Log in

GIS-based DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment in the Peshawar District, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater is the most economic natural source of drinking in urban and rural areas which are degraded due to high population growth and increased industrial development. We applied a GIS-based DRASTIC model in a populated urban area of Pakistan (Peshawar) to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Six input parameters—depth to phreatic/groundwater level, groundwater recharge, aquifer material, soil type, slope, and hydraulic conductivity—were used in the model to generate the groundwater vulnerable zones. Each parameter was divided into different ranges or media types, and ratings R = 1 – 10 were assigned to each factor where 1 represented the very low impact on pollution potential and 10 represented very high impact. Weight multipliers W = 1 – 5 were also used to balance and enhance the importance of each factor. The DRASTIC model scores obtained varied from 47 to 147, which were divided into three different zones: low, moderate, and high vulnerability to pollution. The final results indicate that about 31.22, 39.50, and 29.27% of the total area are under low, moderate, and high vulnerable zones, respectively. Our method presents a very simple and robust way to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution and helps the decision-makers to select appropriate landfill sites for waste disposals, and manage groundwater pollution problems efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Each letter in the name DRASTIC represents a parameter: Depth to groundwater/Phreatic level, net Recharge, Aquifer media, Soil media, Topography, Impact of vadose zone, and hydraulic Conductivity (see “DRASTIC model” section).

References

  • Adnan S, Iqbal J (2014) Spatial analysis of the groundwater quality in the Peshawar district, Pakistan. Procedia Eng 70:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Adamat RA, Foster ID, Baban SM (2003) Groundwater vulnerability and risk map** for the basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl Geogr 23(4):303–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Lehr JH, Petty R, Bennett T (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system to evaluate groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. National Water Well Association, Worthington

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto JC, García-Río L (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123(4):247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha H (2010) Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability map** and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric Water Manag 97(2):240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha HM (2011) Map** groundwater contamination risk using GIS and groundwater modelling. A case study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Arab J Geosci 4(3–4):483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball D, MacDonald A, Dochartaigh B (2004) Development of a groundwater vulnerability screening methodology for the water framework directive. Final report. Project WFD28, SNIFFER

  • Chen H, Druliner AD (1988) Agricultural chemical contamination of ground water in six areas of the High Plains aquifer, Nebraska. National Water Summary 1986—hydrologic events and ground-water quality. Water-supply paper 2325. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey

  • Cohen DB, Fisher C, Reid ML (1986) Ground-water contamination by toxic substances: a California assessment. In: Garner WY, Honeycutt RC, Nigg HN (eds) Evaluation of pesticides in ground water, ACS Symp. Series 315. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp 499–529

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dean JD, Huyakorn PS, Donigian AS Jr, Voos KA, Schanz RW, Meeks YJ, Carsel RF (1989) Risk of unsaturated/saturated transport and transformation of chemical concentrations (RUSTIC). Volumes I and II. EPA/600/3-89/048a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans BM, Myers WL (1990) A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC. J Soil Water Conserv 45(2):242–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D'Elia M, Paris M (2002) Groundwater quality protection: a guide for water utilities, municipal authorities, and environment agencies. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater, 604. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AD, Onta PR (1997) Sustainable groundwater resources development. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer BE, Hallberg GR (1991) Ground water vulnerability regions of Iowa, special map 11. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamrah A, Al-Futaisi A, Rajmohan N, Al-Yaroubi S (2008) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Environ Monit Assess 147:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinski RJ, Kelly WE, Bogardi I, Ehrman RL, Yaniamoto PD (1994) Correlation between DRASTIC vulnerabilities and incidents of VOC contamination of municipal wells in Nebraska. Ground Water 32:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FA, Ali J, Ullah R, Ayaz S (2013) Bacteriological quality assessment of drinking water available at the flood affected areas of Peshawar. Toxicol Environ Chem 95(8):1448–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Thirumalaivasan D, Radhakrishnan N (2014) GIS based assessment of groundwater vulnerability using Drastic model. Arab J Sci Eng 39:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment, Government of Pakistan (2009) National Drinking Water Policy. Policy. Available from http://waterinfo.net.pk/sites/default/files/knowledge/Pakistan%20National%20Drinking%20Water%20Policy%20-%202009.pdf. Accessed November 2017

  • Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms, Government of Pakistan (2013) Pakistan Millennium Development Goals. Available from http://www.pk.undp.org/content/dam/pakistan/docs/MDGs/MDG2013Report/final%20report.pdf. Accessed November 2017

  • National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Committee on Techniques for Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability. Water Science and technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources. National Academy Press, Washington DC

  • Odong J (2007) Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. J Am Sci 3(3):54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR) (2007) National Water Quality Monitoring Programme (2005–2006). Available from http://pcrwr.gov.pk/Publications/Water%20Quality%20Reports/National%20Water%20Quality%20Monitoring%20Program/water%20quality%20status%20in%20pakistan%20phasev%202005-2006.pdf. Accessed November 2017

  • Pettyjohn WA, Savoca M, Self D (1991) Regional assessment of aquifer vulnerability and sensitivity in the conterminous United States. In: Report EPA-600/2-91/043. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo G (2001) Groundwater vulnerability map explanatory notes—Castlereagh catchment. NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior JC, Boekhoff JL, Howes MR, Libra RD, VanDorpe PE (2003) Iowa’s groundwater basics: a geological guide to the occurence, use, and vulnerability of Iowa’s aquifers

  • Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Samani AN, Mahdavi M, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2015) Groundwater potential map** at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arab J Geosci 8:7059–7071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter KS, Sibley P, Hall K, Keen P, Mattu G, Beth Linton L (2002) Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry. J Toxic Environ Health A 65(1):1–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi S, Imran H, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun Z (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. J Toxic Environ Health A 70:2293–2304

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasamoorthy K, Vijayaraghavan K, Vasanthavigar M, Sarma V, Rajivgandhi R, Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Manivannan R (2011) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in Mettur region, Tamilnadu, India using drastic and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci 4:1215–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuis TS, Pacenka S, Porter KS (1987) MOUSE: a management model for evaluation ground water contamination from diffuse surface sources aided by computer graphics. Appl Agric Res 2:277–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Teso RR, Younglove T, Peterson MR, Sheeks DL III, Gallavan RE (1988) Soil taxonomy and surveys: classification of areal sensitivity to pesticide contamination of ground water. J Soil Water Conserv 43(4):348–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Visnuvarthanan N, Sivakumar SS (2016) Cultivating productive water in Valukai Aru catchment in Valikamam division of Jaffna District of northern Sri Lanka. Int J Sci Eng Res 1:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2001) Terrestrial water budget data archive: monthly time series (1950–1999)

  • Wu W, Yin S, Liu H, Chen H (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and feasibility map** under reclaimed water irrigation by a modified DRASTIC model. Water Resour Manag 28:1219–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Adnan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adnan, S., Iqbal, J., Maltamo, M. et al. GIS-based DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment in the Peshawar District, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 11, 458 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3795-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3795-9

Keywords

Navigation