Log in

Large scale current systems developed from substorm onset: Global MHD results

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the large-scale substorm current systems developed from its onset in an idealized substorm event simulated by global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models. Mainly three current systems (loops) are revealed: (1) the classical substorm current wedge, which is composed by the disputed cross-tail current in the magnetotail, the nightside westward electrojet in the high-latitude ionosphere and a pair of region 1 field-aligned currents (FAC); (2) the partial-ring current system, which is braced by two region 2 FACs; and (3) the meridional current system, which is formed by an equatorial radial current (outward/inward in the morning/evening sector), and region 1 and region 2 FACs at its two ends. The region 2 FAC connects with region 1 FAC by a latitudinal horizontal current at each morning/evening ionosphere to complete Loops 2 and 3. A quantitative study shows the significant enhancement of these current systems during the substorm expansion phase, while Loop 1 dominates, which can reach a magnitude of ~1 MA. Empirical relations among the ionospheric currents and the related magnetotail currents are established based on the simulation results, implying that the substorm current systems are not evolved locally or separately, but must be viewed from a global perspective. This knowledge of large-scale substorm current system would deepen our understanding of the substorm development and could be validated by observations in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McPherron R L, Russell C T, Aubry M P. Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968: 9. Phenomenological model for substorms. J Geophys Res, 1973, 78: 3131–3149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sergeev V A, Tsyganenko N A, Smirnov M V, et al. Magnetic effects of the substorm current wedge in a “spread-out wire model and their comparison with ground, geosynchronous, and tail lobe data. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116: A07218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sergeev V A, Nikolaev A V, Tsyganenko N A, et al. Testing a two-loop pattern of the substorm current wedge (SCW2L). J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2014, 119: 947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang J, Toffoletto F R, Wolf R A, et al. Large-scale current systems and ground magnetic disturbance during deep substorm injections. J Geophys Res, 2012, 117: A04223

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Angelopoulos V, Runov A, et al. On the current sheets surrounding dipolarizing flux bundles in the magnetotail: The case for wedgelets. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2013, 118: 2000–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun W J, Fu S Y, Parks G K, et al. Field-aligned currents associated with dipolarization fronts. Geophys Res Lett, 2013, 40: 4503–4508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu Y, Cao J, Fu H, et al. The effects of bursty bulk flows on global-scale current systems. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2017, 122: 6139–6149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Birn J, Hesse M, Haerendel G, et al. Flow braking and the substorm current wedge. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 19895–19903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Birn J, Hesse M. The substorm current wedge: Further insights from MHD simulations. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2014, 119: 3503–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iijima T, Potemra T A, Zanetti L J. Large-scale characteristics of magnetospheric equatorial currents. J Geophys Res, 1990, 95: 991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bostr¨om R. A model of the auroral electrojects. J Geophys Res, 1964, 69: 4983–4999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiokawa K, Haerendel G, Baumjohann W. Azimuthal pressure gradient as driving force of substorm currents. Geophys Res Lett, 1998, 25: 959–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lui A T Y, Kamide Y. A fresh perspective of the substorm current system and its dynamo. Geophys Res Lett, 2003, 30: 1958

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iijima T, Potemra T A. Large-scale characteristics of field-aligned currents associated with substorms. J Geophys Res, 1978, 83: 599–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coxon J C, Milan S E, Clausen L B N, et al. A superposed epoch analysis of the regions 1 and 2 Birkeland currents observed by AMPERE during substorms. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2014, 119: 9834–9846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamide Y, Sun W, Akasofu S I. The average ionospheric electrodynamics for the different substorm phases. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang B B, Wang C, Hu Y Q, et al. Intensification of the Cowling current in the global MHD simulation model. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116: A06204

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cowley S W H. Magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions: A tutorial review. In: Ohtani S-I, Fujii R, Hesse M, et al., eds. Magnetospheric Current Systems. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, 2000. 91–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kepko L, McPherron R L, Amm O, et al. Substorm Current Wedge Revisited. Space Sci Rev, 2015, 190: 1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Y Q, Guo X C, Wang C. On the ionospheric and reconnection potentials of the earth: Results from global MHD simulations. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: A07215

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang C, Guo X C, Peng Z, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) numerical simulations on the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere: A review. Sci China Earth Sci, 2013, 56: 1141–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lester M, Davies J A, Virdi T S. High-latitude Hall and Pedersen conductances during substorm activity in the SUNDIAL-ATLAS campaign. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 26719–26728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyashita Y, Machida S, Kamide Y, et al. A state-of-the-art picture of substorm-associated evolution of the near-Earth magnetotail obtained from superposed epoch analysis. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A01211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. **ng X, Lyons L R, Angelopoulos V, et al. Plasma sheet pressure evolution related to substorms. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A01212

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahn B H, Richmond A D, Kamide Y, et al. An ionospheric conductance model based on ground magnetic disturbance data. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 14769–14780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Raeder J, McPherron R L, Frank L A, et al. Global simulation of the Geospace EnvironmentModeling substorm challenge event. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Angelopoulos V, Chu X, et al. Substorm current wedge composition by wedgelets. Geophys Res Lett, 2015, 42: 1669–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo X C, Wang C, Hu Y Q, et al. Bow shock contributions to region 1 field-aligned current: A new result from global MHD simulations. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35: L03108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu Y, Jordanova V K, Ridley A J, et al. A new ionospheric electron precipitation module coupled with RAM-SCB within the geospace general circulation model. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2016, 121: 8554–8575

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to BinBin Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, B., Wang, C. Large scale current systems developed from substorm onset: Global MHD results. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 61, 389–396 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9132-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9132-y

Keywords

Navigation