Log in

Application of Machine Learning Approaches in Particle Tracking Model to Estimate Sediment Transport in Natural Streams

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous empirical equations and machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged to forecast dispersion coefficients in open channels. However, the efficacy of certain learning-based models in predicting these coefficients remains unstudied. Also, the direct application of machine learning-derived dispersion coefficients to Lagrangian sediment transport models has not been investigated. The present study utilizes data from prior research to assess the performance of ensemble ML-based models, specifically, random forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) inn estimating longitudinal and transverse dispersion in natural streams. The optimal hyper-parameters of these ensemble models were fine-tuned using grid-search cross-validation. The ML-based dispersion models were then integrated into a Lagrangian particle tracking model (PTM) to simulate suspended sediment concentration in natural streams. Suspended sediment concentration distribution maps generated from developed PTM with ML-based dispersion coefficients were compared with field data. The findings indicated that the GBR model, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95, outperformed the RFR model, which had an R2 of 0.9, in predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficients in a natural stream across both training and testing stages. However, during the testing phase, the RFR model with an R2 of 0.94 performed better than the GBR model with an R2 of 0.91 in predicting transverse dispersion. Both models consistently underestimated dispersion coefficients in both training and testing stages. Comparisons between the PTM with ensemble dispersion coefficients and empirical-based dispersion relationships revealed the superior performance of the GBR model compared to the other two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Some or all datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmad Z (2007) Two-dimensional mixing of pollutants in open channels. A technical report submitted to DST, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmari H (2013) Shoreline erosion and sedimentation effects during construction. In: Keeyask generation project. Technical memorandum GN 9.2.10. Manitoba Hydro, Manitoba

  • Ahmari H, Ahsan MR, Penner LA, Gonzalez N (2013) Assessment of erosion and sedimentation for hydropower projects on the lower Nelson River, Manitoba. In: Canadian dam safety 2013 annual conference, Oct. 5–10, Montreal

  • Ahmari H, Baharvand S, Pebworth M (2021) Develo** an ArcGIS pro toolkit for assessing bridge construction effects on sediment regime and aquatic habitat. In: 20th Iranian hydraulic conference. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan

  • Ahmari H, Pebworth M, Baharvand S, Kandel S, Yu X (2022a) Development of an ArcGIS-Pro Toolkit for Assessing the Effects of Bridge Construction on Overland Soil Erosion. Land 11(9):1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmari H, Pebworth M, Baharvand S, Kandel S, Goldsmith AM (2022b) Determining downstream ecological impacts of sediment derived from bridge construction. TxDOT report no. 0-7023

  • Alwated B, El-Amin MF (2021) Enhanced oil recovery by nanoparticles flooding: From numerical modeling improvement to machine learning prediction. Adv Geo-Energy Res 5(3):297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos VZ, Georgiou PE, Antonopoulos ZV (2015) Dispersion Coefficient Prediction Using Empirical Models and ANNs. Environ Process 2(2):379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Ahmad Z (2012) Gene-expression programming for transverse mixing coefficient. J Hydrol 434–435:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Ghani AA (2011) Genetic Programming for Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficients in Streams. Water Resour Manage 25(6):1537–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Wu F-C (2011) Support vector machine approach for longitudinal dispersion coefficients in natural streams. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2902–2905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek KO, Seo IW (2008) Prediction of transverse dispersion coefficient using vertical profile of secondary flow in meandering channels. KSCE J Civ Eng 12(6):417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baharvand S, Jozaghi A, Fatahi-Alkouhi R, Karimzadeh S, Nasiri R, Lashkar-Ara B (2021) Comparative Study on the Machine Learning and Regression-Based Approaches to Predict the Hydraulic Jump Sequent Depth Ratio. Iranian J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 45(4):2719–2732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baharvand S (2022) Develo** a Lagrangian sediment transport model for natural streams. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington.

