Abstract
Considering the increasing rates of bullying in adolescence, more empirical evidence on how multiple factors work together in relation to the bully-victim role is needed. This study aims to explore individual and perceived school-level factors associated with the bully-victim role in the context of traditional bullying and cyberbullying, based on the social-ecological model. Factors such as aggressive conflict resolution, normative adjustment, emotional dysregulation, peer social network, teacher apathy, teacher support, and school connectedness were analyzed. Gender differences were also examined. Participants were 854 students (402 girls) between 11 and 18 years of age (M = 13.65; SD = 1.36) from four secondary schools. Results indicated common factors associated with the bully-victim role in both traditional bullying and cyberbullying, such as aggressive conflict resolution, normative adjustment, and school connectedness. Whereas higher teacher support was associated with the bully-victim role in traditional bullying, lower peer social network was associated with the cyberbully-victim role. Gender interaction effects were found in traditional bullying, with the likelihood of being a bully-victim being higher for girls with higher levels of teacher support and lower school connectedness. Our results highlight that individual factors affect bully-victims in traditional bullying and cyberbullying, and act in concert with perceived environmental conditions in the education context. Discipline and norm adjustment, as well as socio-emotional competencies such as emotional regulation and adequate conflict resolution, are important for preventing bully-victim involvement. Key factors in the school context to prevent double-role involvement are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailen, N. H., Green, L. M., & Thompson, R. J. (2019). Understanding emotion in adolescents: A review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity. Emotion Review, 11(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918768878.
Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Sorrentino, A. (2017). School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: Roles and overlap. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(9), 937–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1330793.
Baroncelli, A., & Ciucci, E. (2014). Unique effects of different components of trait emotional intelligence in traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 37(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.05.009.
Cunningham, N. (2007). Level of bonding to school and perception of the school environment by bullies, victims, and bully victims. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431607302940.
Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., & Ortega Ruiz, R. (2017). Desarrollo y validación de la Escala de Convivencia Escolar [The development and validation of the Schoolwide Climate Scale]. Universitas Psychologica, 16(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-1.dvec.
Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P., & Plichta, P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the european cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065.
Ding, Y., Li, D., Li, X., **ao, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2020). Profiles of adolescent traditional and cyber bullying and victimization: The role of demographic, individual, family, school, and peer factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106439.
D’Urso, G., Symonds, J., Sloan, S., & Devine, D. (2022). Bullies, victims, and meanies: The role of child and classmate social and emotional competencies. Social Psychology of Education, 25(1), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09684-1.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2019). Development of aggressive-victims from childhood through adolescence: Associations with emotion dysregulation, withdrawn behaviors, moral disengagement, peer rejection, and friendships. Development and Psychopathology, 32(1), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579419000063.
Fossum, S., Skokauskas, N., Handegård, B. H., Hansen, K. L., & Kyrrestad, H. (2021). The significance of traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and mental health problems for middle school students feeling unsafe in the school environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.2006305.
Furlong, M. J., O’Brennan, L. M., & You, S. (2011). Psychometric properties of the add Health School Connectedness Scale for 18 sociocultural groups. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20609.
Garaigordobil, M. (2017). Conducta antisocial: Conexión con bullying/cyberbullying y estrategias de resolución de conflictos [Antisocial behavior: Connection with bullying/cyberbullying and conflict resolution]. Psychosocial Intervention, 26(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.12.002.
Garaigordobil, M., Machimbarrena, J. M., & Maganto, C. (2016). Adaptación española de un instrumento para evaluar la resolución de conflictos (Conflictalk): Datos psicométricos de fiabilidad y validez [Spanish adaptation of an instrument to evaluate conflict resolution (Conflictalk) Reliability and validity psychometric data]. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 3(2), 59–67.
García-Fernández, C. M., Romera, E. M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2015). Explicative factors of face-to-face harassment and cyberbullying in a sample of primary students. Psicothema, 27(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.35.
García-Moya, I., Brooks, F., & Moreno, C. (2020). A new measure for the assessment of student–teacher connectedness in adolescence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(5), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000621.
Gómez-Ortiz, O., Romera-Félix, E. M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2017). Multidimensionality of social competence: Measurement of the construct and its relationship with bullying roles. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.15702.
Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2022). Statistical Analysis in JASP 0.16.1: A Guide for Students. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Statistical-Analysis-in-JASP-A-Students-Guide-v14-Nov2020.pdf.
Kennedy, R. S. (2021). Bully-victims: An analysis of subtypes and risk characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 5401–5421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517741213.
