Abstract
We test a copula-based joint discrete–continuous model to unravel mode choice and travel distance decisions in a joint framework for school trips. This framework explicitly accounts for common unobserved factors that may affect both the mode choice and travel distance. Joint estimation of the models makes a significant difference in the effect of travel distance on willingness to walk to school. The absolute value of the travel distance coefficient in the mode choice model increases by 22% when a joint formulation is adopted instead of the conventional single estimations. We find a significant decrease of 19% in the coefficient of travel safety perception in the joint mode choice model compared to the single model. This underscores the impact of model specification, in terms of the variable effect interpretation and policy assessments. The effect magnitude of several policy-sensitive variables is discussed and compared with previous studies. Particularly, we indicate that the probability of walking is reduced by 0.85% due to a 1% increase in travel distance; accordingly, it propels parents to select non-active modes, particularly school bus. This study also demonstrates how addressing parental concerns about travel safety could double the propensity to walk to school.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alemu, D.D., Tsutsumi, J.I.G.: Determinants and spatial variability of after-school travel by teenagers. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(4), 876–881 (2011)
Bhat, C.R., Eluru, N.: A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 43(7), 749–765 (2009)
Broberg, A., Sarjala, S.: School travel mode choice and the characteristics of the urban built environment: the case of Helsinki, Finland. Transp. Policy 37, 1–10 (2015)
City Mayors. http://www.citymayors.com. Accessed 29 July 2013
Cooper, A.R., Andersen, L.B., Wedderkopp, N., Page, A.S., Froberg, K.: Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 29(3), 179–184 (2005)
Council of Educational Facility Planners, International. Creating Connections: The CEFPI Guide to Educational Facility Planning. Council of Education Facility Planners International, Scottsdale AZ (2004)
De Jong, G., Ben-Akiva, M.: A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 41(9), 950–965 (2007)
D’Haese, S., De Meester, F., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Cardon, G.: Criterion distances and environmental correlates of active commuting to school in children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act 8, 88 (2011)
Easton, S., Ferrari, E.: Children’s travel to school—the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors. Transp. Policy 44, 9–18 (2015)
Ermagun, A., Levinson, D.: Intra-household bargaining for school trip accompaniment of children: a group decision approach. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 222–234 (2016)
Ermagun, A., Levinson, D.: Public transit, active travel, and the journey to school: a cross-nested logit analysis. Transport. A Transport. Sci. 13(1), 24–37 (2017)
Ermagun, A., Samimi, A.: Promoting active transportation modes in school trips. Transp. Policy 37, 203–211 (2015)
Ermagun, A., Hossein Rashidi, T., Samimi, A.: A joint model for mode choice and escort decisions of school trips. Transport. A Transp. Sci. 11(3), 270–289 (2015a)
Ermagun, A., Rashidi, T.H., Lari, Z.A.: Mode choice for school trips: long-term planning and impact of modal specification on policy assessments. Transport. Res. Rec. J. Transport. Res. Board 2513, 97–105 (2015b)
Ermagun, A., Samimi, A., Rashidi, T.H.: How Far Is Too Far? Providing Safe and Comfortable Walking Environments. Transport. Res. Rec. J. Transport. Res. Board 2586, 72–82 (2016)
Evenson, K.R., Huston, S.L., McMillen, B.J., Bors, P., Ward, D.S.: Statewide prevalence and correlates of walking and bicycling to school. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 157(9), 887 (2003)
Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., Greene, W.: School location and student travel analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transport. Res. Rec. J. Transport. Res. Board 1895(1), 55–63 (2004)
Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 5/e. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2003)
Habib, K.M.N.: Modeling commuting mode choice jointly with work start time and work duration. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46(1), 33–47 (2012)
Habib, K.N.: An investigation on mode choice and travel distance demand of older people in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Canada: application of a utility theoretic joint econometric model. Transportation 42(1), 143–161 (2015)
Kerr, J., Rosenberg, D., Sallis, J.F., Saelens, B.E., Frank, L.D., Conway, T.L.: Active commuting to school: associations with environment and parental concerns. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 38(4), 787 (2006)
Kerr, J., Frank, L., Sallis, J.F., Chapman, J.: Urban form correlates of pedestrian travel in youth: differences by gender, race-ethnicity and household attributes. Transport. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 12(3), 177–182 (2007)
Larsen, K., Gilliland, J., Hess, P., Tucker, P., Irwin, J., He, M.: The influence of the physical environment and sociodemographic characteristics on children’s mode of travel to and from school. Am. J. Public Health 99(3), 520 (2009)
Leslie, E., Kremer, P., Toumbourou, J.W., Williams, J.W.: Gender differences in personal, social and environmental influences on active travel to and from school for Australian adolescents. J. Sci. Med. Sport 13(6), 597–601 (2010)
Li, S., Zhao, P.: The determinants of commuting mode choice among school children in Bei**g. J. Transp. Geogr. 46, 112–121 (2015)
Martin, S.L., Lee, S.M., Lowry, R.: National prevalence and correlates of walking and bicycling to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33(2), 98–105 (2007)
