SpringerLink
Log in

Composition of Avian Communities in a Human-modified Wetland Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India: With Notes on Conservation Initiatives

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the Zoological Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring of avian community composition in different landscapes are being emphasized from environmental monitoring perspective. Okhla bird sanctuary is an important bird area and has widest flood plains along the stretch of river Yamuna flowing through National Capital Region, India. At the same time, this sanctuary is under tremendous pressure particularly due to encroachment, unsustainable harvesting and pollution. Present study was carried out in Okhla bird sanctuary from July 2004 to June 2005 to assess the species composition and richness of the avifaunal community along with their seasonal variation. A total of 126 species belonging to 18 orders and 44 families were recorded. The avian species richness was highest for the order Passeriformes followed by Charadriformes, Anseriformes, Pelicaniformes and others. Anatidae was the most diverse avian family in the study area. Species richness of avifauna was highest in January (83 species) and least during July (37 species). This wetland supports good number of resident (86 species) and migratory birds (40 species). Most avian species (41.27%) were found to be wetland-dependent followed by wetland-associated (34.13%) and terrestrial (24.6%) birds. Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant variation in the number of migratory and wetland-dependent species in different seasons. This study emphasize the importance of Okhla bird sanctuary for resident and migratory, as well as, terrestrial, wetland-associated and wetland dependent birds and thus contribute towards the existing knowledge of the seasonal pattern avifaunal composition of this wetland. Long-term monitoring of avifaunal composition over the years is an excellent means to assess the health of this waterbody and thus might be useful to foster its sustainable improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addinsoft. 2010. XLSTAT, data analysis and statistics software for Microsoft Excel [Internet]. Paris: Addinsoft Corporation. http://www.xlstat.com.

  • Aleem, A., and A. Malik. 2005. Genotoxicity of the Yamuna river water at Okhla (Delhi), India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 61(3): 404–412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., and S.D. Ripley. 1987. Compact handbook of birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Srilanka. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Z., F. Bibi, S.Y. Shelly, A. Qazi, and A.M. Khan. 2011. Comparative avian faunal diversity of Jiwani Coastal Wetlands and Taunsa barrage Wildlife Sanctuary, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 21(2 Suppl.): 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrikovics, S., L. Forró, G. Gere, G. Lakatos, and L. Sasvári. 2006. Water bird guilds and their feeding connections in the Bodrogzug, Hungary. Hydrobiologia 567(1): 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon, 2004. Checklist of the birds of the Delhi region—2004 update. Delhi: Delhibird and the Northern India Bird Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., D. Kar, A. Banerjee, and D. Palit. 2012. Utilization of some aquatic macrophytes in Borobandh-a lentic water body in Durgapur, West Bengal, India: Implications for socio-economic upliftment of local stakeholder. Indian Journal of Applied and Pure Biology 27(1): 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral, H.S., and C. Inskipp. 2005. Important bird areas in Nepal: Key sites for conservation. Kathmandu, Nepal and Cambridge, UK: Bird Conservation Nepal and BirdLife International.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D.F., S.E. Franson, A.C. Neale, D.T. Heggem, G.R. Miller, and G.E. Canterbury. 1998. Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 49(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, S.F., D.H. Johnson, and I.J. Ball. 2002. Assemblages of breeding birds as indicators of grassland condition. Ecological Indicators 2(3): 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckton, S. 2007. Managing wetlands for sustainable livelihoods at Koshi Tappu. Danphe 16(1): 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. 2015. A study on avifaunal species diversity of Purbasthali Oxbow Lake, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Science and Research 6(3): 866–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, K.J., and S. Gabor. 2006. Breeding waterbird wetland habitat availability and response to water-level management in Saint John River floodplain wetlands, New Brunswick. Hydrobiologia 567: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal, P., and A.K. Vaghela. 2015. Preliminary survey of avifaunal diversity around Shetrunji River, Dhari, India. Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences 5(1): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, T. 2011. Human interference and avifaunal diversity of two wetlands of Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(12): 2253–2262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepa, R.S., and T.V. Ramachandra. 1999. Impact of urbanization in the interconnectivity of wetlands. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resource: Retrospective and Perspective (XIX-XXI, 1999). Bangalore: Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

  • del Hoyo, J., N.J. Collar, D.A. Christie, A. Elliott, and L.D.C. Fishpool. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.B., B.J. Danielson, and H.R. Pulliam. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvořaki, J., and E.P. Best. 1982. Macro-invertebrate communities associated with the macrophytes of Lake Vechten: Structural and functional relationships. Hydrobiologia 95(1): 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J., and L. Cohen. 1986. Statistics for ornithologists (BTO Guide No. 22). Hertfordshire: British Trust for Ornithology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli, U. 1975. A guide to the birds of the Delhi area. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, K. 2016. Avian diversity and species richness in Khanyan and adjoining areas of Hooghly District, West Bengal. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies 3(3): 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S.K. 2005. Illustrated aquatic and wetland plants in harmony with mankind. India: Standard Literature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, B., and M. Sah. 1993. Conservation and management of rivers in India: case-study of the river Yamuna. Environmental Conservation 20(3): 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopisundar, K.G., and S. Kittur. 2013. Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India. Biological Conservation 168: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp, and T. Inskipp. 1998. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. 2001. Checklist of the birds of Yamuna river (Okhla to Jaitpur village). http://www.delhibird.org/checklists/checklists_yamuna.htm.

