Log in

Comparative study of anatomical features of primary and accessory maxillary ostia between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls

  • Dentistry • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine how the size and shape of the maxillary sinus and its ostia (the primary maxillary ostium and accessory maxillary ostium) relate to each other in patients with OSA using computed tomography (CT) scans. Additionally, the study aimed to explore whether or not obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) had an effect on these structures.

Methods

CT images of patients diagnosed with OSAS and healthy participants were evaluated to compare the patency, location, dimension, and presence of PMOs and AMOs using the Mann–Whitney U, Student t, and chi-square tests. Also, intragroup correlations were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation test.

Results

Among 139 patients with OSA and healthy controls, there were significant variations in the average length (p = 0.001) and width (p = 0.008) of PMOs among the study groups. The mean maxillary sinus volume was significantly decreased in the OSA group (p = 0.001). A significant decrease in the maxillary sinus volume was observed in the OSA group (p = 0.001). In the OSA group, a significant correlation was observed between PMO obstruction and the presence of AMO (p = 0.004). The healthy group had significant correlations (r = 0.755, p = 0.000) between the vertical height and the distance between PMO and the maxillary sinus floor. Correlation analyses revealed positive, strong correlations between study variables such as the mean length and width of AMO and the vertical height of the maxillary sinus (r = 0.566, p = 0.000) in the OSA group.

Conclusions

The current study indicated significant differences in sinus volume, PMO occlusion, and AMO-related dimensions between patients with OSA and healthy controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kim Y-J, Shin H-K, Lee D-Y, Ryu J-J, Kim TH (2020) Decreased maxillary sinus volume is a potential predictor of obstructive sleep apnea. Angle Orthod 90:556–563. https://doi.org/10.2319/080819-520.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Costa E Sousa RA, dos Santos Gil NA (2013) Craniofacial skeletal architecture and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome severity. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg Off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 41:740–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.12.010

  3. Neelapu BC, Kharbanda OP, Sardana HK, Balachandran R, Sardana V, Kapoor P et al (2017) Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in adult obstructive sleep apnea patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cephalometric studies. Sleep Med Rev 31:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2016.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadry S, Koca CG, Kurtulmuş H (2021) Cone beam computed tomography analysis results in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 75:e14497. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suratt PM, Turner BL, Wilhoit SC (1986) Effect of intranasal obstruction on breathing during sleep. Chest 90:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.90.3.324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cisonni J, Lucey AD, King AJC, Islam SMS, Lewis R, Goonewardene MS (2015) Numerical simulation of pharyngeal airflow applied to obstructive sleep apnea: effect of the nasal cavity in anatomically accurate airway models. Med Biol Eng Comput 53:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1399-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oz U, Orhan K, Aksoy S, Ciftci F, Özdoğanoğlu T, Rasmussen F (2016) Association between pterygoid hamulus length and apnea hypopnea index in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a combined three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography and polysomnographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121:330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prasanna LC, Mamatha H (2010) The location of maxillary sinus ostium and its clinical application. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off Publ Assoc Otolaryngol India 62:335–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0047-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Timmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Liem RSB, van Weissenbruch R, Manson WL, Vissink A (2003) Effects of maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology. Eur J Oral Sci 111:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00012.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeung AWK, Colsoul N, Montalvao C, Hung K, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM (2019) Visibility, location, and morphology of the primary maxillary sinus ostium and presence of accessory ostia: a retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Clin Oral Investig 23:3977–3986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02829-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar H, Choudhry R, Kakar S (2001) Accessory maxillary ostia: topography and clinical application. J Anat Soc India 50:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ali IK, Sansare K, Karjodkar FR, Vanga K, Salve P, Pawar AM (2017) Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of accessory maxillary ostium and Haller cells: Prevalence and clinical significance. Imaging Sci Dent 47:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Joe JK, Ho SY, Yanagisawa E (2000) Documentation of variations in sinonasal anatomy by intraoperative nasal endoscopy. Laryngoscope 110:229–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones NS (2002) CT of the paranasal sinuses: a review of the correlation with clinical, surgical and histopathological findings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:11–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Penttilä M (2018) Accessory maxillary ostium repair using middle turbinate flap: a case series of 116 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:1204–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aramani A, Karadi RN, Kumar S (2014) A Study of Anatomical Variations of Osteomeatal Complex in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients-CT Findings. J Clin Diagn Res 8:KC01-4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9323.4923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rege ICC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonça EF (2012) Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health 12:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Akay G, Yaman D, Karadağ Ö, Güngör K (2020) Evaluation of the Relationship of Dimensions of Maxillary Sinus Drainage System with Anatomical Variations and Sinusopathy: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Findings. Med Princ Pract Int J Kuwait Univ Heal Sci Cent 29:354–363. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yousefi Z, Dalili Kajan Z, Jalali MM, Khosravifard N, Rafiei E (2021) Computed Tomographic Comparison of Length, Width and Angulation of Ethmoidal Infundibulum in Patients With and Without Maxillary Sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1–12.

