Log in

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion imaging

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The appropriate clinical approach to incidentally detected lesions (IDLs) on CT attenuation correction (CTAC) images in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) remains uncertain. We sought to establish their prevalence and clinical significance in a large cohort and compared to previous studies to help provide further clarity and guide future clinical practice.

Methods and Results

A total of 3758 MPI studies were reviewed retrospectively. IDLs of potential clinical significance—not known before MPI - were reported in 245 (6.5%) of these cases. Following appropriate further investigation/follow-up, these were of proven clinical significance in 30 (12.2%) cases with 14 patients (5.7%) harboring previously undiagnosed or progressive malignancies. The positive predictive value (PPV) for clinically significant incidental findings on CTAC images was 17.2% and the PPV value for incidental malignant findings was 8.0%.

Conclusion

Although incidental findings on CTAC images in MPI are common and often clearly insignificant at time of MPI reporting, many are clinically significant with a relatively high positive predictive value. This is especially so for malignancies. Our findings, therefore, in combination with previous studies as described here support routine reporting and appropriate further investigation of incidental CTAC findings in MPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

CTAC:

Computed tomography attenuation correction

IDL:

Incidentally detected lesion

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

References

  1. Vitola JV, Shaw LJ, Allam AH, et al. Assessing the need for nuclear cardiology and other advanced cardiac imaging modalities in the develo** world. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:956-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang JY, Huang CK, Yen RF, et al. Diagnostic performance of attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med 2016;57:1893-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, et al. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1305-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pazhenkottil AP, Ghadri JR, Nkoulou RN, et al. Improved outcome prediction by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging after CT attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2011;52:196-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernández-Arguado I. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2010;83:276-89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frank L, Quint L. Chest CT incidentalomas: thyroid lesions, enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes and lung nodules. Cancer Imaging 2012;12:41*8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goetze S, Pannu HK, Wahl RL. Clinically significant abnormal findings on the “nondiagnostic” CT portion of the low-amperage-CT-attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT studies. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1312-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Husmann L, Tatsugami F, Aepli U, et al. Prevalence of noncardiac findings on low-dose 64-slice computed tomography used for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:859-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coward J, Lawson R, Kane T, et al. Multi-centre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coward J, Lawson R, Kane T, et al. Multicentre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images: an extended study. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20150555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zadro C, Roussel N, Cassol E, et al. Prognostic impact of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with major extracardiac findings by computed tomography for attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:1574-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He BJ, Malm BJ, Carino M, Sadeghi MM. Prevalence and variability in reporting of clinically actionable incidental findings on attenuation-correction CT scans in a veteran population. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:1688-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qureshi WT, Alirhhayim Z, Khalid F, Al-Mallah MH. Prognostic value of extracardiac incidental findings on attenuation correction cardiac computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1266-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lantheus Medical Imaging®. Cardiolite®. Kit for the preparation of technetium Tc99m sestamibi for injection. 2014. http://www.lantheus.com/assets/CARDIOLITE-US-PI-513121-0514-1.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2019.

  15. Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Delbeke D, et al. SNMMI/ASNC/SCCT guideline for cardiac SPECT/CT and PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 2013; 54:1485-1507.

  16. Verberne HJ, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, et al. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1929-40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for the management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284:228-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coward J, Nightingale J, Hogg P. The clinical dilemma of incidental findings on the low-resolution CT images from SPECT/CT MPI studies. J Nucl Med Tech 2016;44:167-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benz DC, Fuchs TA. Extracardiac findings on computed tomography attenuation correction: is it worth paying extra attention? J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:1584-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Husmann L, et al. Validation of CT attenuation correction for high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging using a novel cadmiumzinc-telluride detector technique. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1539-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rana JS, Rozanski A, Berman DS. Combination of myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary artery calcium scanning: potential synergies for improving risk assessment in subjects with suspected coronary artery disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2011;13:381-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Okuda K, Nakajima K, Yamada M, et al. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT. Ann Nucl Med 2014;28:60-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brambilla M, Lechhi M, Matheoud R, et al. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and new solid state cameras dedicated to myocardial perfusion imaging. Phys Med 2017;41:109-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delaney FT, Fong KM, Lee JC. Primary thoracic cancers incidentally detected on CT attenuation correction images during myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Clin Lung Cancer 2018;19:575-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA, et al. Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:555-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldman LH, Lerer R, Shabrang C, Travin MI, Levsky JM. Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: insights from a randomized control trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01647-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Husmann L, Tatsugami F, Buechel RR, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA. Incidental detection of a pulmonary adenocarcinoma on low-dose computed tomography used for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT. Clin Nucl Med 2010;35:751-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Delaney FT, Gray EL, Lee JC. The importance of appropriate reporting and investigation of incidental findings on computed tomography attenuation correction images during myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. World J Nucl Med 2019;18:74-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tilkemeier PL, Bourque J, Doukky R, Sanghani R, Weinberg RL. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:2064-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tragardh E, Hesse B, Knuuti J, et al. Reporting nuclear cardiology: A joint position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:272-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K, et al. Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:378-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aase A, Fabbrini AA, White KM, Averill S, Gravely A, Melzer AC. Implementation of a standardized template for reporting of incidental pulmonary nodules: feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:216-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald JS, Koo CW, White D, Hartman TE, Bender CE, Sykes AG. Addition of the Fleischner Society guidelines to chest CT examination interpretive reports improves adherence to recommended follow-up care for incidental pulmonary nodules. Acad Radiol 2017;24:337-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr Lee has received travel expenses for attending meetings of his specialty College’s Continuing Professional Development Committee, of which he is a member. Dr Delaney has nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph C. Lee MBBS, FRACP, FAANMS, PGDipClinUS.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarizes the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

The authors have also provided an audio summary of the article, which is available to download as ESM, or to listen to via the JNC/ASNC Podcast.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.C., Delaney, F.T. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 29, 1813–1822 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02499-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02499-1

Keywords

Navigation