Log in

Correlation of eddy current responses between fatigue cracks and electrical-discharge-machining notches

  • Published:
Metals and Materials International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The eddy current responses of Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) notches and fatigue cracks are directly compared to verify the reliability of eddy current inspection. The fatigue crack growth tests using a constant load range control mode were conducted to obtain a variety of edge crack sizes, ranging from 0.9 to 6.6 mm for Al alloy and from 0.1 to 3 mm for Ti alloy. EDM notch specimens of Al and Ti alloys were accordingly prepared in lengths similar to that of the fatigued specimen. The crack length was determined by optical microscope and scanning electron microscope. The eddy current responses between the EDM and fatigued specimens with varying notch/crack length were examined using probe sensors at (100-500) kHz and (1-2) MHz for Al and Ti alloys, respectively. The results show a significant difference in the eddy current signal between the two specimens, based on the correlation between the eddy current response and notch/crack length. This suggests that eddy current inspection using the EDM reference specimen is inaccurate in determining the precise crack size, unless the eddy current response data base is obtained from a fatigue-cracked specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. A. Smith and G. R. Hugo, Insight 43, 14 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bohacova, Eng. Fail. Anal. 35, 597 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Sasi, B. P. C. Rao, and T. Jayakumar, Defence Sci. J. 54, 563 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Morozov, R. Guglielmo, T. Antonello, and V. Salvatore, IEEE. T. Magn. 42, 1568 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Van den Bos, S. Sahlen, and J. Andersson, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Tec. 75, 491 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. R. Underhill and T. W. Krause, NDT & E Int. 44, 513 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Sasi, Defence Sci. J. 59, 106 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Knopp, J. C. Aldrin, and K. V. Jata, Nondestruct. Test. Eva. 24, 103 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. F. Larson, C. C. Lo, and N. Nakagawa, AIP Conf. Proc. 1211, 1973 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. H. Hur, D. H. Lee, M. S. Choi, U. C. Lee, S. J. Kim, and J. H. Han, NDT & E Int. 39, 361 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. S. Forsyth and A. Fahr, RTO-AVT Workshop on Airframe Inspection Reliability under Field/Depot Conditions, p. 10–1, NATO Research and Technology Organization, Cedex, France (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Nakagawa, M. Yang, B. F. Larson, E. M. Madison, and D. Raulerson, AIP Conf. Proc. 1096, 287 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. C. Lo and N. Nakagawa, AIP Conf. Proc. 1096, 355 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. H. Ho and S. T. Newman, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 43, 1287 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. K. Garg, K. K. Singh, A. Sachdeva, V. S. Sharma, K. Ojha, and S. Singh, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 50, 611 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Yeol Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, S., Choi, G., Eom, T.J. et al. Correlation of eddy current responses between fatigue cracks and electrical-discharge-machining notches. Met. Mater. Int. 23, 756–763 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-017-6738-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-017-6738-1

Keywords

Navigation