Abstract
Occupational skin disease is common. It affects workers more often than reported. Contact dermatitis, both irritant and allergic, accounts for the majority of occupational skin diagnoses. Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) frequently affects the hands and may have a profound impact on an employee’s ability to perform a job. Severe OCD can affect a worker’s activities of daily living and can even lead to job loss. Numerous irritants have been described in the workplace, from the common (wet work) to the more obscure (warm, dry air). Several contact allergens may be work-related, and the majority of established occupational allergens are also known nonoccupational allergens. Emerging occupational allergens are continually described in the literature. Patch testing is the gold standard for the workup of allergic contact dermatitis. Patch testing in the setting of OCD may require extended or unique allergen trays, as well as a thorough occupational history and collection of workplace Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). These MSDS contain valuable information but may not be complete or accurate. Proof of occupational causation can be aided by employing the Mathias criteria. Certain industries and occupations are associated with higher rates of OCD, and as expected, the industries with direct contact with irritants and allergens are highly represented. The differential diagnosis for occupational dermatitis is broad and should be considered when evaluating an employee with suspected OCD. Some other diagnoses to consider include atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and manifestations of internal disease, as well as an overlap syndrome of more than one diagnosis. OCD treatment should ideally follow the public health hazard controls’ stepwise approach. Prevention and early intervention are key to promoting occupational health and preventing OCD. Multidisciplinary teams have been successful in the treatment of OCD, and newly described topical treatments may provide additional modalities for use in the occupational setting.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12016-018-8706-z/MediaObjects/12016_2018_8706_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SEER Training: Layers of the skin (n.d.) Retrieved from https://training.seer.cancer.gov/melanoma/anatomy/layers.html
Bhatia R, Sharma VK, Ramam M, Sethuraman G, Yadav CP (2015) Clinical profile and quality of life of patients with occupational contact dermatitis from New Delhi, India. Contact Dermatitis 73(3):172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12411
Koch P (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2(6):353–365. https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102060-00002
Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1999) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72(8):496–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200050407
Caroe TK, Ebbehoj N, Agner T (2013) A survey of exposures related to recognized occupational contact dermatitis in Denmark in 2010. Contact Dermatitis 70(1):56–62
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014 Survey of occupational injuries & illnesses. Summary estimates charts package. Curr Popul Surv 2015:1Y16. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/osch0054.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2017
Ibler KS, Jemec GBE, Flyvholm MA, Diepgen TL, Jensen A, Agner T (2012) Hand eczema: prevalence and risk factors of hand eczema in a population of 2274 healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 67(4):200–207
Luk N-MT, Lee H-CS, Luk C-KD, Cheung YYA, Chang MC, Chao VKD, Ng SC, Tang LSN (2011) Hand eczema among Hong Kong nurses: a self-report questionnaire survey conducted in a regional hospital. Contact Dermatitis 65(6):329–335
Luckhaupt SE, Dahlhamer JM, Ward BW et al (2010) Prevalence of dermatitis in the working population, United States, 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Ind Med 56(6):625–634
Keegel T, Moyle M, Dharmage S, Frowen K, Nixon R (2009) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990–2007): a systematic review. Int J Dermatol 48(6):571–578
Keegel T, Cahill J, Noon A et al (2005) Incidence and prevalence rates for occupational contact dermatitis in an Australian suburban area. Contact Dermatitis 52(5):254–259
Chen YX, Gao BA, Cheng HY, Li LF (2017) Survey of occupational allergic contact dermatitis and patch test among clothing employees in Bei**g. Biomed Res Int 2017:10 pages
Febriana SA, Hardyanto S, Coenraads PJ (2014) Occupational skin hazards and prevalence of occupational skin diseases in shoe manufacturing workers in Indonesia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87(2):185–194
Visser MJ, Verberk MM, van Dijk FJ, Bakker JG, Bos JD, Kezic S (2013) Wet work and hand eczema in apprentice nurses; part I of a prospective cohort study. Contact Dermatitis 70(1):44–55
Timmerman JG, Heederik D, Spee T, van Rooy FG, Krop EJM, Rustemeyer T, Smit LAM (2017) Contact dermatitis is an unrecognized problem in the construction industry: comparison of four different assessment methods. Am J Ind Med 60(10):879–888
Timmerman JG, Heederik D, Spee T, Smit LAM (2014) Skin symptoms in the construction industry: occurrence and determinants. Am J Ind Med 57(6):660–668
Özyazıcıoğlu N, Sürenler S, Tanrıverdi G (2010) Hand dermatitis among paediatric nurses. J Clin Nurs 19((11–12))
