Abstract
The editors of scholarly journals have a duty to uphold and promote the highest standards of ethical conduct of research. They also have a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the literature, and to promote transparency and honesty in reporting research findings. In the process of screening manuscripts they receive for possible publication, editors have the obligation to report infractions to the institutions of offending authors, and request an investigation. Since editors can reject a paper on ethical grounds, they can be considered to be the guardians of ethics who should express high ethical standards in conducting and publishing their own research. An examination of several publishers’ websites reveals no such requirement or clear selection criteria for journal editors. Therefore, we aim to discuss the factors that publishers, in a broad sense, should consider when selecting editors for scholarly journals and believe that such criteria should be made public to ensure accountability. This would restore some of the eroding public trust in disseminated research, fortify confidence in the composition and qualification of members of an editorial board, and help to protect the reputations of publishers and editors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). What rights do authors have? Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9808-8 (in press).
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011). Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20Conduct_2.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
Council of Science Editors (CSE). (2012). Editor roles and responsibilities. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-1-editor-roles-and-responsibilities/. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
Hindawi Publishing Corporation. (2015). Hindawi concludes an in-depth investigation into peer review fraud. https://www.hindawi.com/statement/. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2015). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
Kleinert, S., & Wager, E. (2011). Responsible research publication: International standards for editors. A position statement developed at the 2nd world conference on research integrity, Singapore, July 22–24, 2010. In T. Mayer, & N. Steneck (Eds.), Promoting research integrity in a global environment (Chapter 51, pp. 317–328). Singapore: Imperial College Press/World Scientific Publishing. (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7).
Resnik, D. B., & Elmore, S. A. (2016). Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 169–188. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5.
Smith, R. (2003). Editorial misconduct: Medical editors need effective self regulation. British Medical Journal, 326(7401), 1224–1225. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1224.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013). Responsibilities and rights of authors, peer reviewers, editors and publishers: A status quo inquiry and assessment. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(Special Issue 1), 6–15.
Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 348–353. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2013). Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors? Journal of Global Health, 3(2), 020301. doi:10.7189/jogh.03.020301.
Walters, W. H. (2016). The research contributions of editorial board members in library and information science. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2), 121–146. doi:10.3138/jsp.47.2.121.
Wong, V. S. S., & Callaham, M. L. (2012). Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(3), 247–252. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.003.
World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). (2016). http://www.wame.org/wame-professionalism-code-of-conduct. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Al-Khatib, A. How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 1801–1804 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9821-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9821-y