Log in

Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To provide much-needed guidance for digital transformations in sales organizations, we draw from change readiness theory to propose a digital selling effectiveness framework. Based on a cross-industry sample of 225 salespeople across 69 sales organizations, findings reveal key organizational and managerial influence mechanisms that impact digital selling readiness, and consequently, effectiveness. We discover that digital selling psychological climate drives digital selling readiness; however, results also reveal the strong influence marketing has over this relationship. Marketing-sales joint rewards increase the influence of digital selling climate on readiness, whereas marketing-sales rivalry weakens such influence. On the managerial side, positive outcome framing, an apprising managerial influence tactic, positively impacts digital selling readiness. At the same time, sanction influence tactics negate the effect of positive outcome framing on readiness while consultation tactics yield little influence. Importantly, we demonstrate an association between digital selling readiness and effectiveness, illustrating a performance-based approach for successful digital transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In comparison to a broad general theory, our middle-range theory approach (i.e., less abstract and more specific to an empirical context) (Merton, 1968) aims “to form a basis for more abstract general theories that are more diversified, inclusive, loose knit, and generalized across domains” (Setia et al., 2013, p. 566).

  2. In their seminal work, Kipnis and Schmidt (1985) suggest that managerial influence tactics can be grouped into categories of hard, soft, and rational tactics. Hard tactics involve the use of authority/power, soft tactics involve the use of power-sharing, and apprising falls within the category of rational tactics, which rely on explanations and evidence (Lee et al., 2017, p. 213).

  3. Given previous research has shown that rewards may reduce the impact of interfunctional conflict, there is potential for an interaction between marketing-sales rivalry and joint rewards. As a result, we tested the possibility of a three-way moderation between marketing-sales rivalry, marketing-sales joint-rewards, and digital selling climate. Results did not support this model however (γ = –.008, SE = .075, p > .40), providing empirical evidence for the specification of the proposed model.

References

  • Agnihotri, R., Dingus, R., Hu, M. Y., & Krush, M. T. (2016). Social media: Influencing customer satisfaction in B2B sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, R. (2020). Social media, customer engagement, and sales organizations: a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 90(October), 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, R. (2021). From sales force automation to digital transformation: how social media, social CRM, and artificial intelligence technologies are influencing the sales process. In A Research Agenda for Sales. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Ahearne, M., Jelinek, R., & Rapp, A. (2005). Moving beyond the direct effect of SFA adoption on salesperson performance: Training and support as key moderating factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, M., Hughes, D. E., & Schillewaert, N. (2007). Why sales reps should welcome information technology: Measuring the impact of CRM-based IT on sales effectiveness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, M., & Rapp, A. (2010). The role of technology at the interface between salespeople and consumers. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 30(2), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, M., Jones, E., Rapp, A., & Mathieu, J. (2008). High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Science, 54(4), 671–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angevine, C., Plotkin, C. L., & Stanley, J. (2018). The secret to making it in the digital sales world: The human touch. McKinsey & Company (May). Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-secret-to-making-it-in-the-digital-sales-world

  • Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human relations, 46(6), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., Bernerth, J. B., Pitts, J. P., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Organizational change recipients' beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(4), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., Rousseau, D. M., Rudolph, J. W., & DePalma, J. A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 182–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolander, W., Chaker, N. N., Pappas, A., & Bradbury, D. R. (2021). Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–20.

  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 733–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckenooghe, D., Devos, G., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Organizational change questionnaire–climate of change, processes, and readiness: Development of a new instrument. The Journal of psychology, 143(6), 559–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckenooghe, D. (2010). Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 46(4), 500–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, N., & Shipley, G. M. (2020). Salesperson communication effectiveness in a digital sales interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bill, F., Feurer, S., & Klarmann, M. (2020). Salesperson social media use in business-to-business relationships: An empirical test of an integrative framework linking antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 734–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Managers' upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behavior: the International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(2), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. J., Yeh, S. P., & Yeh, I. J. (2007). The Effects of Joint Rewards System in New Product Development. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, D. R., Lee, N., Dewsnap, B., & Cadogan, J. W. (2019). A within-person theoretical perspective in sales research: outlining recommendations for adoption and consideration of boundary conditions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(4), 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B., Jones, E., Roberts, J. A., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2002). The role of environmental turbulence, readiness for change, and salesperson learning in the success of sales force change. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 22(4), 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979). A paradigm for develo** better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., & Ward, K. (2006). The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation. Risk analysis, 26(5), 1175–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cron, W. L., & Baldauf, A. (2021). Practical insights for sales force digitalization success: the scholar’s perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2021), Why digital transformations are failing, Forbes, May 23, 2021. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2021/05/23/why-digital-transformations-are-failing/?sh=59b2fbb97617

