Abstract
To address the issue of unreasonable route planning in modern logistics intelligent distribution, a comprehensive, efficient, and practical path planning method is provided by modern logistics intelligent distribution. This study takes a comprehensive multimodal transportation perspective between cities as its starting point. Firstly, a physical network system model describes logistics distribution’s fundamental physical network elements. Additionally, a logistics service network system model is established to depict the service network elements of logistics distribution. These two models are then combined. Building upon this foundation, variables such as risk and cost in logistics path planning are examined and considered, leading to the design of a logistics path planning model. Simulation analysis is employed in this study for data analysis. Analyzing section utilization and planning results reveals key information in logistics path planning. Segment 4 exhibits the lowest utilization rate at 46.2%, while Segment 7 demonstrates the highest utilization rate at 100%. This indicates that the model favors segment 7 as the primary path due to its superior physical facility elements and road conditions. By integrating section planning with cost and risk considerations, the optimal planning path is determined to be 1–3–6–7, encompassing sections 2, 7, and 10. This plan is based on the analysis results of the model and is considered the most economical and safe logistics path after comprehensive deliberation. The designed green logistics path planning model for the physical network system enables comprehensive planning of combined logistics routes, thereby enhancing the distribution path. The studied and designed green logistics path planning model of the physical network system allows for a comprehensive perspective in planning combined logistics traffic paths, resulting in improved distribution paths. This presents a novel and effective path-planning method for modern logistics intelligent distribution, accomplishing the research objectives and providing important references for subsequent related research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
It can be obtained from the author on reasonable request.
References
Zarbakhshnia N, Soleimani H, Goh M, SaraRazavid S (2019) A novel multi-objective model for green forward and reverse logistics network design. J Clean Prod 208:1304–1316
Mei Q (2020) Research on optimization of B2B cold chain logistics distribution path under new retail mode. Int Core J Eng 6(3):227–237
Lei S, Chen C, Li Y (2019) Resilient disaster recovery logistics of distribution systems: co-optimize service restoration with repair crew and mobile power source dispatch. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(6):6187–6202
Ferrell W, Ellis K, Kaminsky P, Rainwater C (2020) Horizontal collaboration: opportunities for improved logistics planning. Int J Prod Res 58(14):4267–4284
Bortolini R, Formoso CT, Viana DD, Hou Y (2019) Site logistics planning and control for engineer-to-order prefabricated building systems using BIM 4D modeling. Autom Constr 98:248–264
Paula IC, Campos EAR, Pagani RN, Guarnieri P, KavianiAmin M (2020) Are collaboration and trust sources for innovation in the reverse logistics? Insights from a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 25(2):176–222
Zhang H, Zhang G, Cai X (2020) Logistics transfer center planning based on internet of things technology. Application of intelligent systems in multi-modal information analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multi-model Information Analytics (MMIA2020), Vol. 1, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp 175–182
Winkelhaus S, Grosse EH (2020) Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system. Int J Prod Res 58(1):18–43
Aloui A, Hamani N, Derrouiche R, Derrouiche R, Delahoche L (2022) Assessing the benefits of horizontal collaboration using an integrated planning model for two-echelon energy efficiency-oriented logistics networks design. Int J Syst Sci: Op Logist 9(3):302–323
Ullah MH, Park JD (2021) Peer-to-peer energy trading in transactive markets considering physical network constraints. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 12(4):3390–3403
Misra S, Vuffray M, Zlotnik A (2020) Monotonicity properties of physical network flows and application to robust optimal allocation. Proc IEEE 108(9):1558–1579
Cao L, Jiang X, Zhao Y et al (2020) A survey of network attacks on cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access 8:44219–44227
