SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial pattern of grassland aboveground biomass and its environmental controls in the Eurasian steppe

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vegetation biomass is an important component of terrestrial ecosystem carbon stocks. Grasslands are one of the most widespread biomes worldwide, playing an important role in global carbon cycling. Therefore, studying spatial patterns of biomass and their correlations to environment in grasslands is fundamental to quantifying terrestrial carbon budgets. The Eurasian steppe, an important part of global grasslands, is the largest and relatively well preserved grassland in the world. In this study, we analyzed the spatial pattern of aboveground biomass (AGB), and correlations of AGB to its environment in the Eurasian steppe by meta-analysis. AGB data used in this study were derived from the harvesting method and were obtained from three data sources (literature, global NPP database at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center (ORNL), some data provided by other researchers). Our results demonstrated that: (1) as for the Eurasian steppe overall, the spatial variation in AGB exhibited significant horizontal and vertical zonality. In detail, AGB showed an inverted parabola curve with the latitude and with the elevation, while a parabola curve with the longitude. In addition, the spatial pattern of AGB had marked horizontal zonality in the Black Sea-Kazakhstan steppe subregion and the Mongolian Plateau steppe subregion, while horizontal and vertical zonality in the Tibetan Plateau alpine steppe subregion. (2) Of the examined environmental variables, the spatial variation of AGB was related to mean annual precipitation (MAP), mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual solar radiation (MAR), soil Gravel content, soil pH and soil organic content (SOC) at the depth of 0–30 cm. Nevertheless, MAP dominated spatial patterns of AGB in the Eurasian steppe and its three subregions. (3) A Gaussian function was found between AGB and MAP in the Eurasian steppe overall, which was primarily determined by unique patterns of grasslands and environment in the Tibetan Plateau. AGB was significantly positively related to MAP in the Black Sea-Kazakhstan steppe subregion (elevation < 3000 m), the Mongolian Plateau steppe subregion (elevation < 3000 m) and the surface (elevation ≥ 4800 m) of the Tibetan Plateau. Nevertheless, the spatial variation in AGB exhibited a Gaussian function curve with the increasing MAP in the east and southeast margins (elevation < 4800 m) of the Tibetan Plateau. This study provided more knowledge of spatial patterns of AGB and their environmental controls in grasslands than previous studies only conducted in local regions like the Inner Mongolian temperate grassland, the Tibetan Plateau alpine grassland, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anwar M, Yang Y H, Guo Zhaodi et al., 2006. Grassland aboveground biomass in **njiang. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 42(7): 521–526. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibold O W, 2012. Ecology of World Vegetation. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Han X, Wu J et al., 2004. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature, 431(7006): 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Wu J, **ng Q et al., 2008. Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology, 89(8): 2140–2153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Townsend C R, Harper J L, 2005. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao M K, Woodward F I, 1998. Net primary and ecosystem production and carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems and their responses to climate change. Global Change Biology, 4(2): 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CGIAR-CSI, 2006. NASA Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM). The SRTM data is available as 3 arc second (approx. 90 m resolution) DEMs. The dataset is available for download at: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F S, Mcfarland J, Mcguire A D et al., 2009. The changing global carbon cycle: Linking plant-soil carbon dynamics to global consequences. Journal of Ecology, 97(5): 840–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F S, Woodwell G M, Randerson J T et al., 2006. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems, 9(7): 1041–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churkina G, Running S W, 1998. Contrasting climatic controls on the estimated productivity of global terrestrial biomes. Ecosystems, 1(2): 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai E F, Huang Y, Wu Z et al., 2016. Analysis of spatio-temporal features of a carbon source/sink and its relationship to climatic factors in the Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(3): 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Committee of Vegetation Map of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007. Vegetation Map of China and Its Geographical Pattern: Vegetation Map of the People’s Republic of China (1:1000 000). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein H E, Lauenroth W K, Burke I C, 1997. Effects of temperature and soil texture on ANPP in the US Great Plains. Ecology, 78(8): 2628–2831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, van den Berg E, Reich P, 1993. Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(1): 192–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Yang Y, Ma W et al., 2010. Ecosystem carbon stocks and their changes in China’s grasslands. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences, 53(7): 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao T, Xu B, Yang X et al., 2013. Using MODIS time series data to estimate aboveground biomass and its spatio-temporal variation in Inner Mongolia’s grassland between 2001 and 2011. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(21): 7796–7810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Hu Z, Li S et al., 2012. Spatial variations in aboveground net primary productivity along a climate gradient in Eurasian temperate grassland: Effects of mean annual precipitation and its seasonal distribution. Global Change Biology, 18(12): 3624–3631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall D O, Scurlock J M O, 1991. Climate change and productivity of natural grasslands. Annals of Botany, 67(Supp1. ): 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han F, Zhang Q, Buyantuev A et al., 2015. Effects of climate change on phenology and primary productivity in the desert steppe of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land, 7(2): 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans R J, Cameron S E, Parra J L et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15): 1965–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou X Y, 2014. Thinking and practice on the protection and development of the Eurasian steppe based on the northern China’s grasslands. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 36(1): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton R A, Forrest H, Goetz S J, 2009. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 114: G00E03. doi: 10.1029/2009JG000935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Fan J, Zhong H et al., 2007. Spatiotemporal dynamics of aboveground primary productivity along a precipitation gradient in Chinese temperate grassland. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(5): 754–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Yu G, Fan J et al., 2010. Precipitation-use efficiency along a 4500-km grassland transects. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(6): 842–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Tao J, Huang Y et al., 2015. The spatial pattern of grassland aboveground biomass on **zang Plateau and its climatic controls. Journal of Plant Ecology, 8(1): 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy E G, Sala O E, Paruelo J M, 2002. Patterns and controls of primary production in the Patagonian steppe: A remote sensing approach. Ecology, 83(2): 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kicklighter D W, Bondeau A, Schloss A L et al., 1999. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Global pattern and differentiation by major biome. Global Change Biology, 5(S1): 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp A K, Smith M D, 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science, 291(5503): 481–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JIabpehko, 1959. Geography, dynamics and history of the Eurasian steppe. In: JIabpehko (ed. ). Grasslands in Soviet Union. Bei**g: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane D R, Coffin D P, Lauenroth W K, 1998. Effects of soil texture and precipitation on above-ground net primary productivity and vegetation structure across the Central Grassland region of the United States. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9(2): 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth W K, Sala O E, 1992. Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecological Applications, 2(4): 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, 1979. General characters of vegetation in grasslands in China. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 1: 1–13. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth H, 1975. Modeling the primary productivity of the world. In: Lieth H, Whittaker R H. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luo T, Li W, Zhu H, 2002. Estimated biomass and productivity of natural vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Applications, 12(4): 980–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Yang Y, He J et al., 2008. Above- and belowground biomass in relation to environmental factors in temperate grasslands, Inner Mongolia. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences, 51(3): 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myneni R B, Keeling C D, Tucker C J et al., 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature, 386(6626): 698–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele F, van Velthuizen H, Verelst L, 2012. Harmonized World Soil Database Version 1. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis(IIASA), ISRIC-World Soil Information, Institute of Soil Science–Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISSCAS), Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC).

