Log in

Is Diversion with Ileostomy Non-inferior to Hartmann Resection for Left-sided Colorectal Anastomotic Leak?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Treatment of left-sided colorectal anastomotic leaks often requires fecal stream diversion for prevention of further septic complications. To manage anastomotic leak, it is unclear if diverting ileostomy provides similar outcomes to Hartmann resection with colostomy.

Methods

We identified all patients who developed anastomotic leak following left-sided colorectal resections from 1/2012 through 12/2014 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Then, we examined the risk of mortality and abdominal reoperation in patients treated with diverting ileostomy as compared to Hartmann resection.

Results

There were 1745 patients who experienced an anastomotic leak in a cohort of 63,748 patients (3.7%). Two hundred thirty-five patients had a reoperation for anastomotic leak involving the formation of a diverting ileostomy (n = 77) or Hartmann resection (n = 158). There was no difference in mortality or abdominal reoperation in patients treated with diverting ileostomy (3.9, 7.8%) versus Hartmann resection (3.8, 6.3%) (p = 0.8).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the outcomes of mortality or need for second abdominal reoperation in patients treated with diverting ileostomy as compared to Hartmann resection for left-sided colorectal anastomotic leak. Thus, select patients with left-sided colorectal anastomotic leaks may be safely managed with diverting ileostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trencheva K, Morrissey K, Wells M et al. Identifying Important Predictors for Anastomotic Leak After Colon and Rectal Resection. Annals of Surgery, 2013: 257:108–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blumetti J, Chaudhey V, Cintron J et al. Management of Anastomotic Leak Lessons Learned from a Large Colon and Rectal Surgery Training Program. World J Surg, 2014: 38:985–991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Francone T, Saleem A, Read T, Roberts PL, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, Ricciardi R. Ultimate fate of the leaking intestinal anastomosis; does leak mean perminant stoma? J Gastrointest Surg , 2010: 14:987–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murrell Z, Stamos M. Reoperation for Anastomotic Failure. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 2006: 19:213–216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricket A, Willeke F, Kienle P, Post S. Management and outcome of anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Colorectal Disease, 2010: 12:e216-e223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. NSQIP. National Surgical Improvement Program [Home page on the internet]. (American College of Surgeons) 2005.

  7. Health Information Privacy. 2011. http://hhs.gov/ocr/privacy-Washington DC, (accessed July 27, 2011).

  8. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderston W et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP; the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk adjusted, and peer controlled program for the measurements and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg, 1998: 288:491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parc Y, Frileux P, Schmitt G, Dehni N, Ollivier J, Parc R. Management of Post-Operative Peritonitis After Anterior Resection. Experience from a Referral Intensive Care Unit. Disease of the Colon and Rectum, 2000: 43:579–589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chun L, Haigh P, Tam M, et al. Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy for Pelvic Anastomoses: Predictors of Morbidity and Nonclosure. Disease of the Colon and Rectum, 2012: 55:2;167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbas, S. Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2007: 22:4;351–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garber A, Hyman N, Turner O. Complications of Hartmann takedown in a decade of preferred primary anastomosis. The American Journal of Surgery, 2014: 207, 60–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedrick T, Sawyer R, Foley E, Freil C. Anastomotic Leak and the Loop Ileostomy: Friend or Foe? Disease of the Colon & Rectum , 2006: 49: 1167–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J et al. Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: difference between salvage and anastomotic takedown. The Americal Journal of Surgery , 2012: 206:671–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krarup P, Jorhensen L, Darling H. Management of Anastomotic Leakage in a Nationwide Cohort of Colonic Cancer Patients. J Am Coll Surg, 2014: 218:940–949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanna M, Vinci A, Pigazzi A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery; when is it necessary. Langenbecks Arch Surgery, 2015: 400:145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made (a) substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (c) final approval of the version to be published. (d) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco Ricciardi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stafford, C., Francone, T.D., Marcello, P.W. et al. Is Diversion with Ileostomy Non-inferior to Hartmann Resection for Left-sided Colorectal Anastomotic Leak?. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 503–507 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3612-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3612-x

Keywords

Navigation