  • Dewsnap, B., & Jobber, D. (2000). The sales–marketing interface in consumer packaged-goods companies: a conceptual framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(2), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. R., Landry, T. D., Li, P. C., & Zou, S. (2007). How sales controls affect job-related outcomes: the role of organizational sales-related psychological climate perceptions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 638–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. (2019), 100 stats on digital transformation and customer experience, Forbes, December 16, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/12/16/100-stats-on-digital-transformation-and-customer-experience/?sh=8c2b2573bf3e

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(2), 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2020), Gartner survey of nearly 2,000 CIOs reveals top performing enterprises are prioritizing digital innovation during the pandemic, Gartner Newsroom, October 20, 2020 https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-10-20-gartner-survey-of-nearly-2000-cios-reveals-top-performing-enterprises-are-prioritizing-digital-innovation-during-the-pandemic.

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. J. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: when your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenzi, P., & Habel, J. (2020). Mastering the digital transformation of sales. California Management Review, 62(4), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenzi, P., & Nijssen, E. J. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on salespeople: an empirical investigation using the JD-R model. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Caldwell, S. D. (2007). Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstein, B., Bolander, W., Goldsmith, R., & Plouffe, C. R. (2019). Adapting influence approaches to informed consumers in high-involvement purchases: are salespeople really doomed? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houpis, C. (2010), Sales and marketing alignment, Aberdeen Group report. Accessed January 26, 2021: https://www.dnb.com/content/dam/english/dnb-solutions/sales-and-marketing/aberdeen_report_sales_and_marketing_alignment_2010_09.pdf

  • Hunter, G. K., & Perreault Jr., W. D. (2007). Making sales technology effective. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G. K., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2015). Commitment to technological change, sales force intelligence norms, and salesperson key outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J., Nenkov, G. Y., & Barclay, D. W. (2012). Perceived marketing–sales relationship effectiveness: a matter of justice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itani, O. S., Agnihotri, R., & Dingus, R. (2017). Social media use in B2b sales and its impact on competitive intelligence collection and adaptive selling: Examining the role of learning orientation as an enabler. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itani, O. S., Krush, M. T., Agnihotri, R., & Trainor, K. J. (2020). Social media and customer relationship management technologies: Influencing buyer-seller information exchanges. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. S., & Bharadwaj, S. (2005). Digitization of selling activity and sales force performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. (1985). The language of persuasion. Psychology Today, 4, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirrane, M., Lennon, M., O’Connor, C., & Fu, N. (2017). Linking perceived management support with employees’ readiness for change: the mediating role of psychological capital. Journal of Change Management, 17(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. G., Hornung, S., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Change-supportive employee behavior: Antecedents and the moderating role of time. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1664–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Rackham, N., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2006). Ending the war between sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., & Kumar, P. (2020). Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Massey, G. R., & Piercy, N. F. (2011). The impact of aligned rewards and senior manager attitudes on conflict and collaboration between sales and marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1161–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational research methods, 11(4), 815–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Han, S., Cheong, M., Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2017). How do I get my way? A meta-analytic review of research on influence tactics. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34(10), 1252–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2020). Social media marketing strategy: definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–20.

  • Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming, X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, R. G., Challagalla, G. N., & Shervani, T. A. (2006). Influence tactics for effective adaptive selling. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, R. G., & Dixon, A. L. (2019). An updated taxonomy of salesperson influence tactics. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(3), 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. (1996). Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. Journal of marketing Research, 33(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Ahearne, M., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A longitudinal cross-level model of leader and salesperson influences on sales force technology use and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 528–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, M., Yrjölä, M., & Hautamäki, P. (2021). Digital transformation of business-to-business sales: what needs to be unlearned? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1–17.

  • Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. (1996). The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). On the sociological Theories of the Middle Range, in Social Theory and Social Structure. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P. H., Sales, A. L., & Hackett, E. J. (1991). The implementation and adoption of new technology in organizations: the impact on work, people, and culture. Human Resource Management, 30(1), 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, V., & Ross Jr., W. T. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(3), 298–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. J., & Inks, S. A. (2001). Technology and the sales force: Increasing acceptance of sales force automation. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(5), 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., Malhotra, S., & Locander, W. B. (2012). Reluctant employees and felt stress: The moderating impact of manager decisiveness. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, J., Rapp, A., Bachrach, D. G., Mullins, R., & Harvey, J. (2017). Do sales and service compete? The impact of multiple psychological climates on frontline employee performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe, C. R., Bolander, W., Cote, J. A., & Hochstein, B. (2016). Does the customer matter most? Exploring strategic frontline employees’ influence of customers, the internal business team, and external business partners. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 106–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological methods, 21(2), 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69(2), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). Offerings as digitalized interactive platforms: A conceptual framework and implications. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Forbes, L. P. (2008). The sales force technology–performance chain: The role of adaptive selling and effort. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A., & Beeler, L. (2021). The state of selling & sales management research: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860680

  • Román, S., & Rodríguez, R. (2015). The influence of sales force technology use on outcome performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(6), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouziès, D., & Hulland, J. (2014). Does marketing and sales integration always pay off? Evidence from a social capital perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(5), 511–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, C. D. (2005). The application of change management theory to HR portal implementation in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 44(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, S., Challagalla, G., & Kohli, A. K. (2012). Implementing changes in marketing strategy: The role of perceived outcome-and process-oriented supervisory actions. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 564–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, W. A., Hughes, D. E., Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., & Jones, E. (2016). Better together: Trait competitiveness and competitive psychological climate as antecedents of salesperson organizational commitment and sales performance. Marketing Letters, 27(2), 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

  • Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., & Joglekar, S. (2013). Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 565–590.

  • Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. Handbook of organizational change and innovation, 73–107.

  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational research methods, 13(3), 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., Flaherty, K., Sohi, R. S., Deeter-Schmelz, D., Habel, J., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Malshe, A., Mullins, R., & Onyemah, V. (2019). Sales profession and professionals in the age of digitization and artificial intelligence technologies: concepts, priorities, and questions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(1), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleep, S., Lam, S. K., & Hulland, J. (2018). The sales–marketing integration gap: a social identity approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(4), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. (2012). Explaining employee engagement with strategic change implementation: A meaning-making approach. Organization Science, 23(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenburgh, T., & Ahearne, M. (2012). Motivating salespeople: What really works. Harvard Business Review, (July-August).

  • Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, S., Schwarz, A., Jones, E., & Chin, W. W. (2007). Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R., Kohli, A. K., & Zaltman, G. (1995). Influence strategies in buying centers. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, V. A., de Almeida, M. I. S., Agnihotri, R., da Silva, N. S. D. A. C., & Arunachalam, S. (2019). In pursuit of an effective B2B digital marketing strategy in an emerging market. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1085–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2011). The meaning and measurement of implementation climate. Implementation Science, 6(1), 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, L., & Mullins, R. (2012). Technology usage and sales teams: A multilevel analysis of the antecedents of usage. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(2), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J., Marinova, D., & Singh, J. (2007). Strategic change implementation and performance loss in the front lines. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Chavez, C. (2002). Influence tactics and leader effectiveness. Leadership, 139–165.

  • Zoltners, A., Sinha, P., Sahay, D., Shastri, A., & Lorimer, S. E. (2021). Practical insights to ensure sales force digitalization success. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Mullins.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Willy Bolander served as Area Editor for this article.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 4

Table 4 Item measures and factor loadings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mullins, R., Agnihotri, R. Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 50, 800–821 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00836-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00836-5

Keywords

Navigation