Abstract
Waste management in low-income countries faces challenges with an average cost of $35/ton approximately 51% collection efficiency. Despite investments in treatment, processing, and recycling, the system remains unsustainable owing to poor planning and policies. The current analysis of Lahore’s solid waste management (SWM) system, selected as a major city of a low-income country as a case study, focuses on collection efficiency and waste generation. However, it neglects the complex and dynamic nature of SWM systems. To capture the complexities and dynamic nature of the SWM system, system dynamic (SD) modeling is proposed for its effectiveness in modeling complex and dynamic systems. Unlike previous attempts at SD modeling that mostly consider only some components of the SWM system with varying success, this study attempts to use a holistic approach by considering all aspects of an integrated SWM system. In addition, this study explores different financial and management policies, highlighting the weaknesses of the system through a quantitative comparison of three scenarios: (1) business-as-usual (BAU) which considers the current trends in waste generation and practices of collection and disposal to landfill, (2) waste treatment system (WTS) in which various waste treatment systems are included to reduce burden on landfill, and (3) introduction of user fee with awareness campaigns (UFAC) which encourages community participation towards reduction in waste generation and financially supports the SWM. All three scenarios use four indices: waste generation, waste ending up in landfill, uncollected waste, and annual budget deficit as performance indices. These scenarios were simulated over a 25-year period using an SD model, covering all six components of the SWM system. The BAU scenario shows a 16% increase in waste generation, a 173% increase in landfill waste, an 11% reduction in uncollected waste, and a 64% increase in the budget deficit over the simulation period, indicating an unsustainable SWM system. The WTS scenario exhibits a 16% increase in waste generation, a 155% increase in landfill waste, an 11% reduction in uncollected waste, and a 61% increase in the budget deficit, showing a significant reduction in landfill waste and a slight reduction in deficit but it remains unsustainable. The UFAC scenario, however, results in a 40% reduction in waste generation, a 67% decrease in uncollected waste, an 8% decrease in landfill waste, and a 59% decrease in the budget deficit. These results demonstrate that instituting user fees for SWM services and incentivizing community participation towards waste reduction and segregation can make the SWM system of Lahore sustainable. This SD model provides insights for policymakers, aiding what-if analyses and long/short-term waste management plans for metropolitan cities in low-income countries. To validate the sustainability judgments based on performance indices, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool commonly used for ranking policy decisions based on competing criteria, was employed. It considered the same four criteria as in the SD model. The results of the AHP analysis aligned with those of the SD model, ranking the UFAC scenario as the most sustainable option.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-023-31534-0/MediaObjects/11356_2023_31534_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SWM:
-
Solid waste management
- SD:
-
System dynamic
- MRF:
-
Material recovery facility
- RDF:
-
Refused derived fuel
- MCDA:
-
Multi-criteria decision-making
- AHP:
-
Analytical hierarchy process
- BAU:
-
Business-as-usual
- WTS:
-
Waste treatment system
- UFAC:
-
User fee with awareness campaigns
- PBS:
-
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
- LWMC:
-
Lahore Waste Management Company
References
Atiq UZ (2014) Measuring waste management performance using the “Zero Waste Index”: the case of Adelaide Australia. J Clean Prod 66:407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.032
Carolina A, Adriana P, Sara O (2011) A set of indicators for waste management programs. 2nd Int Conf Environ Eng Appl 17:144–148
Cesar A, Pinha H, Sagawa JK (2020) A system dynamics modeling approach for municipal solid waste management and financial analysis. J Clean Prod 269:122350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122350
Clark T (2019) Swedish Waste Management. Report No. 1234. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1234/5678
Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu AN (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130
Debrah JK, Vidal DG, Dinis MAP (2021) Raising awareness on solid waste management through formal education for sustainability: a develo** countries. Recycyling 6:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecycling6010006
Desmond M (2006) Municipal solid waste management in Ireland: assessing for sustainability. Ir Geogr 39(1):22–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00750770609555864
Deus RM, Bezerra BS, Battistelle AG (2019) Solid waste indicators and their implications for management practice. Int J Environ 16(2):1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2163-3
EEA (2020) Recycling industry can boost the European economy. European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/recycling-industry-can-boost-the. Accessed 19 Jun 2023
ENV PK (2021) Improper management of solid waste in Pakistan and its effects. https://www.envpk.com/improper-management-of-solid-waste-in-pakistan-and-its-effects/. Accessed 19 Jun 2023
EPA U (2023) Recycling economic information report. United States Evnironmental Protection Agency https://www.epa.gov/smm/recycling-economic-information-rei-report. Accessed 20 Jun 2023
Ferronato N, Torretta V (2019) Waste mismanagement in develo** countries: a review of global issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(6):1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060
Hina G-E, Haydar S (2021) Development and validation of a holistic sustainable solid waste management model. Int J Emerg Technol 12(2):140–154
Iqbal A, Liu X, Chen GH (2020) Municipal solid waste: review of best practices in application of life cycle assessment and sustainable management techniques. Sci Total Environ 729:138622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138622
Iqbal A, Abdullah Y, Nizami AS, Sultan IA, Shar F (2022) Assessment of solid waste management system in Pakistan and sustainable model from environmental and economic perspective. Sustainability 14(19):12680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912680
Iqbal A, Yasar A, Nizami AS, Sharif F, Tabinda AB, Sultan IA, Ahmad M (2023) Evolution of solid waste management system in Lahore: a step towards sustainability of the sector in Pakistan. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 13(2):983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020983
Kaza S, Yao L, Tata Bhada P, Van Woerden F (2019) What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Urban Development. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30317. Accessed 2021
Kolekar KA, Bardhan B, Hazra T, Chakrabarty SN (2019) Fuzzy logic modelling to predict residential solid waste generation: a case study of Baranaga. WMRE, pp 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7290-1
Lahore Waste Management Company (2016) LWMC sanitary landfill. https://www.lwmc.com.pk/lwmc-sanitary-landfill.php. Accessed 19 June 2023.
