Abstract
Debris accumulation upstream of bridge piers is a destructive agent against the piers stability. In this study, the effect of debris geometrical characteristics on the local scour at piers group was investigated. A large set of experimental tests were conducted to investigate the effect of piers configurations, as well as, the shape, thickness, length, and position of debris on the dimensions of scour hole. The results showed that the debris with rectangular shape caused the most scour depth. In addition, among the different configurations of bridge piers, the group piers (2 × 2) demonstrated the largest scour hole. In this configuration, high complex interactions occurred among the flow, sediment and piers which generated strong horseshoe and wake vortices around the piers. The observations showed that the maximum depth of scour hole increases as the debris thickness increases. In addition, more the debris effective length, more the depth of scour hole. In the case of debris with rectangular shape, as the relative thickness of debris increased from 0.5 to 2.67, the depth of scour hole increased 67%, 80%, 84% and 104%, in single, side by side, tandem, and group piers (2 × 2), respectively. By increasing the distance of debris from the water surface, the depth of scour hole increased at the first, and then decreased when the relative submergence depth of debris became 0.46. In this condition, the debris acted as a collar, prevented the bed from scour. The measured scour depths were compared with common empirical formula, the formula were modified by considering the experimental results of this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbe, T. B. and Montgomery, D. R. (1996). “Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers.” Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, Vol. 12, pp. 201–201.
Ataie-Ashtiani, B. and Beheshti, A. A. (2006). “Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour at pile groups.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 10, pp. 1100–1104.
Bradley, J. B., Richards, D. L., and Bahner, C. D. (2005). Debris control structures-Evaluation and countermeasures, FHWA-IF-04-016, HEC-9, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Braudrick, C. A., Grant, G. E., Ishikawa, Y., and Ikeda, H. (1997). “Dynamics of wood transport in streams: A flume experiment.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 669–683.
Briaud, J. L., Chen, H. C., Chang, K. A., Chen, X., and Oh, S. J. (2006). “Scour at bridges due to debris accumulation: A review.” Proc., ICSE 2006, 3rd Int. Conf. on Scour and Erosion, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Chang, F. F. M. and Shen, H. W. (1979). Debris Problems in the River Environment, FHWA-RD-79-62.
Chiew, Y. M. and Melville, B. W. (1987). “Local scour around bridge piers.” Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 15–26.
Diehl, T. H. (1997). Potential drift accumulations at bridges, Report RD-97-28, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, McLean, VA.
Franzetti, S., Radice, A., Rabitti, M., and Rossi, G. (2011). “Hydraulic design and preliminary performance evaluation of countermeasure against debris accumulation and resulting local pier scour on river po in Italy.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000340, 615-620.
Kattell, J. and Eriksson, M. (1998). Bridge scour evaluation: Screening, analysis, and countermeasures, Gen. Tech, Rep. 9877-1207-SDTDC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, San Dimas, CA.
Kumar, V., Raju, K. G. R., and Vittal, N. (1999). “Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 12, pp. 1302–1305.
Lagasse, P. F., Clopper, P. E., and Zevenbergen, L. W. (2010). Effects of Debris on Bridge Pier Scour, NCHRP Report 653, Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science, Washington, D.C.
Laursen, E. M. and Toch, A. (1956). Scour around bridge piers and abutments, Bulletin No. 4, Iowa Highways Research Board, Ames, Iowa.
Lyn, D. A., Cooper, T., Yi, Y. K., Sinha, R., and Rao, A. R. (2003). “Debris accumulation at bridge crossings: Laboratory and field studies.” Joint Transportation Research Program, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/10.
Madadi, M. R., Rahimpour, M., and Qaderi, K. (2016). “Sediment flushing upstream of large orifices: An experimental study.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 52, pp.180–189.
Melville, B. W. and Coleman, S. E. (2000). “Bridge scour.” Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO.
Melville, B. W. and Dongol, D. M. (1992). “Bridge pier scour with debris accumulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng., Vol. 118, No. 9, pp. 1306–1310.
Melville, B. W. and Hadfield, A. C. (1999). “Use of sacrificial piles as pier scour countermeasures.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 11, pp. 1221–1224.
Mueller, D. S. and Parola, A. C. (1998). “Detailed Scour Measurements around a Debris Accumulation.” ASCE. Water Resources Engineering, pp. 234–239.
Oliveto, G. and Hager, W. H. (2002). “Temporal evolution of clear-water pier and abutment scour.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 811–820.
Pagliara S. and Carnacina I. (2010). “Temporal scour evolution at bridge piers: Effect of wood debris roughness and porosity.” Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 3–13.
Pagliara, S. and Carnacina, I. (2011). “Influence of large woody debris on sediment scour at bridge piers.” International Journal of Sediment Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 121–136, DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6279(11) 60081-4.
Park, J. H., Sok, C., Park, C. K., and Kim, Y. D. (2016a). “A study on the effects of debris accumulation at sacrificial piles on bridge pier Scour: I. Experimental Results.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 1546–1551, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0207-5.
Park, J. H., Sok, C., Park, C. K., and Kim, Y. D. (2016b). “A study on the effects of debris accumulation at sacrificial piles on bridge pier Scour: II. Empirical formula.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 1552–1557, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0208-4.
Parola, A. C., Apelt, C. J., and Jempson, M. A. (2000). Debris forces on highway bridges, Transportation Research Record, NCHRP Report No. 445, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., ISBN: 0-309-06661-1.
Raudkivi, A. J. and Ettema, R. (1983). “Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 338–350.
Richardson, E. V. and Davis, S. R. (2001). Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Fourth Edition, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18, Federal Highways Administration Publication No. FHWA NHI 01-001, Washington, D.C.
Wallerstein, N. P. (2003). “Dynamic model for constriction scour caused by large woody debris.” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, Vol. 28, pp. 49–68.
Zevenbergen, L. W., Lagasse, P. F., Clopper, P. E., and Spitz, W. J. (2006). Effect of debris on bridge pier scour, 3rd International conference on scour erosion, Amsterdam, The Nederland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahimi, E., Qaderi, K., Rahimpour, M. et al. Effect of Debris on Piers Group Scour: An Experimental Study. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 1496–1505 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-2002-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-2002-y