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P, 1999. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate, 12(3): 829–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P, 2000. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: Development of 1901–1996 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. Journal of Climate, 13(13): 2217–2238.

    Google Scholar 

  • New M, Jones P, Hulme M. ISLSCP II Climate Research Unit CRU05 Monthly Climate Data. In: Hall, Forrest G, Collatz G, Meeson B et al. (eds.). ISLSCP Initiative II Collection. Dataset. Available on-line [http://daac.ornl.gov/] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U. S. A. doi: 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1015,2011.

  • Noy-Meir I, 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M L, 1968. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: Prediction from climatological data. American Naturalist, 102(923): 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala O E, Parton W J, Joyce L A et al., 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology, 69(1): 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel D S, Emanuel W, Rizzo B et al., 1997. Continental scale variability in ecosystem processes: Models, data, and the role of disturbance. Ecological Monographs, 67(2): 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger W H, 1977. Carbon balance in terrestrial detritus. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 8: 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scurlock J M O, Hall D O, 1998. The global carbon sink: A grassland perspective. Global Change Biology, 4(2): 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scurlock J M O, Johnson K, Olson R J, 2002. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology, 8(8): 736–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scurlock J M O, Johnson K R, Olson R J, 2015. NPP Grassland: NPP Estimates from Biomass Dynamics for 31 Sites, 1948–1994, R1. Data set. Available on-line [http://daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al., 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: United Kingdom Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner D P, Ritts W D, Cohen W B et al., 2005. Site-level evaluation of satellite-based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring. Global Change Biology, 11(4): 666–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Luo T, Li R et al., 2013. Causes for the unimodal pattern of biomass and productivity in alpine grasslands along a large altitudinal gradient in semi-arid regions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(1): 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward S L, 2008. The Temperate Grassland Biome. In: Woodward S L (ed.). Grassland Biomes. Westport, Connecticut • London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z Y, 1979. Chinese Vegetation. Bei**g: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Mi R, Liu J, 2009. Variations in soil properties and their effect on subsurface biomass distribution in four alpine meadows of the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau of China. Environmental Geology, 57(8): 1881–1891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Fang J, Ma W et al., 2010. Large-scale pattern of biomass partitioning across China’s grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(2): 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Fang J, Pan Y D et al., 2009. Aboveground biomass in Tibetan grasslands. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(1): 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R, Fang H J, Fu Y L et al., 2011. Research on carbon budget and carbon cycle of terrestrial ecosystems in regional scale: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(19): 5449–5459. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y L, Qi W, Zhou C P et al., 2014. Spatial and temporal variability in the net primary production of alpine grassland on the Tibetan Plateau since 1982. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2): 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X M, 1980. A summary of alpine grasslands in the Tibetan Plateau and their correlation to the Eurasian steppe. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 4: 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Bei**g, 100101, China

    Cuicui Jiao, Guirui Yu, Nianpeng He, Anna Ma & Zhongmin Hu

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g, 100049, China

    Cuicui Jiao

  3. College of Life Sciences, Bei**g Normal University, Bei**g, 100875, China

    Jian** Ge

Authors
  1. Cuicui Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guirui Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nianpeng He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian** Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhongmin Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guirui Yu.

Additional information

Foundation: The Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program, No.XDA05050602; The Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.31290221

Jiao Cuicui (1987–), PhD, specialized in carbon cycle in grassland ecosystems.

Yu Guirui, Professor, specialized in carbon, water and nitrogen cycle in terrestrial ecosystems and global change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiao, C., Yu, G., He, N. et al. Spatial pattern of grassland aboveground biomass and its environmental controls in the Eurasian steppe. J. Geogr. Sci. 27, 3–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1361-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1361-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation