Abstract
The source-sink relationship is one of major determinants of plant performance. The influence of reproductive sink demand on light-saturated photosynthesis (P max), dark respiration (R D), stomatal conductance (g s), intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi), contents of soluble sugar (SSC), nitrogen, carbon, and photosynthetic pigments was examined in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. cv. ‘Brigitta’) during the final stage of rapid fruit growth. Measurements were performed three times per day on developed, sun-exposed leaves of girdled shoots with 0.1, 1, and 10 fruit per leaf (0.1F:L, 1F:L, and 10F:L, respectively) and nongirdled shoots bearing one fruit per leaf (NG). Girdling and lower fruit amount induced lower P max, g s, N, and total chlorophyll (Chl) and higher WUEi, SSC, R D, Chl a/b ratio and carotenoids-to-chlorophylls ratio (Car/Chl) for the 1F:L and 0.1F:L treatments. The impact of girdling was counterbalanced by 10F:L, with NG and 10F:L having similar values. Variables other than P max, R D, g s, WUEi, and SSC were unaffected throughout the course of the day. P max and g s decreased during the course of the day, but g s decreased more than P max in the afternoon, while WUEi was increasing in almost all treatments. SSC increased from the morning until afternoon, whereas R D peaked at noon regardless of the treatment. Generally, P max was closely and negatively correlated to SSC, indicating that sugar-sensing mechanisms played an important role in regulation of blueberry leaf photosynthesis. With respect to treatments, P max and N content were positively related, while R D was not associated to substrate availability. The enhanced Car/Chl ratio showed a higher photoprotection under the lower sink demand. Changes in the source-sink relationship in ‘Brigitta’ blueberry led to a rearrangement of physiological and structural leaf traits which allowed adjusting the daily balance between carbon assimilation and absorbed light energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AM:
-
measurements at 08:00–10:40
- Car:
-
carotenoids
- Chl:
-
chlorophyll
- Chltot :
-
total chlorophylls
- DM:
-
dry mass
- FM:
-
fresh mass
- g s :
-
stomatal conductance to water vapour
- NG:
-
nongirdled shoots
- P max :
-
light-saturated photosynthesis
- PM:
-
measurements at 17:00–19:40
- R D :
-
dark respiration rate
- SSC:
-
soluble sugar concentration
- WUEi :
-
intrinsic water-use efficiency
References
Avery D.J., Priestley C.A., Treharne K.J.: Integration of assimilation and carbohydrate utilization of apple–In: Marcelle R., Clijsters H., van Pouke W. (ed.): Photosynthesis and Plant Development. Pp. 221–231. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1979.
Azcon-Bieto J., Lambers H., Day D.A.: Respiratory properties of develo** bean and pea leaves.–Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 237–245, 1983.
Bartoli C.G., Gomez F., Gergoff G. et al.: Up-regulation of the mitochondrial alternative oxidase pathway enhances photosynthetic electron transport under drought conditions.–J. Exp. Bot. 56: 1269–1276, 2005.
Demmig-Adams B.: Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants. A role for the xanthophyll zeaxanthin.–BBA-Bioenergetics 1020: 1–24, 1990.
Duan W., Fan P.G., Wang L.J. et al.: Photosynthetic response to low sink demand after fruit removal in relation to photoinhibition and photoprotection in peach trees.–Tree Physiol. 28: 123–132, 2008.
Eberhard S., Finazzi G., Wollman F.A.: The dynamics of photosynthesis.–Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 463–515, 2008.
Famiani F., Antognozzi E., Boco M. et al.: Effects of altered source-sink relationships on fruit development and quality in Actinidia deliciosa.–Acta Hortic. 444: 355–360, 1997.
Fondy B.F., Geiger D.R.: Diurnal pattern of translocation and carbohydrate metabolism in source leaves of Beta vulgaris L.–Plant Physiol. 70: 671–676, 1982.
Franck N., Vaast P., Génard M. et al.: Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in fieldgrown Coffea arabica.–Tree Physiol. 26: 517–525, 2006.
Geiger D.R., Servaites J.C.: Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation.–Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 45: 235–256, 1994.
Gilbert M.E., Zwieniecki M.A., Holbrook N.M.: Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought.–J. Exp. Bot. 62: 2875–2887, 2011.
Gonçalves J.F.C., Barreto D.C.S., Santos Junior U.M. et al.: Growth, photosynthesis and stress indicators in young rosewood plants (Aniba rosaeodora Ducke) under different light intensities.–Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 325–334, 2005.
Hallik L., Niinemets Ü., Kull O.: Photosynthetic acclimation to light in woody and herbaceous species: a comparison of leaf structure, pigment content and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics measured in the field.–Plant Biol. 14: 88–99, 2012.
