Abstract
The 92/43/EEC Habitats Directive is the main European Union legal tool concerning nature conservation. The habitat types listed in Annex I to the Directive are phytosociology-based. It is widely acknowledged that phytosociological analysis is a crucial approach for habitats characterization and for monitoring their conservation status. Based on bibliographic investigations and new field survey campaigns, a list of habitat types neglected by the Habitats Directive is here presented and described for southern Italy. In this paper, 8 new habitat types and 13 subtypes are proposed. For each of these proposed new habitat types, a wide range of information, including ecology, chorology, species composition, syntaxonomy, threats, and conservation status, is here provided. To supply more detailed phytogeographical and coenological information about the proposed new habitat types, distribution maps based on 10 × 10 km reference grids and phytosociological tables including unpublished relevés were carried out.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Habitats Directive (Dir. 92/43/EEC, hereafter HD) is the main European Union (EU) legal tool concerning nature conservation (European Commission 1992, 2013). It defines plant and animal species, and natural and semi-natural habitat types of Community importance, listed in the Directive’s Annexes, relevant to biodiversity conservation.
Correctly identifying of habitat types is a fundamental prerequisite for setting up adequate management policies and adopting biodiversity conservation measures. Habitat types of European Community importance listed in Annex I of the HD are primarily identified on a phytosociological basis, and mainly characterized by their floristic and geographic features (Evans 2006; Biondi et al. 2009, 2012). The use of phytosociology for the analysis and interpretation of habitat types is a widely established methodology (Loidi et al. 2007; Angelini et al. 2016; Tomaselli et al. 2016; Attorre et al. 2018; Stinca et al. 2020; Cano Carmona et al. 2022). In fact, the HD explicitly refers to the phytosociological syntaxa for the identification of the habitat types of community interest included in Annex I and described in the European interpretation manual (latest version EUR/28, European Commission 2013). The phytosociological classification, thanks to a synthetic approach that considers floristic, biogeographic, ecological, and syndynamic (successional-serial) features of plant communities, is probably the most complete framework available, to classify such a complex system as the list of European habitat types (Loidi et al. 2010). A standardized phytosociological reference for all the Annex I Habitats of the HD recognized in the Italian territory is provided by Biondi et al. (2012).
One of the basic principles on which the HD is based is that the maintenance of habitats in a good conservation status is the best way to conserve animal and plant species (Lengyel et al. 2008; Bunce et al. 2008; Henle et al. 2013; Evangelista et al. 2016; Hoffmann et al. 2018). The EU has recently launched a new Biodiversity Strategy intended to create Protected Areas for 30% of its land and sea territory by 2030 and ensure no deterioration in conservation trends and status of protected species and habitats (European Commission 2020), with the consequent estimation of important economic investments in this direction (Mammola et al. 2020). Consequently, it becomes important to invest in Protected Areas and their enhancement. Since in the EU, the main network of protected areas is represented by the Natura 2000 network (often considered one of the most important and largest conservation networks worldwide; Lockwood 2006), it becomes a crucial issue to operate in the sense of its strengthening and also in the integration and amending the HD Annexes (e.g., greater flexibility of the lists of species and habitat types in the Annexes; Hochkirch et al. 2013; Maes et al. 2013).
The HD defines natural habitat types of community interest as those that (i) are in danger of disappearance in their natural range; (ii) have a small natural range following their regression or by reason of their intrinsically restricted area; (iii) present outstanding examples of typical characteristics of one or more of the nine following biogeographic regions: Alpine, Atlantic, Black Sea, Boreal, Continental, Macaronesian, Mediterranean, Pannonian, and Steppic (Article, current consolidated version: 01/07/2013—https://eur-lex.europa.eu). In the same article is reported that “such habitat types are listed or may be listed in Annex I”, highlighting that the list of habitat types is not comprehensive. Moreover, several authors have pointed up that there are some habitats which do not appear in Annex I but which probably fall within the definition of ‘habitats of community interest’ (e.g., Evans 2006). Therefore, in this paper, it is proposed to integrate the Annex I with those habitat types falling within the study area and which are of Community interest, as defined in Article 1c. Many contributions have focused on the effectiveness of the HD in protecting biodiversity, especially in terms of species, highlighting the presence of gaps, that is on how the Natura 2000 ecological network is effective in covering target species and minimizing the number of gap species (i.e., species not represented in a single site of the Natura 2000 network) (Cardoso 2012; Gruber et al. 2012; Trochet and Schmeller 2013). Numerous authors have also focused on the several gaps in the protection of plant communities by the HD (Petermann and Ssymank 2007; Rosati et al. 2008; Hochkirch et al. 2013; Tomaselli et al. 2012; Angiolini et al. 2017; Spampinato et al. 2018). Many of these gaps concern wetlands and humid environments, but others concern forest environments, open grasslands, shrubland, and garrigues (Quinto-Canas et al. 2018; Spampinato et al. 2018; Cano-Ortiz et al. 2021). Moreover, some habitat type diagnoses in the HD interpretation manual may lead to problems of identification or inaccuracies in the description of local southern European habitat types being the original description focused on central-northern European communities (Feola et al. 2011; Biondi et al. 2009, 2012).
The list of habitat types included in Annex I to the HD has been progressively implemented by the accession of new Member States, with the latest in 2013 (Croatia). However, despite the significant production of vegetation studies in the last 30 years throughout Europe, and notwithstanding the awareness of the occurrence of significant gaps in the list of protected vegetation types, neither amendments nor additions have been adopted so far. During the drawing up of the “Italian Interpretation Manual of the Dir. 92/43/EEC”, the need to consider possible new habitat types of community interest to be proposed as relevant for updating the current nature conservation framework in the Mediterranean bioregion clearly emerged (Biondi et al. 2012). To fill this knowledge gap, in the framework of the third report on the monitoring of species and habitats of the EEC directive 42/93, Biondi et al. (2014c) highlighted the need to consider new habitat types to be included in Annex I to the Directive and provided descriptive data sheets. More recently, new habitat types or new subtypes have recently been proposed for central Italy (Casavecchia et al. 2021), Sardinia (Fois et al. 2021), and Sicily (Guarino et al. 2021). In this paper, new habitat types suitable to be included in HD are proposed and described for southern Italy based on the expert knowledge of the authors and supported by both relevant phytosociological literature and new field investigations. The new habitat types proposed are characterized by plant communities hosting several species of conservation concern (e.g., rare, endemic, and endangered species or species included in international protection standards).
2 Study area
Southern Italy is a part of the Italian peninsula, which extends from 42°04′16″ to 37°54′59″ N in latitude, from 13°45′45″ to 18°31′13″ E in longitude, and which can be broadly defined by the following administrative regions: Molise, Apulia, Campania, Basilicata, and Calabria (Fig. 1).
It covers a total area of 62966 km2, with 2256 km of coastline lapped by the Tyrrhenian, Ionian, and Adriatic seas. The altitude range of the study area spans from the sea level to 2267 m a.s.l. of Serra Dolcedorme, which is the highest peak of the Pollino massif, and it is located in the North of the Calabria region.
Southern Italy is particularly heterogeneous from both lithological and geomorphological point of view. The backbone of the southern Apennines, from the Matese Mountains to the Pollino massif, is mainly characterized by limestone–dolomitic rocks, generally intensely fractured and karstified. In the Daunian sub-Apennines, there is a prevalence of marls and pelithic–arenaceous flysch substrates. The Calabrian Arc exhibits a varied geological feature with granite and gneiss (Sila massif), predominant granite rocks (Serre), and prevalent gneiss (Aspromonte). Sedimentary deposits emerge along the Ionian edge, while the Campania Tyrrhenian area is characterized by volcanic activity (e.g., Vesuvio, Campi Flegrei) and by large depressions and alluvial plains (Campania plain and Sele plain). The area between the southern Apennines and Apulia is occupied by the “Bradanica” foreland, develo** NW–SE and consisting of sedimentary rocks, as well as in Ionian Basilicata. At last, the most of Apulia consists of an extensive carbonatic platform including Gargano promontory, Murge plateau and Salento (Budetta et al. 1993).
The southern Apennines almost entirely falls within the Mediterranean macrobioclimate, with some important enclaves of Temperate macrobioclimate (e.g., the high-altitude areas of the main Apennine massifs) and few scattered areas of the Gargano promontory and Murgian plateau (Rivas-Martínez et al. 2004; Blasi and Michetti 2005). Bioclimates range from Mediterranean Pluviseasonal Oceanic to Temperate Oceanic (mainly in the submediterranean variant). Thermotypes are from lower thermomediterranean (southern Calabria and Apulia, as well as coastal areas of Campania and Basilicata) to upper supramediterranean (in Mediterranean macrobioclimate), whereas in Temperate, macrobioclimate thermotypes range from upper thermotemperate (inner hilly areas of Apennines and some areas of Gargano) to lower upper orotemperate (e.g., Pollino). Ombrotypes range from lower dry to lower hyperhumid (Rivas-Martínez et al. 2011; Pesaresi et al. 2014). The bioclimatic and geomorphologic features of southern Italy lead to remarkable floristic (Stinca et al. 2019, 2021) and phytocoenotic diversity, as emphasized by the presence of several alliances and sub-alliances endemic to this territory (Spampinato 2009a).
3 Materials and methods
The identification of habitat types neglected by HD in southern Italy was based on field investigation supported by vegetation surveys (see Online Resource 1) carried out with the Braun-Blanquet phytosociological approach (Braun-Blanquet 1964), and on careful analysis of phytosociological and geobotanical literature (see Online Resource 2). Detailed information on date and localities, coordinates, environmental data, and authors of the original relevés are reported in Online Resource 3. For each habitat, the table containing the relevés used for classification is given (Online Resource 1); the number of relevés, their area (average, maximum, and minimum) and the average number of species are also specified. Habitat description, syntaxonomic classification, and diagnostic species designation were based on field and bibliographic data.
Plant nomenclature follows the checklist of Italian vascular flora (Bartolucci et al. 2018) and the updates available on the information system “FlorItaly-Portal to the Flora of Italy” (2022), Pignatti et al. (2017–2019), and Aleffi et al. (2020) for Bryophytes. Syntaxonomic nomenclature, at the levels of alliance, order, and class, refers to the Italian Vegetation Prodrome (Biondi et al. 2014b). Reference was made also to the Checklist of European vegetation (Mucina et al. 2016) for those habitat types whose syntaxonomic classification is still controversial at European level and for the identification or coenological interpretation of the habitat types considered. Bioclimatic classification is in accordance with Pesaresi et al. (2014).
For each neglected habitat type identified, the following data were provided: name, macrocategory, correspondence with other habitat classification systems (EUNIS, CORINE Biotopes), description, closest habitat types already included in the Annex I to the HD, biogeographic, ecological and conservation importance, subtypes and variants (if any), diagnostic species, phytosociological reference, successional stages and spatial contacts, distribution, and possible threats. Species of conservation concern (e.g., Red List, rare, endemic, at the limits of distribution area) were also highlighted. Threats and Pressures were identified and coded as reported under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive (Eionet 2022; first reference in brackets), and also according to the IUCN-CMP Classification of Threats (IUCN-CMP 2012; the second reference). We assessed the protection status of neglected habitats by analyzing the distribution of each site in the Natura 2000 Network and in the Italian protected areas (National and Regional Parks, State and Regional Reserves).
The graphical processing of the distribution maps was carried out using the open-source software ©QGIS 3.26.3 Buenos Aires.
4 Results
Mediterranean helophytic sub-halophilous meadows
Macrocategory: 14 Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic saltmarshes and salt meadows.
Correspondence with other habitat classification systems
EUNIS: A2.5d—Mediterranean and Black Sea coastal salt marsh; A2.53C—Saline beds of Phragmites australis; A2.53D—Geolittoral wetlands and meadows: saline and brackish reed, rush and sedge stands; A5.541—Vegetation of brackish waters dominated by Phragmites australis; C3.2—Water-fringing reedbeds and tall helophytes other than canes.
CORINE Biotopes: 53.11—Common reed beds; 53.17—Halophile clubrush beds.
Description. Mediterranean helophytic sub-halophilous plant communities belonging to the Scirpion maritimi alliance (Bolboschoenetalia maritimi (= Scirpetalia compacti), Phragmito-Magnocaricetea) and partly to the Phragmition communis (Phragmitetalia, Phragmito-Magnocaricetea), growing in coastal areas, usually in correspondence of areas behind the dunes and river mouths, on soils flooded by brackish waters for medium–long periods.
Closest habitat types of the Annex I
1410: Mediterranean salt meadows (Juncetalia maritimi).
7210: Calcareous fens with Cladium mariscus and species of the Caricion davallianae.
Importance. These plant communities often provide essential habitat for wildlife; moreover, they act as very important resting, feeding, and nesting sites for many bird species (Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2002; Orłowski and Górka 2013). The dominant species of these vegetation types are widespread and have no special conservation value, with some exceptions (see below).
Subtypes and variants. Three subtypes of this habitat type can be distinguished:
-
(a)
communities dominated by tall rushes and sedges (Bolboschoenus maritimus);
-
(b)
communities dominated by small rushes and sedges (Cyperus distachyos);
-
(c)
subalophilous reedbeds (Phragmites australis subsp. australis) of the mouth of Mediterranean rivers and of the back-dune lagoons.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species: Bolboschoenus maritimus, Phragmites australis subsp. australis, Schoenoplectus litoralis, Typha angustifolia. Species of conservation interest: Cyperus distachyos, Ipomoea sagittata.
