Log in

Analyzing the Premature Failure of Rubber Bands in Excavator Track Chains

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rubber bands used in the track chains of excavators, known as track pin rubber bands, frequently experience failures due to factors such as their heavyweight, fast speed, sharp objects on off-road paths, shocks, vibrations, accumulated heat (generated during operation), and track tension. To identify the main cause of these failures, we conducted a failure analysis by evaluating their chemical compositions, morphological, mechanical, and thermal properties. For this study, four different types of failed rubber bands, designated as RB1, RB2, RB3, and RB4, were collected from the track pins of four distinct excavator track chains. None of the selected rubber bands passed the 1000 km running trial. RB1 failed after covering 650 km, RB2 failed after 250 km, RB3 after 400 km, and RB4 after 800 km. Both mechanical and thermal properties are dependent on the chemical formulations of the rubber bands, and all the failed rubber bands exhibited poor chemical formulations. RB1 showed a Schallamach wave on the outer used surface, indicating significant plastic deformation before fracture. In contrast, the other failed rubber bands (RB2, RB3, and RB4) displayed severe mechanical degradation with surface defects such as deep grooves, catering or pitting, micro-cracks, and scars. Thermogravimetric analysis further supported the cause of failure, revealing higher total mass loss and lower residue mass percentages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Li, V.R.L.P. Bahadursha, M.S. Hoo Fatt, Predicting failure in rubber membranes: An experimental-numerical approach. Eng. Fail. Anal. 90, 404–424 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L.H. Zhao, X.B. Wei, X.G. Li, The analysis on the tribological properties of CR/EPDM blends with chrome-plated steel under dry sliding. Adv. Mater. Res. 774–776, 99–102 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Bódai, T.J. Goda, Friction force measurement at windscreen wiper/glass contact. Tribol. Lett. 45(3), 515–523 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L.I. Farfán-Cabrera et al., Experimental method for wear assessment of sealing elastomers. Polym. Testing. 53, 116–121 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Lorenz, et al. Rubber friction on road surfaces: Experiment and theory for low sliding speeds. J. Chem. Phys. 142(19) (2015).

  6. M. Khafidh et al., Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials. Wear. 412–413, 23–29 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P.R. Fry, Loads and stresses—the real cause of failures in surface mining machinery. Pract. Fail. Anal. 3(2), 7–14 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.M. Bošnjak et al., ‘Designing-in’ failures and redesign of bucket wheel excavator undercarriage. Eng. Fail. Anal. 35, 95–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Bošnjak et al., Failure investigation of the bucket wheel excavator crawler chain link. Eng. Fail. Anal. 35, 462–469 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Bošnjak et al., Cracks, repair and reconstruction of bucket wheel excavator slewing platform. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16(5), 1631–1642 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Bošnjak et al., Failure analysis of the end eye connection of the bucket wheel excavator portal tie-rod support. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16(3), 740–750 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S.M. Bošnjak et al., Bucket wheel excavator: Integrity assessment of the bucket wheel boom tie-rod welded joint. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18(1), 212–222 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Bošnjak et al., Failure analysis and redesign of the bucket wheel excavator two-wheel bogie. Eng. Fail. Anal. 17(2), 473–485 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Savković et al., Analysis of the drive shaft fracture of the bucket wheel excavator. Eng. Fail. Anal. 20, 105–117 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.M. Bošnjak et al., Failure of the bucket wheel excavator buckets. Eng. Fail. Anal. 84, 247–261 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.M. Bošnjak et al., Bucket chain excavator: Failure analysis and redesign of the counterweight boom supporting truss columns. Eng. Fail. Anal. 32, 322–333 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Li et al., Failure analysis of bolts on fatigue test bench for excavator stick. Eng. Fail. Anal. 118, 104863 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Z.S. Liu et al., Prediction of noise inside tracked vehicles. Appl. Acoust. 67(1), 74–91 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Balasooriya et al., The effect of the surface area of carbon black grades on HNBR in harsh environments. Polym. 11(1), 61 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Wang, X. Rui, H. Yu, Study on dynamic track tension control for high-speed tracked vehicles. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 132, 277–292 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Thavamani, A.K. Bhowmick, D. Khastgir, Effect of ageing on strength and wear of tank track pad compounds. Wear. 170(1), 25–32 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Thavamani, A.K. Bhowmick, Wear of tank track pad rubber vulcanizates by various rocks. Rubber Chem. Technol. 65(1), 31–45 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Pergantis, Thermographic field-inspection study on M1 main battle tank track systems. Aerospace Sensing. 1682, SPIE (1992)

  24. W. Kim et al., Fatigue crack growth behavior of NR and HNBR based vulcanizates with potential application to track pad for heavy weight vehicles. Macromol. Res. 11(2), 73–79 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Dhir, S. Sankar, Assessment of tracked vehicle suspension system using a validated computer simulation model. J. Terrramech. 32(3), 127–149 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Thavamani, D. Khastgir, A.K. Bhowmick, Microscopic studies on the mechanisms of wear of NR, SBR and HNBR vulcanizates under different conditions. J. Mater. Sci. 28(23), 6318–6322 (1993)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Karásek, M. Sumita, Characterization of dispersion state of filler and polymer-filler interactions in rubber-carbon black composites. J. Mater. Sci. 31(2), 281–289 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Grincova, M. Andrejiova, D. Marasova, Failure analysis of the impact resistance of protective rubber panels. Eng. Fail. Anal. 139, 106481 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M.G. Maya et al., Development of a flexible and conductive elastomeric composite based on chloroprene rubber. Polym. Testing. 65, 256–263 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Z. Xu et al., Graphene oxide-supported zinc oxide nanoparticles for chloroprene rubber with improved crosslinking network and mechanical properties. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 124, 105492 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. M. Deen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafeez, M.A., Farooq, A. & Deen, K.M. Analyzing the Premature Failure of Rubber Bands in Excavator Track Chains. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 24, 179–189 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01830-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01830-5

Keywords

Navigation