McDonald, N.C.: Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school. Transportation 35(1), 23–35 (2008)
McDonald, N.C., Aalborg, A.E.: Why parents drive children to school: implications for safe routes to school programs. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 75(3), 331–342 (2009)
McMillan, T.E.: The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(1), 69–79 (2007)
McMillan, T., Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., Anderson, C.: Johnny walks to school-does Jane? Sex differences in children’s active travel to school. Child. Youth Environ. 16(1), 75–89 (2006)
Merom, D., Tudor-Locke, C., Bauman, A., Rissel, C.: Active commuting to school among NSW primary school children: implications for public health. Health Place 12(4), 678–687 (2006)
Mitra, R., Buliung, R.N.: Exploring differences in school travel mode choice behaviour between children and youth. Transp. Policy 42, 4–11 (2015)
Mitra, R., Buliung, R.N., Roorda, M.J.: Built environment and school travel mode choice in Toronto, Canada. Transport. Res. Rec. J. Transport. Res. Board 2156(1), 150–159 (2010)
Mota, J., Gomes, H., Almeida, M., Ribeiro, J.C., Carvalho, J., Santos, M.P.: Active versus passive transportation to school-differences in screen time, socio-economic position and perceived environmental characteristics in adolescent girls. Ann. Hum. Biol. 34(3), 273–282 (2007)
Nelson, N.M., Foley, E., O’Gorman, D.J., Moyna, N.M., Woods, C.B.: Active commuting to school: how far is too far? Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 5(1), 1 (2008)
Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center.: Safe Routes to School guide. Retrieved June 9, 2008. http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/guide/pdf/SRTS-Guide_full.pdf (2008)
R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/ (2013)
Samimi, A., Ermagun, A.: Students’ tendency to walk to school: case study of Tehran. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 139, 144 (2012)
Schlossberg, M., Phillips, P.P., Johnson, B., Parker, B.: How do they get there? A spatial analysis of a ‘sprawl school’in Oregon. Plann. Pract. Res. 20(2), 147–162 (2005)
Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P.P., Johnson, B., Parker, B.: School trips: effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 72(3), 337–346 (2006)
Schoeppe, S., Tranter, P., Duncan, M. J., Curtis, C., Carver, A., & Malone, K. (2015). Australian children’s independent mobility levels: secondary analyses of cross-sectional data between 1991 and 2012. Children’s Geographies, 1–14
Sepulveda, M.J., Tait, F., Zimmerman, E., Edington, D.: Impact of childhood obesity on employers. Health Aff. 29(3), 513–521 (2010)
Seraj, S., Sidharthan, R., Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G.: Parental attitudes towards children walking and bicycling to school. Transport. Res. Rec. 2323, 46–55 (2012)
Sidharthan, R., Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G.: Model for children’s school travel mode choice: accounting for effects of spatial and social interaction. Transport. Res. Rec. 2213, 78–86 (2011)
Sklar, A.: Fonctions de répartition à dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris 8, 229–231 (1959)
Spissu, E., Pinjari, A.R., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R.: A copula-based joint multinomial discrete–continuous model of vehicle type choice and miles of travel. Transportation 36(4), 403–422 (2009)
Statistics of Minister of Education. http://tehranedu.ir/. Accessed 2 Jan 2012
Staunton, C.E., Hubsmith, D., Kallins, W.: Promoting safe walking and biking to school: the Marin County success story. J. Inf. 93(9), 11 (2003)
Tehran Comprehensive Transportation and Traffic Studies Co. http://en.tehran.ir/. Accessed 4 May 2013
The 3rd Okinawa personal trip survey (Opts), Okinawa, 2009. In: Final Report, pp. 1–279 (Japanese)
Timperio, A., Ball, K., Salmon, J., Roberts, R., Giles-Corti, B., Simmons, D., Crawford, D.: Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 30(1), 45–51 (2006)
Train, K.: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Trivedi, P.K., Zimmer, D.M.: Copula modeling: an introduction for practitioners. Now Publishers Inc, Breda (2007)
Van Dyck, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Cardon, G., Deforche, B.: Criterion distances and correlates of active transportation to school in Belgian older adolescents. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 7(1), 87 (2010)
Walberg, H. On Local Control: Is Bigger Better? In Source Book on School and District Size, Cost, and Quality. University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Minneapolis, 1992, pp. 118–134
Wen, L.M., Fry, D., Rissel, C., Dirkis, H., Balafas, A., Merom, D.: Factors associated with children being driven to school: implications for walk to school programs. Health Educ. Res. 23(2), 325–334 (2008)
Wilson, E.J., Wilson, R., Krizek, K.J.: The implications of school choice on travel behavior and environmental emissions. Transport. Res. Part D Transport Environ. 12(7), 506–518 (2007)
Wilson, E.J., Marshall, J., Wilson, R., Krizek, K.J.: By foot, bus or car: children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environ. Plann. A 42(9), 2168 (2010)
Yarlagadda, A.K., Srinivasan, S.: Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation 35(2), 201–218 (2008)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Abdul Pinjari for the helpful comments. He offered detailed advices on the modeling procedure and the theme of the paper. We also thank Ali Shamshiripour for providing assistance in the code development process, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ermagun, A., Samimi, A. Mode choice and travel distance joint models in school trips. Transportation 45, 1755–1781 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9794-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9794-y