Phytosociological reference. (Tab. 1, 16 relevés, area: mean 55 m2, minimum 20 m2, maximum 100 m2, mean number of species: 6; Online Resource 1) Cyperetum distachyi Bolòs & Molinier 1984, Phragmitetum communis (Koch 1926) Schmale 1939, Scirpetum maritimi (Christiansen 1934) R. Tx. 1937, Scirpetum maritimo-litoralis (Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952) O. de Bolòs 1962.
Dynamics and contacts. The plant communities included in this habitat type are stable edapho-hygrophilous formations, conditioned by various ecological factors, including salinity and water availability. They are in spatial contact with vegetation types belonging to Juncetea maritimi (habitat 1410), Salicornietea fruticosae (habitat 1420), as well as Saginetea maritimae and Therosalicornietea (habitat 1310), in some cases forming complex mosaics (Maiorca et al. 2002, 2007; Giusso del Galdo et al. 2008; Tomaselli et al. 2011, 2020; Sciandrello and Tomaselli 2014).
Distribution. Coastal areas of all the regions falling in the study area (Corbetta 1970; Gehu and Biondi 1988; Taffetani and Biondi 1989; Corbetta et al. 1992; Maiorca et al. 2002, 2007; Tomaselli et al. 2008, 2011; Spampinato et al. 2019b; Tomaselli and Sciandrello 2017; Veronico et al. 2017) (Fig. 2; Fig. 3; Tab. 2; Online Resource 2). The distribution of this habitat type extends to other territories within the Mediterranean basin and in the Temperate bioregions of Europe (Landucci et al. 2020; Sarika et al. 2016; Stešević et al. 2019).
Pressures and threats. Abstraction of surface and ground water, as well as modification of the water regime (C14—7.2) are the main threats. Land drainage and reclamation for agriculture (A31—2.1) and also water-borne pollutants from agricultural, silvicultural, and aquaculture systems (A26, B23—9.3) may also heavily affect this habitat type. Mediterranean coastal salt marsh is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2016).
Streams and springs of the southern Apennines and Sicily
Macrocategory: 32 Running water.
Correspondence with other habitat classification systems
EUNIS Classification: C2.11—Soft water springs; C2.16—Crenal streams (spring brooks).
CORINE Biotopes: 24.11—Springs and rivulets.
Description. Springs, brooks, little streams, or small watercourses of the southern Apennines and Sicily mountains with acid or neutral water, oligotrophic to slightly eutrophic, non-calcareous, permanently flowing but not swirling, with high stability in temperature, near the annual average of the groundwater.
Closest habitat types of the Annex I
3260: Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation.
7160: Fennoscandian mineral-rich springs and springfens.
Importance. The relevance of this habitat type had already been reported during the monitoring activities on habitat types of community interest in Italy for the “3rd National Report on the Habitats Directive” (Biondi et al. 2014c) and in the “Italian interpretation Manual of the habitats Directive” (Spampinato 2009b).
The markedly humid environmental conditions, characterized by more or less slowly flowing and well-oxygenated waters, allow the presence of hygrophilous herbaceous communities that host various species of biogeographic importance.
This habitat type hosts several endangered endemic hygrophilous vascular plants, such as Soldanella calabrella, Cryptotaenia thomasii, and Petagnaea gussonei, the latter being the only known species of Petagnea, a genus of the Apiaceae, phylogenetically isolated and restricted to the Nebrodi Mountains in north-eastern Sicily (De Castro et al. 2013; Bellino et al. 2015; Stinca et al. 2019; Stinca and Ricciardi 2019; Orsenigo et al. 2020).
In a study on the bryophytic flora of the Aspromonte streams, Puglisi et al. (2021) highlighted a set of species of phytogeographical interest that play an important role in this habitat type as Racomitrium aciculare, Dichodontium pellucidum, Chiloscyphus pallescens var. pallescens, Philonotis capillaris, rare in the south Italy, Diobelonella palustris, Calypogeia sphagnicola, these last two species very rare in the Mediterranean.
The brooks are the breeding site for some amphibians of the Apennine Range, including the endemic Salamandra salamandra giglioli and Salamandrina terdigitata, both included among the endangered species of fauna (Bulgarini et al. 1998).
Europe’s peninsulas protruding into the Mediterranean, such as southern Italy, with their high diversity in habitats, have been refuge areas for many species during the Quaternary (Médail and Diadema 2009). Streams and springs are climatically stable habitats and provide a refuge for species of high conservation priority. They are crucial for the long-term persistence of species and genetic diversity, especially in light of the threat posed by climate change. Zhang et al. (2001) highlight that Soldanella species growing in this habitat experienced different cycles of range expansion and contraction during late Quaternary climatic changes. This process probably affected many of the endemic species that inhabit southern Apennines’ streams and springs.
Subtypes and variants. Two subtypes of this habitat type can be distinguished:
-
(a)
oligotrophic waters subtype (Montio-Cardaminetea);
-
(b)
mesotrophic waters subtype (Galio-Urticetea).
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species. Vascular plants: Athyrium filix-femina, Cardamine flexuosa, Carex remota, Chrysosplenium dubium, Lysimachia nemorum, Rhynchocorys elephas, Sagina saginoides. Bryophytes: Philonotis fontana, Ptychostomum pseudotriquetrum, Pellia epiphylla, Phaeoceros laevis. Species of conservation interest: Vascular plants: Alchemilla austroitalica, Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala, Cardamine silana, Cryptotaenia thomasii, Digitalis purpurea, Petagnaea gussonei, Senecio ovatus subsp. stabianus, Soldanella calabrella, Soldanella sacra. Bryophytes: Sciuro-hypnum plumosum, Scapania undulata, Racomitrium aciculare, and Dichodontium pellucidum.
Phytosociological reference. Streams and springs of southern Italy host different plant communities depending on the variation of the main ecological factors, such as light and nutrient availability (Codogno et al. 1984; Maiorca and Spampinato 1999; Brullo et al. 2001). The plant communities growing in the upper part of streams (Tab. 3; 9 relevés, area: mean 16 m2, minimum 10 m2, maximum 20 m2; mean number of species: 11; Online Resource 1), between 1400 and 1800 m a.s.l., such as Adenostylo-Soldanelletum calabrellae (plant community with Soldanella calabrella growing on small humid rocky walls along mountain streams of Aspromonte and Sila) and Rhynchocoryto-Alchemilletum austroitalicae (localized phytocoenosis near small waterfalls or water jumps), are referred to the Caricion remotae alliance.
The communities growing in mountain streams with mesotrophic waters located between 900 and 1900 m a.s.l., such as the Chrysosplenio-Cryptotaenietum thomasii, Digitali purpureae-Urticetum dioicae, and Petasito-Chaerophylletum calabrici, are referred to the Impatienti noli-tangere-Stachyion sylvaticae.
The same alliance also includes Petagnaetum gussonei, a nemoral plant community rich in mosses which occurs on the humid shady sides of the northern Sicily Mountain streams only (Brullo and Grillo 1978; Gianguzzi and La Mantia 2004).
Dynamics and contacts. The plant communities of this habitat type are permanent vegetation types linked to peculiar micro-ecological conditions. In the Calabro-Lucanian Apennines, they are in spatial contact with deciduous mesophilic broad-leaved forests of the mountain belt of the Querco roboris-Fagetea sylvaticae (Brullo et al. 2001). In Sicily, where this habitat type occurs from 1400 to 300 m a.s.l., in particular heterotopic environmental conditions, it is in spatial contact with Fraxino orni-Quercion ilicis woods (Gianguzzi and La Mantia 2004).
Distribution. Mountain belt of Campania, Basilicata, Calabria. (Fig. 4; Fig. 5; Tab. 4; Online Resource 2). This habitat type is also found in northern Sicily. Due to its biogeographic characteristics, this habitat type can be considered endemic to southern Italy and Sicily.
Pressures and threats. Springs and streams are restricted to small plots and exhibit a scattered distribution in southern Italy, so they are strongly influenced by the anthropogenic disturbance both in the area covered by the habitat type and in the surrounding areas.
Many springs have been destroyed or extremely damaged by water extraction or by the abstraction of streams to supply aqueducts (C14—7.2). Grazing (A10—2.3.1) and deforestation of surrounding habitats (B05, B09—5.3). Habitats which fall at high-altitude within the maximum protection zones of protected areas tend to preserve their natural features, whereas those occurring at lower altitudes are often subject to a significant decrease in their quality.
Helophytic communities of flowing and well-oxygenated waters
Macrocategory: 32 Running water.
Correspondence with other habitat classification systems
EUNIS: C3.421—Short Mediterranean amphibious communities.
CORINE Biotopes: 53.14—Medium-tall waterside communities.
Description. Helophytic or hemicryptophytic communities, of slowly flowing and well-oxygenated fresh waters typical of streams of the Temperate and Mediterranean bioclimatic regions (Landucci et al. 2020), classified in the Glycerio fluitantis-Sparganion neglecti and Apion nodiflori, alliance of Phragmito australis-Magnocaricetea elatae.
Closest habitat type of the Annex I
3260: Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation.
This habitat type frames submerged or floating rooted macrophytic communities (Batrachids) of limpid and unshaded running water of Potametea class that develops in the central part of watercourses where the current is faster (Biondi et al. 2009). The proposed habitat, on the other hand, refers to amphibious communities characterized by hemicryptophytes and helophytes, and not by hydrophytes, growing at the margins of perennial watercourses or streams, with fresh and shallow waters where there may be brief periods of desiccation.
Importance. The importance of this habitat type is linked to the degree of vulnerability which affects riverine systems. Although this habitat type does not host particularly rare or endemic vascular plant species, nevertheless, it plays an important ecological role by forming a transition belt between aquatic and terrestrial environments. It is also a refuge, reproduction, or shelter area for various fauna species, such as batrachians, aquatic invertebrates, and fishes.
Subtypes and variants. Two subtypes can be distinguished:
-
(a)
communities dominated by Sparganium erectum, Glyceria sp. pl. (Glycerio fluitantis-Sparganion neglecti);
-
(b)
communities dominated by Helosciadium nodiflorum, Nasturtium officinale (Apion nodiflori).
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species: Berula erecta, Glyceria fluitans, Glyceria notata, Helosciadium nodiflorum subsp. nodiflorum, Nasturtium officinale, Scrophularia umbrosa, Sparganium erectum, Veronica anagallis-aquatica, and Veronica beccabunga. Species of conservation interest: Ranunculus sect. Batrachium.
Phytosociological reference. Helosciadietum nodiflori, Polygono salicifolii-Nasturtietum officinalis (Tab. 5, 3 relevés, area: mean 3.3 m2, minimum 2 m2, maximum 5 m2, mean number of species: 6; Online Resource 1), Apio nodiflori-Glycerietum plicatae, Sparganietum erecti, Glycerietum notatae. In Mucina et al. (2016), the alliance Apion nodiflori is considered a syntaxonomical synonym of Glycerio fluitantis-Sparganion neglecti as both referred to “Herbland vegetation of small freshwater streams and in shallow water bodies of temperate Europe”. This more inclusive interpretation of the EuroVegChecklist would shift the identification of the habitat subtypes from the alliance level to the association level.
Dynamics and contacts. The plant communities of this habitat type are permanent vegetation types linked to particular ecological and micro-environmental conditions in spatial contact with the riverine forests of the Salici purpureae–Populetea nigrae or with perennial helophytic communities of large size such as reeds, sedges, of Phragmito australis-Magnocaricetea elatae. Inside of the water body, the spatial contacts occur with the floating vegetation of the Ranunculion fluitantis and Ranunculion aquatilis.
Distribution. Coastal, hilly, and submontane belts of all the Italian southern regions (Fig. 6; Fig. 7; Tab. 6; Online Resource 2), Sicily (Brullo and Spampinato 1990), and of other Mediterranean territories (Navarro et al. 2001) (Fig. 7).
Pressures and threats. Modification of the water regime (C14—7.2) and also water-borne pollutants from different origin as domestic and urban activity (F12—9.1), industrial and commercial activities (F15—9.2); agricultural and forestry activity (A25, B23—9.3) may affect this habitat type.
Mediterranean and sub-Mediterranean dwarf garrigues with rare and/or endemic species
Macrocategory: 54 Phrygana.
Correspondence with other habitat classification systems
EUNIS: F6.1—Western garrigues; F6.2—Eastern garrigues.
CORINE Biotopes: 32.212—Thermo-Mediterranean heath garrigues; 32.46—Lavender garrigues; 32.47—Thyme, sage, germander and other labiate garrigues; 32.4B—Erica garrigues; 32.4D—Helianthemum and Fumana garrigues.
Description. Thermo-Mediterranean, meso-Mediterranean and sub-Mediterranean, primary and secondary garrigues, growing on poorly developed carbonatic soils with outcrops, physiognomically dominated by chamaephytes, often with cushion-like-thorny habitus.
Closest habitat types of the Annex I
5410: West Mediterranean cliff top phryganas (Astragalo-Plantaginetum subulatae).
5420: Sarcopoterium spinosum phryganas.
5430: Endemic phryganas of the Euphorbio-Verbascion.
Importance. This habitat type differs from other types of dwarf garrigues, because it is characterized by rare, and often endemic species or by species of particular phytogeographic and/or conservation value. The garrigues belonging to this habitat type may be of primary or secondary origin, mainly developed on inland limestone rocky outcrops. Numerous physiognomically very different plant communities belong to this habitat type and most of them show a high species richness. According to Janssen et al. (2016), the proposed habitat type represents an outstanding example of typical characteristics of Mediterranean region as it is exclusively occurring on eroded soils of this region subjected to Mediterranean macrobioclimate.
