SpringerLink
Log in

Foodborne Disease Symptoms, Diagnostics, and Predictions Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review

  • Review article
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food-borne diseases have a high worldwide occurrence, substantially impacting public health and the social economy. Most food-borne diseases are contagious or poisonous and are caused by bacteria, viruses or chemicals that enter the body via contaminated food. The most prevalent harmful bacteria (Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, Clostridium and Listeria) and viruses (norovirus) may cause acute poisoning or chronic disorders such as cancer. Thus, the detection of pathogenic organisms is crucial for the safety of food. Artificial intelligence has recently been an effective technique for predicting pathogens spreading food-borne diseases. This study compares and contrasts the accuracy of many popular methods for making predictions about the pathogens in food-borne diseases, including decision trees, random forests, k-Nearest Neighbors, stochastic gradient descent and extremely randomized trees, along with an ensemble model incorporating all of these approaches. In addition, principal component analysis and scaling methods were used to normalize and rescale the values of the target variable in order to increase the prediction rate. The performance of classification systems has been examined using precision, accuracy, recall, F1-score and root mean square error (RMSE). The experimental results demonstrate that the suggested new ensemble model beat all other classifiers and achieved the average highest 97.26% accuracy, 0.22 RMSE value, 97.77% recall, 97.66% precision and 98.44% F1-Score. This research investigates the predictability of pathogens in food-borne diseases using ensemble learning techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Finger JA, Baroni WS, Maffei DF, Bastos DH, Pinto UM (2019) Overview of foodborne disease outbreaks in Brazil from 2000 to 2018. Foods 8(10):434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharif MK, Javed K, Nasir A (2018) Foodborne illness: threats and control. Foodborne diseases. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 501–523

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jung Y, Jang H, Matthews KR (2014) Effect of the food production chain from farm practices to vegetable processing on outbreak incidence. Microb Biotechnol 7(6):517–527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur I, Garg R, Kaur T, Mathur G (2023) Using artificial intelligence to predict clinical requirements in healthcare. J Pharm Negat Results 2023:4177–4180

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vidyadharani G, Vijaya Bhavadharani HK, Sathishnath P, Ramanathan S, Sariga P, Sandhya A, Sugumar S (2022) Present and pioneer methods of early detection of food borne pathogens. J Food Sci Technol 59(6):2087–2107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torgerson PR, Devleesschauwer B, Praet N, Speybroeck N, Willingham AL, Kasuga F, de Silva N (2015) World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 11 foodborne parasitic diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Med 12(12):e1001920

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilne B, Meistere I, Grantiņa-Ieviņa L, Ķibilds J (2019) Machine learning approaches for epidemiological investigations of food-borne disease outbreaks. Front Microbiol 10:1722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadariya J, Smith TC, Thapaliya D (2014) Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed Res Int 2014:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, Cui W, Guo Y, Du Y, Zhou Y (2021) Machine learning prediction of foodborne disease pathogens: algorithm development and validation study. JMIR Med Inform 9(1):e24924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey SK, Bhandari AK (2023) A systematic review of modern approaches in healthcare systems for lung cancer detection and classification. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 30:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar Y, Gupta S (2023) Deep transfer learning approaches to predict glaucoma, cataract, choroidal neovascularization, diabetic macular edema, drusen and healthy eyes: an experimental review. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 30(1):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heredia N, García S (2018) Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: a review. Animal nutrition 4(3):250–255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Hemavathy RV, Jeevanantham S, Kamalesh R, Sneha S, Yaashikaa PR (2021) Methods of detection of food-borne pathogens: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chukwu EE, Nwaokorie FO, Coker AO, Avila-Campos MJ, Ogunsola FT (2019) 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a practical approach to confirming the identity of food borne bacteria. IFE J Sci 21(3):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koul A, Bawa RK, Kumar Y (2023) Artificial intelligence techniques to predict the airway disorders illness: a systematic review. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 30(2):831–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu W, Feng K, Jiang A, **u Z, Lao Y, Li Y, Long Y (2020) An in situ-synthesized gene chip for the detection of food-borne pathogens on fresh-cut cantaloupe and lettuce. Front Microbiol 10:3089

