MA, Ehsanullah M, Haroon U, Azam SM, Hameed A (2012) Production of peptide antibiotics by Bacillus sp. GU 057 indigenously isolated from saline soil. Braz J Microbiol 43(4):1340–1346. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220120004000015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. de Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Kreig NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifel K-H, Whitman WB (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 3. Wiley Publishing Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA, The Firmicutes. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. dos Santos KMO, de Matos CR, Salles HO, Franco BDGM, Arellano K, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD (2020) Exploring beneficial/virulence properties of two dairy related strains of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius. Probiot Antimicrob Prot 12(4):1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09637-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chopra L, Singh G, Choudhary V, Sahoo DK (2014) Sonorensin: an antimicrobial peptide, belonging to the heterocycloanthracin subfamily of bacteriocins, from a new marine isolate, Bacillus sonorensis MT93. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(10):2981–2990. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04259-13

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Todorov SD, Stojanovski S, Iliev I, Moncheva P, Nero LA, Ivanova IV (2017) Technology and safety assessment for lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Bulgarian fermented meat product “Lukanka”. Braz J Microbiol 48(3):576–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Valledor SJD, Bucheli JEV, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD (2020) Exploring beneficial properties of the bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz strain isolated from boza, a Bulgarian cereal-based beverage. Microorganisms 8:1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Guinebretière MH, Broussolle V, Nguyen-The C (2002) Enterotoxigenic profile of food-poisoning and foodborne Bacillus cereus strains. J Clin Microbiol 40:3053–3056. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.8.3053-3056.2002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bover-Cid S, Holzapfel WH (2019) Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 53(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00152-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colombo M, Castilho NPA, Todorov SD, Nero LA (2018) Beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria naturally present in dairy production. BMC Microbiol 18(1):219–230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1356-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim H-S, Arellano K, Park H, Todorov SD, Kim B, Kang H, Park YJ, Suh DH, Jung ES, Ji Y, Holzapfel WH (2021) Assessment of the safety and anti-inflammatory effects of three Bacillus strains in the respiratory tract. Environ Microbiol 23:3077–3098. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miljaković D, Marinković J, Balešević-Tubić S (2020) The significance of Bacillus spp. in disease suppression and growth promotion of field and vegetable crops. Microorganisms 8(7):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ehling-Schulz M, Lereclus D, Koehler TM (2019) The Bacillus cereus group: Bacillus species with pathogenic potential. Microbiol Spect. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0032-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung S, Woo C, Fugaban JII, Bucheli JEV, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD (2021) Bacteriocinogenic potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolated from kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented cabbage. Probiot Antimicrob Prot 13(4):1195–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09772-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fugaban JII, Bucheli JEV, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD (2021) Bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. isolated from Korean fermented cabbage (kimchi) -beneficial or hazardous? Fermentation 7:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7020056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi G-H, Fugaban JII, Dioso CM, Bucheli JEV, Holzapfel W, Todorov SD (2021) Selection of bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. from traditional fermented Korean food products with additional beneficial properties. Fermentation 7(4):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park H, Lee M, Ji Y, Todorov SD, Holzapfel WH (2021) Safety evaluation and in vivo strain-specific functionality of Bacillus strains isolated from Korean traditional fermented foods. Probiot Antimicrob Prot 13(1):60–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09672-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Compaoré CS, Nielsen DS, Ouoba LI, Berner TS, Nielsen KF, Sawadogo-Lingani H, Diawara B, Ouédraogo GA, Jakobsen M, Thorsen L (2013) Co-production of surfactin and a novel bacteriocin by Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis H4 isolated from bikalga, an African alkaline Hibiscus sabdariffa seed fermented condiment. Int J Food Microbiol 162(3):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.01.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiang C-M, Wang T-Y, Yang S-Y, Wu J-Y, Chang T-S (2018) Production of new isoflavone glucosides from glycosylation of 8-hydroxydaidzein by glycosyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Catalysts 8(9):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8090387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Todorov SD, Franco BDGM, Tagg JR (2019) Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria having activity spectra extending beyond closely-related species. Benef Microb 10(3):315–328. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2018.0126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Heng N, Tagg J (2006) What’s in a name? Class distinction for bacteriocins. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:160. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1273-c1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma D, Singh SS, Baindara P, Sharma S, Khatri N, Grover V, Patil PB, Korpole S (2020) Surfactin like broad spectrum antimicrobial lipopeptide co-produced with sublancin from Bacillus subtilis strain A52: Dual reservoir of bioactives. Front Microbiol 11:1167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tabanelli G (2020) Biogenic amines and food quality: emerging challenges and public health concerns. Foods 9(7):859. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9070859

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalac P, Krizek M (2003) A Review of biogenic amines and polyamines in beer. J Inst Brew 109(2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2003.tb00141.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Montassier E, Valdés-Mas R, Batard E, Zmora N, Dori-Bachash M, Suez J, Elinav E (2021) Probiotics impact the antibiotic resistance gene reservoir along the human GI tract in a person-specific and antibiotic-dependent manner. Nat Microbiol 6:1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00920-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Suvorov A (2020) What is wrong with enterococcal probiotics? Probiot Antimicrob Prot 12(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09633-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Arnold BJ, Huang IT, Hanage WP (2022) Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:206–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hepsomali P, Groeger JA, Nishihira J, Scholey A (2020) Effects of oral gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration on stress and sleep in humans: a systematic review. Front Neurosci 14:923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Montel MC, Masson F, Talon R (1998) Bacterial role in flavor development. Meat Sci 49:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)90042-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Biscola V, Tulini FL, Choiset Y, Rabesona H, Ivanova I, Chobert JM, Todorov SD, Haertlé T, Franco BDGM (2016) Proteolytic activity of Enterococcus faecalis VB63F for reduction of allergenicity of bovine milk proteins. J Dairy Sci 99(7):5144–5154. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. El Mecherfi K-E, Todorov SD, de Albuquerque MC, Denery-Papini S, Lupi R, Haertlé T, Franco BDGM, Larré C (2020) Allergenicity of fermented foods: emphasis on seeds protein-based product. Foods 9(6):792. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was performed and supported by Handong Global University, Pohang, Republic of Korea. The authors acknowledge Mia Miau for her unconditional support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept: SDT; experimental work: SDT, JIIF, CMD, GHC, and JEVB; funds: WHH, SDT; writing of the manuscript: SDT, CMD, and JIIF; corrections and editing: WHH, MTL, and SDT All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fugaban, J.I.I., Dioso, C.M., Choi, G.H. et al. The Evaluation of Different Bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. with Activity Against Staphylococcus spp. and Their Beneficial and/or Hazardous Properties. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 16, 35–52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-022-10017-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-022-10017-7

Keywords

Navigation