Log in

Influence of Pulsed Light, Ultrasound, and Series Treatments on Quality Attributes, Pectin Methyl Esterase, and Native Flora Inactivation in Sweet Orange Juice (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Food and Bioprocess Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pectin methyl esterase (PME) is responsible for the destabilization of clouds in sweet orange juice. The study aims to optimize pulsed light (PL) and ultrasound (US) treatments for the maximum inactivation of PME in sweet orange juice. A central composite design was used for PL treatments (2.5 -2.9 kV for 200–300 s) and US treatments (40- 120 W for 2–10 min). The numerical optimization predicted 98.5% inactivation of PME in the juice after 283 s PL exposure at 2.84 kV (2711 J/cm2). US optimized condition was 108 W for 9 min with 82.5% PME inactivation. The first-order rate constants for PL-induced PME inactivation varied from 0.0033 to 0.0159 s−1, whereas, for the US, the range was 0.00126 to 0.0015 s−1. The impact of PL and US treatments in series on various quality attributes of the juice was assessed. PL exposure at 2.4 kV for 180 s [1278 J/cm2; the highest intensity of PL] followed by US treatment for 360 s at 80 W [1.14 W/mL; the highest intensity of US] resulted in 98.3% PME inactivation, > 5-log reduction in natural microbiota, 5% loss in vitamin C, 1.7% loss in antioxidant capacity, and 99.4% retention in phenolics in the juice. The sequence of PL or US had minimal impact on enzyme inactivation and bioactive degradation in the juice. The PL-optimized processing also led to more than 5.0 log reductions in natural microflora. However, the preliminary sensory acceptance, color difference, and bioactive retention of the sample treated at the highest intensity of PL+US were superior to the PL-optimized juice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

Download references

Funding

The research is funded by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Govt of India, under the grant number: Q-11/42/2018-R&D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Padmanav Sahoo: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Resources, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Snehasis Chakraborty: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing- Original draft preparation, Revision–Reviewing and Editing, Funding Acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Snehasis Chakraborty.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Ethics approval was not required for this research.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 754 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahoo, P., Chakraborty, S. Influence of Pulsed Light, Ultrasound, and Series Treatments on Quality Attributes, Pectin Methyl Esterase, and Native Flora Inactivation in Sweet Orange Juice (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). Food Bioprocess Technol 16, 2095–2112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-023-03042-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-023-03042-z

Keywords

Navigation