Subtypes and variants. None.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species: Erica forskalii (= E. manipuliflora), Euphorbia spinosa, Fumana ericifolia, F. laevis, F. procumbens, F. thymifolia, Helianthemum oleandicum subsp. incanum, Micromeria juliana, M. graeca subsp. graeca, Petrosedum ochroleucum subsp. mediterraneum, Phagnalon rupestre subsp. illyricum, Phlomis fruticosa, Rhamnus saxatilis, Satureja montana, S. cuneifolia, Teucrium capitatum, Thymbra capitata. Bryophytes: Cheilothela chloropus, Tortella squarrosa, Scorpiurium circinatum. Species of conservation interest: Allium apulum, Aristida adscensionis, Asyneuma limonifolium subsp. limonifolium, Centaurea brulla, C. subtilis, Dianthus tarentinus, Erica forskalii, Fumana scoparia, Genista michelii, Helianthemum farinulentum, H. jonium, H. lippii, Lavandula austroapennina, L. multifida, Leontodon apulus, Linum tommasinii, Micromeria graeca subsp. garganica, Onobrychis calabrica, Ptilostemon gnaphaloides, Salvia ceratophylloides, S. officinalis, S. fruticosa subsp. thomasii, Scabiosa pseudisetensis, and Tuberaria lignosa.
Phytosociological reference. The vegetation shows a great floristic diversity, and many dwarf garrigues rich in endemic species or species of particular phytogeographical interest are known for southern Italy (Tab. 7, 28 relevés, area: mean 60 m2, minimum 20 m2, maximum 100 m2, mean number of species: 19; Online Resource 1): Saturejo cuneifoliae-Ericetum manipuliflorae Brullo et al. 1986, Chamaecytiso spinescentis-Genistetum michelii De Faveri & Nimis ex Biondi 2000, Centaureo subtilis-Thymetum capitati Terzi & D’Amico 2006, Asyneumo limonifolii-Saturejetum montanae Biondi & Guerra 2008, Cisto eriocephali-Phlomidetum fruticosae Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001, Phagnalo saxatilii-Saturejetum cuneifoliae Biondi & Guerra 2008, Helianthemo jonii-Thymetum capitati Biondi & Guerra 2008, Rhamno saxatilis-Saturejetum montanae Tomaselli et al. 2021, Ruto chalepensis-Salvietum trilobae, Biondi & Guerra 2008, Sedo ochroleuci-Saturejetum cuneifoliae Di Pietro & Misano 2010, Thymo-Lavanduletum multifidae Brullo, Minissale & Spampinato 1987, Ptilostemo-Helianthetum farinulentum Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001, Thymelaeo hirsutae-Rosmarinetum officinalis Brullo, Minissale & Spampinato 1997. The garrigues, due to their climatic and edaphic features, favor the settlement of thermo-xerophytic bryophyte communities as Pleurochaeto squarrosae-Cheilotheletum chloropidi Privitera & Puglisi 1996 (Puglisi et al. 2019). At higher syntaxonomic level, the Prodrome of the Italian vegetation classifies these Mediterranean garrigue communities in two classes, i.e., Cisto-Micromerietea for the central and eastern Mediterranean and Rosmarinetea officinalis for the western Mediterranean. Conversely, Mucina et al. (2016) consider one class only, Ononido-Rosmarinetea (Cisto-Micromerietea = syntax. syn.) as representative of all the Mediterranean scrub on base-rich substrates, distinguishing a western order (Rosmarinetalia officinalis) from an eastern one (Cisto-Micromerietalia julianae). The most of the aforementioned associations belong to two alliances of Cisto-Micrtomeretalia, such as Cisto-Ericion manipuliflorae (lower hilly belt) and Cytiso spinescentis-Satureion montanae (upper hilly belt–lower montane belt). However, as regards the Salvia officinalis communities and the coenological circumscription of the whole alliance Cytiso spinescentis-Satureion montanae, there is not a general agreement, especially as regards their classification at higher syntaxonomical rank. For more in-depth analysis on this topic, we refer to the following papers: Biondi et al. 1995, 2014a, 2014c; Brullo et al. 1996; Allegrezza et al. 1997; Pirone and Tammaro 1997; Di Pietro et al. 2002; Di Pietro 2011; Cutini et al. 2007; Mucina et al. 2016; Terzi et al. 2021; Tomaselli et al. 2021.
Dynamics and contacts. The dwarf garrigues in issue may act as permanent vegetation (highly rocky outcrops) or secondary vegetation (deeper soils), and are in spatial contact with the ephemeral herbaceous vegetation of Tuberarietea guttati, the dry grasslands of Festuco-Brometea or pseudosteppes of Lygeo-Stipetea, nano-phanerophytic garrigues (e.g., Cistus sp. pl. dominated garrigues) of Cisto-Micromerietalia julianae, shrub communities of Rhamno-Prunetea and Quercetea ilicis (Pistacio lentisci-Rhamnetalia alaterni), forest vegetation of Quercetalia ilicis and of Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae. It can also be in contact with chasmophytic vegetation of Asplenietea trichomanis and with bryophyte communities of Psoretea decipientis Mattick ex Follmann 1974 (De Faveri and Nimis 1982; Brullo et al. 1997; Terzi and D’Amico 2006; Biondi and Guerra 2008; Di Pietro and Misano 2010; Puglisi et al. 2019; Tomaselli et al. 2021).
Distribution. Coastal, hilly, and submontane belts of all the Italian southern regions (Fig. 8; Figs. 9, 10; Tab. 8; Online Resource 2) as well as in Sicily, Sardinia and Italian peninsula (Gehu and Biondi 1988; Taffetani and Biondi 1989; Corbetta et al. 1992; Brullo et al. 1987a, 1987b, 2001; Cutini et al. 2007; Tomaselli et al. 2008, 2011; Forte et al. 2011; Tomaselli and Sciandrello 2017; Veronico et al. 2017; Panuccio et al. 2018; Spampinato et al. 2019a, b). Its distribution extends also to other Mediterranean territories (Brullo et al. 1997).
Pressures and threats. The main factors threatening the conservation of this habitat type are overgrazing (A10—2.3), fire (H04—7.1), agricultural conversion (A01—2.1), afforestation (B01—2.2), urbanization, and touristic expansion (F01—1.1) in some areas. Garrigues are included in the European Red List of Habitats resulting Least Concern (LC) assessment (Janssen et al. 2016).
Centuries-old olive groves
Macrocategory: 63 Sclerophillous grazed forests (dehesas).
Correspondence with other habitat classification systems
Eunis: G2.91—Olea europaea groves.
CORINE Biotopes: 83.111—Traditional olive groves.
Description. Olive groves characterized by centuries-old trees of Olea europaea. They may derive from transformations of the Mediterranean scrub by grafting wild olive trees, or from plantations made in past centuries of wild olive trees grafted with different agronomic varieties of Olea europaea.
Closest habitat type of the Annex I
9320: Olea and Ceratonia forests.
Importance. The centuries-old olive groves are cultivated using traditional, low environmental impact techniques and create a semi-natural habitat that has remained unchanged for centuries. They are cultivated ecosystems typical of Mediterranean territories, characterized by a good level of naturalness, rich in biodiversity where cultivated and spontaneous species coexist, and some of these latter are of considerable conservation interest (Crocè 1999; Gangale and Uzunov 2003; Calabrese et al. 2012, 2015; Perrino et al. 2011, 2014; Perrino and Calabrese 2014; Cohen et al. 2015). Biondi et al. (2007), and later, Casavecchia et al. (2021) have proposed the inclusion in Annex I to HD of the new habitat type, named “Centuries-old olive groves with evergreen Quercus spp. and arborescent matorral”, because these environments fit two criteria for the identification of habitat types of Community interest: they are in danger of disappearing in their natural range and represent exceptional examples of typical characteristics of the Mediterranean biogeographic region. However, even if this habitat type is referred by the Authors to the Macrotype 63 “Sclerophillous grazed forests (dehesas)”, it is then phytosociologically framed within the Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae and described by a list of diagnostic species including exclusively shrub and tree species mostly of Quercetea ilicis. In doing so, this habitat type includes only the olive groves that are no longer cultivated for a long time and where, in the absence of cultural practices, evergreen sclerophyllous species take over as a consequence of the succession dynamics that tend toward the formations of potential natural vegetation of the Mediterranean scrub (Blasi et al. 2000; Di Pietro and Filibeck 2001; Di Pietro and Blasi 2002). In our proposal, we refer also to centuries-old olive groves sometimes terraced and bordered by dry stone walls, that are currently cultivated, even if using the traditional techniques and that constitute an integral and significant part of the Mediterranean culture and environment. It partially matches the new habitat type, proposed by Fois et al. (2021) for the Sardinia region, “Mediterranean wooded pasturelands”, subtype 2 “wooded pasturelands dominated by wild olive and carob trees”. Traditionally cultivated and abandoned centuries-old olive groves are two aspects of the same vanishing landscape (Vos and Meekes 1999), both of which risk disappearing either through intensification of agricultural practices or total abandonment of cultivation. The list of species of conservation interest reported below in the text is in accordance with Gangale and Uzunov (2003) and Perrino et al. (2014). Centuries-old olive groves are an important habitat providing nourishment and refuge to numerous animal species, many of which are priority species and listed in annexes II and IV of the HD (Biondi et al. 2007, 2014a, b, c; Marzano and Scarafino 2012).
Subtypes and variants. Two subtypes can be here proposed:
-
(a)
centuries-old olive groves subject to traditional agricultural practices;
-
(b)
centuries-old olive groves evolving toward Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae shrublands.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species: Plant, woody species: Olea europaea var. europaea, Olea europaea var. sylvestris, Ceratonia siliqua, Prunus domestica, P. dulcis, Ficus carica, Pyrus communis, Quercus ilex, Q. pubescens, Q. trojana, Punica granatum, Pistacia lentiscus, Phillyrea angustifolia, Sorbus domestica, Myrtus communis, Rhamnus alaternus; herbaceous species: Anisantha diandra, Arabidopsis thaliana, Avena barbata, Calendula arvensis, Capsella bursa-pastoris, C. rubella, Cardamine hirsuta, Crepis neglecta, C. sancta, Diplotaxis erucoides, D. tenuifolia, Euphorbia helioscopia, Fumaria officinalis, Geranium molle, Hypochaeris achyrophorus, Lamium amplexicaule, Medicago orbicularis, M. truncatula, Muscari neglectum, Myosotis arvensis, Ornithogalum gussonei, O. divergens, Papaver rhoeas, Rumex bucephalophorus, Sagina apetala, Saxifraga tridactylites, Sherardia arvensis, Sinapis alba, Tordylium apulum, Vicia villosa. Reptiles: Cyrtopodion kotschyi; Birds: Certhia brachydactyla, Turdus viscivorus, Sylvia melanocephala, Turdus philomelos. Species of conservation interest: Artemisia campestris subsp. variabilis, Barlia robertiana, Biscutella maritima, Crepis apula, Erucastrum virgatum, Muscari parviflorum, Ophrys bertolonii, O. incubacea, Orchis italica, O. purpurea, Pseudopodospermum hispanicum subsp. neapolitanum, and Triticum uniaristatum.
Dynamics and contacts. The abandonment of olive cultivation favors the natural evolution toward Mediterranean maquis formations of the Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae; over time, the vegetation may evolve toward forest vegetation of Quercetea ilicis.
Phytosociological reference. The centuries-old olive groves cultivated in the traditional way of subtype (a) (Tab. 9, 5 relevés, area: mean, minimum and maximum 100 m2, mean number of species: 30; Online Resource 1) are characterized by a large number of herbaceous nitrophilous and sub-nitrophilous species of the Stellarietea mediae. However, many species of the Tuberarietea guttatae are also present; this class includes the ephemeral, xerophilous and thermophilous, non-nitrophilous annual plant communities with a short winter-spring growth cycle.
Distribution. Apulia, Calabria (Fig. 11; Fig. 12; Tab. 10; Online Resource 2) and other regions of southern and central Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia (Casavecchia et al. 2021; Fois et al. 2021; Guarino et al. 2021). Inventories of centuries-old olive groves are available for Italy and other European territories (Ismaili 2018).
Pressures and threats. Centuries-old olive groves are at risk of disappearing as a result of the changing of the socio-economic conditions of the rural populations. In many regions, such as Calabria and Apulia, ancient olive trees are uprooted to decorate gardens (G09—5.2). In other cases, they were eliminated because due to their low productivity and poor economic yield and replaced with more modern plantings made with varieties suitable for mechanical harvesting (A01—2.1.). Olive groves near residential areas are cleared for urban development (F01—1.1). Xylella fastidiosa infestations are a serious threat to the centuries-old olive groves of southern Apulia (I05—8.5), generating severe economic repercussions affecting not only farmers and olive oil producers, but directly or indirectly the local society (Saponari et al. 2019; Scortichini 2020; Ali et al. 2021). It should be emphasized that the proposal of a new habitat type, based on traditional cultivation of centuries-old olive groves that can also include areas of active cultivation, is a delicate topic, because it would impose management rules on the owners who should be the guardians of this habitat type and of a traditional vanishing landscape.
Mofettes and mud volcanoes
Macrocategory: 83—Other rocky habitats.
Correspondence with other habitat classification
EUNIS: H6.1—Active volcanic features.
CORINE Biotopes: 66.6—Fumaroles, solfataras, and mofettes.
Description. Phenomena of secondary volcanism characterized by cold emissions of carbon dioxide, various other gases, water, or mud.
Closest habitat type of the Annex I
8320: Fields of lava and natural excavations.