Wright LG, Onodera T, Stein MM, Tianyu Wang Darren T, Schachter (2022) Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation. Nature 601(7894):549–555
Nguyen GN, Le Viet NH, Elhoseny M, Shankar K, Gupta BB, Abd AA, El-Latif. (2021) Secure blockchain enabled cyber-physical systems in healthcare using deep belief network with ResNet model. J Parallel Distrib Comput 153:150–160
Zhao B, Gui H, Li H (2020) Cold chain logistics path optimization via improved multi-objective ant colony algorithm. IEEE Access 8:142977–142995
Xu W, Rong M (2022) Research on optimization of expressway logistics path based on the advantages of multimodal transport in the environment of internet of things. Wirel Pers Commun 126(3):1981–1997
Liu D, Ji S (2019) Research on efficient online planning of emergency logistics path based on double-layer ant colony optimization algorithm. Int J Comput Appl 41(5):400–406
Tang X (2019) Optimal scheduling method of transport path in coastal port international logistics park. J Coast Res 93((SI)):1125–1131
Gao K, **n J, Cheng H (2018) Multi-mobile robot autonomous navigation system for intelligent logistics. In: 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE, pp 2603–2609
Feng X, Song R, Yin W et al (2023) Multimodal transportation network with cargo containerization technology: advantages and challenges. Transp Policy 132:128–143
Rouky N, Boukachour J, Boudebous D, Alaoui AE (2023) Optimization under uncertainty: generality and application to multimodal transport. Int J Supply Op Manag 10(2):223–244
Mondal MA, Rehena Z (2023) Designing of A* based route recommendation service for multimodal transportation system in smart cities. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 47(1):609–625
**e J (2023) Comparing the sustainability of multimodal transportation between China and Europe. Front Bus Econ Manag 7(1):5–16
Scarişoreanu DI, Ghiculescu LD (2023) Study of the multimodal freight transport sector in Romania: analysis of the external and internal environment. BRAIN. Broad Res Artif Intell Neurosci 14(1):571–595
Bogachev VA, Kravets AS, Bogachev TV (2023) Mathematical experiment in logistics research of multimodal freight transportation with time and cost indicators. Mod Transp Syst Technol 9(1):108–121
Odugbesan JA, Sogeke OS, Aghazadeh S, Qaralleh REA (2023) Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: the roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership. J Knowl Manag 27(3):696–716
Menges A, Wortmann T (2022) Synthesising artificial intelligence and physical performance. Archit Des 92(3):94–99
Zou Q, Guo X, Luo Y, Jiang Y, Cui P, Su L, Ou G, Pan H, Liu W (2022) Spatial pattern and response of landslide and debris flow risks in China-Pakistan economic corridor. Bull Chin Acad Sci 36(2):160–169
Moeinaddini M, Saadi I, Torfs K, Moeinaddini M (2022) Cools MUnderstanding the growing role of driving anger in the risk of traffic incidents involving vietnamese motorcyclists. Traffic Inj Prev 23(5):215–220
Envelope RIA (2022) Determination of costs for international motor transportation of goods. Transp Res Proced 63:229–243
Ouyang B, Wills PS, Tang Y, Hallstrom JO, Su TC (2021) Initial development of the hybrid aerial underwater robotic system (HAUCS). Internet of Things (IoT) for aquatic farms. IEEE Internet Things J 8(18):14013–14027
Ke BR, Fang SC, Lai JH (2022) Adjustment of bus departure time of an electric bus transportation system for reducing costs and carbon emissions: a case study in Penghu: Energy Environ 33(4):728–751
Zhao B, Gui H, Li H, Xue J (2020) Cold chain logistics path optimization via improved multi-objective ant colony algorithm. IEEE Access 8:142977–142995
Leng K, Li S (2021) Distribution path optimization for intelligent logistics vehicles of urban rail transportation using VRP optimization model. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 23(2):1661–1669
Sun Y, Geng N, Gong S, Yinbao Y (2020) Research on improved genetic algorithm in path optimization of aviation logistics distribution center. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(1):29–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JR Complete the design and execution of this study. SSS completed the first draft and revisions of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, J., Salleh, S.S. Green urban logistics path planning design based on physical network system in the context of artificial intelligence . J Supercomput 80, 9140–9161 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05796-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05796-x