Log in

Thermodynamic analysis of promising MOF/water pairs for adsorption cooling systems

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous coordination polymers constructed from co-ordinately binding metals and organic linkers. Aluminium fumarate, a microporous MOF composed of aluminium and fumaric acid, has a high affinity toward water vapor adsorption. The adsorption process in such porous materials could be featured for cooling by harnessing thermal energy, reducing the need for an energy-intensive vapor compression refrigeration system. The thermodynamic property field analysis is crucial for calculating the adsorption cooling system’s energetic performance. In this work, the thermodynamic property fields of pristine aluminium fumarate and nickel and cobalt-doped aluminium fumarates were analyzed, and the results were compared from the viewpoint of adsorption cooling application. The water adsorption isotherms on these samples were correlated with the Sun and Chakraborty and the Universal models. Thermodynamic properties, isosteric heat of adsorption, and specific heat capacity of the MOF/water pairs were investigated, and results were analyzed with respect to the adsorbate uptake. The performance parameters, specific cooling effect, and coefficient of performance were studied and compared for the samples. Nickle and cobalt-doped aluminium fumarates have presented a higher specific cooling effect than the pristine MOF. This analysis provides crucial findings contributing to design practical MOF/water-based adsorption cooling systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

COP :

Coefficient of performance [–]

c p,a :

Specific heat capacity of the adsorbed phase [kJ kg1 K1]

c p,ads :

Specific heat capacity of the solid adsorbent [kJ kg1 K1]

c p,g :

Specific heat capacity of the gas [kJ kg1 K1]

c p,s :

Specific heat capacity of the system [kJ kg1 K1]

h a :

Adsorbed phase enthalpy [kJ kg1]

h f :

Liquid enthalpy [kJ kg1]

h fg :

Enthalpy of evaporation [kJ kg1]

m :

Surface heterogeneity factor [–]

P :

Equilibrium pressure [kPa]

P s :

Saturated pressure [kPa]

q :

Instantaneous adsorption uptake [g g−1]

q 0 :

Equilibrium adsorption uptake [g g−1]

Q st * :

Isosteric heat of adsorption at zero uptake [J g1]

Q st :

Isosteric heat of adsorption [J g1]

R :

Universal gas constant [J g1 K1]

SCE :

Specific cooling effect [kJ kg1]

T :

Adsorption temperature [K]

cond :

Condenser

evap :

Evaporator

e des :

End of desorption

e ads :

End of adsorption

max :

Maximum

min :

Minimum

s des :

Start of desorption

s ads :

Start of adsorption

α :

Pre-exponential coefficient [–]

α i :

Fractional probability factor [–]

ε 0 :

Energy of the adsorption site [J mol1]

υ g :