Masood M, Barlow CY, Wilson DC (2014) An assessment of the current municipal solid waste management system in Lahore. Pakistan WM & R 32(9):834–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14545373
Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs (2016) A circular economy in the Netherlands by 2050. Report No. 17037. Government of Netherlands https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/17037circulaireeconomie_en.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2023
National G, Pillars H (2015) World urbanization prospects—the 2014 revision. Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/366. United Nation. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2014-Report.pdf. Accessed 2021
Ogawa H (1996) Sustainable solid waste management in develo** countries. In 7Th ISWA International Congress, Proceedings II. ISWA, pp 105–111. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/waste/swm-fogawa1.htm. Accessed 23 Sept 2022
Olasunkanmi AO (2014) System dynamics modelling of waste management system. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Asia-Pacific System Dynamics Conference, pp 1–14
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2017) Population census 2017. Pakistan Bureaue of Statistics. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/population_census/results/05301.pdf. Accessed 14 Jul 2023
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2023). Population by province/region since 1951. Report No. 1. Government of Pakistan. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files//population_census/census_2017_tables/kpk/Table01p.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2023
Rafew SM, Rafizu IM (2021) Application of system dynamics model for municipal solid waste management in Khulna city of Bangladesh. Waste Manag 129:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.059
Rahayu N, Arai T, Yudoko G, Morimoto H (2013) System dynamics models for planning long-term integrated municipal solid waste management in Bandung city. Sustain City VIII 2:1153–1168. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC130982. (WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment)
Rai RK, Nepal M, Khadayat MS, Bhardwaj B (2019) Improving municipal solid waste collection services in develo** countries: a case of Bharatpur Metropolitan City, Nepal. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(11):3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113010
Sancheta LN, GdeD Chaves, Siman RR (2021) The use of system dynamics on urban solid waste management: a literature analysis. Gestao and Producao 28(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5336
Sanjeevi V, Shahabudeen P (2015) Development of performance indicators for municipal solid waste management (PIMS): A review. WM&R 33(12):1052–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X15607428
Shirazi SA, Kazmi JH (2016) Analysis of socio-environmental impacts of the loss of urban trees and vegetation in Lahore, Pakistan: a review of public perception. Ecol Processes 5:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0050-8
UN-Habitat (2022) Envisaging the future of cities. World City Report. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2022-envisaging-the-future-of-cities. Accessed 23 Sept 2022
United Nations (2017) World economic situation and prospects 2017. Report No. E/2017/50. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-2017/. Accessed 15 Sept 2022
Vučijak B, Kurtagić SM, Silajdžić I (2016) Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Clean Prod 130:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.030
Wikurendra EA, Syafiuddi A, Herdiani N, Nurika G (2023) Forecast of waste generated and waste fleet using linear regression model. Poli J Environ Stud 32(2):1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/158779
**ao S, Dong H, Geng Y, Tian X, Liu C, Li H (2020) Policy impacts on municipal solid waste management in Shanghai: a system dynamics model analysis. J Clean Prod 262:121366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121366
Yuan Z, Wen B, He C, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Xu F (2022) Application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis to rural spatial sustainability evaluation: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(11):6572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116572
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge and thank the Institute of Environmental Engineering and Research (IEER), University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore Pakistan, and the National Institute of Urban Infrastructure and Planning (NIUIP), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar Pakistan, for the support provided to complete this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and investigation were done by GEH. The original draft was prepared by GEH. GEH and SH reviewed and edited this article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ta Yeong Wu
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gul-E-Hina, Haydar, S. A system dynamics model and analytical hierarchy process: an integrated approach for achieving sustainable solid waste management system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 6992–7007 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31534-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31534-0