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nesakumar N, Lakshmanakumar M, Srinivasan S, Jayalatha Jbb A, Balaguru Rayappan JB (2021) Principles and recent advances in biosensors for pathogens detection. ChemistrySelect 6(37):10063–10091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng S, Yang Q, Yang H, Zhang Y, Guo W, Zhang W (2023) An ultrasensitive and specific ratiometric electrochemical biosensor based on SRCA-CRISPR/Cas12a system for detection of Salmonella in food. Food Control 146:109528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chenar SS, Deng Z (2021) Hybrid modeling and prediction of oyster norovirus outbreaks. J Water Health 19(2):254–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang P, Cui W, Wang H, Du Y, Zhou Y (2021) High-efficiency machine learning method for identifying foodborne disease outbreaks and confounding factors. Foodborne Pathog Dis 18(8):590–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chenar SS, Deng Z (2018) Development of artificial intelligence approach to forecasting oyster norovirus outbreaks along Gulf of Mexico coast. Environ Int 111:212–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Min HJ, Mina HA, Deering AJ, Bae E (2021) Development of a smartphone-based lateral-flow imaging system using machine-learning classifiers for detection of Salmonella spp. J Microbiol Methods 188:106288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen M, Long SW, McDermott PF, Olsen RJ, Olson R, Stevens RL, Davis JJ (2018) Using machine learning to predict antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations and associated genomic features for nontyphoidal Salmonella. bioRxiv 2018:380782

    Google Scholar 

  24. Polat H, Topalcengiz Z, Danyluk MD (2020) Prediction of Salmonella presence and absence in agricultural surface waters by artificial intelligence approaches. J Food Saf 40(1):e12733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amado TM, Bunuan MR, Chicote RF, Espenida SMC, Masangcay HL, Ventura CH, Enriquez LAC (2019) Development of predictive models using machine learning algorithms for food adulterants bacteria detection. 2019 IEEE 11th international conference on humanoid, nanotechnology, information technology, communication and control, environment, and management (HNICEM). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lupolova N, Dallman TJ, Holden NJ, Gally DL (2017) Patchy promiscuity: machine learning applied to predict the host specificity of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli. Microb Genom. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hiura S, Koseki S, Koyama K (2021) Prediction of population behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in food using machine learning and a microbial growth and survival database. Sci Rep 11(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Njage PMK, Henri C, Leekitcharoenphon P, Mistou MY, Hendriksen RS, Hald T (2019) Machine learning methods as a tool for predicting risk of illness applying next-generation sequencing data. Risk Anal 39(6):1397–1413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Borujeni MS, Ghaderi-Zefrehei M, Ghanegolmohammadi F, Ansari-Mahyari S (2018) A novel LSSVM based algorithm to increase accuracy of bacterial growth modeling. Iran J Biotech 16(2):105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bandoy DJ, Weimer BC (2020) Biological machine learning combined with campylobacter population genomics reveals virulence gene allelic variants cause disease. Microorganisms 8(4):549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hill AA, Crotta M, Wall B, Good L, O’Brien SJ, Guitian J (2017) Towards an integrated food safety surveillance system: a simulation study to explore the potential of combining genomic and epidemiological metadata. Royal Soc Open Sci 4(3):160721

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maharana A, Cai K, Hellerstein J, Hswen Y, Munsell M, Staneva V, Nsoesie EO (2019) Detecting reports of unsafe foods in consumer product reviews. JAMIA Open 2(3):330–338

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Olm MR, Bhattacharya N, Crits-Christoph A, Firek BA, Baker R, Song YS, Banfield JF (2019) Necrotizing enterocolitis is preceded by increased gut bacterial replication, Klebsiella, and fimbriae-encoding bacteria. Sci Adv 5(12):eaax5727

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nogales A, Morón RD, García-Tejedor ÁJ (2020) Food safety risk prediction with Deep Learning models using categorical embeddings on European Union data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06704

  35. Ahsan MM, Mahmud MA, Saha PK, Gupta KD, Siddique Z (2021) Effect of data scaling methods on machine learning algorithms and model performance. Technologies 9(3):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rudra T, Paul P (2021) Heart disease prediction using traditional machine learning.

