Log in

Allostery and protein plasticity: the keystones for bacterial signaling and regulation

  • Review
  • Published:
Biophysical Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacteria sense intracellular and environmental signals using an array of proteins as antennas. The information is transmitted from such sensory modules to other protein domains that act as output effectors. Sensor and effector can be part of the same polypeptide or instead be separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically. The output effector modules regulate physiologic responses, allowing the cells to adapt to the varying conditions. These biological machineries are known as signal transduction systems (STSs). Despite the captivating architectural diversity exhibited by STS proteins, a universal feature is their allosteric regulation: signal binding at one site modifies the activity at a physically distant site. Allostery requires protein plasticity, precisely encoded within their 3D structures, and implicating programmed molecular motions. This review summarizes how STS proteins connect stimuli to specific responses by exploiting allostery and protein plasticity. Illustrative examples spanning a wide variety of protein folds will focus on one- and two-component systems (TCSs). The former encompass the entire transmission route within a single polypeptide, whereas TCSs have evolved as separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically, sometimes including additional intermediary proteins in the pathway. Irrespective of their structural diversity, STS proteins are able to modulate their own molecular motions, which can be relatively slow, rigid-body movements, all the way to fast fluctuations in the form of macromolecular flexibility, thus spanning a continuous protein dynamics spectrum. In sum, STSs rely on allostery to steer information transmission, going from simple two-state switching to rich multi-state conformational order/disorder transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

adapted from PDB 6O6O) by completing a hydrophobic spine and rendering a DNA-binding-incompetent geometry. 6O6O is here schematically blurred to highlight regions of higher flexibility in TFRs, constituting a multi-state conformational ensemble. DNA selects the proper conformation and stabilizes the DNA-bound form (rightmost panel, PDB 6O6N), achieving the proper distance between DBD helices that insert into the major groove (Lara et al. 2020)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study received funding from ANII (grant FCE_1_2017_1_136291) and from the Unit of Integrative Microbiology of Zoonotic Agents IMiZA, Joint International Units program, Institut Pasteur/Institut Pasteur de Montevideo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Buschiazzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imelio, J.A., Trajtenberg, F. & Buschiazzo, A. Allostery and protein plasticity: the keystones for bacterial signaling and regulation. Biophys Rev 13, 943–953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-021-00892-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-021-00892-9

Keywords

Navigation