SpringerLink
Log in

Participatory monitoring of small-scale coastal fisheries in South America: use of fishers’ knowledge and factors affecting participation

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participatory approaches to fisheries management are gaining increasing support from researchers, non-governmental organizations, and governments in Latin America, and different forms of participatory monitoring have been implemented over the last few decades. Among several advantages, these initiatives allow incorporation of fishers’ knowledge on ecology, fishing practices, social aspects, markets, regulations, into different stages of management. In this paper, we analyze key features of participatory monitoring programs in small-scale coastal fisheries in South America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay) through a literature review complemented by expert opinion. Our review considered the fisheries and variables monitored; objectives, duration, institutional context of the monitoring programs; and factors that affect the extent of fishers’ participation and the incorporation of fishers’ knowledge. We found 14 case studies described in the literature, most of which correspond to benthic fisheries. Most cases focused on ecological and/or catch and effort variables; few initiatives included social variables. Initiatives were mainly driven by researchers in partnership with fishers and other stakeholders under formal or informal institutional arrangements. Institutional arrangements were largely responsible for the effectiveness of participation. In most cases, fishers’ participation in monitoring was fostered as a component of a broader participatory co-management approach. Despite the challenges, participatory monitoring approaches are gaining traction in South America, receiving significant support from researchers in most cases, and from nongovernmental organizations in some cases. Increased governmental support for implementing and sustaining long-lasting participatory monitoring programs would strengthen monitoring initiatives that emerge locally.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “fishers” as a generic term to refer indistinctly to fishermen and fisherwomen.

  2. Undersecretary of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Chile, SUBPESCA.

  3. SocMon is a global initiative aimed to establish local programs of socioeconomic monitoring in coastal areas, to complement biological and ecological monitoring.

  4. Indicators include total returns obtained by the organization from resources extracted inside AMERBs, total costs, benefit/cost ratio, and average gross returns per member (solely considering AMERB catches).

References

  • Aburto JA, Stotz WB, Cundill G (2014) Social-ecological collapse: TURF governance in the context of highly variable resources in Chile. Ecol Soc 19(1):2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06145-190102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwala M, Ginsberg JR (2017) Untangling outcomes of de jure and de facto community-based management of natural resources. Conserv Biol 31(6):1232–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida HLPS (2002) Indicadores de Qualidade de Vida, instrumento para o Monitoramento Participativo da Qualidade de Vida de Comunidades Costeiras Tradicionais: O caso da Prainha do Canto Verde, Beberibe/CE. (Master’s Dissertation). Retrieved from Universidade do Ceará Database: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/15743

  • Berkes F (1994) Co-management: bridging the two solitudes. North Perspect 22(2–3):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2011) Restoring unity: the concept of marine social-ecological systems. In: Ommer RE, Perry RI, Cochrane K, Cury P (eds) World fisheries: a social-ecological analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 9–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C, Gadgil M (1995) Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In: Perrings CA, Mäler KG, Folke C, Jansson BO, Holling CS (eds) Biodiversity conservation. Kluwer, Dorrecht pp, pp 269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Mahon R, McConney P, Pollnac R, Pomeroy R (2001) Managing small-scale fisheries: alternative directions and methods. International Development Research, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil, Federal Law N. 9.985, from 18th of July 2000. Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação (SNUC)

  • Bunce L, Townsley P, Pomeroy R, Pollnac R (2000) Socioeconomic manual for coral reef management. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC, Defeo O (2001) Latin American benthic shellfisheries: emphasis on co-management and experimental practices. Rev Fish Biol Fish 11:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014235924952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, Castilla JC (2005) More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fish 15:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-005-4865-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, Castrejón M, Pérez-Castañeda R, Castilla JC, Gutiérrez NL, Essington TE, Folke C (2016) Co‐management in Latin American small‐scale shellfisheries: assessment from long‐term case studies. Fish Fish 17(1):176–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein G, Pittman J, Alexander SM, Berdej S, Dyck T, Kreitmair U, Rathwell KJ, Villamayor-Tomas S, Vogt J, Armitage D (2015) Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorda P, Trobbiani G, Parma M (2013) Relevamiento de Bancos de Vieira Tehuelche en el Golfo San José. Informe Técnico Lapemar Nº 29. Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Chubut

