Abstract
Purpose of Review
The goal of this paper was to discuss the issues and/or overt complications associated with the 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (3-IPP) pump. We also addressed how to resolve such issues with or without surgical intervention.
Recent Findings
Numerous modifications of the 3-IPP pump have been introduced with multiple techniques to place the pump. These are largely dependent on the approach to place the 3-IPP. Pump issues may inevitably occur, and there are numerous special maneuvers that can be performed to resolve pump issues.
Summary
It is important for urologists to know maneuvers for pump malfunctions to prevent unnecessary surgical procedures and pump revision. Several studies are reviewed regarding pump issues and patient satisfaction; however, a more structured prospective research project is warranted to further evaluate these issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Mulcahy JJ. The development of modern penile implants. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(2):177–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.11.003.
Pastuszak AW, Lentz AC, Farooq A, Jones L, Bella AJ. Technological improvements in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis design over the past 40 years. J Sex Med. 2015;12(Suppl 7):415–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.13004Historical overview of penile prosthesis development and evolution with detailed pump history.
Munarriz RM, Goldstein I. Experience with the Mentor alpha-1. In: Carson CC, editor. Urologic prostheses: the complete, practical guide to devices, their implantation and patient follow up. Totowa: Humana Press; 2002. p. 192.
Delk J, Knoll LD, McMurray J, Shore N, Wilson S. Early experience with the American Medical Systems new tactile pump: results of a multicenter study. J Sex Med. 2005;2(2):266–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20238.x.
Trost L. Future considerations in prosthetic urology. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_103_19.
AMS 700TM with MS PumpTM: Penile prosthesis. Operating room manual. Boston Scientific Corporation; 2018. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/Manuals/us/current-rev-en/92162622-01B_AMS700_ORM_en_s.pdf
Knoll LD, Henry G, Culkin D, Culkin D, Ohl DA, Otheguy J, et al. Physician and patient satisfaction with the new AMS 700 momentary squeeze inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1773–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01251.x.
Kavoussi NL, Viers BR, ME VD, Pagliara TJ, Morey AF. “Stiction syndrome”: non-operative management of patients with difficult AMS 700 series inflation. J Sex Med. 2017;14(9):1079–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.07.007The authors describe a non-operative technique for the resolution of pump malfunction of the Momentary Squeeze pump while also providing recommendations for its prevention. A detailed explanation as to why this malfunction occurs is also provided.
Levine LA, Becher E, Bella AJ, Brant WO, Kohler TS, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13(4):489–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017.
Titan®, Titan® OTR and Titan® Touch: inflatable penile prosthesis. instructions for use. Coloplast Corporation;2017.
Shaw T, Garber BB. Coloplast titan inflatable penile prosthesis with one-touch release pump: review of 100 cases and comparison with genesis pump. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):310–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02064.x.
Ohl DA, Brock G, Ralph D, Bogache W, Jones L, Munarriz R, et al. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2467–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x.
Romero Otero J, Rojas Cruz C, García Gómez B, Sarquella Geli J, Medina Polo J, Ruiz Castañé E, et al. Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan Penile Prostheses. Asian J Androl. 2017;19(3):321–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.172822.
Çayan S, Aşcı R, Efesoy O, Bolat MS, Akbay E, Yaman Ö. Comparison of long-term results and couples’ satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019;16(7):1092–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S, et al. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15(8):1180–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.011.
Mulcahy JJ, Austoni E, Barada JH, Choi HK, Hellstrom WJG, Krishnamurti S, et al. The penile implant for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004;1(1):98–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10115.x.
Alarcon JA. Penile pump placement for the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2013;10(2):309–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12080Detailed step by step describing the technique for adequate pump placement through the penoscrotal approach.
Henry GD, Mahle P, Caso J, Eisenhart E, Carrion R, Kramer A. Surgical techniques in penoscrotal implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis: a guide to increasing patient satisfaction and surgeon ease. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/smrj.39Surgical overview for proper pump placement during the penoscrotal approach.
Chan EP, Punjani N, Campbell JD, Abed H, Brock G. Indications for penile prosthesis revision: lessons learned to limit technical causes of reoperation. J Sex Med. 2019;16(9):1444–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.06.003Causes of mechanical and technical failure of pump placement are discussed, with emphasis on modification of technique, including pump fixation, for the prevention of reoperation/repositioning of the pump component.
Palmisano F, Boeri L, Cristini C, Antonini G, Spinelli MG, Franco G, et al. Comparison of infrapubic vs penoscrotal approaches for 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement: do we have a winner? Sex Med Rev. 2018;6(4):631–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.03.007.
Perito PP. Surgical techniques: minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile implant. J Sex Med. 2006;5(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00682.x.
Vollstedt A, Gross MS, Antonini G, Perito PE. The infrapubic surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):620–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.14.
Kramer A, Chason J. Residents at the University of Maryland Medical System provide insight to learning infrapubic approach for IPP surgery: relative benefits but novel challenges exposed in first 15 cases. J Sex Med. 2010;7(3):1298–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01588.x.
Gupta NK, Ring J, Trost L, Wilson SK, Köhler TS. The penoscrotal surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):628–38. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.32.
Henry GD, Laborde E. A review of surgical techniques for impending distal erosion and intraoperative penile implant complications: part 2 of a three-part review series on penile prosthetic surgery. J Sex Med. 2012;9(3):927–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02606.x.
Hellstrom WJG, Montague DK, Moncada I, Carson C, Minhas S, Faria G, et al. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(1):501–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01626.x.
Chung E, Van CT, Wilson I, Cartmill RA. Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures. World J Urol. 2013;31(3):591–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0859-4.
Mulcahy JJ. The prevention and management of noninfectious complications of penile implants. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3(3):203–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/smrj.41.
Mirheydar H, Zhou T, Chang DC, Hsieh T-C. Reoperation rates for penile prosthetic surgery. J Sex Med. 2016;13(1):129–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.11.013.
Bozkurt IH, Arslan B, Yonguc T, Kozacioglu Z, Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, et al. Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(3):535–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0241.
Loh-Doyle J, Patil MB, Nakhoda Z, Nassiri N, Yip W, Wayne K, et al. Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis placement following pelvic radiation: technical considerations and contemporary outcomes. J Sex Med. 2018;15(7):1049–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.634.
Wilson SK. Titan IPP pump guide: tips & tricks to ensure success. Coloplast; 2018. Accessed May 26, 2020. https://www.coloplastmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Tips-Tricks-to-Ensure-Success-Titan-IPP-Pump-Guide.pdf
Garber BB, Khurgin JL, Stember DS, Perito PE. Pseudo-malfunction of the Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis one-touch release pump. Urology. 2014;84(4):857–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Rafael Carrion is a consultant for Coloplast and Endo Pharmaceutical. Dr. Justin Parker is a consultant for Coloplast and Baxter. Dr. Raul E. Fernandez-Crespo and Dr. Kristina Buscaino each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Men’s Health
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez-Crespo, R.E., Buscaino, K. & Carrion, R. “Pumpology”: the Realistic Issues Associated with Pump Placement in Prosthetic Surgery. Curr Urol Rep 22, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01027-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01027-5