The proposed habitat type differs from fumaroles because set on sedimentary sequences and characterized by low temperatures. It includes phenomena commonly referred to as “mofettes” or “mud volcanoes”.
Importance. Mofettes and mud volcanoes are extreme habitats located in volcanic or tectonically active areas that strongly influence the presence of living beings. Mofettes are important sites for studying the action of CO2 on living organisms. Dry CO2 gas exhalations at ambient temperatures change the living conditions in the soil so much, that the community consists of few highly specialized microbial species. The food web in the soil become less efficient in the degradation of organic material, which then accumulates in large amounts in the ground (Schime 2016). Carbon dioxide influences the presence of living beings according to an ecological gradient. The vascular flora growing on the areas less exposed to gases is generally paucispecific and strictly related to the potential of the surrounding vegetation. A few vascular plants adapt to the conditions of anoxia and acidity and settle closer to the source of CO2. In the Tuscany mofettes, Agrostis stolonifera is among the best-adapted vascular plants (Selvi 1998).
In Campania, Haworth et al. (2010) studied the population of Agrostis canina growing close to natural springs of Mefite d’Ansanto (AV) emitting CO2, SO2, and H2S (Paoletti et al. 2005); the authors showed that individuals living in these so harsh conditions possess resistance to toxic gases and are adapted to grow at elevated CO2 levels, even if this resistance is not associated with a reduction in stomatal index. In the German mofettes, Pfanz et al. (2019) point out that the number of species and the vegetation cover decrease with increasing CO2 concentration and only a few marsh species such as Carex acutiformis and Phragmites australis grow closer to the emission areas.
Mud volcanoes are landforms formed by the expulsion of water, gas, and mud which originate from a sedimentary sequence, often from great depth (Martinelli and Judd 2004). In mud volcanoes, the precipitation of salts contained in the rising waters leads to considerable salinity of the substrate, allowing the sporadic presence of only a few halophytes, such as species of the genera Salsola and Suaeda, that structure pioneer plant assemblages growing on fresh mud-volcanic flows (Korzhenevsky and Klyukin 1991; Guarino et al. 2021).
The need to revise the Interpretation Manual and include Mud volcanoes among the habitats of community interest was also highlighted by the EEC “Group of Experts on Protected Areas and Ecological Networks” (CoE 2018) who also included this habitat type among those endangered requiring specific conservation measures (CoE 2019).
Subtypes and variants. Two subtypes can be here proposed:
-
(a)
mofettes: natural sources mainly of carbon dioxide, wet cold (small gurgling ponds) or only cold, with presence of paucispecific communities formed by organisms adapted to these extreme environments with very low pH values. Among these species, acid-tolerant unicellular algae such as Viridiella fridericiana and Ochromonas vulcanica are reported (Albertano et al. 1991, 1994);
-
(b)
mud volcanoes: mud natural sources, characterized by the emission of clay mixed with water and gas, with morphology variable in relation to the characteristics of the mud, the viscosity, the interstitial pressure, as well as the topography of the area.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species. Mofettes, Algae: Viridiella fridericiana and Ochromonas vulcanica. Vascular plants: Agrostis canina, A. stolonifera. Mud volcanoes, Vascular plants: Salsola sp. pl., Suaeda sp. pl.
Phytosociological reference. In close proximity of the mud volcanoes, a halophilous vegetation grows on the salty clays, which can be classified in the classes Thero-Suaedetea splendentis Rivas-Martínez 1972 and Festuco-Puccinellietea Soó ex Vicherek 1973 (Korzhenevsky and Klyukin 1991).
Distribution: Campania, Basilicata, Calabria (Fig. 13a, b; Fig. 14; Tab. 11a, b; Online Resource 2), and other regions of Italy (Martinelli and Judd 2004; Minissale et al. 2019; Guarino et al. 2021); but it is also known for many other places of the world preferentially located along faults and tectono-sedimentary accretionary wedges, or are characteristic of thick deep sedimentary basins of continental margins (Mazzini and Etiope 2017).
Pressures and threats. Mofettes and mud volcanoes are affected by various anthropogenic activities that transform the environment for productive purposes. Mofettes are sometimes destroyed and transformed into industrial sites for the storage of carbon dioxide (C03, F03—1.2). These sites are sometimes used as waste dumps (F09—9.4).
Mediterranean drip** cliffs (Adiantetalia)
Macrocategory: 83—Other rocky habitats.
Correspondence with other classification systems
EUNIS: H3.41—Mediterranean wet inland cliffs.
CORINE Biotopes: 62.51—Mediterranean wet inland cliffs.
Description. Cliffs with water percolation of Adiantetalia in Mediterranean regions, colonized by hygrophilous vegetation characterized by carpets of mosses on which grow various species of pteridophytes and spermatophytes.
Closest habitat type of the Annex I
7220: Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratoneurion).
The plant communities of the Adiantetalia are often referred to Habitat 7220 which, however, is characterized by different ecological conditions and floristic composition. This habitat type, in fact, concerns hard water springs with active formation of travertine or tufa due to Cratoneurion lime-encrusted moss mats, while vascular plants are rare or absent.
Importance. Drip** cliffs and walls in the Mediterranean environment are characterized by a water-soaked moss layer on which some vascular plants grow, especially pteridophytes of considerable phytogeographical interest, often threatened by extinction, such as Woodwardia radicans, included in Annex II of HD, and in the IUCN Red List with the status of “Endangered” for the Mediterranean basin (De Bélair 2010), “Vulnerable” for Europe (Christenhusz et al. 2017) and Italy (Spampinato and Puglisi 2009), and Critically Endangered (CE) for Sicily (Crisafulli et al. 2021).
Subtypes and variants. Two subtypes can be here proposed:
-
(a)
communities dominated by Adiantum capillus-veneris and rich in bryophytes that grow on siliceous or calcareous drip** cliffs that can contribute to the genesis of travertine;
-
(b)
fern-rich communities of shady drip** siliceous cliffs with Woodwardia radicans and other large ferns in narrow ravines.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species. Pteridophytes: Adiantum capillus-veneris, Osmunda regalis, Phyllitis scolopendrium subsp. scolopendrium, Pteris vittata, P. cretica, Struthiopteris spicant. Angiosperms: Samolus valerandi, Trachelium caeruleum subsp. caeruleum, T. caeruleum subsp. lanceolatum. Bryophytes: Conocephalum conicum, Didymodon tophaceus, Dumortiera hirsuta, Eucladium verticillatum, Palustriella commutata, and Pellia endiviifolia (Cortini Pedrotti 1992). Species of conservation interest. Pteridophytes: Woodwardia radicans. Angiosperms: **uicula hirtiflora, P. poldinii, and P. vallis-regiae.
Phytosociological reference. Plant communities of cliffs with water percolation in Mediterranean regions are included in the Adiantetea class (Deil 1998). Many Adiantum capillus-veneris communities rich in bryophytes are known for southern Italy (Tab. 12, 22 relevés, area: mean 22 m2, minimum 2 m2, maximum 40 m2, mean number of species: 17; Online Resource 1), as Eucladio verticillati-Adiantetum capilli-veneris, Adianto capilli-veneris-Osmundetum regalis, Adianto capilli-veneris-Pteridetum vittatae (Tab 12b; Online Resource 1). Communities rich in large ferns of shady drip** siliceous cliffs are referred to Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii alliance (Biondi et al. 2014b) which includes Conocephalo conici-Woodwardietum radicantis and Thamnobryo alopecuri-Phyllitidetum scolopendrium (Tab. 12a, Online Resource 1) (Brullo et al. 1993, 2001). Mucina et al. (2016) classified the alliance Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii in the class Polypodietea, which is considered ecologically separated by Adiantetea being mainly composed of fern- and moss-rich communities.
Dynamics and contacts. Adiantetelia order gathers permanent communities tied to drip** rocks. This habitat type is sometimes located at the mouth of the caves referable to habitat 8310: “Caves not yet exploited for tourism”. In gorges, they take catenal contact with the forest communities of the habitat 9180*: “Tilio-Acerion forests of slopes, screes and ravines”, mixed mesophilic broad-leaved forests growing on steep rocky slopes or gorges, with the evergreen forests dominated by holm oaks of the habitat 9340: “Quercus ilex and Quercus rotundifolia forests”, or with secondary evergreen scrub (Piñar Fuentes et al. 2017).
Distribution. Coastal, hilly, and submontane belts of all the Italian southern regions (Fig. 15; Fig. 16; Tab. 13; Online Resource 2), Sicily (Brullo et al. 1989), and of many other Mediterranean territories (Deil 1998; Foucault 2015).
Pressures and threats. Water uptaking, or the modification of the water regime (C14—7.2), are the main threats to this habitat type. Moreover, the logging activities (B05, B09—5.3) in the adjacent areas, by altering the microclimatic conditions, are a factor of considerable disturbance.
Acidophilous oak woods with Quercus petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica of the southern Apennines and Sicily
Macrocategory: 92 Mediterranean deciduous forests.
Correspondence with other classification systems
EUNIS: G1.7513—Southern Italic Quercus petraea woods.
CORINE Biotopes: 41.7513—Southern Italic Quercus petraea woods.
Description. Southern sessile oak-dominated woodlands typical of acidic, draining soils with mor humus on metamorphic and igneous rocks, sandstones, and sandy and gravelly soils through the temperate of supra-Mediterranean belts.
Closest habitat type of the Annex I
91M0: Pannonian-Balkanic turkey oak-sessile oak forests.
This habitat type concerns sub-continental thermo-xerophilous Quercus cerris, Q. petraea, or Q. frainetto forests of the Pannonic and northern Balkanic hilly regions and in lower mountains distributed generally between 250 and 600 (800) m a.s.l. and developed on varied substrates (European Commission 2013). In the Italian manual of habitat interpretation, Biondi et al. (2012) expanded the significance of habitat 91M0 in order to include the subacidophilic formations of the Q. petraea mountain range of the central-southern Apennines and Sicily.
Importance. The oak forests of southern Italy are an example of relict vegetation of high phytogeographic interest (Petit et al. 2002). Brullo et al. (1999) referred to the southern populations of Q. petraea as a subspecies endemic to southern Italy and Sicily (Q. petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica). Although the taxonomic classification of southern Italy white oaks is currently being updated on the basis of recent in-depth studies on their micro- and macromorphological traits (Fortini et al. 2015a; Musarella et al. 2018; Di Pietro et al. 2020) as well as on their genetic features (Antonecchia et al. 2015; Fortini et al. 2015b; Di Pietro et al. 2021), there is no doubt that the sessile oak communities of southern Italy represent refuge areas for the white oak species genetic lineages from which the post-glacial migration started (Dumolin-Lapegue et al. 1997). Many stands of Q. petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica woods are composed of centuries-old oak trees, as is the case of the 930 years old oak named “Demetra” in the Aspromonte National Park (Piovesan et al. 2020). Several nemoral plants endemic to the southern Apennines and Sicily grow in the undergrowth of these oak groves, such as Epipactis meridionalis, Aquilegia dumeticola, and A. sicula, and this allows to distinguish the sessile-oak woods of southern Italy from all the other types of sessile-oak woods of southern Europe.
Subtypes and variants. None.
Diagnostic species. Dominant and frequent species: Quercus petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica, Carpinus betulus, Aristolochia lutea, Drymochloa drymeja subsp. exaltata, Euphorbia meuselii, Festuca heterophylla, Hypochaeris laevigata, Ilex aquifolium, Silene italica subsp. sicula, Luzula sylvatica subsp. sicula, Rabelera holostea, Taxus baccata. Species of conservation interest: Aquilegia sicula, A. dumeticola, Arabis collina subsp. rosea, Epipactis meridionalis, Helleborus viridis subsp. bocconei, Lathyrus jordanii, and Teucrium siculum subsp. siculum.
Phytosociological reference. The communities of Q. petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica of Southern Italy (Tab. 14, 19 relevés, area: mean, minimum and maximum 100 m2, mean number of species: 26; Online Resource 1) are described as Aristolochio luteo-Quercetum austrotyrrhenicae, while those from Sicily as Ilici aquifolii-Quercetum austrothyrrenicae. Both these associations were originally included in the Geranium versicoloris-Fagion sylvaticae (Brullo et al. 1996, 2001).
Dynamics and contacts. Quercus petraea subsp. austrotyrrhenica woods grow on particular edaphic conditions, as watersheds and in the steep areas with poorly developed soils, were they replace the climax Fagus sylvatica or Q. cerris forests of the mountain belt. Regressive successional stages are the bushes of Prunetalia spinosae on neutral-to-sub-acidic substrates and those of Cytisetea scopario-striati on typically acidic substrates (Brullo et al. 2001).
Distribution. Mountain belt of Basilicata and Calabria (Brullo et al. 2001; Fascetti and Lapenna 2006) (Fig. 17; Fig. 18; Tab 15; Online Resource 2). This habitat type occurs also in northern Sicily (Bagnato et al. 2012).
Pressures and threats. The main factors threatening the conservation of this habitat type are overgrazing (A10—2.3.1), which affects the renewal of tree species, deforestation (B05, B09—5.3) and fire which systematically affects the forests of southern Italy (H04—7.1). Janssen et al. (2016) assess acidophilous Quercus petraea/robur woodlands of Europe as Vulnerable (VU) despite their large distribution range, because the majority of these forests show a strong reduction in quality.