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Jorgensen J, Josupeit H, Kalikoski D, Lucas CM (2015) Fishers’ knowledge and the ecosystem approach to fisheries: applications, experiences and lessons in Latin America. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1999) Indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 8. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2003) The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 4, Suppl. 2. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2009) Report of the workshop on toolbox for applying the ecosystem approach to fisheries, Rome, 26–29 February 2008. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 884. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small‐scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton S, Hernández-Velasco A, Suarez-Castillo A, Melo FFR, Rojo M, Sáenz-Arroyo A, Weaver AH, Cudney-Bueno R, Micheli F, Torre J (2019) From fishing fish to fishing data: the role of artisanal fishers in conservation and resource management in Mexico. Viability and sustainability of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean. Springer, Cham, pp 151–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22(2/3):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia SM, Allison EH, Andrew NJ, Béné C, Bianchi G, de Graaf GJ, Kalikoski D, Mahon R, Orensanz JM (2008) Towards integrated assessment and advice in small-scale fisheries: principles and processes. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 515. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelcich S, Pinto A, Rivera J, Jerez G, Burotto L (2015) Exploring opportunities to include local and traditional knowledge in the recently created ‘Marine Management Plans’ Policy of Chile. In: Fischer J, Jorgensen J, Josupeit H, Kalikoski D, Lucas CM (eds) Fishermen’ knowledge and the ecosystem approach to fisheries: applications, experiences and lessons in Latin America. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper N. 591. FAO, Rome, pp 247–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianelli I, Horta S, Martínez G, de la Rosa A, Defeo O (2018) Operationalizing an ecosystem approach to small-scale fisheries in develo** countries: the case of Uruguay. Mar Policy 95:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon VG, Sriskanthan P, Townsley B, Cattermoul L, Bunce EB, Pomeroy V (2008) Socioeconomic monitoring guidelines for coastal managers in South Asia, SocMon South Asia. IUCN/CORDIO, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) (2017) SocMon Brasil: síntese das lições aprendidas. Brasília: ICMBIO. Disponível em: http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/comunicacao/publicacoes/publicacoes-diversas/socmon_brasil_sintese_das_licoes_aprendidas.pdf

  • Ignatius S, Delaney A, Haapasaari P (2019) Socio-cultural values as a dimension of fisheries governance: the cases of Baltic salmon and herring. Environ Sci Policy 94:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine RA, Cam B, Davis-Case D (1996) Participatory analysis, monitoring and evaluation for fishing communities: a manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 364. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan T, Castilla JC, White AT, Defeo O (2008) Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 19:33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura RL, Dutra GF, Francini-Filho RB, Minte-Vera CV, Curado IB, Guimarães FJ, Oliveira RF, Alves DC (2007) Gestão do Uso de Recursos Pesqueiros na Reserva Extrativista Marinha do Corumbau, Bahia. In: Equipe do Núcleo da Zona Costeira e Marinha (ed) Areas Aquáticas como instrumento de gestão pesqueira. MMA/SBF, Brasília, pp 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Obura DO (2001) Participatory monitoring of shallow tropical marine fisheries by artisanal fishers in Diani, Kenya. Bull Mar Sci 69(2):777–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Obura DO, Wells S, Church J, Horrill C (2002) Monitoring of fish and fish catches by local fishermen in Kenya and Tanzania. Mar Freshw Res 53(2):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Parma AM, Jerez G, Barahona N, Montecinos M, Elías I (2005) What are the key elements for the sustainability of “S-fisheries”? Insights from South America. Bull Mar Sci 76:527–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Parma AM, Ciocco NF, Cinti A (2007) Commercial diving for bivalves in San José Gulf, Argentine Patagonia- Round 5 is on. In: McClanahan TR, Castilla JC (eds) Successes in marine coastal resource management. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Cinti A, Parma AM, Burotto L, Espinosa-Guerrero S, Sosa-Cordero E, Sepúlveda C, Toral-Granda V (2013) Latin-American rights-based fisheries targeting sedentary resources. In: Orensanz JM, Seijo JC (eds) Rights-based management in Latin American fisheries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper N. 582. FAO, Rome, pp 72–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Parma AM, Cinti A (2015) Methods to use fishermen’ knowledge for fisheries assessment and management. In: Fischer J, Jorgensen J, Josupeit H, Kalikoski D, Lucas CM (eds) Fishermen’ knowledge and the ecosystem approach to fisheries: applications, experiences and lessons in Latin America. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper N. 591. FAO, Rome, pp 41–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parma AM, Orensanz JM, Elías I, Jerez G (2003) Diving for shellfish- and data: incentives for the participation of fishers in the monitoring and management of artisanal fisheries around southern South America. In: Newman SJ, Gaughan DJ, Jackson G, Mackie MC, Molony B, St John J, Kaiola P (eds) Towards sustainability of data-limited multi-sector fisheries, Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop Proceedings, Bunbury, Australia. Department of Fisheries, Perth, pp 8–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RC, Roque FO, Constantino PAL, Sabino J, Uehara-Prado M (2013) Monitoramento in situ da biodiversidade. ICMBio, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy RS, Rivera-Guieb R (2006) Fishery co-management: a practical handbook. CABI Publishing and International Development Research Centre, Ottawa/Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • República De Chile (1995) Reglamento sobre Areas de Manejo y Explotación de Recursos Bentónicos. Decree N. 355, from 26 August 1995

