Log in

Comparative studies on behavioral neurochemical effects of N,α-diethylphenethylamine and methamphetamine in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One objective was to compare the psychostimulating effects of N,α-diethylphenethylamine (NADEP) with those of methamphetamine (METH) in experiments on behavioral activities of rats. Another objective was to compare concentrations of neurotransmitters dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT), and their metabolites such as dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in brain tissues (striatum and frontal cortex) carried out after administration of NADEP and METH in rats. The animals were treated with NADEP and METH for 6 consecutive days (5 mg/kg per day, respectively), and the scores of stereotypy were measured on the first, second, fourth, and sixth day. The increase of the stereotypy score was observed in the NADEP-treated group, but it was less than that after treatment with METH. NADEP administration (5 and 10 mg/kg) resulted in a significant increase of DA and 5-HT and a decrease of DOPAC and HVA in the striatum tissues, which were collected 1 h after administration, but the changes of the compounds were less than those after treatment with METH (5 mg/kg). Unlike the METH-treated group, the changed DA, 5-HT, DOPAC, and HVA levels of the NADEP- treated group (5 and 10 mg/kg) were soon recovered within 6 h after administration. Both NADEP and METH had no significant effect on the 5-HIAA concentrations of the brain tissues. These results suggest that NADEP has significant psychostimulatory effects, though the effects were less than those of METH. Thus, NADEP should be carefully monitored to avoid abuse as a psychoactive drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sulzer D, Sonders MS, Poulsen NW, Galli A (2005) Mechanisms of neurotransmitter release by amphetamines: a review. Prog Neurobiol 75:406–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore KE (1977) The actions of amphetamine on neurotransmitters: a brief review. Biol Psychiatry 12:451–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, Kupfer DJ, Kinahan PE, Grace AA, Price JL, Mathis CA (2001) Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol Psychiatry 49:81–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuczenski R, Segal DS (1997) Effects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine: comparison with amphetamine. J Neurochem 68:2032–2037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abekawa T, Ohmori T, Koyama T (1994) Effects of repeated administration of a high dose of methamphetamine on dopamine and glutamate release in rat striatum and nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 643:276–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown JM, Riddle EL, Sandoval V, Weston RK, Hanson JE, Crosby MJ, Ugarte YV, Gibb JW, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2002) A single methamphetamine administration rapidly decreases vesicular dopamine uptake. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302:497–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleckenstein AE, Hanson GR (2003) Impact of psychostimulants on vesicular monoamine transporter function. Eur J Pharmacol 479:283–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scorza MC, Carrau C, Silveira R, Zapata-Torres G, Cassels BK, Reyes-Parada M (1997) Monoamine oxidase inhibitory properties of some methoxylated and alkylthio amphetamine derivatives: structure-activity relationships. Biochem Pharmacol 54:1361–1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilber B, Scholze P, Dorostkar MM, Sandtner W, Holy M, Boehm S, Singer EA, Sitte HH (2005) Serotonin-transporter mediated efflux: a pharmacological analysis of amphetamines and non-amphetamines. Neuropharmacology 49:811–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones S, Kauer JA (1999) Amphetamine depresses excitatory synaptic transmission via serotonin receptors in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci 19:9780–9787

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins GA, Fletcher PJ (2003) Serotonin and drug reward: focus on 5-HT2C receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 480:151–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. József K, Antal S, Éva S, Zoltán T, Károly M, János B (1988) New psychostimulant agent. International application published under the patent cooperation treaty (PCT) by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Publication No. WO 88/02254

  13. Noggle FT, Clark CR, Pitts-Monk P, De Ruiter J (1991) Liquid chromatographic and mass spectral analysis of 1-phenyl-2-butanamines: homologues of the amphetamines. J Liquid Chromatogr 14:1393–1408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J, Choe S, Choi H, Heo S, Kim E, Kim H, Bang E, Chung H (2013) Identification of N-ethyl-α-ethylphenethylamine in crystalline powder seized for suspected drug trafficking: a research chemical or a new designer drug? Forensic Toxicol 31:54–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen PA, Travis JC, Venhuis BJ (2014) A methamphetamine analog (N,α-diethyl-phenethylamine) identified in a mainstream dietary supplement. Drug Test Anal 6:805–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee J, Venhuis BJ, Heo S, Choi H, Seol I, Kim E (2014) Identification and quantitation of N,α-diethylphenethylamine in preworkout supplements sold via the Internet. Forensic Toxicol 32:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Young A (2013) Popular sports supplements contain meth-like compound. USA TODAY 25 October 2013

  18. Parliament of the United Kingdom (1971) Misuse of drugs act 1971

  19. Junet R (1956) Ethylamphetamine in the treatment of obesity (in French). Praxis 45:986–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nichols DE (1986) Differences between the mechanism of action of MDMA, MBDB, and the classic hallucinogens. Identification of a new therapeutic class: entactogens. J Psychoact Drugs 18:305–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oberlender R, Nichols DE (1991) Structural variation and (+)-amphetamine like discriminative stimulus properties. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:581–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricaurte GA, De Lanney LE, Irwin I, Witkin JM, Katz J, Langston JW (1989) Evaluation of the neurotoxic potential of N, N-dimethylamphetamine: an illicit analog of methamphetamine. Brain Res 490:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naylor RJ, Olley JE (1972) Modification of the behavioral changes induced by amphetamine in the rat by lesions in the caudate nucleus, the caudate-putamen and globus pallidus. Neuropharmacology 11:91–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kinnard WJ, Watzman N (1966) Techniques utilized in the evaluation of psychotropic drugs on animal activity. J Pharm Sci 55:995–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schiørring E (1971) Amphetamine induced selective stimulation of certain behavior items with concurrent inhibition of others in an open-field test with rats. Behavior 39:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fibiger HC, Fibiger HP, Zis AP (1973) Attenuation of amphetamine-induced motor stimulation and stereotypy by 6-hydroxydopamine in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 47:683–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Randrup A, Munkvad I (1967) Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacologia 11:300–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bedingfield JB, Calder LD, Thai DK, Karler R (1997) The role of the striatum in the mouse in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 56:305–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bodybuilding.com (2014) CRAZE’s reviews on bodybuilding.com. http://reviews.bodybuilding.com/Driven_Sports/CRAZE/. Accessed 10 February 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2014M3A9A4049149), and by the National Forensic Service of the Korea government.

Conflict of interest

There is no financial or other relationship that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongkoo Lim or Jaesin Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seol, I., Lim, D., Lee, J. et al. Comparative studies on behavioral neurochemical effects of N,α-diethylphenethylamine and methamphetamine in rats. Forensic Toxicol 33, 77–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-014-0254-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-014-0254-5

Keywords

Navigation