5 Discussion and conclusions
Habitats are the fundamental indicators of biodiversity and the main reference points for the European nature conservation policy (Musarella et al. 2020; Bonari et al. 2021). As it is widely known, good habitat conservation status improves biodiversity, to which ecosystem functions are linked, both directly (e.g., productivity) and indirectly (e.g., stability). Moreover, biodiversity enhances resilience that is the capacity of an ecosystem to recover from external pressures. Effects of conservation status of habitat types on biodiversity have been extensively analyzed and reported in scientific literature, as well as their potential to maintain or improve the provisioning of ecosystem services (Loreau et al. 2001; Bullock et al. 2011; Isbell et al. 2015). The European Environmental Agency (EEA) approach on ecosystem map** (and related services) and assessment builds on the Map** and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES; Maes et al. 2015) initiative. In this framework, the classification of ecosystem types and assessment of ecosystem services is based on a habitat perspective, where the underlying assumption is that at a national or regional scale, habitat types represent meaningful units forming the basis of the ecosystems for which the status and trends of the various services are reported (Potschin and Haines-Young 2013). The size and conservation status of natural habitats have direct implications on the provision of ecosystem services; assessments at European scale show that habitats with a favorable conservation status provide more biodiversity and have a higher potential to supply, in particular, “Regulation” and “Cultural” ecosystem services than habitats in an unfavorable conservation status (Maes et al. 2012). The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) classification is the framework adopted by the common implementation of the ecosystem assessment approach in the EU (Haines-Young and Potschin-Young 2018); it identifies three main categories of ecosystem services (i.e., Provisioning; Regulation and Maintenance; Cultural); each of them includes numerous divisions and classes. Focusing on the habitat types here proposed, aquatic ecosystems (rivers, lakes, groundwaters, and wetlands) support the delivery of crucial services, such as fish production, water provisioning, and recreation. Moreover, they have an essential role in water retention and water quality regulation (i.e., water purification); in particular, in the case of streams and springs, they contribute also to maintaining water flow for water supply and hydrological cycle (Grizzetti et al. 2016). Coastal wetlands such as saline and brackish helophytic meadows dominated by reeds, rushes, and sedges are widely recognized as essential for representing habitats that act as nurseries, spawning areas, or migratory routes; these habitats and the connectivity among them are crucial for the successful life cycle of species. Another service provided by these coastal environments is natural defense of the coastal zone against inundation and erosion from waves, storms, or sea-level rise (Liquete et al. 2013). All these ecosystem services fall within the Regulation & Maintenance category. Forests provide maintenance of soil conditions (soil stabilization and erosion control) and of climate and air quality at local-to-regional scale (i.e., micro- and regional climate regulation; Krieger 2001). Maintaining old olive groves is sure of relevance for preserving traditional management practices and landscapes (cultural heritage; Cultural section in CICES) and, more in general, all elements of wilderness provide enjoyment and opportunities for experiential–physical interactions with the natural environment.
To go forward in the direction of possible rounds of revision or integration of the HD, the correct definition of habitat types is a fundamental prerequisite and, as discussed above, this must be based on a precise phytosociological diagnosis and syntaxonomical classification (Bagella et al. 2007; Biondi et al. 2012; Cano-Ortiz et al. 2021). The numerous studies carried out so far on the vegetation of southern Italy have shown that the addition of some habitat types to Annex I of the HD would be highly desirable to guarantee adequate and explicit protection of the high degree of biodiversity occurring there (especially considering that the most of this biodiversity is due to endemic or rare species). Furthermore, the results of this study, with the characterization and distribution of rare and threatened habitat types, could represent a contribution to the implementation of the Red List of Ecosystems that is being drawn up for Italy (Capotorti et al. 2020). The assessment of the protection status of the proposed habitat types (Figs. 19, 20; Online resources 4) shows that most of the sites fall within protected areas (Natura 2000 network and Italian protected areas), with the exception of “Mofettes and mud volcanoes”, whose sites fall outside protected areas. As a general consideration, the inclusion of the proposed new habitat types in the HD would require the involvement of local institutions, management bodies, and stakeholders (e.g., to meet the need to redefine the management plans of the Natura 2000 sites, the possible identification of new sites, a greater effort in monitoring activities, the need to build the social consensus and to find the suitable financial resources necessary for the implementation of new conservation strategies, etc.); however, with the exception of the old olive groves, the new habitat types proposed here have characteristics or fall within areas generally of little interest to landowners. Despite the awareness of the difficulties of including new habitat types in the HD, we believe that it is important to keep alive the attention of the international scientific and political community regarding the existing issues in the protection of natural and semi-natural habitat types in southern Italy.
Based on an initiative of the Italian Society of Vegetation Science and the Vegetation group of the Italian Botanical Society, other contributions have been recently provided for the definition of new habitat types suitable for possible amendments of the HD Annex I, focusing on central Italy, Sicily and Sardinia (Guarino et al. 2021; Fois et al. 2021; Casavecchia et al. 2021). Some of them (e.g., “Mediterranean drip** cliffs (Adiantetalia)”, “Mediterranean helophytic sub-halophilous meadows”, “Mofettes and mud volcanoes”, “Centuries-old olive groves”) correspond, and partially overlap with some habitat types here proposed. Moreover, the habitat types proposed in this contribution have been well characterized and the affinity with habitats already included in the HD has been highlighted; therefore, this study could represent a useful starting point for the implementation of an extension of the habitat subtypes present in the habitats already included in the HD. It would be desirable if all these contributions could be merged in an integrated, comprehensive, and unified proposal at national and, hopefully, at supranational level and provide a basis for updating the Annex I, as part of ad hoc initiatives for the thirtieth anniversary of HD.
Syntaxonomic scheme (based on the prodrome of the Italian vegetation)
Montio fontanae-Cardaminetea amarae Br.-Bl.& Tüxen ex Klika & Hadac 1944
Montio fontanae-Cardaminetalia amarae Pawlowski in Pawlowski, Sokolowski & Wallisch 1928
Caricion remotae Kästner 1941
-
Adenostylo-Soldanelletum calabrellae Signorello 1986 corr. Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Rhynchocoryto-Alchemilletum austroitalicae Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Carici-Osmundetum regalis Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
Galio aparines-Urticetea dioicae Passarge ex Kopecký 1969
Impatienti noli-tangere-Stachyetalia sylvaticae Boullet, Géhu & Rameau in Bardat et al. 2004
Impatienti noli-tangere-Stachyion sylvaticae Görs ex Mucina in Mucina, Grabherr & Ellmauer 1993
-
Chrysosplenio-Cryptotaenietum thomasii Brullo & Furnari in Barbagallo et al. 1982
-
Digitali purpureae-Urticetum dioicae Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Petasito-Chaerophylletum calabrici Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Petagnaetum gussonei Brullo & Grillo 1978
Adiantetea capilli-veneris Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine Negre 1952
Adiantetalia capilli-veneris Br.-Bl. ex Horvatić 1939
Adiantion Br.-Bl. ex Horvatić 1939
-
Eucladio verticillati-Adiantetum capilli-veneris Braun-Blanq. ex Horvatić 1934
-
Adianto capilli-veneris-Osmundetum regalis Brullo, Lo Giudice & Privitera 1989
-
Adianto capilli-veneris-Pteridetum vittatae Brullo, Lo Giudice & Privitera 1989
-
**uicula hirtiflora communities
Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii Ubaldi ex Ubaldi Biondi in Biondi et al. 2014
-
Conocephalo conici-Woodwardietum radicantis Brullo, Lo Giudice & Privitera 1989
-
Thamnobryo alopecuri-Phyllitidetum scolopendrium Brullo, Privitera & Puglisi 1993
Phragmito australis-Magnocaricetea elatae Klika in Klika & Novák 1941
Scirpetalia compacti Heijný in Holub, et al. 1967 corr. Rivas-Martínez et al. 1980 (= Bolboschoenetalia maritimi Hejny in Holub et al. 1967)
Scirpion compacti Dahl & Hadac 1941 corr. Rivas-Martínez, Costa, Castroviejo & E. Valdés 1980 (= Scirpion maritimi Dahl et Hadac 1941)
-
Scirpetum maritimi (Christiansen 1934) R. Tx. 1937
-
Scirpetum maritimo-litoralis (Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952) O. de Bolòs 1962
-
Cyperetum distachyi Bolòs & Molinier 1984
Phragmitetalia australis Koch 1926
Phragmition communis Koch 1926
-
Phragmitetum communis (Koch 1926) Schmale 1939
Nasturtio officinalis-Glycerietalia fluitantis Pignatti 1953
Glycerio fluitantis-Sparganion neglecti Br.-Bl. & Sissingh in Boer 1942
-
Sparganietum erecti Roll 1938
-
Glycerietum notatae Kulczyński 1928
Apion nodiflori Segal in Westhoff & Den Held 1969
-
Helosciadietum nodiflori Br.-Bl. 1952
-
Polygono salicifolii-Nasturtietum officinalis Gehu & Biondi 1988
-
Apio nodiflori-Glycerietum plicatae Brullo & Spampinato 1988
Cisto cretici-Micromerietea julianae Oberdorfer ex Horvatić 1958
Cisto cretici-Ericetalia manipuliflorae Horvatic 1958
Cisto cretici-Ericion manipuliflorae Horvatic 1958
-
Saturejo cuneifoliae-Ericetum manipuliflorae Brullo et al. 1986
-
Chamaecytiso spinescentis-Genistetum michelii De Faveri & Nimis ex Biondi 2000
-
Centaureo subtilis-Thymetum capitati Terzi & D’Amico 2006
-
Asyneumo limonifolii-Saturejetum montanae Biondi & Guerra 2008
-
Phagnalo saxatili-Saturejetum cuneifoliae Biondi & Guerra 2008
-
Ruto chalepensis-Salvietum trilobae, Biondi & Guerra 2008
-
Helianthemo jonii-Thymetum capitati Biondi & Guerra 2008
-
Sedo ochroleuci-Saturejetum cuneifoliae Di Pietro & Misano 2010
-
Thymo-Lavanduletum multifidae Brullo, Minissale & Spampinato 1987
-
Cisto eriocephali-Phlomidetum fruticosae Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Ptilostemo-Helianthetum farinulentum Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Thymelaeo hirsutae-Rosmarinetum officinalis Brullo, Minissale & Spampinato 1987
-
Plocama calabrica and Dianthus longicaulis communities
-
Thymbra capitata and Fumana scoparia communities
-
Satureja cuneifolia and Euphorbia spinosa communities
-
Satureja cuneifolia and Thymbra capitata communities
-
Dianthus longicaulis communities
-
Tuberaria lignosa communities
Cytiso spinescentis-Saturejion montanae Pirone & Tammaro 1997
-
Rhamno saxatilis-Saturejetum montanae Tomaselli, Silletti & Forte 2021
-
Elaeoselino asclepii-Salvietum officinalis Lucchese, Persia & Pignatti 1995
-
Erico multiflorae-Salvietum officinalis Maiorca & Spampinato 1999
Querco roboris-Fagetea sylvaticae Br.-Bl. & Vlieger in Vlieger 1937
Fagetalia sylvaticae Pawłowski in Pawłowski, Sokołowski & Wallisch 1928
Geranio versicoloris-Fagion sylvaticae Gentile 1970
-
Aristolochio luteae-Quercetum austrotyrrhenicae Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001
-
Ilici aquifolii-Quercetum austrothyrrenicae Brullo et Marcenò in Brullo 1984 corr. Brullo, Giusso del Galdo, Minissale, Spampinato 2002
Psoretea decipientis Mattick ex Follmann 1974
Barbuletalia unguiculatae von Hübschmann 1960
Homalothecio aurei-Pleurochaetion squarrosae (Ros & Guerra 1987) Marstaller 1993
-
Pleurochaeto squarrosae-Cheilotheletum chloropodis Privitera & Puglisi 1996.
Data availability
The authors confrm that the data supporting the fndings of this study are available in the article and in Supplementary materials.
