Abstract
Nowadays, excessive use of the Internet and addiction to it became constant concerns among researchers. The proliferation of this research stream came along with a constant need for valid operationalizations. Our study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) on a Romanian sample (n = 421 students). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution: Mental Disorder (α = .78); Time Management Disorder (α = .79). Also, the overall IAT had good reliability (α = .86). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial structure and through multigroup comparisons revealed that the instrument is invariant across genders. Further proofs in support of the IAT’s validity were given by the significant associations with social anxiety, social support, and dissociation. Moreover, each scale and also the overall IAT score correlated positively with participants’ self-reported time spent online (both during a week’s working days and during weekends), and the time spent on the Facebook messenger smartphone application. The study showed that the Romanian version of the IAT has promising psychometric properties and can be successfully used in research regarding excessive Internet use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
Barke, A., Nyenhuis, N., & Kröner-Herwig, B. (2012). The German version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0616.
Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(2), 727–735.
Boysan, M., Kuss, D. J., Barut, Y., Ayköse, N., Güleç, M., & Özdemir, O. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Addictive Behaviors, 64, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.09.002.
Chang, M. K., & Man Law, S. P. (2008). Factor structure for Young’s Internet Addiction Test: a confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2597–2619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.001.
Cheng, C., & Li, A. Y. (2014). Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (real) life: a meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(12), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0317.
Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E., & Weisler, R. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.
Fernández-Villa, T., Molina, A. J., García-Martín, M., Llorca, J., Delgado-Rodríguez, M., & Martin, V. (2015). Validation and psychometric analysis of the Internet Addiction Test in Spanish among college students. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2281-5.
Fioravanti, G., & Casale, S. (2015). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Italian Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0493.
Gowing, L. R., Ali, R. L., Allsop, S., Marsden, J., Turf, E. E., West, R., & Witton, J. (2015). Global statistics on addictive behaviours: 2014 status report. Addiction, 110(6), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12899.
Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Internet addiction—time to be taken seriously? Addiclion Rewarch and Theory, 8(5), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066350009005587.
Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The role of context in online gaming excess and addiction: some case study evidence. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9229-x.
Guertler, D., Rumpf, H.-J., Bischof, A., Kastirke, N., Petersen, K. U., John, U., & Meyer, C. (2014). Assessment of problematic Internet use by the Compulsive Internet Use Scale and the Internet Addiction Test: a sample of problematic and pathological gamblers. European Addiction Research, 20(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355076.
Hawi, N. S., Blachnio, A., & Przepiorka, A. (2015). Polish validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.058.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jelenchick, L. A., Becker, T., & Moreno, M. A. (2012). Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Research, 196(2–3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.09.007.
Khazaal, Y., Billieux, J., Thorens, G., Khan, R., Louati, Y., Scarlatti, E., Theintz, F., Lederrey, J., Van Der Linden, M., & Zullino, D. (2008). French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 703–706. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0249.
Korkeila, J., Kaarlas, S., Jääskeläinen, M., Vahlberg, T., & Taiminen, T. (2010). Attached to the web—harmful use of the Internet and its correlates. European Psychiatry, 25(4), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.02.008.
Laconi, S., Rodgers, R. F., & Chabrol, H. (2014). The measurement of Internet addiction: a critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.026.
Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of Internet literacy, Internet addiction symptoms, and Internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311435217.
Lopez-Fernandez, O., Freixa-Blanxart, M., & Honrubia-Serrano, M. L. (2013). The Problematic Internet Entertainment Use Scale for adolescents: prevalence of problem Internet use in Spanish high school students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0250.
Lortie, C. L., & Guitton, M. J. (2013). Internet addiction assessment tools: dimensional structure and methodological status. Addiction, 108(7), 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12202.
Mazzoni, E., Baiocco, L., Cannata, D., & Dimas, I. (2016). Is Internet the cherry on top or a crutch? Offline social support as moderator of the outcomes of online social support on problematic Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.032.
Pawlikowski, M., Altstötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2013). Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1212–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.014.
Pontes, H. M., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Clinical psychology of internet addiction: a review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 4, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.2147/NAN.S60982.
Tsimtsiou, Z., Haidich, A.-B., Kokkali, S., Dardavesis, T., Young, K. S., & Arvanitidou, M. (2014). Greek version of the Internet Addiction Test: a validation study. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-013-9282-2.
Vasiluță-Ștefanescu, M. (2015). The information technology role in the dynamics and evolution of SMEs in Timis County, Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01575-0.
Wang, E. S. T., & Wang, M. C. H. (2013). Social support and social interaction ties on internet addiction: integrating online and offline contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0557.
Watters, C. A., Keefer, K. V., Kloosterman, P. H., Summerfeldt, L. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (2013). Examining the structure of the Internet Addiction Test in adolescents: a bifactor approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2294–2302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.020.
Weinstein, A., Dorani, D., Elhadif, R., Bukovza, Y., & Yarmulnik, A. (2015). Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 27(1), 4–9.
Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(4), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tudorel, O.I., Vintilă, M., Vlaicu, L. et al. Romanian Version of the Internet Addiction Test: Psychometric Properties and Cross-Gender Invariance. Int J Ment Health Addiction 17, 234–246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0014-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0014-6