Abstract
This study investigates the seed and fruit anatomy and micromorphology of five pennycress taxa (Thlaspi L. sensu lato) from Turkey, some of which have not been previously investigated. Systematic work in this group suffers from a lack of comprehensive anatomical and micromorphological data, especially for narrowly endemic species. We find that seed surface structure is taxonomically more useful than seed coat anatomy in Thlaspi s. lat., but despite this, it remains understudied. Our results indicate that the most useful anatomical characters are seed-epidermis cell shape and the presence of mucilage cells. As for micromorphology, seed periclinal walls and cell shape were most significant. Thlaspi ceratocarpon Murray, the only taxa remaining in Thlaspi sensu stricto, was unique among these taxa both anatomically and micromorphologically. It notably differs from Thlaspi alliaceum L., according to our results, corroborating recent studies that placed the latter into Mummenhoffia Esmailbegi & Al-Shehbaz. Our PCoA analysis resulted in a close grou** of T. jaubertii Hedge, T. crassum P.H. Davis and T. cilicicum (Boiss) Hayek, three species that have been moved to Noccaea Moench, based on molecular evidence. We discuss the fragmentation of Thlaspi s. lat. into smaller genera in the context of broader trends in plant systematics.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12228-022-09730-y/MediaObjects/12228_2022_9730_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12228-022-09730-y/MediaObjects/12228_2022_9730_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12228-022-09730-y/MediaObjects/12228_2022_9730_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 2014. A synopsis of the genus Noccaea (Coluteocarpeae, Brassicaceae). Harvard Papers of Botany 19(1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.3100/hpib.v19iss1.2014.n3
Al-Shehbaz, I. A., M. A. Beilstein & E. A. Kellogg. 2006. Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): An overview. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259(2–4): 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0415-z
Al-Shehbaz, I. A., B. Mutlu & A. A. Donmez. 2007. The Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) of Turkey, updated. Turkish Journal of Botany 31(4): 327–336.
Antkowiak, W., M. Janyszek-Sołtysiak & M. Klimko. 2018. Taxonomic significance of seed-coat microsculpturing in Noccaea Moench and Thlaspi L. (Brassicaceae: Coluteocarpeae, Thlaspideae). Nordic Journal of Botany 36: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02037
Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1(3): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.x
Bruyns, P. V., C. Klak, P. Hanáček. 2017. A revised, phylogenetically-based concept of Ceropegia (Apocynaceae). South African Journal of Botany 112: 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.06.021
Drew, B. T., J. G. González-Gallegos, C. L. **ang, R. Kriebel, C. P. Drummond, J. B. Walker, K. J. Sytsma. 2017. Salvia united: the greatest good for the greatest number. Taxon 66 (1): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.12705/661.7
Esmailbegi, S., I. A. Al-Shehbaz, M. Pouch, T. Mandáková, K. Mummenhoff, M. R. Rahiminejad, M. Mirtadzadini & M. A. Lysak. 2018. Phylogeny and systematics of the tribe Thlaspideae (Brassicaceae) and the recognition of two new genera. Taxon 67 (2): 324–340. https://doi.org/10.12705/672.4
Eyde, R. H. 1987. The case for kee** Cornus in the broad Linnaean sense. Systematic Botany 12 (4): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418886
Firat, M., B. Ozudogru, B. Tarikahya-Hacioglu, A. S. Bulbul, I. A. Al-Shehbaz & K. Mummenhoff. 2014. Phylogenetic position and taxonomic assignment of Thlaspi aghricum P.H.Davis and K.Tan (Brassicaceae). Phytotaxa 178 (4): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.178.4.2
German, D. A. 2018. On the identity of some endemic SW Asian Cruciferae. I. Thlaspi s. l. Turczaninowia 21 (1): 180–187. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.21.1.18
Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper & P. D. Ryan. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 (1): art. 4.