Abbreviations
- HD:
-
92/43/EEC “Habitat Directive”
References
Albertano P, Pollio A, Taddei R (1991) Viridiella fridericiana (Chlorococcales, Chlorophyta), a new species isolated from extremely acid environments. Phycologia 30(4):346–354
Albertano P, Pinto G, Pollio A (1994) Ecophysiology and ultrastructure of an acidophilic species of Ochromonas (Chrysophyceae, Ochromonadales). Arch Protistenkund 144(1):75–82
Aleffi M, Tacchi R, Poponessi S (2020) New checklist of the bryophytes of Italy. Cryptogam Bryol 41(13):147–195. https://doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2020v41a13
Ali BM, van der Werf W, Lansink AO (2021) Assessment of the environmental impacts of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in Puglia. Crop Prot 142:105519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105519
Allegrezza M, Biondi E, Formica E, Ballelli S (1997) La vegetazione dei settori rupestri calcarei dell’Italia centrale. Fitosociol 32:91–120
Angelini P, Casella L, Grignetti A, Genovesi P (eds) (2016) Manuali per il monitoraggio di specie e habitat di interesse comunitario (Direttiva 92/43/CEE) in Italia: habitat. ISPRA, Serie Manuali e linee guida 142/2016
Angiolini C, Viciani D, Bonari G, Lastrucci L (2017) Habitat conservation prioritization: a floristic approach applied to a Mediterranean wetland network. Plant Biosyst 151(4):598–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2016.1187678
Antonecchia G, Fortini P, Lepais O, Gerber S, Léger P, Scippa GS, Viscosi V (2015) Genetic structure of a natural oak community in central Italy, Evidence of gene flow between three sympatric white oak species (Quercus, Fagaceae). Ann for Res 58:205–216. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2015.415
Attorre F, Pignatti S, Spada F, Casella L, Agrillo E (2018) Introduction: vegetation science and the habitats directive: approaches and methodologies of a never-ending story. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 29:233–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-018-0716-5
Bagella S, Caria MC, Farris E, Filigheddu R (2007) Issues related to the classification of Mediterranean temporary wet habitats according with the European Union Habitats Directive. Fitosociol 44(2, Suppl. 1):245–249
Bagnato S, Merlino A, Mercurio R, Solano F, Scarfò F, Spampinato G (2012) Le basi conoscitive per il restauro forestale: il caso di Bosco Pomieri (Parco Regionale delle Madonie, Sicilia). Forest 9:8–19. https://doi.org/10.3832/efor0679-008
Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, Albano A, Alessandrini A, Ardenghi NMG, Astuti G, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, Banfi E, Barberis G, Bernardo L, Bouvet D, Bovio M, Cecchi L, Di Pietro R, Domina G, Fascetti S, Fenu G, Festi F, Foggi B, Gallo L, Gottschlich G, Gubellini L, Iamonico D, Iberite M, Jiménez-Mejías P, Lattanzi E, Marchetti D, Martinetto E, Masin RR, Medagli P, Passalacqua NG, Peccenini S, Pennesi R, Pierini B, Poldini L, Prosser F, Raimondo FM, Roma-Marzio F, Rosati L, Santangelo A, Scoppola A, Scortegagna S, Selvaggi A, Selvi F, Soldano A, Stinca A, Wagensommer RP, Wilhalm T, Conti F (2018) An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst 152:179–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996
Bellino A, Bellino L, Baldantoni D, Saracino A (2015) Evolution, ecology and systematics of Soldanella (Primulaceae) in the southern Apennines (Italy). BMC Evol Biol 15:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0433-y
Biondi E, Guerra V (2008) Vegetazione e paesaggio vegetale delle gravine arco jonico. Fitosociol 45(1, Suppl. 1):57–125
Biondi E, Ballelli S, Allegrezza M, Zuccarello V (1995) La vegetazione dell’ordine Brometalia erecti Br.-Bl. 1936 nell’Appennino (Italia). Fitosociol 30:3–45
Biondi E, Biscotti N, Casavecchia S, Marrese M (2007) ‘“Oliveti secolari”’: habitat nuovo proposto per l’inserimento nell’Allegato I della Direttiva (92/43 CEE). Fitosociol 44(2, Suppl. 1):213–218
Biondi E, Blasi C, Burrascano S, Casavecchia S, Copiz R, Del Vico E, Galdenzi D, Gigante D, Lasen C, Spampinato G, Venanzoni R, Zivkovic L (2009) Manuale Italiano di interpretazione degli habitat della Direttiva 92/43/CEE (Italian Interpretation Manual of the 92/43/EEC Directive Habitats). Retrived from http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/index.jsp. Accessed 1 Dec 2022
Biondi E, Burrascano S, Casavecchia S, Copiz R, Del Vico E, Galdenzi D, Gigante D, Lasen C, Spampinato G, Venanzoni R, Zivkovic L, Blasi C (2012) Diagnosis and syntaxonomic interpretation of Annex I Habitats (Dir. 92/43/EEC) in Italy at the alliance level. Plant Sociol 49(1):5–37. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2012491/01
Biondi E, Allegrezza M, Casavecchia S, Galdenzi D, Gasparri R, Pesaresi S, Vagge I, Blasi C (2014a) New and validated syntaxa for the checklist of Italian vegetation. Plant Biosyst 148(2):318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.892907
Biondi E, Blasi C, Allegrezza M, Anzellotti I, Azzella MM, Carli E, Casavecchia S, Copiz R, Delvico E, Facioni L, Galdenzi D, Gasparri R, Lasen C, Pesaresi S, Poldini SG, Taffetani F, Vagge I, Zitti S, Zivkovic L (2014b) Plant communities of Italy: the vegetation prodrome. Plant Biosyst 148:728–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.948527
Biondi E, Lasen C, Spampinato G, Zivkovic L, Angelini P (2014c) Habitat. In: Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, Ronchi F, Stoch F (eds) Specie e habitat di interesse comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, stato di conservazione e trend. ISPRA Serie Rapporti, Roma, 194/2014c, pp 107–110. ISBN: 978-88-448-0644-6
Blasi C, Michetti L (2005) Biodiversity and climate. In: Blasi C, Boitani L, La Posta S, Manes F, Marchetti M (eds) Biodiversity in Italy. Contribution to the national biodiversity strategy. Palombi Editori, Roma
Blasi C, Di Pietro R, Fortini P (2000) A phytosociological analysis of abandoned terraced olive grove shrublands in the Tyrrhenian district of Central Italy. Plant Biosyst 134:305–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500012331350475
Bonari G, Fantinato E, Lazzaro L, Sperandii MG, Acosta ATR, Allegrezza M, Assini S, Caccianiga M, Di Cecco V, Frattaroli A, Gigante D, Rivieccio G, Tesei G, Valle B, Viciani D, Albani Rocchetti G, Angiolini C, Badalamenti E, Barberis D, Barcella M, Bazan G, Bertacchi A, Bolpagni R, Bonini F, Bricca A, Buffa G, Calbi M, Cannucci S, Cao Pinna L, Caria MC, Carli E, Cascone S, Casti M, Cerabolini BEL, Copiz R, Cutini M, De Simone L, De Toma A, Dalle Fratte M, Di Martino L, Di Pietro R, Filesi L, Foggi B, Fortini P, Gennaio R, Gheza G, Lonati M, Mainetti A, Malavasi M, Marcenò C, Micheli C, Minuzzo C, Mugnai M, Musarella CM, Napoleone F, Nota G, Piga G, Pittarello M, Pozzi I, Praleskouskaya S, Rota F, Santini G, Sarmati S, Selvaggi A, Spampinato G, Stinca A, Tozzi FP, Venanzoni R, Villani M, Zanatta K, Zanzottera M, Bagella S (2021) Shedding light on typical species: implications for habitat monitoring. Plant Sociol 58(1):157–166. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2020581/08
Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Springer Verlag, Wien and New York, p 330
Brullo S, Grillo M (1978) Ricerche fitosociologiche sui pascoli dei Monti Nebrodi (Sicilia settentrionale). Not Fitosociol 13:26–61
Brullo S, Spampinato G (1990) La vegetazione dei corsi d’acqua della Sicilia. Boll Acc Gioenia Sci Nat 23(336):183–229
Brullo S, Minissale P, Signorello P, Spampinato G (1987a) Studio fitosociologico delle garighe ad Erica manipuliflora del Salento (Puglia meridionale). Arch Bot Biogeogr Ital 62(3–4):201–214
Brullo S, Minissale P, Spampinato G (1987b) Thymo-Lavanduletum multifidae associazione nuova del Cisto-Ericion rinvenuta nella Calabria meridionale. Boll Acc Gioenia Sci Nat 20(330):283–292
Brullo S, Lo GR, Privitera M (1989) La classe Adiantetea in Sicilia. Arch Bot Biogeogr Ital 65(1–2):81–99
Brullo S, Privitera M, Puglisi M (1993) Thamnobryo alopecuri-Phyllitidetum scolopendrium, nuova associazione centro-mediterranea della classe Adiantetea. Arch Bot Biogeogr Ital 68:35–43
Brullo S, Minissale P, Signorello P, Spampinato G (1996) Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione forestale della Sicilia. Colloq Phytosociol 24:635–647
Brullo S, Minissale P, Spampinato G (1997) La classe Cisto-Micromerietea nel Mediterraneo centrale e occidentale. Fitosociol 32:29–60
Brullo S, Guarino R, Siracusa G (1999) Revisione tassonomica delle querce caducifoglie in Sicilia. Webbia 54(1):1–72
Brullo S, Scelsi F, Spampinato G (2001) La Vegetazione dell’Aspromonte, Studio Fitosociologico. Laruffa Ed. s.l.r., Reggio Calabria
Budetta P, Calcaterra D, Corniello A, De Riso R, Ducci D, Santo A (1993) Appunti di Geologia dell’Appennino Meridionale con riferimento ai “rischi” ed alle risorse del territorio. Pubbl. 332, Ist Geol Appl Eliografia Ilardo, Napoli
Bulgarini F, Calvario E, Fraticelli F, Petretti F, Sarrocco S (eds) (1998) Libro rosso degli animali d’Italia—Vertebrati. WWF Italia, Roma
Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26(10):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
Bunce RGH, Metzger MJ, Jongman RHG, Brandt J, de Blust G, Elena-Rossello R, Groom GB, Halada L, Hofer G, Howard DC, Kovář P, Mücher CA, Padoa-Schioppa E, Paelinx D, Palo A, Perez-Soba M, Ramos IL, Roche P, Skånes H, Wrbka T (2008) A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landsc Ecol 23:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9173-8
Calabrese G, Tartaglini N, Ladisa G (2012) Study on biodiversity in century-old olive groves. CIHEAM—Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Bari, p 97
Calabrese G, Perrino EV, Ladisa G, Aly A, Tesfmichel Solomon M, Mazdarc S, Benedetti A, Ceglie FG (2015) Short-term effects of different soil management practices on biodiversity and soil quality of Mediterranean ancient olive orchards. Org Agr 5:209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0120-8
Cano Carmona E, Quinto-Canas R, Cano-Ortiz A, Musarella CM (2022) Introductory chapter: methodological aspects for the study of vegetation. In: Cano Carmona E, Cano-Ortiz A, Quinto-Canas R, Musarella CM (eds) Vegetation index and dynamics. IntechOpen, London
Cano-Ortiz A, Musarella CM, Piñar-Fuentes JC, Quinto-Canas R, Pinto-Gomes CJ, Spampinato G, Ighbareyeh JMH, Del Río S, Cano E (2021) Forest and arborescent scrub habitats of special interest for SCIs in Central Spain. Land 10:183. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020183
Capotorti G, Zavattero L, Copiz R, Del Vico E, Facioni L, Bonacquisti S, Frondoni R, Allegrezza M, Attorre F, Bacchetta G, Barni E, Biondi E, Brandmayr P, Caccianiga MS, Carli E, Casavecchia S, Cerabolini BEL, Chiarucci A, Dell’Olmo L, Fascetti S, Fenu G, Galdenzi D, Gargano D, Gianguzzi LA, Manes F, Oddi L, Orsenigo S, Paolanti M, Pinna MS, Rosati L, Rossi G, Sarandrea P, Siniscalco C, Spampinato G, Tazzari ER, Tesei G, Venanzoni R, Viciani D, Blasi C (2020) Implementation of IUCN criteria for the definition of the red list of ecosystems in Italy. Plant Biosyst 154(6):1007–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2020.1839806
Cardoso P (2012) Habitats Directive species lists: urgent need of revision. Insect Conserv Divers 5(2):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00140.x
Casavecchia S, Allegrezza M, Angiolini C, Biondi E, Bonini F, Del Vico E, Fanfarillo E, Foggi B, Gigante D, Gianguzzi L, Lasen C, Maccherini S, Mariotti M, Pesaresi S, Pirone G, Poldini L, Selvi F, Venanzoni R, Viciani D, Vidali M, Ciaschetti G (2021) Proposals for improvement of Annex I of Directive 92/43/EEC: Central Italy. Plant Sociol 58(2):99–118. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2021582/08
Christenhusz M, Bento Elias R, Dyer R, Ivanenko Y, Rouhan G, Rumsey F, Väre H (2017) Woodwardia radicans. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: e.T162393A85426487
Codogno M, Corbetta F, Puntillo D (1984) Valutazione ecologica delle stazioni di Lereschia thomasii (Ten.) Boiss. In: Calabria. Biogeogr n.s., vol 10, pp 179–184
CoE (2019) Interpretation manual of the habitats listed in resolution no. 4 (1996) listing endangered natural habitats requiring specific conservation measures, third draft version 2015. https://rm.coe.int/16807469e7. Accessed 1 Dec 2022
CoE (2018) Ukrainian proposal for 4 additional habitats to resolution no. 4 (1996). https://rm.coe.int/ukrainian-proposal-for-4-additional-habitats-to-resolution-no-4-1996-/16808d2a6a. Accessed 1 Dec 2022
Cohen M, Bilodeau C, Alexandre F, Godron M, Andrieu J, Grésillon E, Garlatti F, Morganti A (2015) What is the plant biodiversity in a cultural landscape? A comparative, multi-scale and interdisciplinary study in olive groves and vineyards (Mediterranean France). Agric Ecosyst Environ 212:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.023
Corbetta F (1970) Lineamenti della vegetazione macrofitica dei laghi di Lesina e Varano. Giorn Bot Ital 104:165–191
Corbetta F, Gratani L, Moriconi M, Pirone G (1992) Lineamenti vegetazionali e caratterizzazione ecologica delle spiagge dell’arco jonico da Taranto alla foce del Sinni. Colloq Phytosociol 19:461–521
Cortini Pedrotti C (1992) Check list of the mosses of Italy. Flora Mediterr 2:119–221
Crisafulli A, Picone RM, Spampinato G (2021) Woodwardia radicans in Sicilia: distribuzione, ecologia e stato di conservazione. Not Soc Bot Ital 5:14–16
Crocè D (1999) La risorsa “ulivo” nella Piana di Gioia Tauro: stato attuale della coltura e indagine preliminare per la realizzazione di un Parco Naturale degli Ulivi. Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Tesi di Laurea
Cutini M, Cancellieri L, Ceschin S, Lucchese F, Caneva G (2007) Analisi cenologica e sintassonomia delle garighe a Salvia officinalis L. lucane nel quadro dei salvieti peninsulari (Basilicata, Appennino meridionale). Webbia 62:225–244