Quandt SA, Newman JC, Pichardo-Geisinger R et al (2013) Self-reported skin symptoms and skin-related quality of life among Latino immigrant poultry processing and other manual workers. Am J Ind Med 57(5):605–614
Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Mellen BG (2003) An exploratory analysis of occupational skin disease among Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers in North Carolina. J Agric Saf Health 9(3):221–232
Lampel HP, Patel N, Boyse K, O’Brien SH, Zirwas MJ (2007) Prevalence of hand dermatitis in inpatient nurses at a United States hospital. Dermatitis 18(3):140–142
Cvetkovski R, Rothman K, Olsen J et al (2005) Relation between diagnoses on severity, sick leave and loss of job among patients with occupational hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 152(1):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06415.x
Meding B, Lantto R, Lindahl G, Wrangsjö K, Bengtsson B (2005) Occupational skin disease in Sweden—a 12-year follow-up. Contact Dermatitis 53(6):308–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00731.x
Shah D (2009) Health worker effect phenomenon. Indian J Occup Environ Med 13(2):77–79
Mathias CG (1985) The cost of occupational skin disease. Arch Dermatol 121(3):332–334. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.121.3.332
Blanciforti LA (2011) Eonomic burden of dermatitis in US workers. J Occup Environ Med 53(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318209a6b9
Rietschel RL, Mathias CG, Fowler JF Jr et al (2002) North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis (OCD): evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 13(4):170–176
Pesonen M, Jolanki R, Filon FL et al (2015) Patch test results of European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe—analyses of European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002-2010. Contact Dermatitis 72(3):154–163
Bangsgaard N, Thysse JP, Menne T et al (2012) Contact allergy to epoxy resin: risk occupations and consequences. Contact Dermatitis 67(2):73–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02072.x
Arrandale VH, Liss GM, Tario SM et al (2012) Occupational contact allergens: are they also associated with occupational asthma? Am J Ind Med 55(4):353–360
Goyer N, Bégin D, Beaudry C et al (2006) Prevention guide: formaldehyde in the workplace. Available at http://biology.mcgill.ca/safety/Formaldehyde_guide.pdf. Retrieved on November 19, 2017
Reich HC, Warshaw EM (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde textile resins. Dermatitis 21(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2010.09077
Aalto-Korte K, Kuuliala O, Suuronen K, Alanko K (2008) Occupational contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Contact Dermatitis 59(5):280–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01422.x
Cameo Chemicals “1-(3-CHLOROALLYL)-3,5,7-TRIAZA-1-AZONIAADAMANTANE CHLORIDE” Website. Available at: https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/18075. Accessed November 18, 2017
Chempoint “Suttocide A Hydroxymethylglycinate” Website. Available at: https://www.chempoint.com/products/catalog/ashland/ashland-personal-care-preservatives/suttocide-a-sodium-hydroxymethylglycinate. Accessed November 18, 2017
Dekoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV et al (2017) North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014. Dermatitis 28(1):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000225
Chemo Nickel Test. Chemotechnique Diagnostics. Available at: https://www.chemotechnique.se/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Nickel%20Test%20Package%20Insert,%20version%201%20-%20Digital.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2017
Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Kuuliala O, Suuronen K (2014) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 70(3):169–174
Aalto-Korte K, Pesonon M, Kuuliala O et al (2013) Contact allergy from metalworking fluid traced to tall oil fatty acids monoethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 69(5):316–317
Suuronen K, Aalto-Korte K, Suomela S (2014) Contact allergy to capryldiethanolamine in metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 72(2):120–121
Hagvall L, Bråred-Christensson J, Inerot A (2014) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by sodium cocoamphopropionate in a liquid soap used in fast-food restaurants. Contact Dermatitis 71(2):122–124
Swinnen I, Ghys K, Kerre S, Constandt L, Goossens A (2014) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis from benzodiazepines and other drugs. Contact Dermatitis 70(4):227–232
Burches E, Revert A, Martin J et al (2015) Occupational systemic allergic dermatitis caused by sevoflurane. Contact Dermatitis 71(1):62–63
Alwan W, Banerjee P, White IR (2014) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by omeprazole in a veterinary medicament. Contact Dermatitis 71(6):376–376
Al-Falah K, Schachter J, Sasseville D (2014) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by omeprazole in a horse breeder. Contact Dermatitis 71(6):377–378
De Mozzi P, Johnston GA (2014) An outbreak of allergic contact dermatitis caused by citral in beauticians working in a health spa. Contact Dermatitis 70(6):377–379
Pesonen M, Suomela S, Kuuliala O, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K (2014) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by D-limonene. Contact Dermatitis 71(5):273–279