Kljakovic, M., & Hunt, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of predictors of bullying and victimisation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.002.
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students’ co** with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618.
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009.
Lan, M., Law, N., & Pan, Q. (2022). Effectiveness of anti-cyberbullying educational programs: A socio-ecologically grounded systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107200.
Lereya, S. T., Copeland, W. E., Zammit, S., & Wolke, D. (2015). Bully/victims: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of their mental health. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(12), 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0705-5.
Lucas-Molina, B., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Solbes-Canales, I., Ortuño-Sierra, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2022). Bullying, cyberbullying and mental health: The role of student connectedness as a school protective factor. Psychosocial Intervention, 31(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.7440/res64.2018.03.
MacEvoy, J. P., & Asher, S. R. (2012). When friends disappoint: Boys’ and girls’ responses to transgressions of friendship expectations. Child Development, 83(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01685.x.
Marengo, D., Jungert, T., Iotti, N. O., Settanni, M., Thornberg, R., & Longobardi, C. (2018). Conflictual student–teacher relationship, emotional and behavioral problems, prosocial behavior, and their associations with bullies, victims, and bullies/victims. Educational Psychology, 38(9), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1481199.
McGrath, K. F., & Van Bergen, P. (2015). Who, when, why and to what end? Students at risk of negative student–teacher relationships and their outcomes. Educational Research Review, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.12.001.
Monopoli, W. J., Evans, S. W., & Himawan, L. K. (2022). Risk and protective factors for patterns of bullying involvement in middle school students. Journal of School Violence, 21(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2022.2036171.
Ortega-Ruiz, R., Rey, D., R., & Casas, J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q [Assessing bullying and cyberbullying: Spanish validation of EBIPQ and ECIPQ]. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004.
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2016). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’(cyber) bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415573639.
Quintana-Orts, C., Mérida-López, S., Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2021). A closer look at the emotional intelligence construct: How do emotional intelligence facets relate to life satisfaction in students involved in bullying and cyberbullying? European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 11(3), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030051.
Quintana-Orts, C., Rey, L., Chamizo-Nieto, M. T., & Worthington, E. L. (2020). A serial mediation model of the relationship between cybervictimization and cyberaggression: The role of stress and unforgiveness motivations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7966. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217966.
Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., Mero, O., Solera, E., Herrera-López, M., & Calmaestra, J. (2020). Prevalence and psychosocial predictors of cyberaggression and cybervictimization in adolescents: A Spain-Ecuador transcultural study on cyberbullying. Plos One, 15(11), e0241288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241288.
Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. [Attenuation of the skewness and kurtosis of the observed scores through variable transformations: Impact on the factor structure]. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología y Psicología Experimental, 29(2), 205–227.
Romera, E. M., Carmona-Rojas, M., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Camacho, A. (2022). Bidirectional association between normative adjustment and bullying perpetration in adolescence: A prospective longitudinal study. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 27(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2022.03.001.
Shi, H. F., Fan, C. Y., Chu, X. W., Zhang, X. C., & Wu, L. L. (2021). Positive perceived school climate and cyberbullying in chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model from the perspective of internet characteristics. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(8), 1177–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431621989816.
Springer, A. E., Jaramillo, C., Ortiz, M. C., Gómez, Y., Case, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). School social cohesion, student-school connectedness, and bullying in colombian adolescents. Global Health Promotion, 23(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975915576305.
Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). Validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS-18) in five samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9547-9.
Wang, P., Wang, X., & Lei, L. (2021). Gender differences between student–student relationship and cyberbullying perpetration: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 9187–9207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519865970.
Wilson, C., Parry, L., Nettelbeck, T., & Bell, J. (2003). Conflict resolution tactics and bullying: The influence of social learning. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204002238364.
Zych, I., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Protective factors against bullying and cyberbullying: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.008.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the adolescents, their families and their schools’ administration for agreeing to take part in the research. This work was supported by the Juan de la Cierva-Formación postdoctoral fellowship programme to C.Q.-O.from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under Grant [number FJC2019-038942-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]; Junta de Andalucía for personal funding to C.Q.-O. under Grant [Talento Doctores ref POSTDOC_21_00364]; and by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [PID2020-115913GB-I00]. Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Research Agency/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Union “NextGenerationEU/Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan” financed the fellowship of N.M.F [RYC2021-034977-I].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Quintana-Orts, C., Mora-Merchán, J.A., Muñoz-Fernández, N. et al. Bully-victims in bullying and cyberbullying: An analysis of school-level risk factors. Soc Psychol Educ 27, 587–609 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09846-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09846-3