De Bélair G (2010) Woodwardia radicans. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2010: e.T162393A5585162
De Castro O, Sepe F, Di Maio A, Cennamo P, De Luca P, Gianguzzi L, Menale B (2013) Genetic structure in the paleoendemic and endangered Petagnaea gussonei (Spreng.) Rauschert (Saniculoideae, Apiaceae) and implications for its conservation. Plant Syst Evol 299(1):209–223
De Faveri R, Nimis PL (1982) Chamaecytiso-genistetum michelii a new thorny cushions association in the Gargano peninsula (SE-Italy). Ecol Mediterr 8(3):85–98. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.1982.197
de Foucault B (2015) Contribution au prodrome des végétations de France: les Adiantetea capilli-veneris Braun-Blanq. ex Braun-Blanq. Roussine & Nègre. Acta Bot Gall 162(4):375–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2015.1108868
Deil U (1998) The class Adiantetea in the Mediterranean area—a state of knowledge report. Ann Bot (roma) 56(1):73–78
Di Pietro R (2011) New dry grassland associations from the Ausoni-Aurunci mountains (central Italy), syntaxonomical updating and discussion on the higher rank syntaxa. Hacquetia 10(2):183–231. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-011-0011-9T
Di Pietro R, Blasi C (2002) A phytosociological analysis of abandoned olive groves grasslands of Ausoni mountains (Tyrrhenian district of Central Italy). Lazaroa 23:79–93
Di Pietro R, Filibeck G (2001) Terrazzamenti abbandonati e recupero della vegetazione spontanea: il caso dei Monti Aurunci. Inf Bot Ital 32(1):17–30
Di Pietro R, Misano G (2010) Shrubland and garrigue vegetation in the «Gravine» gorges (Apulia region, south-eastern Italy). Acta Bot Gall 157(2):195–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2010.10516199
Di Pietro R, Filesi L, Blasi C (2002) Una nuova associazione del Cisto-Ericion nel Lazio meridionale. Inf Bot Ital 34:125–135
Di Pietro R, Conte AL, Di Marzio P, Gianguzzi L, Spampinato G, Caldarella O, Fortini P (2020) A multivariate morphometric analysis of diagnostic traits in southern Italy and Sicily pubescent oaks. Folia Geobot 55:163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-020-09378-0
Di Pietro R, Conte AL, Di Marzio P, Fortini P, Farris E, Gianguzzi L, Müller M, Rosati L, Spampinato G, Gailing O (2021) Does the genetic diversity among pubescent white oaks in southern Italy, Sicily and Sardinia islands support the current taxonomic classification. Eur J for Res 40:355–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01334-z
Dumolin-Lapegue S, Demesure B, Fineschi S, Le Corre V, Petit RJ (1997) Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146:1475–1487
Eionet (2022) List of pressures and threats—reference portal for reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. Downloaded from https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/habitats_art17. Accessed 02 December 2022
European Commission (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Off J Eur Union 206:7–50
European Commission (2013) Interpretation manual of European Union Habitats, vers. EUR28. European Commission, DG Environment, Brussel
European Commission (2020) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives
Evangelista A, Frate L, Stinca A, Carranza ML, Stanisci A (2016) VIOLA—the vegetation database of the central Apennines: structure, current status and usefulness for monitoring EU habitats (92/43/EEC). Plant Sociol 53(2):47–58. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2016532/04
Evans D (2006) The habitats of the European Union Habitats Directive. Proc Royal Irish Acad Biol Environ 106B(3):167–173. https://doi.org/10.3318/BIOE.2006.106.3.167
Fascetti S, Lapenna MR (2006) Indagine fitosociologica sui popolamenti a Quercus petraea ssp. austrotyrrhenica dell’Appennino Lucano (Basilicata, Italia meridionale). 42esimo Congresso della Società Italiana di Fitosociologica. Libro degli Abstract: 49
Feola S, Carranza ML, Schaminée JHJ, Janssen JAM, Acosta ATR (2011) EU habitats of interest: an insight into Atlantic and Mediterranean beach and foredunes. Biodivers Conserv 20:1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0037-9
FlorItaly-Portal to the Flora of Italy (2022). Available at http://dryades.units.it/floritaly/index.php. Accessed 15 March 2022
Fois M, Bacchetta G, Caria MC, Cogoni D, Farris E, Fenu G, Manca M, Pinna SM, Pisanu S, Rivieccio G, Bagella S (2021) Proposals for improvement of Annex I of Directive 92/43/EEC: Sardinia. Plant Sociol 58(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2021582/06
Forte L, Carruggio F, Mantino F (2011) Sulla presenza di una nuova associazione a Thymus capitatus (L.) Hoffmanns and Link e Fumana scoparia Pomel nell’Arco Jonico tarantino (Puglia). Inf Bot Ital 43(1):16–17
Fortini P, Antonecchia G, Di Marzio P, Maiuro L, Viscosi V (2015a) Role of micromorphological leaf traits and molecular data in taxonomy of three sympatric white oak species and their hybrids (Quercus L.). Plant Biosyst 149(3):546–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.868374
Fortini P, Di Marzio P, Di Pietro R (2015b) Differentiation and hybridization of Quercus frainetto, Q. petraea, and Q. pubescens (Fagaceae), insights from macro-morphological leaf traits and molecular data. Plant Syst Evol 301:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1080-2
Gangale C, Uzunov D (2003) Floristic composition of traditional olive grove on Ionian coast of South Italy. Bocconea 16(2):783–792
Gehu JM, Biondi E (1988) Données sur la végétation des ceintures d’atterissement des lacs Alimini (Salento Italie). Doc Phytosociol N.s. 11:353–380
Gianguzzi L, La Mantia A (2004) Osservazioni fitosociologiche, sinecologiche e sincorologiche sulla vegetazione relittuale a Petagnaea gussonei (Galio-Urticetea) nell’area dei Monti Nebrodi (Sicilia nord-orientale). Fitosociol 41(1):165–180
Giusso del Galdo G, Marcenò C, Musarella CM, Sciandrello S (2008) La vegetazione costiera della R.N.O “Torre Salsa” (Siculiana-AG). Inf Bot Ital 40(1):73–89
Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC (2016) Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Policy 61:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
Gruber B, Evans D, Henle K, Bauch B, Schmeller D, Dziock F, Henry PY, Lengyel S, Margules C, Dormann CF (2012) “Mind the gap!”—how well does Natura 2000 cover species of European interest? Nat Conserv 3:45–62. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.3.3732
Guarino R, Pasta S, Bazan G, Crisafulli A, Caldarella O, Giusso del Galdo GP, Gristina AS, Ilardi V, La Mantia A, Marcenò C, Minissale P, Sciandrello S, Scuderi L, Spampinato G, Troia A, Gianguzzi L (2021) Relevant habitats neglected by the Directive 92/43 EEC: the contribution of vegetation science for their reappraisal in Sicily. Plant Sociol 58(2):49–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2021582/05
Haines-Young R, Potschin-Young M (2018) Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V51): a policy brief. One Ecosyst 3:e27108
Haworth M, Gallagher A, Elliott-Kingston C, Raschi A, Marandola D, McElwain JC (2010) Stomatal index responses of Agrostis canina to CO2 and sulphur dioxide: implications for palaeo-[CO2] using the stomatal proxy. New Phytol 188:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03403.x
Henle K, Bauch B, Auliya M, Külvik M, Pe’er G, Schmeller DS, Framstad E (2013) Priorities for biodiversity monitoring in Europe: a review of supranational policies and a novel scheme for integrative prioritization. Ecol Indic 33:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.028
Hochkirch A, Schmitt T, Beninde J, Hiery M, Kinitz T, Kirschey J, Matenaar D, Rohde K, Stoefen A, Wagner N, Zink A, Lötters S, Veith M, Proelss A (2013) Europe needs a new vision for a Natura 2020 network. Conserv Lett 6:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12006
Hoffmann S, Beierkuhnlein C, Field R, Provenzale A, Chiarucci A (2018) Uniqueness of protected areas for conservation strategies in the European Union. Sci Rep 8:6445. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24390-3
Isbell F, Tilman D, Polasky S, Loreau M (2015) The biodiversity-dependent ecosystem service debt. Ecol Lett 18(2):119–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12393
Ismaili H (2018) The inventory and evaluation of centuries old olives. A J Sci O 5(1):1–15
IUCN-CMP (2012) Unified classification of direct threats (version 3.2). Downloaded from https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme. Accessed February 2022
Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, García Criado M, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, Sanders N, Landucci F, Loidi J, Ssymank A, Tahvanainen T, Valderrabano M, Acosta A, Aronsson M, Arts G, Attorre F, Bergmeier E, Bijlsma RJ, Bioret F, Biţă-Nicolae C, Biurrun I, Calix M, Capelo J, Čarni A, Chytrý M, Dengler J, Dimopoulos P, Essl F, Gardfjell H, Gigante D, Giusso del Galdo G, Hájek M, Jansen F, Jansen J, Kapfer J, Mickolajczak A, Molina JA, Molnár Z, Paternoster D, Piernik A, Poulin B, Renaux B, Schaminée JHJ, Šumberová K, Toivonen H, Tonteri T, Tsiripidis I, Tzonev R, Valachovič M (2016) European red list of habitats. Part 2: terrestrial and freshwater habitats. European Commission, Brussels
Korzhenevsky VV, Klyukin AA (1991) Vegetation description of mud volcanoes of Crimea. Feddes Repert 102(1–2):137–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.19911020115
Krieger DJ (2001) Economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review. The Wilderness Society, Washington DC
Landucci F, Šumberová K, Tichý L, Hennekens S, Aunina L, Biță-Nicolae C, Borsukevych L, Bobrov A, Čarni A, Bie ED, Golub V, Hrivnák R, Iemelianova S, Jandt U, Jansen F, Kącki Z, Lájer K, Papastergiadou E, Šilc U, Sinkevičienė Z, Stančić Z, Stepanovič J, Teteryuk B, Tzonev R, Venanzoni R, Zelnik I, Chytrý M (2020) Classification of the European marsh vegetation (Phragmito-Magnocaricetea) to the association level. Appl Veg Sci 23(2):297–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12484
Lengyel S, Kobler S, Kutnar L, Framstad E, Henry PY, Babij V, Gruber B, Schmeller D, Henle K (2008) A review and a framework for the integration of biodiversity monitoring at the habitat level. Biodivers Conserv 17:3341–3356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9359-7
Liquete C, Piroddi C, Drakou EG, Gurney L, Katsanevakis S, Charef A, Egoh B (2013) Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 8(7):e67737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067737
Lockwood M (2006) Global protected area framework. In: Lockwood M, Graeme V, Kothari A (eds) Managing protected areas: a global guide. Cromwell Press, Trowbridge, UK, pp 73–100
Loidi J, Ortega M, Orrantia O (2007) Vegetation science and the implementation of the habitat directive in Spain: up-to-now experiences and further development to provide tools for management. Fitosociol 44(2, Suppl. 1):9–16
Loidi J, del Arco M, Pérez de Paz PL, Asensi A, Díez Garretas B, Costa M, Díaz González T, Fernández-González F, Izco J, Penas A, Rivas-Martínez S, Sánchez Mata D (2010) Understanding properly the potential natural vegetation concept. J Biogeogr 37:2209–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02302.x
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294(5543):804–808. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064088
Maes J, Paracchini MP, Zulian G, Alkemade R (2012) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1–12
Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2013) Not the right time to amend the annexes of the European Habitats Directive. Conserv Lett 6:468–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12030
Maes J, Fabrega N, Zulian G, Barbosa A, Vizcaino P, Ivits E, Polce C, Vandecasteele I, MaríRivero I, Guerra C, Perpiña Castillo C, Vallecillo S, Baranzelli C, Barranco R, Batista F, Jacobs-Crisoni C, Trombetti M, Lavalle C (2015) Map** and assessment of ecosystemsand their services. JRC science and policy reports. ISSN 1831-9424
Maiorca G, Spampinato G (1999) La vegetazione della riserva naturale orientata “Valle del Fiume Argentino” (Calabria Nord-Occidentale). Fitosociol 36:15–60
Maiorca G, Caprio A, Spampinato G (2002) Flora e vegetazione dei laghi costieri La Vota (Calabria Centro-Occidentale). Fitosociol 39:84–105
Maiorca G, Spampinato G, Crisafulli A, Cameriere P (2007) The vascular flora and vegetation of “Foce del Crati” Regional Nature Reserve (Calabria, South Italy). Webbia 62(2):121–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2007.10670821
Mammola S, Riccardi N, Prié V, Correia R, Cardoso P, Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R (2020) Towards a taxonomically unbiased European Union biodiversity strategy for 2030. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 287:1940. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2166
Martinelli G, Judd A (2004) Mud volcanoes of Italy. Geol J 39:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.943
Martínez-Vilalta J, Bertolero A, Bigas D, Paquet JY, Martínez-Vilalta A (2002) Habitat selection of passerine birds nesting in the Ebro delta reedbeds (NE Spain): management implications. Wetlands 22(2):318–325
Marzano G, Scarafino C (2012) Fauna in ancient olive orchards on Apulia region (Italy). In: Calabrese G et al (eds) Study on biodiversity in century-old olive groves. CIHEAM-Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Bari, pp 63–78
Mazzini A, Etiope G (2017) Mud volcanism: an updated review. Earth Sci Rev 168:81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.03.001
Médail F, Diadema K (2009) Glacial refugia influence plant diversity patterns in the Mediterranean basin. J Biogeogr 36:1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02051.x
