Abstract
Groundwater is the most economic natural source of drinking in urban and rural areas which are degraded due to high population growth and increased industrial development. We applied a GIS-based DRASTIC model in a populated urban area of Pakistan (Peshawar) to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Six input parameters—depth to phreatic/groundwater level, groundwater recharge, aquifer material, soil type, slope, and hydraulic conductivity—were used in the model to generate the groundwater vulnerable zones. Each parameter was divided into different ranges or media types, and ratings R = 1 – 10 were assigned to each factor where 1 represented the very low impact on pollution potential and 10 represented very high impact. Weight multipliers W = 1 – 5 were also used to balance and enhance the importance of each factor. The DRASTIC model scores obtained varied from 47 to 147, which were divided into three different zones: low, moderate, and high vulnerability to pollution. The final results indicate that about 31.22, 39.50, and 29.27% of the total area are under low, moderate, and high vulnerable zones, respectively. Our method presents a very simple and robust way to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution and helps the decision-makers to select appropriate landfill sites for waste disposals, and manage groundwater pollution problems efficiently.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12517-018-3795-9/MediaObjects/12517_2018_3795_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Each letter in the name DRASTIC represents a parameter: Depth to groundwater/Phreatic level, net Recharge, Aquifer media, Soil media, Topography, Impact of vadose zone, and hydraulic Conductivity (see “DRASTIC model” section).
References
Adnan S, Iqbal J (2014) Spatial analysis of the groundwater quality in the Peshawar district, Pakistan. Procedia Eng 70:14–22
Al-Adamat RA, Foster ID, Baban SM (2003) Groundwater vulnerability and risk map** for the basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl Geogr 23(4):303–324
Aller L, Lehr JH, Petty R, Bennett T (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system to evaluate groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. National Water Well Association, Worthington
Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto JC, García-Río L (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123(4):247–260
Baalousha H (2010) Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability map** and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric Water Manag 97(2):240–246
Baalousha HM (2011) Map** groundwater contamination risk using GIS and groundwater modelling. A case study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Arab J Geosci 4(3–4):483–494
Ball D, MacDonald A, Dochartaigh B (2004) Development of a groundwater vulnerability screening methodology for the water framework directive. Final report. Project WFD28, SNIFFER
Chen H, Druliner AD (1988) Agricultural chemical contamination of ground water in six areas of the High Plains aquifer, Nebraska. National Water Summary 1986—hydrologic events and ground-water quality. Water-supply paper 2325. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey
Cohen DB, Fisher C, Reid ML (1986) Ground-water contamination by toxic substances: a California assessment. In: Garner WY, Honeycutt RC, Nigg HN (eds) Evaluation of pesticides in ground water, ACS Symp. Series 315. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp 499–529
Dean JD, Huyakorn PS, Donigian AS Jr, Voos KA, Schanz RW, Meeks YJ, Carsel RF (1989) Risk of unsaturated/saturated transport and transformation of chemical concentrations (RUSTIC). Volumes I and II. EPA/600/3-89/048a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens
Evans BM, Myers WL (1990) A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC. J Soil Water Conserv 45(2):242–245
Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D'Elia M, Paris M (2002) Groundwater quality protection: a guide for water utilities, municipal authorities, and environment agencies. World Bank, Washington, DC
Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater, 604. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Gupta AD, Onta PR (1997) Sustainable groundwater resources development. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):565–582
Hoyer BE, Hallberg GR (1991) Ground water vulnerability regions of Iowa, special map 11. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa City
Jamrah A, Al-Futaisi A, Rajmohan N, Al-Yaroubi S (2008) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Environ Monit Assess 147:125–138
Kalinski RJ, Kelly WE, Bogardi I, Ehrman RL, Yaniamoto PD (1994) Correlation between DRASTIC vulnerabilities and incidents of VOC contamination of municipal wells in Nebraska. Ground Water 32:31–34
Khan FA, Ali J, Ullah R, Ayaz S (2013) Bacteriological quality assessment of drinking water available at the flood affected areas of Peshawar. Toxicol Environ Chem 95(8):1448–1454
Kumar S, Thirumalaivasan D, Radhakrishnan N (2014) GIS based assessment of groundwater vulnerability using Drastic model. Arab J Sci Eng 39:207–216
Ministry of Environment, Government of Pakistan (2009) National Drinking Water Policy. Policy. Available from http://waterinfo.net.pk/sites/default/files/knowledge/Pakistan%20National%20Drinking%20Water%20Policy%20-%202009.pdf. Accessed November 2017
Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms, Government of Pakistan (2013) Pakistan Millennium Development Goals. Available from http://www.pk.undp.org/content/dam/pakistan/docs/MDGs/MDG2013Report/final%20report.pdf. Accessed November 2017
National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Committee on Techniques for Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability. Water Science and technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources. National Academy Press, Washington DC
Odong J (2007) Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. J Am Sci 3(3):54–60
Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR) (2007) National Water Quality Monitoring Programme (2005–2006). Available from http://pcrwr.gov.pk/Publications/Water%20Quality%20Reports/National%20Water%20Quality%20Monitoring%20Program/water%20quality%20status%20in%20pakistan%20phasev%202005-2006.pdf. Accessed November 2017
Pettyjohn WA, Savoca M, Self D (1991) Regional assessment of aquifer vulnerability and sensitivity in the conterminous United States. In: Report EPA-600/2-91/043. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada
Piscopo G (2001) Groundwater vulnerability map explanatory notes—Castlereagh catchment. NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Australia
Prior JC, Boekhoff JL, Howes MR, Libra RD, VanDorpe PE (2003) Iowa’s groundwater basics: a geological guide to the occurence, use, and vulnerability of Iowa’s aquifers
Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53
Rahmati O, Samani AN, Mahdavi M, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2015) Groundwater potential map** at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arab J Geosci 8:7059–7071
Ritter KS, Sibley P, Hall K, Keen P, Mattu G, Beth Linton L (2002) Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry. J Toxic Environ Health A 65(1):1–142
Shirazi S, Imran H, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun Z (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. J Toxic Environ Health A 70:2293–2304
Srinivasamoorthy K, Vijayaraghavan K, Vasanthavigar M, Sarma V, Rajivgandhi R, Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Manivannan R (2011) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in Mettur region, Tamilnadu, India using drastic and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci 4:1215–1228
Steenhuis TS, Pacenka S, Porter KS (1987) MOUSE: a management model for evaluation ground water contamination from diffuse surface sources aided by computer graphics. Appl Agric Res 2:277–289
Teso RR, Younglove T, Peterson MR, Sheeks DL III, Gallavan RE (1988) Soil taxonomy and surveys: classification of areal sensitivity to pesticide contamination of ground water. J Soil Water Conserv 43(4):348–352
Visnuvarthanan N, Sivakumar SS (2016) Cultivating productive water in Valukai Aru catchment in Valikamam division of Jaffna District of northern Sri Lanka. Int J Sci Eng Res 1:7
Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2001) Terrestrial water budget data archive: monthly time series (1950–1999)
Wu W, Yin S, Liu H, Chen H (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and feasibility map** under reclaimed water irrigation by a modified DRASTIC model. Water Resour Manag 28:1219–1234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adnan, S., Iqbal, J., Maltamo, M. et al. GIS-based DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment in the Peshawar District, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 11, 458 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3795-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3795-9