Abstract
Background and aims
Outcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination.
Methods
This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least 2 years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Results
The proportions of complete viral suppression (CVS) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 98.5%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n = 198), TDF (n = 137), and NA combination (n = 123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20–2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved CVS at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, p < 0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those without (coefficient 21.7, p < 0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48.
Conclusions
Based on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12072-021-10295-3/MediaObjects/12072_2021_10295_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12072-021-10295-3/MediaObjects/12072_2021_10295_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12072-021-10295-3/MediaObjects/12072_2021_10295_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AASLD:
-
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- ADF:
-
Adefovir
- ALT:
-
Alanine aminotransferase
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CHB:
-
Chronic hepatitis B
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disease
- CVS:
-
Complete viral suppression
- eGFR:
-
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
- ETV:
-
Entecavir
- GEE:
-
Generalized estimating equation
- HBeAg:
-
Hepatitis B e antigen
- HBsAg:
-
Hepatitis B surface antigen
- HBV:
-
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- LAM:
-
Lamivudine
- NA:
-
Nucleos(t)ide analogue
- qHBsAg:
-
Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen
- TAF:
-
Tenofovir alafenamide
- TDF:
-
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
References
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128
Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546–1555
Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67:1560–1599
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–398
Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HL, Chen CJ, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1–98
Lok AS, Zoulim F, Dusheiko G, Ghany MG. Hepatitis B cure: from discovery to regulatory approval. J Hepatol. 2017;67:847–861
Cornberg M, Lok AS, Terrault NA, Zoulim F. EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference faculty. Guidance for design and endpoints of clinical trials in chronic hepatitis B—report from the 2019 EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference‡. J Hepatol. 2019;2020(72):539–557
Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Nguyen MH. Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:3197–3204
Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Brown RS Jr, Wong JB, Ahmed AT, Farah W, et al. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2016;63:284–306
Woo G, Tomlinson G, Nishikawa Y, Kowgier M, Sherman M, Wong DK, et al. Tenofovir and entecavir are the most effective antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analyses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1218–1229
Tang LSY, Covert E, Wilson E, Kottilil S. Chronic hepatitis B infection: a review. JAMA. 2018;319:1802–1813
Casado JL. Renal and bone toxicity with the use of tenofovir: understanding at the end. AIDS Rev. 2016;18:59–68
Buti M, Tsai N, Petersen J, Flisiak R, Gurel S, Krastev Z, et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety of treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1457–1464
Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, Chuang WL, Chen CY, Kim HJ, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:185–195
Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, Chan HL, Chuang WL, Stepanova T, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:196–206
Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, Lim YS, Fung S, Marcellin P, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018;68:672–681
Ogawa E, Nomura H, Nakamuta M, Furusyo N, Koyanagi T, Dohmen K, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide after switching from entecavir or nucleos(t)ide combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2020;40:1578–1589
Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–992
Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Murata M, Ohnishi H, Toyoda K, Taniai H, et al. Longitudinal assessment of liver stiffness by transient elastography for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleoside analog. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:1178–1188
Uchida Y, Nakao M, Tsuji S, Uemura H, Kouyama JI, Naiki K, et al. Significance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. J Med Virol. 2020;92:329–338
Li ZB, Li L, Niu XX, Chen SH, Fu YM, Wang CY, et al. Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viraemia. Liver Int. 2021;41:1254–1264
Nguyen MH, Atsukawa M, Ishikawa T, Yasuda S, Yokohama K, Trinh HN, et al. Outcomes of sequential therapy with tenofovir alafenamide after long-term entecavir. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:1264–1273
Fong TL, Lee BT, Tien A, Chang M, Lim C, Ahn A, et al. Improvement of bone mineral density and markers of proximal renal tubular function in chronic hepatitis B patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26:561–567
Lampertico P, Buti M, Fung S, Ahn SH, Chuang WL, Tak WY, et al. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:441–453
Toyoda H, Leong J, Landis C, Atsukawa M, Watanabe T, Huang DQ, et al. Treatment and renal outcomes up to 96 weeks after tenofovir alafenamide switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in routine practice. Hepatology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31793
Wong GL, Chan HL, Mak CW, Lee SK, Ip ZM, Lam AT, et al. Entecavir treatment reduces hepatic events and deaths in chronic hepatitis B patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2013;58:1537–1547
Tseng TC, Liu CJ, Yang HC, Su TH, Wang CC, Chen CL, et al. High levels of hepatitis B surface antigen increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with low HBV load. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1140–1149
Yip TC, Wong GL, Chan HL, Tse YK, Lam KL, Lui GC, et al. HBsAg seroclearance further reduces hepatocellular carcinoma risk after complete viral suppression with nucleos(t)ide analogues. J Hepatol. 2019;70:361–370
Bedossa P, Carrat F. Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol. 2009;50:1–3
Razek AA, Abdalla A, Omran E, Fathy A, Zalata K. Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis in children with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:129–134
Razek AAKA, Khashaba M, Abdalla A, Bayomy M, Barakat T. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis. Radiol Med. 2014;119:903–909
Razek AA, Massoud SM, Azziz MR, El-Bendary MM, Zalata K, Motawea EM. Prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with apparent diffusion coefficient of the spleen. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1465–1469
Besheer T, Elalfy H, Abd El-Maksoud M, Abd El-Razek A, Taman S, Zalata K, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and micro-RNA in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1366–1377
Surial B, Mugglin C, Calmy A, Cavassini M, Günthard HF, Stöckle M, et al. Weight and metabolic changes after switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in people living with HIV: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-4853
Chan HLY, Buti M, Agarwal K, et al. Maintenance of high levels of viral suppression and improved safety profile of tenofovir alafenamide relative to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B patients treated for 5 years in 2 ongoing phase 3 studies. Hepatology. 2020;72:490A
Fontana RJ. Side effects of long-term oral antiviral therapy for hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2009;49:S185–S195
Gish RG, Clark MD, Kane SD, Shaw RE, Mangahas MF, Baqai S. Similar risk of renal events among patients treated with tenofovir or entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:941–946
Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW. Longitudinal studies on the rate of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:278–285
Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Nakanishi H, Itakura J, Inada K, Kirino S, et al. Comparison of medication adherence and satisfaction between entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 2020;92:1355–1358
Funding
This study was funded by Gilead Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
All authors were involved in the design of the study, acquisition of samples and/or analysis. EO drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical discussion of the results and approved the final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Eiichi Ogawa has received speaker fees from Gilead Sciences and AbbVie. Makoto Nakamuta, Toshimasa Koyanagi, Aritsune Ooho, Norihiro Furusyo, Eiji Kajiwara, Kazufumi Dohmen, Akira Kawano, Takeaki Satoh, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Koichi Azuma, Nobuyuki Yamashita, Naoki Yamashita, Rie Sugimoto, Hiromasa Amagase, Masami Kuniyoshi, Yasunori Ichiki, Chie Morita, Masaki Kato, Shinji Shimoda, Hideyuki Nomura, and Jun Hayashi declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the STROBE statement. It was approved by the Ethics Committees of Kyushu University Hospital and each study site and is registered as a clinical study on the University Hospital Medical Information Network (ID 000034696).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogawa, E., Nakamuta, M., Koyanagi, T. et al. Sequential HBV treatment with tenofovir alafenamide for patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 96 results from a real-world, multicenter cohort study. Hepatol Int 16, 282–293 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10295-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10295-3