Specific volume of gas [m3 kg1

References

  1. Pal A, Uddin K, Thu K and Saha B B 2018 Activated carbon and graphene nanoplatelets based novel composite for performance enhancement of adsorption cooling cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 180: 134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saha B B, Uddin K, Pal A and Thu K 2019 Emerging sorption pairs for heat pump applications: an overview. JMST Adv. 1: 161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lollar C T, Qin J S, Pang J, Yuan J S, Becker B and Zhou H C 2018 Interior decoration of stable metal-organic frameworks. Langmuir. 34: 13795–13807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Furukawa H, Gándara F, Zhang Y B, Jiang J, Queen W L, Hudson M R and Yaghi O M 2014 Water adsorption in porous metal-organic frameworks and related materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136: 4369–4381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rupam T H, Islam M A, Pal A and Saha B B 2020 Adsorption thermodynamics and performance indicators of selective adsorbent/refrigerant pairs. Appl. Therm. Eng. 175: 115361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pal A, Rocky K A and Saha B B 2021 Thermodynamic analysis of promising biomass-derived activated carbons/CO2 based adsorption cooling systems. J. CO2 Util. 46: 101457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rocky K A, Pal A, Moniruzzaman M and Saha B B 2019 Adsorption characteristics and thermodynamic property fields of polymerized ionic liquid and polyvinyl alcohol based composite/CO2 pairs. J. Mol. Liq. 294: 111555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chakraborty A, Saha B B, Koyama S, Ng K C and Srinivasan K 2009 Adsorption thermodynamics of silica gel−water systems. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 54: 448–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palash M L, Jahan I, Rupam T H, Harish S and Saha B B 2020 Novel technique for improving the water adsorption isotherms of metal-organic frameworks for performance enhancement of adsorption driven chillers. Inorganica Chim. Acta. 501: 119313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jahan I, Islam M A, Palash M L, Rocky K A, Rupam T H and Saha B B 2020 Experimental study on the influence of metal do** on thermophysical properties of porous aluminum fumarate. Heat Transf. Eng. 42(13–14): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rupam T H, Palash M L, Islam M A and Saha B B 2022 Transitional metal-doped aluminum fumarates for ultra-low heat driven adsorption cooling systems. Energy. 238(C): 122079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pal A, Thu K, Mitra S, El-Sharkawy I I, Saha B B, Kil H S, Yoon S H and Miyawaki J 2017 Study on biomass derived activated carbons for adsorptive heat pump application. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 110: 7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahman M M, Muttakin M, Pal A, Shafiullah A Z and Saha B B 2019 A Statistical approach to determine optimal models for IUPAC-classified adsorption isotherms. Energies. 12: 12234565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun B and Chakraborty A 2014 Thermodynamic formalism of water uptakes on solid porous adsorbents for adsorption cooling applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104: 201901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng K C, Burhan M, Shahzad M W and Ismail A B 2017 A universal isotherm model to capture adsorption uptake and energy distribution of porous heterogeneous surface. Sci. Rep. 7: 10634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jahan I, Rupam T H, Palash M L, Rocky K A and Saha B B 2022 Energy efficient green synthesized MOF-801 for adsorption cooling applications. J. Mol. Liq. 345: 117760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tun H and Chen C C 2021 Isosteric heat of adsorption from thermodynamic Langmuir isotherm. Adsorption. 27: 979–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teo H W B, Chakraborty A, Kitagawa Y and Kayal Y S 2017 Experimental study of isotherms and kinetics for adsorption of water on Aluminium Fumarate. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 114: 621–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Solovyeva M V, Shkatulov A I, Gordeeva L G, Fedorova E A, Krieger T A and Aristov Y I 2021 Water vapor adsorption on CAU-10-X: effect of functional groups on adsorption equilibrium and mechanisms. Langmuir. 37: 693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feidt M 2017 From thermostatics to non-equilibrium thermodynamics. finite physical dimensions optimal thermodynamics 1. Feidt (Ed.). Elsevier. 1–41

  21. Rocky K A, Islam M A, Pal A, Ghosh S, Thu K and Saha B B 2020 Experimental investigation of the specific heat capacity of parent materials and composite adsorbents for adsorption heat pumps. Appl. Therm. Eng. 164: 114431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uddin K, Islam M A, Mitra S, Lee J, Thu K, Saha B B and Koyama S 2018 Specific heat capacities of carbon-based adsorbents for adsorption heat pump application. Appl. Therm. Eng. 129: 117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Islam M A, Pal A and Saha B B 2020 Experimental study on thermophysical and porous properties of silica gels. Int. J. Refrig. 110: 277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Muhtaseb S A and Ritter J A 1999 Roles of surface heterogeneity and lateral interactions on the isosteric heat of adsorption and adsorbed phase heat capacity. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103: 2467–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chakraborty A, Saha B B, Koyama S and Ng K C 2007 Specific heat capacity of a single component adsorbent-adsorbate system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90: 171902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pal A, Rocky K A and Saha B B 2021 Thermodynamic analysis of promising biomass-derived activated carbons/CO2 based adsorption cooling systems. J. CO2 Util. 46: 101457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shabir F, Sultan M, Noor S, Hussain G, Miyazaki T, Shakoor A, Kanwal R, Niaz Y, Imran M A and Khalid M U 2021 Study on adsorption equilibrium of adsorbent-refrigerant pairs for adsorption cooling system application. Fres. Env. Bulletin. 30(1): 216–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bidyut Baran Saha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahan, I., Rupam, T.H., Palash, M.L. et al. Thermodynamic analysis of promising MOF/water pairs for adsorption cooling systems. Sādhanā 48, 170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02218-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02218-9

Keywords

Navigation