Minissale A, Donato M, Procesi M, Pizzino L, Giammanco S (2019) Systematic review of geochemical data from thermal springs, gas vents and fumaroles of Southern Italy for geothermal favourability map**. Earth-Sci Rev 188:514–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.09.008
Mucina L, Bültmann H, Dierßen K, Theurillat JP, Raus T, Čarni A, Šumberová K, Willner W, Dengler J, Gavilán García R, Chytrý M, Hájek M, Di Pietro R, Iakushenko D, Pallas J, Daniëls FJA, Bergmeier E, Santos Guerra A, Ermakov N, Valachovič M, Schaminée JHJ, Lysenko T, Didukh YP, Pignatti S, Rodwell JS, Capelo J, Weber HE, Solomeshch A, Dimopoulos P, Aguiar C, Hennekens SM, Tichý L (2016) Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Appl Veg Sci 19(suppl. 1):3–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257
Musarella CM, Cano-Ortiz A, Pinar Fuentes JC, Navas-Urena J, Pinto Gomes CJ, Quinto-Canas R, Cano E, Spampinato G (2018) Similarity analysis between species of the genus Quercus L. (Fagaceae) in southern Italy based on the fractal dimension. PhytoKeys 113:79-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.113.30330
Musarella CM, Cano-Ortiz A, Quinto-Canas R (2020) Introductory chapter: habitats of the world. In: Musarella CM, Cano-Ortiz A, Quinto-Canas R (eds) Habitats of the world—biodiversity and threats. IntechOpen, London
Navarro G, Molina JA, Moreno PS (2001) Vegetación acuática y helofítica del Sistema Ibérico septentrional, centro de España. Acta Bot Malacit 26:143–156. https://doi.org/10.24310/abm.v26i0.7405
Orłowski G, Górka W (2013) Landscape and patch characteristics affecting the assemblages of birds in reedbeds in terrestrial matrix. Ann Zool Fennici 50:36–51. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.050.0103
Orsenigo S, Bernardo L, Cambria S, Gargano D, Laface VLA, Musarella CM, Passalacqua NG, Spampinato G, Tavilla G, Fenu G (2020) Global and regional IUCN red list assessments: 9. Ital Bot 9:111–123. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.9.55223
Panuccio MR, Fazio A, Musarella CM, Mendoza-Fernández AJ, Mota JF, Spampinato G (2018) Seed germination and antioxidant pattern in Lavandula multifida (Lamiaceae): a comparison between core and peripheral populations. Plant Biosyst 152:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1297333
Paoletti E, Pfanz H, Raschi A (2005) Pros and cons of CO2 springs as experimental sites. In: Omasa K, Nouchi L, De Kok J (eds) Plant responses to air pollution and global change. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 195–202
Perrino EV, Calabrese G (2014) Vascular flora of the ancient olive groves of Apulia (Southern Italy). Nat Croat 23(1):189–218
Perrino EV, Calabrese G, Ladisa G, Viti R, Mimiola G (2011) Primi dati sulla biodiversità della flora vascolare di oliveti secolari in Puglia. Inf Bot Ital 43(1):39–64
Perrino EV, Ladisa G, Calabrese G (2014) Flora and plant genetic resources of ancient olive groves of Apulia (Southern Italy). Genet Resour Crop Evol 61:23–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0013-1
Pesaresi S, Galdenzi D, Biondi E, Casavecchia S (2014) Bioclimate of Italy: application of the worldwide bioclimatic classification system. J Maps 10(4):538–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.891472
Petermann J, Ssymank A (2007) Natura 2000 and its implications for the protection of plant syntaxa in Germany with a case study on grasslands. Ann Bot 7:5–18
Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Kremer A (2002) Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manag 156:49–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00634-X
Pfanz H, Saßmannshausen F, Wittmann C, Pfanz B, Thomalla A (2019) Mofette vegetation as an indicator for geogenic CO2 emission: a case study on the Banks of the Laacher See Volcano, Vulkaneifel, Germany. Geofluids. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9589306
Pignatti S, Guarino R, La Rosa M (eds) (2017–2019) Flora d’Italia, 2a Edizione. Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media, Bologna
Piñar Fuentes JC, Cano-Ortiz A, Musarella CM, Pinto-Gomes C, Spampinato G, Cano E (2017) Rupicolous habitats of interest for conservation in the central-southern Iberian Peninsula. Plant Sociol 54:29–42. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2017542S1/03
Piovesan G, Baliva M, Calcagnile L, D’Elia M, Dorado-Liñán I, Palli J, Siclari A, Quarta G (2020) Radiocarbon dating of Aspromonte sessile oaks reveals the oldest dated temperate flowering tree in the world. Ecology 101:12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3179
Pirone G, Tammaro F (1997) The hilly calciophilous garigues in Abruzzo (Central Apennines, Italy). Fitosociol 32:73–90
Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2013) Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 28:1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x
Puglisi M, Sciandrello S, Musarella CM, Spampinato G, Privitera M, Tomaselli V (2019) Bryosociological remarks on garrigue environments in Apulia Region (Southern Italy). Plant Sociol 56(2):43–52. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2019562/03
Puglisi M, Spampinato G, Privitera M (2021) Bryophyte diversity of the montane streams in the Mediterranean region: a study on of the Aspromonte massif (Southern Italy). Nova Hedwigia 112(3–4):359–374. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2021/0627
Quinto-Canas R, Mendes P, Meireles C, Musarella CM, Pinto-Gomes C (2018) The Agrostion castellanae Rivas Goday 1957 Corr. Rivas Goday & Rivas-Martínez 1963 Alliance in the Southwestern Iberian Peninsula. Plant Sociol 55:21–29. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2018551/02
Rivas-Martínez S, Penas A, Diaz TE (2004) Bioclimatic map of Europe—bioclimates. Cartographic Service, University of Leon. http://www.globalbioclimatics.org/form/bi_med.htm. Retrieved 16 December 2013
Rivas-Martínez S, Sáenz SR, Penas A (2011) Worldwide bioclimatic classification system. Glob Geobot 1:1–634
Rosati L, Marignani M, Blasi C (2008) A gap analysis comparing Natura 2000 vs national protected area network with potential natural vegetation. Commun Ecol 9(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.3
Saponari M, Giampetruzzi A, Loconsole G, Boscia D, Saldarelli P (2019) Xylella fastidiosa in olive in Apulia: where we stand. Phytopatology 109:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-08-18-0319-FI
Sarika M, Bazos I, Zervou S, Christopoulou A (2016) Flora and vegetation of the European-network “Natura 2000” habitats of Naxos island (GR4220014) and of nearby islets Mikres Kyklades (GR4220013), Central Aegean (Greece). Plant Sociol 52(2):3–56. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2015522/01
Schime J (2016) Microbial ecology: linking omics to biogeochemistry. Nat Microbiol 1:15028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.28
Sciandrello S, Tomaselli V (2014) Coastal salt-marshes plant communities of the Salicornietea fruticosae class in Apulia (Italy). Biologia 69(1):53–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0283-2
Scortichini M (2020) The multi-millennial olive agroecosystem of Salento (Apulia, Italy) threatened by Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca: a working possibility of restoration. Sustainability 12:6700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176700
Selvi F (1998) Flora of the mineral CO2-spring “Bossoleto” (Rapolano Terme, Tuscany) and its relevance to ecological research. Att Soc Tosc Sci Nat Mem Ser B 105:23–30
Spampinato G (2009a) Phytocoenotic diversity in Southern Italy. Bocconea 23:33–49
Spampinato G (2009b) 32A0 New: Ambienti rivulari dell’Appennino meridionale e della Sicilia. In: Biondi et al (eds) Manuale Italiano di Interpretazione degli habitat di Direttiva 92/43/CEE. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/cerca.do?formato=stampa&idSegnalazione=91
Spampinato G, Puglisi M (2009) 7250 New: Rupi stillicidiose mediterranee. In: Biondi et al (eds) Manuale Italiano di Interpretazione degli habitat di Direttiva 92/43/CEE. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/cerca.do?formato=stampa&idSegnalazione=83
Spampinato G, Musarella CM, Cano-Ortiz A, Signorino G (2018) Habitat, occurrence and conservation status of the Saharo-Macaronesian and Southern-Mediterranean element Fagonia cretica L. (Zygophyllaceae) in Italy. J Arid Land 10:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0076-5
Spampinato G, Laface VLA, Cano-Ortiz A, Quinto-Canas R, Musarella CM (2019a) Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae): a rare endemic species of Calabria (Southern Italy). In: Cano Carmona E, Musarella CM, Cano-Ortiz A (eds) Endemic species. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84905
Spampinato G, Sciandrello S, Giusso del Galdo G, Puglisi M, Tomaselli V, Cannavò S, Musarella CM (2019b) Contribution to the knowledge of Mediterranean wetland biodiversity: plant communities of the Aquila Lake (Calabria, Southern Italy). Plant Sociol 56(2):53–68. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2019562/04
Stešević D, Küzmič F, Milanović D, Stanišić-Vujačić M, Šilc U (2019) Coastal sand dune vegetation of Velika plaža (Montenegro). Acta Bot Croat 79(1):43–54
Stinca A, Ricciardi M (2019) Apiaceae: 785–812. In: Pignatti S, Guarino R, La Rosa M (eds) Flora d’Italia 4. Seconda edizione. Edagricole, Bologna
Stinca A, Bernardo L, Peruzzi L (2019) Appennino Meridionale: 282–366. In: Conti F, Bartolucci F, Di Martino L, Manzi A (eds) La flora endemica minacciata delle montagne italiane. Club Alpino Italiano, Milano
Stinca A, Ravo M, Marzaioli R, Marchese G, Cordella A, Rutigliano FA, Esposito A (2020) Changes in multi-level biodiversity and soil features in a burned beech forest in the southern Italian Coastal Mountain. Forests 11(9):983. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090983
Stinca A, Musarella CM, Rosati L, Laface VLA, Licht W, Fanfarillo E, Wagensommer RP, Galasso G, Fascetti S, Esposito A, Fiaschi T, Nicolella G, Chianese G, Ciaschetti G, Salerno G, Fortini P, Di Pietro R, Perrino EV, Angiolini C, De Simone L, Mei G (2021) Italian vascular flora: new findings, updates and exploration of floristic similarities between regions. Diversity 13(11):600. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110600
Taffetani F, Biondi E (1989) La vegetazione del litorale molisano e pugliese tra le foci dei fiumi Biferno e Fortore (Adriatico Centro-Meridionale). Colloq Phytosociol XVIII:323–350
Terzi M, D’Amico S (2006) Garighe basse a Centaurea subtilis della Murgia Materana (Basilicata). Quad Bot Amb Appl 17(2):65–72
Terzi M, Di Pietro R, Theurillat JP (2021) Nomenclature of Italian syntaxa of the classes Festuco hystricis-Ononideteastriatae and Rumici-Astragaletea siculi. Plant Biosyst 155(6):1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2021.2013338
Tomaselli V, Sciandrello S (2017) Contribution to the knowledge of the coastal vegetation of the SIC IT9110005 “Zone Umide della Capitanata” (Apulia, Italy). Plant Biosyst 151(4):673–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2016.1200689
Tomaselli V, Perrino EV, Cimmarusti G (2008) Paludi Sfinale e Gusmay, due aree umide di rilevante interesse naturalistico nel Parco Nazionale del Gargano. Inf Bot Ital 40(2):183–192
Tomaselli V, Di Pietro R, Sciandrello S (2011) Plant communities structure and composition in three coastal wetlands in southern Apulia (Italy). Biologia 66(6):1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0113-3
Tomaselli V, Tenerelli P, Sciandrello S (2012) Map** and quantifying habitat fragmentation in small coastal areas: a case study of three protected wetlands in Apulia (Italy). Environ Monit Assess 184(2):693–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1995-9
Tomaselli V, Adamo M, Veronico G, Sciandrello S, Tarantino C, Dimopoulos P, Medagli P, Nagendra H, Blonda P (2016) Definition and application of expert knowledge on vegetation pattern, phenology, and seasonality for habitat map**, as exemplified in a Mediterranean coastal site. Plant Biosyst 151(5):887–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2016.1231143
Tomaselli V, Veronico G, Sciandrello S, Forte L (2020) Therophytic halophilous vegetation classification in South-Eastern Italy. Phytocoenologia 50(2):187–209. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/2020/0364
Tomaselli V, Silletti G, Forte L (2021) A new association of Satureja montana L. subsp. montana dominated garrigues in Puglia (SE Italy). Plant Sociol 58(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2021582/01
Trochet A, Schmeller DS (2013) Effectiveness of the natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nat Cons 4:35–53. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.4.3626
Veronico G, Sciandrello S, Medagli P, Tomaselli V (2017) Vegetation survey and plant landscape map** of the SCI IT9140002 “Litorale Brindisino” (Puglia, Southern Italy). Plant Sociol 54(1):89–106. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2017541/04
Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
Zhang LB, Comes HP, Kadereit JW (2001) Phylogeny and quaternary history of the European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. Am J Bot 88(12):2331–2345
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Francesca Carruggio, Giovanna Cimmarusti, and Domenico Saulle, for contributing to the field work.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work was supported by Regione Calabria (P.O.R. Calabria FESR 2014/2020, Asse VI Azione 6.5.A1: "Sistema Carta Natura") for field work in the Calabrian territory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Spampinato, G., Tomaselli, V., Forte, L. et al. Relevant but neglected habitat types by the Directive 92/43 EEC in southern Italy. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 34, 457–482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-023-01136-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-023-01136-6