  37. Kaur I, Sandhu AK, Kumar Y (2022) A hybrid deep transfer learning approach for the detection of vector-borne diseases. 2022 5th international conference on contemporary computing and informatics (IC3I). IEEE, New York, pp 2189–2194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng T, Chen X, Wan M, ** L, Wang X, Du X, Yang X (2021) The prediction of hepatitis E through ensemble learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(1):159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nogales A, Díaz-Morón R, García-Tejedor ÁJ (2022) A comparison of neural and non-neural machine learning models for food safety risk prediction with European Union RASFF data. Food Control 134:108697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wheeler NE (2019) Tracing outbreaks with machine learning. Nat Rev Microbiol 17(5):269–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martínez-García PM, López-Solanilla E, Ramos C, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P (2016) Prediction of bacterial associations with plants using a supervised machine-learning approach. Environ Microbiol 18(12):4847–4861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhardwaj P, Bhandari G, Kumar Y, Gupta S (2022) An investigational approach for the prediction of gastric cancer using artificial intelligence techniques: a systematic review. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 29:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lumogdang CFD, Wata MG, Loyola SJS, Angelia RE, Angelia HLP (2019) Supervised machine learning approach for pork meat freshness identification. Proceedings of the 2019 6th international conference on bioinformatics research and applications. ACM, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chowdhury NH, Reaz MBI, Haque F, Ahmad S, Ali SHM, Bakar AAA, Bhuiyan MAS (2021) Performance analysis of conventional machine learning algorithms for identification of chronic kidney disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Diagnostics 11(12):2267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kader MS, Ahmed F, Akter J (2021) Machine learning techniques to precaution of emerging disease in the poultry industry. 2021 24th international conference on computer and information technology (ICCIT). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rani P, Kumar R, Jain A (2021) Coronary artery disease diagnosis using extra tree-support vector machine: ET-SVMRBF. Int J Comput Appl Technol 66(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ali L, Niamat A, Khan JA, Golilarz NA, **ngzhong X, Noor A, Bukhari SAC (2019) An optimized stacked support vector machines based expert system for the effective prediction of heart failure. IEEE Access 7:54007–54014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Weller DL, Love T, Wiedmann M (2021) Interpretability versus accuracy: a comparison of machine learning models built using different algorithms, performance measures, and features to predict E. coli levels in agricultural water. Front Artif Intell 4:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goyal P, Gopala Krishna DN, Jain D, Rathi M (2021) Foodborne disease outbreak prediction using deep learning. Innovations in computational intelligence and computer vision. Springer, Singapore, pp 165–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaur I, Kumar Y, Sandhu AK, Ijaz MF (2023) Predictive modeling of epidemic diseases based on vector-borne diseases using artificial intelligence techniques. Computational intelligence in medical decision making and diagnosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Singh PD, Kaur R, Singh KD, Dhiman G (2021) A novel ensemble-based classifier for detecting the COVID-19 disease for infected patients. Inf Syst Front 23(6):1385–1401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaur I, Sandhu AK, Kumar Y (2022) Artificial intelligence techniques for predictive modeling of vector-borne diseases and its pathogens: a systematic review. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 29:1–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Kaur I, Sandhu AK, Kumar Y (2021) Analyzing and minimizing the effects of Vector-borne diseases using machine and deep learning techniques: a systematic review. 2021 sixth international conference on image information processing (ICIIP), vol 6. IEEE, New York, pp 69–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of CSE, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Yogesh Kumar & Shakti Mishra

  2. Department of Computer Applications, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran, Mohali, India

    Inderpreet Kaur

Authors
  1. Yogesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inderpreet Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shakti Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakti Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Non-financial interests and authors have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, Y., Kaur, I. & Mishra, S. Foodborne Disease Symptoms, Diagnostics, and Predictions Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng 31, 553–578 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09991-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09991-0

Search

Navigation