  • Baharvand S, Ahmari H, Taghvaei P (2023a) Develo** a Lagrangian sediment transport model for open channel flows. Int J Sedim Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baharvand S, Ahmari H, Kandel S, Goldsmith A, Jaber F, Yu Z (2023b) Modeling non-cohesive sediment transport in natural stream using a Lagrangian approach - case study: Wilson Creek, McKinney, Texas. J Earth Surf Process Landf (under review), USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta RL (1978) Long-term patterns of sediment production following road construction and logging in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resour Res 14(6):1011–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black AR (1995) Major flooding and increased flood frequency in Scotland since 1988. Phys Chem Earth 20(5–6):463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests Machine learning 45:5–32. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0582c/report.pdf

  • Elder JW (1959) The dispersion of marked fluid in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech 5(4):544–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan N, Singh A, Guala M, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Wu B (2016) Exploring a semimechanistic episodic Langevin model for bed load transport: Emergence of normal and anomalous advection and diffusion regimes. Water Resour Res 52(4):2789–2801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer HB, Park M (1967) Transverse mixing in a Sand-Bed Channel. US Geological Survey Professional Paper:267–272

  • Gualtieri C, Mucherino C (2008) Comments on Development of an empirical equation for the transverse dispersion coefficient in natural streams’ by Tae Myoung Jeon, Kyong Oh Baek and Il Won Seo. Environ Fluid Mech 8(1):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, HP, Ferguson, GE (1963) Sediment in small reservoirs due to urbanization. Journal of Hydraulics Division. 88(2): 22–37. Available from https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10217/198027/CERF_64_06.pdf?sequence=1 [accessed 15 July 2020].

  • Hastie L, Boon P, Young M, Way S (2001) The effects of a major flood on an endangered freshwater mussel population. Biol Cons 98(1):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon TM, Baek KO, Seo IW (2007) Development of an empirical equation for the transverse dispersion coefficient in natural streams. Environ Fluid Mech 7(4):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kargar K, Samadianfard S, Parsa J, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A, Chau K (2020) Estimating longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using empirical models and machine learning algorithms. Engin Appl Comput Fluid Mech 14(1):311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashefipour SM, Falconer RA (2002) Longitudinal dispersion coefficients in natural channels. Water Res 36(6):1596–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane A, Prandle D (2006) Random-walk particle modelling for estimating bathymetric evolution of an estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68(1–2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee ME, Seo IW (2013) Spatially variable dispersion coefficients in meandering channels. J Hydraul Eng 139(2):141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lick W (2009) Sediment and contaminant transport in surface waters. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafzadeh M, Noori R, Afroozi D, Ghiasi B, Hosseini-Moghari S-M, Mirchi A, Torabi Haghighi A, Kløve B (2021) A comprehensive uncertainty analysis of model-estimated longitudinal and lateral dispersion coefficients in open channels. J Hydrol 603:126850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezaratian H, Zahiri J, Peykani MF, Haghiabi A, Parsaie A (2021) A genetic algorithm-based support vector machine to estimate the transverse mixing coefficient in streams. Water Quality Research Journal 56(3):127–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noori, R, Deng, Z, Kiaghadi, A, Kachoosangi, FT (2016) How Reliable Are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM Techniques for Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers? J Hydraul Eng, 142(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001062

  • Oh J (2011) Stochastic particle tracking modeling for sediment transport in open channel flows. Doctoral Dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo. https://www.proquest.com/openview/9c1b8a5372186e94302134b59ac052ae/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

  • Ouda M, Toorman EA (2019) Development of a new multiphase sediment transport model for free surface flows. Int J Multiph Flow 117:81–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park I, Seo IW (2018) Modeling non-Fickian pollutant mixing in open channel flows using two-dimensional particle dispersion model. Adv Water Resources, Elsevier 111(August 2016):105–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock E, Haag WR, Warren ML (2005) Prehistoric Decline in Freshwater Mussels Coincident with the Advent of Maize Agriculture. Conserv Biol 19(2):547–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12(85):2825–2830