  • República de Chile (2013) Fisheries and Aquaculture Law No. 20.657 de 06 de Febrero 2013. Modifica en el ámbito de la sustentabilidad de recursos hidrobiológicos, acceso a la actividad pesquera industrial y artesanal y regulaciones para la investigación y fiscalización, la Ley General de Pesca y Acuicultura contenida en Ley No 18.892 y sus modificaciones

  • Röckmann C, van Leeuwen J, Goldsborough D, Kraan M, Piet G (2015) The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem-based management. Mar Policy 52:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross H, Buchy M, Proctor W (2002) Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian Natural Resource Management. J Environ Manag 9(4):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas S, Chuenpagdee R, Charles A, Seijo JC (2011) Coastal fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 544. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas S, Barragán-Paladines MJ, Chuenpagdee R (eds) (2018) Viability and sustainability of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean, vol 19. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • San Martín G, Parma AM, Orensanz JM (2010) The Chilean experience with territorial use rights in fisheries. In: Grafton RQ, Hilborn R, Squires D, Tait M, Williams M (eds) Handbook of marine fisheries conservation and management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 324–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos CZ, Schiavetti A (2014) Assessment of the management in Brazilian Marine Extractive Reserves. Ocean Coast Manag 93:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer R, Rodrigues Ribeiro X, Rodrigues do Nascimento J (2010) Resultados Econômicos da Pesca da Lagosta com Cangalhas na Prainha do Canto Verde. Internal report. Instituto Terramar, Fortaleza, Ceará

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemmel EM, Friedlander AM (2017) Participatory fishery monitoring is successful for understanding the reproductive biology needed for local fisheries management. Environ Biol Fishes 100(2):171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0566-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann S (2010a) A tenuous triumvirate: the role of independent biologists in Chile’s co-management regime for shellfish. Mar Policy 34:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann S (2010b) Application of participatory principles to investigation of the natural world: an example from Chile. Mar Policy 34(6):1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas CS, Vieira MARM (2015) Fisher’s knowledge and the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries: legal instruments and lessons from five cases studies in coastal Brazil. In: Fischer J, Jorgensen J, Josupeit H, Kalikoski D, Lucas CM (eds) Fishers’ knowledge and the ecosystem approach to fisheries: applications, experiences and lessons in Latin America. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 591. FAO, Rome, pp 231–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas CS, Davy B, Leppan W (2009) Community-based conservation and development: lessons learned from the 2004 equator prize. Can J Dev Stud 28(3–4):523–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEPLAN (Secretaria do Planejamento) (n.d.). 2017. Governo do Estado da Bahia. Available at: http://www.seplan.ba.gov.br. Accessed 10 Mar 2017

  • Sowman M (2009) An evolving Partnership: collaboration between ‘experts’ and a net-fishery. Gateways 2:119–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley P (1998) Social issues in fisheries. In: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper (FAO), no. 375 (English)/FAO, Rome (Italy). Fishery Policy and Planning Div

  • Trimble M, Berkes F (2015) Towards adaptive co-management of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay and Brazil: lessons from using Ostrom’s design principles. Mast 14(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-015-0032-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uruguay. Decree-Law N. 149/1997. Actualizacion de la reglamentacion sobre explotacion y dominio sobre riquezas del mar. http://www.impo.com.uy/bases/decretos/149-1997. Accessed 18 Dec 2014

  • Uychiaoco AJ, Arceo HO, Green SJ, Margarita T, Gaite PA, Aliño PM (2005) Monitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle. Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2775–2794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8414-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC, Nielsen JR, Degnbol P (2003) The fisheries co-management experience: accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Fish & Fisheries Series 26. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Y, Gutierrez NL (2017) Ending fishery overexploitation by expanding from local successes to globalized solutions. Nat Ecol Evol 1(7):0179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

    Ana Carolina Esteves Dias

  2. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos (CESIMAR), CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina

    Ana Cinti & Ana M. Parma

  3. Environmental Studies and Research Center, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

    Cristiana Simão Seixas

Authors
  1. Ana Carolina Esteves Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Cinti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana M. Parma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristiana Simão Seixas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Carolina Esteves Dias.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dias, A.C.E., Cinti, A., Parma, A.M. et al. Participatory monitoring of small-scale coastal fisheries in South America: use of fishers’ knowledge and factors affecting participation. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 30, 313–333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09602-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09602-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation