Abstract
Learning to teach science using engineering design is a complex endeavor for elementary preservice teachers (PSTs). This entails hel** PSTs understand students as sense makers and recognizing ways to notice, respond, and leverage their students’ ideas throughout the design process. In this study, we follow a cohort of elementary PSTs through a 16-week method course including a related field experience in a local STEM intermediate school (grades 5–6) to better understand how they organize, plan for, and attempt to integrate engineering design–based science teaching. Data were gathered through interviews, lesson plans, reflective narratives, and classroom observations. Data were analyzed using open coding, document review, and cross case analysis. Results indicated that PSTs demonstrated three different ways they began to appropriate elements of engineering design–based science teaching, including adaptive approximations and compartmentalization of core practices as well as the replication of delivery pedagogies as practiced by school-based mentors. Recommendations for science teacher educators and instructors of science interested in integrating engineering design–based science teaching across contexts are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
All data is password protected and stored in the Purdue University Research Repository (PURR). Access to the PURR can be made upon request to the corresponding author.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Anderson, L. M., & Stillman, J. A. (2013). Student teaching’s contribution to preservice teacher development: A review of research focused on the preparation of teachers for urban and high-needs contexts. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 3–69. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312468619
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
Benedict-Chambers, A., & Aram, R. (2017). Tools for teacher noticing: Hel** preservice teachers notice and analyze student thinking and scientific practice use. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/104650X.2017.1302730
Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braaten, M. (2019). Persistence of the two-worlds pitfall: Learning to teach within and across settings. Science Education, 103(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21460
Bullough, R. V., & Baughman, K. (1997). “First year teacher” eight years later: An inquiry into teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Capobianco, B. M., Kelley, T., Nyquist, C., & Lehman, J. (2015). Dog gone it! https://stemedhub.org/resources/2896. Accessed 3 Aug 2021.
Capobianco, B., Radloff, J., & Lehman, J. (2020). Elementary science teachers’ sense-making with learning to implement engineering design and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1789267
Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21325
Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Teacher noticing in science education: Do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755803
Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers’ engineering teaching responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47, 1101–1125.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teacher, re-imaganing teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
Hogan, T., Rabinowitz, M., & Craven, J. A. (2003). Representation in teaching: Inferences from research of expert and novice teachers. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 235–247.
Johnson, A. W., Wendell, K. B., & Watkins, J. (2017). Examining experienced teachers’ noticing of and responses to students’ engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1162
Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, R. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intention of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teacher’s attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108330245
Loughran, J. J. (2013). Science teacher as learner. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1057–1080). Routledge.
Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1427418
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
National Research Council. (2008). Ready, Set, SCIENCE! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11882
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014
Stein, S., McRobbie, C., & Ginns, I. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities for learning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00049-X
Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Develo** a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213476334
Wallace, J. (2003). Introduction: Learning about teacher learning: Reflections of a science educator. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education (pp. 6–21). Routledge.
Watkins, J., McCormick, M., Wendell, K. B., Spencer, K., Milto, E., Portsmore, M., & Hammer, D. (2018). Data-based conjectures for supporting responsive teaching in engineering design with elementary teachers. Science Education, 102(3), 548–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21334
Wendell, K. B. (2014). Design practices of preservice elementary teachers in an integrated engineering and literature experience. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1085
Wendell, K. B., Swenson, J. E., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019). Epistemological framing and novice elementary teachers’ approaches to learning and teaching engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 956–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21541
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1626197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capobianco, B.M., Radloff, J. Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Trajectories for Appropriating Engineering Design–Based Science Teaching. Res Sci Educ 52, 1623–1641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y