Montgomery RL, Agius R, Wilkinson SM, Carder M (2017) UK trends of allergic occupational skin disease attributed to fragrances 1996-2015. Contact Dermatitis 78:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12902
Schwensen JF, Menné T, Andersen KE, Sommerlund M, Johnasen JD (2014) Occupations at risk of develo** contact allergy to isothiazolinones in Danish contact dermatitis patients: results from a Danish multicenter study (2009-2012). Contact Dermatitis 71(5):295–302
Maor D, Nixon R (2015) Allergic contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in cooling tower technicians. Dermatitis 26(1):62–64
Friis UF, Menné T, Flyvholm MA (2014) Isothiazolinones in commercial products at Danish workplaces. Contact Dermatitis 71(2):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12235
Madsen JT, Broesby-Olsen S, Andersen KE (2014) Undisclosed methylisothiazolinone in an ultrasound gel causing occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 71(5):312–313
McMullen E, Gawkrodger DJ (2006) Physical friction is under-recognized as an irritant that can cause or contribute to contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 154(1):154–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06957.x
Friis UF, Menné T, Schwensen JF, Flyvholm MA, Bonde JPE, Johansen JD (2014) Occupational irritant contact dermatitis diagnosed by analysis of contact irritants and allergens in the work environment. Contact Dermatitis 71(6):364–370
Ramsing DW, Agner T (1996) Effect of glove occlusion on human skin (II). Contact Dermatitis 34(4):258–262
Meding B, Jarvholm B (2002) Hand eczema in Swedish adults—changes in prevalence between 1983 and 1996. J Investig Dermatol 118(4):719–723. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01718.x
Weidinger S, Illig T, Baurecht H, Irvine AD, Rodriguez E, Diaz-Lacava A, Klopp N, Wagenpfeil S, Zhao Y, Liao H (2006) Loss-of-function variations within the filaggrin gene predispose for atopic dermatitis with allergic sensitizations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118(1):214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.05.004
Friis UF, Menné T, Flyvholm MA, Bonde JPE, Johansen JD (2015) Difficulties in using the material safety data sheets to analyse occupational exposures to contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 72(3):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12314
deGroot AC (2008) Patch testing: test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals, 3rd edn. acdegroot publishing, Wapserveen
Thin-layer rapid-use epicutaneous test. Thin-layer rapid-use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test). Available at: https://www.smartpractice.com/dermatologyallergy/pdfs/TRUE%20TEST%20Prescribing%20Information.pdf. Accessed November 19, 2017
Mathias CG (1989) Contact dermatitis and workers’ compensation: criteria for establishing occupational causation and aggravation. J Am Acad Dermatol 20(5):842–848
Ingber A, Merims S (2004) The validity of the Mathias criteria for establishing occupational causation and aggravation of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 51(1):9–12
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) “Hierarchy of Controls” Website. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html. Accessed November 5, 2017
Forsberg K, Mansdorf SZ (2001) Quick selection guide to chemical protective clothing. Wiley, Hoboken
Zack B, Arrandale VH, Holness DL (2017) Preventing occupational skin disease: a review of training programs. Dermatitis 28(3):169–182
Clemmensen KK, Randdboll I, Ryborg MF, Ebbehoj NE, Agner T (2015) Evidence-based training as primary prevention of hand eczema in a population of hospital cleaning workers. Contact Dermatitis 72(1):47–54
Weisshaar E, Skudlik C, Scheidt R, Matterne U, Wulfhorst B, Schönfeld M, Elsner P, Diepgen TL, John SM, for the ROQ Study Group (2013) Multicentre study rehabilitation of occupational skin diseases—optimization and quality assurance of inpatient management (ROQ)—results from 12-month follow-up. Contact Dermatitis 68(3):169–174
van Gils RF, Groenewoud K, Boot CR et al (2012) Process evaluation of an integrated, multidisciplinary intervention programme for hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 66(5):254–263
Chen J, Gomez P, Kudla I, DeKoven J, Holness DL, Skotnicki S (2016) Return to work for nurses with hand dermatitis. Dermatitis 27(5):308–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000215
Mauro M, De Giusti V, Bovenzi M et al (2017) Effectiveness of a secondary prevention protocol for occupational contact dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31(4):656–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13947
Schliemann S, Petri M, Elsner P (2014) Preventing irritant contact dermatitis with protective creams: influence of the application dose. Contact Dermatitis 70(1):19–26
Adisesh A, Robinson E, Nicholson PJ, Sen D, Wilkinson M, Standards of Care Working Group (2013) UK standards of care for occupational contact dermatitis and occupational contact urticaria. Br J Dermatol 168(6):1167–1175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lampel, H.P., Powell, H.B. Occupational and Hand Dermatitis: a Practical Approach. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 56, 60–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8706-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8706-z