Log in

Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin-Based Treatment Versus Twice-Daily Premixed Insulin After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (BEYOND V)

  • Study Protocol
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Many Chinese patients who are uncontrolled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) receive short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in hospital to rapidly relieve glucose-associated toxicity and to preserve/improve β-cell function. However, evidence for optimizing insulin algorithms for maintenance treatment after IIT is lacking. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of basal insulin-based treatment versus twice-daily premixed insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients after short-term in-hospital IIT.

Methods

This 26-week randomized, multicenter, positive-controlled, open-label, parallel-group study will enroll approximately 400 male and female patients aged 18–70 years with poorly-controlled T2DM (HbA1c > 7.5%) despite treatment with metformin plus at least one other OAD for 8 or more weeks. During a run-in period of 7–10 days, patients will be treated in-hospital with IIT comprising insulin glargine (Lantus®) once daily and insulin glulisine (Apidra®) three times daily; both regimens will be titrated daily to achieve the glycemic goal. Eligible patients will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to insulin glargine plus OADs or twice-daily premixed insulin (NovoLog® Mix 70/30) for 24 weeks, with metformin maintained throughout the study in both treatment groups. The primary endpoint is HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints include assessment of fasting plasma glucose, total daily insulin dose, hypoglycemia incidence, body weight change, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

Discussion

Given the current lack of clinical data, this study will provide evidence supporting safe and effective glycemic control using basal insulin glargine-based therapy plus OADs compared with twice-daily premixed insulin in Chinese patients with T2DM after short-term IIT. This will assist physicians by providing a wider choice of treatments.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03359837 (registered on 2 December 2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weng J. Evolution in the Chinese Diabetes Society standards of care for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:440–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317:2515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas (8th edition). Brussels, Belgium, 2017. https://www.idf.org/e-library/welcome.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  4. Huang Y, Vemer P, Zhu J, Postma MJ, Chen W. Economic burden in Chinese patients with diabetes mellitus using electronic insurance claims data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.

  6. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vinik A. Advancing therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus with early, comprehensive progression from oral agents to insulin therapy. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Spec No:1236–53.

  8. Belfiglio M, De Berardis G, Franciosi M, et al. for the QuED Study Group–quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The relationship between physicians’ self-reported target fasting blood glucose levels and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. The QuED Study Group–quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:423–9.

  9. Chinese Diabetes Society. China guideline for type 2 diabetes (2017 edition). Chin J Diabetes Mellitus. 2018;10:4–67.

  10. Weng J, Ji L, Jia W, et al. Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:442–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nathan DM, Roussell A, Godine JE. Glyburide or insulin for metabolic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A randomized, double-blind study. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:334–40.

  12. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ji L, Zhang P, Zhu D, et al. Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: real-life use of basal insulin in China. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:822–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Preiser JC, Devos P. Clinical experience with tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9 Suppl):S503–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Retnakaran R, Zinman B. Short-term intensified insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes: long-term effects on β-cell function. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(Suppl 3):161–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003417.

  18. Guo XH, Yuan L, Lou QQ, et al. A nationwide survey of diabetes education, self-management and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Chin Med J. 2012;125:4175–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo XH, Ji LN, Lu JM, et al. Efficacy of structured education in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin treatment. J Diabetes. 2014;6:290–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu EQ, Zhou S, Yu A, et al. Outcomes associated with post-discharge insulin continuity in US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating insulin in the hospital. Hosp Pract. 1995;2012(40):40–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aschner P, Sethi B, Gomez-Peralta F, et al. Insulin glargine compared with premixed insulin for management of insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs: the open-label, randomized GALAPAGOS study. J Diabetes Compl. 2015;29:838–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheen AJ. DPP-4 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes: a critical review of head-to-head trials. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38:89–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerich J. Pathogenesis and management of postprandial hyperglycemia: role of incretin-based therapies. Int J Gen Med. 2013;6:877–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathieu C, Shankar RR, Lorber D, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of co-administration of sitagliptin with intensively titrated insulin glargine. Diabetes Ther. 2015;6:127–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao Y, Gao F, Zhang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of coadministration of sitagliptin with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes. 2017;9:502–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Y, Shao L, Niu X, et al. Clinical effectiveness of Novolin® 30R versus Lantus® combined with Glucobay® treatment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus controlled by oral hypoglycaemic agents: a randomized study. J Int Med Res. 2014;42:993–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y-B, Ma J-H, Mu Y-M. Clinical expert guidance for short-term insulin intensive therapy for type 2 diabetes. Drug Evaluation, 2017;14(9):5–12,26. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yppj201709001. Accessed Oct 2019.

  28. EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. https://euroqol.org/. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  29. Ji L, Zhang P, Weng J, et al. Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by oral hypoglycemic agents in China—study design and baseline characteristics. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:735–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weng J, Li Y, Xu W, et al. Effect of intensive insulin therapy on beta-cell function and glycaemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomized parallel-group trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1753–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ji L, Min KW, Oliveira J, Lew T, Duan R. Comparison of efficacy and safety of two starting insulin regimens in non-Asian, Asian Indian, and East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the PARADIGM study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:243–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stein CM, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Choi H, Opsteen C, Retnakaran R. Clinical predictors and time course of the improvement in β-cell function with short-term intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2015;32:645–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu FB. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1249–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garber AJ. Premixed insulin analogues for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2006;66:31–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pan A, Malik VS, Hu FB. Exporting diabetes mellitus to Asia: the impact of Western-style fast food. Circulation. 2012;126:163–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanefeld M. Use of insulin in type 2 diabetes: what we learned from recent clinical trials on the benefits of early insulin initiation. Diabetes Metab. 2014;40:391–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lovre D, Fonseca V. Benefits of timely basal insulin control in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29:295–301.

  38. Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, Matthews DR, Tsapas A. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dashora UK, Sibal L, Ashwell SG, Home PD. Insulin glargine in combination with nateglinide in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2007;24:344–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim MK, Suk JH, Kwon MJ, et al. Nateglinide and acarbose for postprandial glucose control after optimizing fasting glucose with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92:322–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Retnakaran R. Emerging strategies for the preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function in early type 2 diabetes. Clin Invest Med. 2014;37:E414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ClinicalTrials.gov. Early Intermittent Intensive Insulin Therapy as an Effective Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (RESET-IT Main Trial) (RESET-IT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02192424. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is currently recruiting participants.

Funding

The study and the journal’s Rapid Service Fee will be funded by Sanofi, China. The funder has contributed to the design of the study, the development of the study protocol, review and revision of this manuscript, and will contribute to the analysis and interpretation of data. The funder has been involved in the decision to submit this manuscript for publication.

Medical Writing, Editorial, and Other Assistance

Editorial assistance in the preparation of this article was provided by David P. Figgitt PhD, ISMPP CMPP™, Content Ed Net. Support for this assistance was funded by Sanofi, China.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Yiming Mu has received research grants, personal fees or non-financial support from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi. Lixin Guo has received research grants, personal fees or non-financial support from Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Bayer, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Nan Cui, ** Wang have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guideline

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local Institutional Review Board at each study site (Supplementary material). Informed consent to participate in the study will be obtained from all participants. The research will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH GCP, as well as all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiming Mu or Lixin Guo.

Additional information

Enhanced Digital Features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11831109.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Jiang, X., Xu, B. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin-Based Treatment Versus Twice-Daily Premixed Insulin After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (BEYOND V). Adv Ther 37, 1675–1687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01265-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01265-6

Keywords

Navigation