  • Hutson, H.P.W. 1954. The birds about Delhi. Delhi: Delhi Birdwatching Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irfanullah, H.M. 2002. Studies on aquatic vascular plants in Bangladesh: An appraisal. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 9(1): 85–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, K.K. 2010. Food plants, weeds and other management aspects of some protected biodiversity rich wetlands in Uttar Pradesh. In Proceedings of National Conference on Biodiversity, Development and Poverty Alleviation (22nd May, 2010), 79–85. Lucknow: UP State Biodiversity Board. http://www.upsbdb.org/pdf/Souvenir2010/15.pdf  

  • Kadlec, R.H., and R.L. Knight. 1996. Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafle, G., M. Cotton, J.R. Chaudhary, H. Pariyar, H. Adhikari, S.B. Bohora, U.K. Chaudhary, A. Ram, and B. Regmi. 2008. Status of and threats to waterbirds of Rupa Lake, Pokhara, Nepal. Journal of Wetlands Ecology 1(1): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan, G.H., and P. Franco. 2004. Bird diversity along elevation gradients in the Andes of Colombia: Area and mass effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S.I., and H. Naher. 2009. Birds in Kurigram district of Bangladesh. Journal of Threatened Taxa 1(4): 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloskowski, J., A.J. Green, M. Polak, J. Bustamante, and J. Krogulec. 2009. Complementary use of natural and artificial wetlands by waterbirds wintering in Doñana, south-west Spain. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(7): 815–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R.L., R.A. Clarke, and R.K. Bastian. 2001. Surface flow (SF) treatment wetlands as habitat for wildlife and humans. Water Science and Technology 44(11): 27–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, P. 2006. Trees of Delhi: A field guide. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., P.C. Tak, and J.P. Sati. 2006. Residential, population and conservation status of Indian wetland birds. In Waterbirds around the world, ed. G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith, and D.A. Stroud, 308. The Stationery Office: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. 2001. Cost of wetland conversion: A case study of floodplain wetland ecosystems along the Yamuna river corridors of Delhi region. In Report of open meeting of the Global Environmental Change Research Community, 6th–8th October 2001, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  • Kumar, P., and S.K. Gupta. 2013. Status of wetland birds of Chhilchhila Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(5): 3969–3976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lad, D., and S. Patil. 2015. Status and diversity of avian fauna in the estuarine wetland area of Bhayander and Naigaon, Maharashtra, India. Bioscience Discovery 6(1): 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.F., T.S. Ding, F.H. Hsu, and S. Geng. 2004. Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: Distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. Journal of Biogeography 31(2): 307–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Y. Cai, B. Li, and J. Chen. 2010. Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: An international perspective. Wetlands 30: 15–27. doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0001-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manral, U., A. Raha, R. Solanki, S.A. Hussain, D. Mohan, G. Talukdar, and G.G. Veeraswami. 2012. Hydrological characteristics and flood plain vegetation of human impacted wetlands: A case study from Okhla bird sanctuary, National Capital Region, India. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 1(2): 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manral, U., A. Raha, R. Solanki, S.A. Hussain, M.M. Babu, D. Mohan, G.G. Veeraswami, K. Sivakumar, and G. Talukdar. 2013. Plant species of Okhla bird sanctuary: A wetland of Upper Gangetic Plains, India. Check List 9(2): 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manral, U., and F.A. Khudsar. 2013. Assessment of wetland water quality and avian diversity of a human-modified floodplain wetland on river Yamuna. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 5(1): 25–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, S. 2005. Crisis in a birds paradise. Panda: WWF Newsletter, (September 2005): 3–4. http://assets.wwfindia.org/downloads/september_newsletter.pdf

  • Mazumdar, S., K. Mookherjee, and G.K. Saha. 2007. Migratory waterbirds of wetlands of southern West Bengal, India. Indian Birds 3(2): 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, S., K. Mookherjee, and G.K. Saha. 2008. Diversity and dominance of migratory waterbirds in six wetlands of southern West Bengal, India. In Zoological research in human welfare, ed. Z.S.I. Director, 161–166. Zooloical Survey of India: Kolkata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, S., P. Ghosh, and G.K. Saha. 2005. Diversity and behaviour of waterfowl in Santragachi Jheel, West Bengal, India, during winter season. Indian Birds 1(3): 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, A., and K. Sharma. 2014. Community structure of plant species in Okhla bird sanctuary, Delhi, India. International Journal of Conservation Science 5(3): 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praveen, J., R. Jayapal, and A. Pittie. 2016. Checklist of the birds of India. Indian Birds 11(5–6): 113–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmani, A.R., and M.Z. Islam. 2008. Ducks, Geese and Swans of India: Their status and distribution, 374. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat, M., M.C.Z. Moturi, and V. Subramanian. 2003. Inventory compilation and distribution of heavy metals in wastewater from small-scale industrial areas of Delhi, India. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 5(6): 906–912.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, B. 2006. Water quality status of Yamuna river (1999–2005), assessment and development of river basin series: ADSORBS/41/2006–07. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/newitems/11.pdf.