  20. Hung K, Montalvao C, Yeung AWK, Li G, Bornstein MM (2020) Frequency, location, and morphology of accessory maxillary sinus ostia: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Surg Radiol Anat 42:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02308-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dancey CP, Reidy J (2008) Statistics without maths or psychology: using SPSS for windows. 4th ed. Pearson: Harlow, England

  22. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 363–74.

  23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barrera JE, Pau CY, Forest V-I, Holbrook AB, Popelka GR (2017) Anatomic measures of upper airway structures in obstructive sleep apnea. World J Otorhinolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 3:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.05.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thakkar K, Yao M (2007) Diagnostic studies in obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 40:785–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2007.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aktuna Belgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Off J Eur Fed Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Soc Affil with Ger Soc Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head Neck Surg 276:1493–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05383-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, Canturk G (2007) Determination of gender by measuring the size of the maxillary sinuses in computerized tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat 29:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0157-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, Al-Timimi JF (2011) Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical CT scanning. J Forensic Sci 56:403–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01642.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Souza AD, Rajagopal KV, Ankolekar VH, Souza ASD, Kotian SR (2016) Anatomy of maxillary sinus and its ostium: A radiological study using computed tomography. Chrismed J Heal Res 3:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Butaric LN (2015) Differential Scaling Patterns in Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasal Cavity Breadth Among Modern Humans. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 298:1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Akiyoshi T (1998) A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:1158–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90761-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YJ, Shin HK, Lee DY, Ryu JJ, Kim TH (2020) Decreased maxillary sinus volume is a potential predictor of obstructiv sleep apnea. Angle Orthod 90:556–563. https://doi.org/10.2319/080819-520.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fried J, Yuen E, Gudis DA, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen SA, Rowan NR (2022) Changes in Sleep Quality Following Treatment for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 36(3):386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924211061442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Butaric LN, Wadle M, Gascon J (2019) Anatomical Variation in Maxillary Sinus Ostium Positioning: Implications for Nasal-Sinus Disease. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 302:917–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Carvalho ABG, Ferreira Costa AL, Fuziy A, de Assis ACS, Castro Veloso JR, Coutinho Manhães LRJ et al (2018) Investigation on the relationship of dimensions of the maxillary sinus drainage system with the presence of sinusopathies: a cone beam computed tomography study. Arch Oral Biol 94:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.06.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. El-Anwar MW, Raafat A, Almolla RM, Alsowey AM, Elzayat S (2018) Maxillary sinus ostium assessment: a CT study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 49:1009–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bani-Ata M, Aleshawi A, Khatatbeh A, Al-Domaidat D, Alnussair B, Al-Shawaqfeh R et al (2020) Accessory Maxillary Ostia: Prevalence of an Anatomical Variant and Association with Chronic Sinusitis. Int J Gen Med 13:163–168. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S253569

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yenigun A, Fazliogullari Z, Gun C, Uysal II, Nayman A, Karabulut AK (2016) The effect of the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium on the maxillary sinus. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273:4315–4319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4129-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express gratitude to the participants who volunteered and cooperated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aras Erdil.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The studies conducted on human participants followed the ethical standards set by the institutional research committee, the Ethics Committee of the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Uşak University Faculty of Medicine. These standards are per the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or similar ethical standards. It is important to note that formal consent is not required for this type of study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koca, C.G.E., Bilgir, E., Çolakoğlu, G. et al. Comparative study of anatomical features of primary and accessory maxillary ostia between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls. Sleep Breath 28, 541–554 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-023-02874-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-023-02874-5

Keywords

Navigation