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski AP, Rowinski PM, Napiorkowski JJ (2012) Comparison of evolutionary computation techniques for noise injected neural network training to estimate longitudinal dispersion coefficients in rivers. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):1354–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay RR, Dutta S (2009) Prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficients in natural rivers using genetic algorithm. Hydrol Res 40(6):544–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar F, Crookston B (2019) A performance comparison of machine learning algorithms for arced labyrinth spillways. Water 11(3):544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seakem Group, ARA Consulting Group and Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd, Yukon Placer Mining Implementation Review Committee, and North/South Consultants (1992) Yukon placer mining study, 1st edn. Yukon Placer Mining Implementation Review Committee, Sidney, British Columbia, p 17. https://books.google.com/books/about/Yukon_Placer_Mining_Study.html?id=CSEoNAEACAAJ

  • Seo IW, Cheong TS (1998) Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. J Hydraul Eng 124(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao H, Deng X (2018) AdaBoosting neural network for short-term wind speed forecasting based on seasonal characteristics analysis and lag space estimation. Comput Modell Eng Sci 114(3):277–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Yu X (2015) An effective Euler-Lagrange model for suspended sediment transport by open channel flows. Int J Sedim Res 30(4):361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman SO, Al-Ansari N, Shahadha A, Ismaeel R, Mohammad S (2021) Evaluation of sediment transport empirical equations: case study of the Euphrates River West Iraq. Arab J Geosci 14(10):825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G, Singh VP (2005) Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Streams by Artificial Neural Network. J Hydraul Eng 131(11):991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toprak ZF, Cigizoglu HK (2008) Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams by artificial intelligence methods. Hydrol Process 22(20):4106–4129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toprak Z, Savci ME (2007) Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient Modeling in Natural Channels using Fuzzy Logic. Clean Soil, Air, Water 35(6):626–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CW, Man C, Oh J (2014) Stochastic particle-based models for suspended particle movement in surface flows. Int J Sedim Res 29(2):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CW, Hung SY, Wu T-H (2020) Stochastic sediment transport: anomalous diffusions and random movement. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 34(2):397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu LX, Thanh VQ, Reyns J, Van SP, Anh DT, Dang TD, Roelvink D (2019) Sediment transport and morphodynamical modeling on the estuaries and coastal zone of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Cont Shelf Res 186:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2016) National Water Information System data available on the World Wide Web (USGS Water Data for the Nation). http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. Accessed 10 June 2012

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2017). EnviroAtlas. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)-EPA Method160.2. Retrieved: 01,19,2017, from: https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/160_2.pdf. Accessed Apr 2021

  • Van Rijn LC (1993) Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries and coastal seas. Aqua Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn, LC (1987) Mathematical modelling of morphological processes in the case of suspended sediment transport (Waterloopkundig Lab., Delft Hydraulics Comm382). Retrieved from https://repository.tudelft.nl. Accessed Feb 2020

  • Van Rossum G (1995) Python tutorial, technical report CS-R9526, centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI). Amsterdam

  • Waskom M (2021) seaborn: statistical data visualization. J Open Source Softw 6(60):3021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Huai W (2014) Estimation of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in rivers. J Hydro-Environ Res 8(1):2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M (2007) Kernels and ensembles: perspectives on statistical learning. ar**v:07121027 [statME]. Accessed Mar 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express appreciation for the support and technical guidance offered by the project team of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Research and Technology Implementation. Their assistance played a crucial role in the successful conclusion of this research endeavor.

Funding

The present study is supported by Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) under project Number 0–7023, and the grant was awarded to the co-author Habib Ahmari.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B and H.A.; methodology, S.B and H.A.; Data Collection, S.B and H.A.; software, SB.; validation and analysis, S.B and H.A.; writing-original draft preparation and editing, SB and H.A.; visualization: S.B and H.A; funding acquisition, H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Baharvand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors assert no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baharvand, S., Ahmari, H. Application of Machine Learning Approaches in Particle Tracking Model to Estimate Sediment Transport in Natural Streams. Water Resour Manage 38, 2905–2934 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03798-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03798-9

Keywords

Navigation