Karaismailoglu, M. C. 2015. Morphological and anatomical features of seeds of Turkish Romulea taxa (Iridaceae) and their taxonomic significance. Acta Botanica Croatica 74 (1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/botcro-2015-0005
Karaismailoglu, M. C. & O. Erol. 2018. Seed structure and its taxonomic implications for genus Thlaspi sensu lato sections Nomisma, Thlaspi, and Pterotropis (Brassicaceae). Turkish Journal of Botany 42 (5): 591–609. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1709-28
Kiefer, M., R. Schmickl, D. A. German, T. Mandáková, M. A. Lysak, I. A. Al-Shehbaz, A. Franzke, K. Mummenhoff, A. Stamatakis & M. A. Koch. 2014. BrassiBase: Introduction to a novel knowledge database on Brassicaceae evolution. Plant and Cell Physiology 55 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct158
Koch, M. & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 2004. Taxonomic and phylogenetic evaluation of the American ‘Thlaspi’ species: Identity and relationship to the Eurasian genus Noccaea (Brassicaceae). Systematic Botany 29 (2):375–384. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364404774195566
Koch, M. & K. Mummenhoff. 2001. Thlaspi s.str. (Brassicaceae) versus Thlaspi s.l.: Morphological and anatomical characters in the light of ITS nrDNA sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 227 (3–4): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006060170049
Koch, M. A., D. A. German, M. Kiefer & A. Franzke. 2018. Database taxonomics as key to modern plant biology. Trends in Plant Science 23 (1): 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.10.005
Koch, M. A., M. Kiefer, D. A. German, I. A. Al-Shehbaz, A. Franzke, K. Mummenhoff & R. Schmickl. 2012. BrassiBase: Tools and biological resources to study characters and traits in the Brassicaceae-version 1.1. Taxon 61: 1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615007
Liu, M. & S. R. Downie. 2017. The phylogenetic significance of fruit anatomical and micromorphological structures in Chinese Heracleum species and related taxa (Apiaceae). Systematic Botany 42 (2): 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1600/154823217X695539
Meyer, F. K. 1973. Conspectus der "Thlaspi"-Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens. Feddes Repertorium 84 (5–6): 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.19730840503
Meyer, F. K. 1979. Kritische revision der "Thlaspi"- Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens I. geschichte, morphologie und chorologie. Feddes Repertorium 90 (3): 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.4910900302
Meyer, F. K. 1991. Seed-coat anatomy as a character for a new classification of Thlaspi. Flora et Vegetatio Mundi 9: 9–15.
Mummenhoff, K. & M. Koch. 1994. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Thlaspi sensu lato (Brassicaceae). Systematic Botany 19 (1): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419713
Ozcan, M. & N. Akinci. 2019. Micromorpho-anatomical fruit characteristics and pappus features of representative Cardueae (Asteraceae) taxa: Their systematic significance. Flora 256: 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.04.009
Ozgisi, K., A. Ocak & B. Tarikahya-Hacioglu. 2020. An attempt to solve the taxonomic confusion of Thlaspiceras F.K.Mey. complex (Noccaea Moench-Brassicaceae) with ISSRs. Turkish Journal of Botany 44 (3): 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1910-22
Ozgisi, K., B. Ozudogru & A. Ocak. 2018. Contributions to Turkish flora: Taxonomic and distributional notes on the poorly known Noccaea (Brassicaceae) species. Phytotaxa 346 (3): 247–257. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.346.3.4
Ozudogru, B., K. Ozgisi, B. Tarıkahya-Hacıoglu, A. Ocak, K. Mummenhoff & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 2019. Phylogeny of the genus Noccaea (Brassicaceae) and a critical review of its generic circumscription. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 104 (3): 339–354. https://doi.org/10.3417/2019347
Potter, D., T. Eriksson, R. C. Evans, S. Oh, J. E. E. Smedmark, D. R. Morgan, M. Kerr, K. R. Robertson, M. Arsenault, T. A. Dickinson & C. S. Campbell. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9
Schultze-Motel, W. 1986. Thlaspi. Pp. 364–381, 587–589 in: Schultze-Motel, W. (ed), Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Parey Publishing, Berlin.
Shi, S., J. Li, J. Sun, J. Yu & S. Zhou. 2013. Phylogeny and classification of Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae). Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 55 (11): 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12095
Sukhorukov, A. P. 2007. Fruit anatomy and its taxonomic significance in Corispermum (Corispermoideae, Chenopodiaceae). Willdenowia 37 (1): 63–87. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.37.37103
Tolivia, D. & J. Tolivia. 1987. Fasga: a new polychromatic method for simultaneous and differential staining of plant tissue. Journal of Microscopy 148 (1): 113–117
Will, M. & R. Claßen-Bockhoff. 2017. Time to split Salvia s.l. (Lamiaceae) – New insights from Old World Salvia phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 109: 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.041
Yembaturova E. Y., B. E. Van Wyk, P. M. Tilney & P. J. D. Winter. 2010. The taxonomic significance of fruit morphology and anatomy in the genus Alepidea Delaroche (Apiaceae, subfamily Saniculoideae). Plant Diversity and Evolution 128 (3): 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0017
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the curators of ISTE, ISTO, DUOF, EGE, HUB and AEF for their cooperation. We also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by Istanbul University Scientific Research Projects Unit through project number 49887. This study is a part of the Ph.D. thesis of the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
