Abstract
Dialetheism is the view that some true sentences have a true negation as well. Defending dialetheism, Graham Priest argues that the correct account of negation should allow for true contradictions (sentences of the form \(\alpha \) and \(\lnot \alpha \)) without entailing triviality. A negation doing precisely that is said to have ‘surplus content’. Now, to defend that the correct account of negation does have surplus content, Priest advances arguments to hold that classical Boolean negation (which rules out surplus content) does not even make sense without begging the question against the dialetheist. We shall argue that Priest’s arguments may be turned upon themselves, and that he may also be accused of begging the question against the classical logician. We then advance an argument to the effect that Priest’s account of negation falls short of satisfying his own desiderata on a correct account of a negation: a theory of negation that attempts to represent contradictions cannot coherently allow surplus content, and vice-versa, a negation allowing for surplus content bans contradiction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arenhart, J.R.B.: Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction. Log. Univ. 9, 523–544 (2015)
Beall, J.C.: Trivializing sentences and the promise of semantic completeness. Analysis 75(4), 573–584 (2015)
Berto, F.: Absolute contradiction, dialetheism, and revenge. Rev. Symb. Log. 7(2), 193–207 (2014)
Berto, F.: A modality called ‘negation’. Mind 124, 761–793 (2015)
Béziau, J.-Y.: Paraconsistent logics! a reply to slater. Sorites 17, 17–25 (2006)
Béziau, J.-Y.: Round squares are no contradictions (tutorial on negation, contradiction, and opposition). In: Béziau, J.-Y., Chakraborty, M., Dutta, S. (eds.) New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic, pp. 39–56. Springer, New Delhi (2015)
Bueno, O.: Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Chakraborty, M., Dutta, S. (eds.) New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic, pp. 465–476. Springer, New Delhi (2015)
Parsons, T.: The traditional square of opposition. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/square/ (2015)
Priest, G.: In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Priest, G.: Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Priest, G.: Reply to Slater. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Carnelli, W., Gabbay, D. (eds.) Handbook of Paraconsistency, pp. 467–474. College Publications, London (2007). (Studies in logic)
Priest, G., Berto, F.: Dialetheism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2013 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/dialetheism/ (2013)
Slater, B.H.: Paraconsistent logics? J. Philos. Log. 24, 451–454 (1995)
Slater, B.H.: Dialetheias are mental confusions. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Carnelli, W., Gabbay, D. (eds.) Handbook of Paraconsistency, pp. 457–466. College Publications, London (2007). (Studies in logic)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arenhart, J.R.B., Melo, E.S. Classical Negation Strikes Back: Why Priest’s Attack on Classical Negation Can’t Succeed. Log. Univers. 11, 465–487 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0178-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0178-z