  • Singh, J.L. 1983. Birds in the Okhla barrage. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 23: 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.E. Jr. 2001. Technical aspects of wetlands: Wetlands as bird habitats. National water summery on wetland resources (United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425). https://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/birdhabitat.html.

  • Sutherland, W.J., I. Newton, and R.E. Green. 2005. Bird ecology and conservation, a handbook of techniques. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre-Cuadros, M.D.L.A.L., S. Herrando-Perez, and K.R. Young. 2007. Diversity and structure patterns for tropical montane and premontane forests of central Peru, with an assessment of the use of higher-taxon surrogacy. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2965–2988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trisal, C., T. Tabassum, and R. Kumar. 2008. Water quality of the river Yamuna in the Delhi stretch: Key determinants and management issues. Clean—Soil, Air, Water 36(3): 306–314.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tulasi, P.T., B.B. Lakshmi, P. Laxmikanth, and P. Srinivas. 2016. Biodiversity conservation of Tatipudi reservior with reference to avifauna. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences. 7(1): 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. Treatment wetland habitat and wildlife use assessment, executive summary. EPA 832-S-99-001. Gainesville, Florida: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Urfi, A.J. 1993a. The birdlife of Okhla. Sanctuary Asia 13(5): 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urfi, A.J. 1993b. Heronries in the Delhi region of India. Oriental Bird Club Bulletin 17: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urfi, A.J. 1995. Wetlands of ornithological significance in the Delhi region. Oriental Bird Club Bulletin 22: 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urfi, A.J. 1996. On some new breeding records of waterbirds from the Delhi region. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 93: 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urfi, A.J. 1997. The significance of Delhi Zoo for wild waterbirds, with special reference to Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala. Forktail 12: 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urfi, A.J. 2003. The birds of Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, Delhi, India. Forktail 19: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayan, L., S.N. Prasad, N. Sridharan, and M.B. Guptha. 2006. Status of wetlands and wetland birds in selected districts of Tamilnadu. Coimbatore: Sálim Ali Centre For Ornithology & Natural History. http://www.sacon.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/FT-2006-PR135s-STATUS-OF-WL-TN.pdf.

  • Vyas, S. 1996. Checklist of the birds of the Delhi region: An update. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 93: 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, S. 2002. Some interesting bird records from the Delhi area. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 99: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, V., S. Saxena, S. Balapure, and P. Shrivastava. 2009 Biodiversity conservation in wetlands of Barna reservoir with reference to migratory birds. In Proceedings of the 13th world lake conference. Wuhan: International Lake Environment Committee. http://wldb.ilec.or.jp/data/ilec/WLC13_Papers/others/42.pdf.

  • Weber, L.M., and S.M. Haig. 1996. Shorebird use of south Carolina managed and natural coastal wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 60: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, M., and M.N. Rajpar. 2010. Bird species composition and feeding guilds based on point count and mist netting methods at the Paya Indah Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Life Sciences Research 21(2): 7–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, M., M.N. Rajpar, and A.S. Sajap. 2009. Species diversity and feeding guilds of birds in Paya Indah Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Zoological Research 5(3): 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Y. Jia, S. Jiao, Q. Zeng, D. Feng, Y. Guo, and G. Lei. 2012. Wuliangsuhai wetlands: A critical habitat for migratory water birds. Journal of Resource Ecology 3(4): 316–323.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My friends Kaushik and Niladri accompanied me in some of the field visits at the OBS, and my wife Bidisa helped me in preparation of this manuscript. I sincerely thank Prof. Goutam Kumar Saha of C.U. and Dr. Dipankar Ghose of WWF-India for their valuable suggestions and guidance. Thanks are due to all the members of the Delhi Bird Group who had been instrumental for the protection of the birds in general and this paradise of birds in particular. Encouragement and support extended by the Wildlife Trust of India, New Delhi (my employer when this survey was conducted) and Principal, Shibpur Dinobundhoo Institution (College) (my present employer) are gratefully acknowledged. I also thank two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments have helped me in improving this paper.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shibpur Dinobundhoo Institution (College), Shibpur, Howrah, India

    Subhendu Mazumdar

Authors
  1. Subhendu Mazumdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhendu Mazumdar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazumdar, S. Composition of Avian Communities in a Human-modified Wetland Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India: With Notes on Conservation Initiatives. Proc Zool Soc 72, 319–333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-017-0239-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-017-0239-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation