Log in

Dynamical analysis of rendezvous and docking with very large space infrastructures in non-Keplerian orbits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Space Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A space station in the vicinity of the Moon can be exploited as a gateway for future human and robotic exploration of the solar system. The natural location for a space system of this kind is about one of the Earth–Moon libration points. The study addresses the dynamics during rendezvous and docking operations with a very large space infrastructure in an EML2 Halo orbit. The model takes into account the coupling effects between the orbital and the attitude motion in a circular restricted three-body problem environment. The flexibility of the system is included, and the interaction between the modes of the structure and those related with the orbital motion is investigated. A lumped parameter technique is used to represents the flexible dynamics. The parameters of the space station are maintained as generic as possible, in a way to delineate a global scenario of the mission. However, the developed model can be tuned and updated according to the information that will be available in the future, when the whole system will be defined with a higher level of precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISECG: The global exploration roadmap (2013)

  2. Guzzetti, D., Armellin, R., Lavagna, M.: Coupling attitude and orbital motion of extended bodies in the restricted circular 3-body problem: a novel study on effects and possible exploitations (2012)

  3. Knutson, A.J., Guzzetti, D., Howell, K.C., Lavagna, M.: Attitude responses in coupled orbit-attitude dynamical model in earth-moon lyapunov orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 38(7), 1264–1273 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colagrossi, A., Lavagna, M.: Preliminary results on the dynamics of large and flexible space structures in Halo orbits. Acta Astronaut. 134, 355–367 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane, T.R., Likins, P.W., Levinson, D.A.: Spacecraft Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peláez, J., Sanjurjo, M., Lucas, F., Lara, M., Lorenzini, E., Curreli, D., Scheeres, D., Bombardelli, C., Dario, I.: Dynamics and stability of tethered satellites at lagrangian points. ESA ACT Report (2008)

  8. Flores, P.: Euler angles, bryant angles and euler parameters. In: Concepts and Formulations for Spatial Multibody Dynamics. Springer, New York, pp. 15–22 (2015)

  9. Meirovitch, L.: Fundamentals of vibrations. Waveland Press, Long Grove (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Junkins, J.L.: Introduction to Dynamics and Control of Flexible Structures. AIAA Education Series, Reston (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fehse, W.: Automated rendezvous and docking of spacecraft, vol. 16. Cambridge university press, Cambridge (2003)

  12. Lizy-Destrez, S.: Rendez vous optimization with an inhabited space station at EML2. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ISSFD). Munich (2015)

  13. Murakami, N., Ueda, S., Ikenaga, T., Maeda, M., Yamamoto, T., Ikeda, H.: Practical rendezvous scenario for transportation missions to cis-lunar station in Earth–Moon L2 Halo orbit. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ISSFD). Munich (2015)

  14. Ueda, S., Murakami, N.: Optimum guidance strategy for rendezvous mission in earth-moon l2 halo orbit. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ISSFD). Munich (2015)

  15. Bernelli, F., Topputo, F., Massari, M.: Assessment of mission design including utilization of libration points and weak stability boundaries. ESA ACT Report (2004)

  16. Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Dynamical systems, the three-body problem and space mission design. Marsden Books, Wellington (2008)

  17. Pavlak, T.A.: Trajectory design and orbit maintenance strategies in multi-body dynamical regimes. Ph.D Dissertation (2013)

  18. Byrd, R.H., Gilbert, J.C., Nocedal, J.: A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 89(1), 149–185 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Waltz, R.A., Morales, J.L., Nocedal, J., Orban, D.: An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps. Math. Program. 107(3), 391–408 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nocedal, J., Wright, S.: Numerical optimization. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Farquhar, R.W.: The control and use of libration-point satellites (1970)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Colagrossi.

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation at the 6th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques, March 14–17, 2016, Darmstadt, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colagrossi, A., Lavagna, M. Dynamical analysis of rendezvous and docking with very large space infrastructures in non-Keplerian orbits. CEAS Space J 10, 87–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-017-0174-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-017-0174-4

Keywords

Navigation