Abstract
Background
There is debate regarding preoperative endoscopy (EGD) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Some centers perform EGD routinely in all patients; others perform EGD selectively. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature to estimate how frequently preoperative EGD changes management.
Methods
Our review yielded 28 studies encompassing 6616 patients. Baseline characteristics including age and body mass index (BMI) were included. Patients were grouped based on EGD findings into two groups: Group 1—findings which did not significantly change management (e.g., mild/moderate duodenitis, Grade A/B esophagitis, mild/moderate gastritis, H. pylori infection, hiatal hernia <2 cm); Group 2—findings which delayed, altered, or cancelled surgery (e.g., severe duodenitis, Grade C/D esophagitis, gastric varices, hiatal hernia >2 cm, mass/carcinoma). A general estimating equation (GEE) model accounting for the correlated data within each study was used to calculate confidence intervals around the estimate of how frequently surgery was delayed or altered.
Results
Mean age was 41.4 ± 2.9 years, the majority was women, and mean preoperative BMI was 47 ± 3.2 kg/m2. Overall 92.4 % (n = 6112) had a normal EGD or findings that did not change clinical management and 7.6 % (n = 504); 95 % CI [4.6, 12.4 %] had findings that delayed/altered surgery. The revised estimate was 20.6 %; 95%CI [14.5, 28.2 %] if all esophagitis (regardless of grade) were categorized into Group 2. The approximate incidence of Barrett’s esophagus and carcinoma were 0.1 and 0.08 %, respectively.
Conclusion
A selective approach to preoperative EGD may be considered, based on the patients’ symptoms, risk factors, and type of procedure planned.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11695-016-2232-y/MediaObjects/11695_2016_2232_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11695-016-2232-y/MediaObjects/11695_2016_2232_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11695-016-2232-y/MediaObjects/11695_2016_2232_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Anderson M, Gan S, et al. Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery patient. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1–10.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Evans J, Muthusamy R, et al. The role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery patient. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;29:1007–17.
Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1–27.
Sauerland S, Angrisani L, Belachew M, et al. Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2005;19:200–21.
Wiltberger G, Bucher J, Schmelzle M, et al. Preoperative endoscopy and its impact on perioperative management in bariatric surgery. Dig Surg. 2015;32:238–42.
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesaphagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–80.
Azagury D, Dumonceau J, Morel P, et al. Preoperative work-up in asymptomatic patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is endoscopy mandatory. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1304–11.
Heacock L, Parikh M, Jain R, et al. Improving the diagnostic accuracy of hiatal hernia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1730–3.
Carabotti M, Avallone M, Cereatti F, Paganini A et al. Usefulness of upper gastrointestinal symptoms as a driver to prescribe gastroscopy in obese patients candidate to bariatric surgery. A prospective study. Obes Surg 2015.
Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:707–18.
Schirmer B, Erenoglu C, Miller A. Flexible endoscopy in the management of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12:634–8.
Brownlee A, Bromberg E, Roslin M. Outcomes in patients with helicobacter pylori undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2276–9.
Abdullahi M, Annibale B, Capoccia D, et al. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori is affected by body mass index (BMI). Obes Surg. 2008;18:1450–4.
Carabotti M, D’Ercole C, Iossa A, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in obesity and its clinical outcome after bariatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:647–53.
Spaniolas K, Kasten K, Brinkley K, et al. The changing bariatric surgery landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1544–6.
Rosenthal R, Diaz A, Arvidsson D, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.
Rebecchi F, Allaix M, Giaccone C, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation. Ann Surg. 2014;260:909–14.
Schigt A, Coblijn U, Lagarde S, et al. Is esophagogastroduodenoscopy before Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve mandatory? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:411–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed Consent
Does not apply
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parikh, M., Liu, J., Vieira, D. et al. Preoperative Endoscopy Prior to Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. OBES SURG 26, 2961–2966 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2232-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2232-y