41304–3 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 7.56 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 19.49 | 0 | 1 | rectangular | 19.37 | ± rounded | 1 | 2 | 3–4 layers | dense | 34.58 | 1–2 layers | 25.25 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41305–1 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | elongated | 3.73 | 1 layer | crushed | 25.94 | 0 | 1 | rounded | 15.31 | ± rounded | 0 | 2 | 3–4 layers | dense | 42.31 | 1–2 layers | 37.97 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41305–2 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | elongated | 8.23 | 1 layer | crushed | 22.29 | 0 | 1 | rounded | 14.75 | ± rounded | 0 | 2 | 3–4 layers | dense | 42.31 | 1–2 layers | 37.97 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41305–3 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | elongated | 7.81 | 1 layer | crushed | 17.82 | 0 | 1 | rounded | 14.45 | ± rounded | 1 | 2 | 2–3 layers | dense | 42.15 | 1–2 layers | 27.13 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41306–1 | T. cilicicum | 1 | isodiametric | 1 | elongated | 6.12 | 2–3 layers | crushed | 18.59 | 0 | 1 | elongated | 16.59 | ± rounded | 0 | 2 | 2–3 layers | dense | 15.24 | 1–2 layers | 20.99 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41306–2 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 6.28 | 2–3 layers | crushed | 6.99 | 0 | 1 | elongated | 9.76 | ± rounded | 0 | 2 | 1–2 layers | dense | 14.1 | 1–2 layers | 18.2 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41306–3 | T. cilicicum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 7.92 | 2–3 layers | crushed | 12.21 | 0 | 1 | elongated | 13.57 | ± rounded | 0 | 2 | 2–3 layers | dense | 21.64 | 1–2 layers | 20.29 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy to undulate | thin | grooved | convex | smooth | elongated | irregular wrinkles | undulated | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41291–0 | T. crassum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 10.61 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 17.86 | 0 | 2 | isodiametric | 72.06 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 3–4 layers | loose | 86.83 | 1–2 layers | 32.37 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41291–1 | T. crassum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 9.64 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 15.14 | 0 | 1 | isodiametric | 38.36 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 3–4 layers | loose | 60.16 | 1 layer | 27.26 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41291–2 | T. crassum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 8.56 | 1 layer | crushed | 11.96 | 0 | 0 | absent | 0 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 3–4 layers | loose | 64.8 | 1–2 layers | 26.55 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1 layer | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41291–3 | T. crassum | 1 | elongated | 1 | isodiametric | 7.29 | 1 layer | crushed | 14.37 | 0 | 1 | isodiametric | 28.82 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 3–4 layers | loose | 44.62 | 1–2 layers | 19.83 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1 layer | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41291–6 | T. crassum | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 8.09 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 11.48 | 0 | 1 | isodiametric | 18.4 | rectangular | 0 | 2 | 2–3 layers | loose | 70.34 | 1 layer | 20.49 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1 layer | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41,291–7 | T. crassum | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 5.59 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 19.78 | 0 | 1 | isodiametric | 29.93 | rectangular | 0 | 2 | 1–3 layers | loose | 37.03 | 1–2 layers | 26.68 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thin | grooved | convex | strongly verruculate | elongated | rugose | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41292–0 | T. jaubertii | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 9.44 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 12.93 | 1 | 1 | isodiametric | 46.22 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 1–3 layers | dense | 41.6 | 1–3 layers | 27.14 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thick | grooved | convex | verruculate | isodiametric | irregular wrinkles | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
34461–1 | T. jaubertii | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 8.44 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 11.23 | 1 | 1 | isodiametric | 19.52 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 2–3 layers | dense | 34.16 | 2–3 layers | 61.6 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thick | grooved | convex | verruculate | isodiametric | irregular wrinkles | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
34461–3 | T. jaubertii | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 8.44 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 11.23 | 1 | 1 | isodiametric | 19.52 | rectangular | 0 | 2 | 1–2 layers | dense | 26.43 | 1–2 layers | 49.79 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thick | grooved | convex | verruculate | isodiametric | irregular wrinkles | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41293–1 | T. jaubertii | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 6.58 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 18.88 | 1 | 1 | isodiametric | 18.59 | rectangular | 0 | 2 | 1–2 layers | dense | 26.68 | 1–2 layers | 42.41 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thick | grooved | convex | verruculate | isodiametric | irregular wrinkles | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
41293–2 | T. jaubertii | 1 | flat | 1 | isodiametric | 6.75 | 1–2 layers | crushed | 17.67 | 1 | 1 | isodiametric | 29.5 | rectangular | 1 | 2 | 1–2 layers | dense | 26.31 | 1–2 layers | 26.05 | parenchyma - sclerenchyma | 1–2 layers | colliculate | wavy | thick | grooved | convex | verruculate | isodiametric | irregular wrinkles | straight | thin | grooved | convex | platelets | elongated |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Çiftçi, A., Mollman, R. & Erol, O. Anatomical and micromorphological study on some understudied taxa of Thlaspi L. s. lat. (Brassicaceae). Brittonia 75, 1–14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-022-09730-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-022-09730-y