Hendrix D.L., Huber S.C.: Diurnal fluctuations in cotton leaf carbon export, carbohydrate content and sucrose synthesizing enzymes.–Plant Physiol. 81: 584–586, 1986.
Iglesias D.J., Lliso I., Tadeo F.R. et al.: Regulation of photosynthesis through source: sink imbalance in citrus is mediated by carbohydrate content in leaves.–Physiol. Plantarum 116: 563–572, 2002.
Jang J.C., Sheen J.: Sugar sensing in higher plants.–Plant Cell 6: 1665–1679, 1994.
Jorquera-Fontena E., Alberi M., Franck N.: Pruning severity affects yield, fruit load and fruit and leaf traits of ‘Brigitta’ blueberry.–J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 14: 855–868, 2014.
Koch K.E., Nolte K.D., Duke E.R. et al.: Sugar levels modulate differential expression of maize sucrose synthase genes.–Plant Cell 4: 59–69, 1992.
Layne D.R., Flore J.A.: End-product inhibition of photosynthesis in Prunus cerasus L. in response to whole-plant source-sink manipulation.–J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120: 583–599, 1995.
Lichtenthaler H.K., Wellburn A.R.: Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents.–Biochem. Soc. T. 11: 591–592, 1983.
Ludewig F., Sonnewald U.: High CO2-mediated down-regulation of photosynthetic gene transcripts is caused by accelerated leaf senescence rather than sugar accumulation.–FEBS Lett. 479: 19–24, 2000.
Maust B.E., Williamson J.G., Darnell R.L.: Effects of flower bud density on vegetative and reproductive development and carbohydrate relations in southern highbush blueberry.–J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124: 532–538, 1999.
Nebauer S.G., Renau-Morata B., Guardiola J.L.: Photosynthesis down-regulation precedes carbohydrate accumulation under sink limitation in Citrus.–Tree Physiol. 31: 169–177, 2011.
Nii N.: Changes of starch and sorbitol in leaves before and after removal of fruits from peach trees.–Ann. Bot.-London 79: 139–144, 1997.
Niinemets Ü.: Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies.–Plant Cell Environ. 30: 1052–1071, 2007.
Noguchi K., Terashima I.: Different regulation of leaf respiration between Spinacia oleracea, a sun species, and Alocasia odora, a shade species.–Physiol. Plantarum 101: 1–7, 1997.
Noguchi K.: Effects of light intensity and carbohydrate status on leaf and root respiration–In: Labert H., Ribas-Carbo M. (ed.): Plant Respiration. Pp. 63–83. Springer, Dordrecht 2005.
Nozue K., Maloof J.N.: Diurnal regulation of plant growth.–Plant Cell Environ. 29: 396–408, 2006.
Paul M.J., Driscoll S.P.: Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source:sink imbalance.–Plant Cell Environ. 20: 110–116, 1997.
Paul M.J., Foyer C.H.: Sink regulation of photosynthesis.–J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1383–1400, 2001.
Proeitti P.: Effect of fruiting on leaf gas exchange in olive (Olea europaea L.).–Photosynthetica 38: 397–402, 2000.
Raven J.A.: The cost of photoinhibition.–Physiol. Plantarum 142: 87–104, 2011.
Roe J.H.: A colorimetric method for the determination of fructose in blood and urine.–J. Biol. Chem. 107: 15–22, 1934.
Roitsch T.: Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress.–Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2: 198–206, 1999.
Strik B., Buller G., Hellman E.: Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight, and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry.–HortScience 38: 196–199, 2003.
Swain P.A., Darnell R.L.: Production systems influence source limitations to growth in ‘Sharpblue’ southern highbush blueberry.–J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127: 409–414, 2002.
Thiebus-Kaesberg P., Lenz F.: Effect of fruit load on growth, carbohydrate and mineral concentrations of leaves of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees.–Erwerbsobstbau 36: 130–133, 1994.
Urban L., Léchaudel M., Lu P.: Effect of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in Mangifera indica L.–J. Exp. Bot. 44: 2075–2085, 2004.
Walter A., Schurr U.: Dynamics of leaf and root growth: endogenous control versus environmental impact.–Ann. Bot.- London 95: 891–900, 2005.
Wingler A., Marès M., Pourtau N.: Spatial patterns and metabolic regulation of photosynthetic parameters during leaf senescence.–New Phytol. 161: 781–789, 2004.
Wünsche J.N., Greer D.H., Laing W.A. et al.: Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple.–Tree Physiol. 25: 1253–1263, 2005.
Yong J.W.H., Wong S.C., Farquhar G.D.: Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air.–Plant Cell Environ. 20: 1213–1216, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Acknowledgements: The first author thanks to ‘Agrícola Berries San Luis’ for facilitating the use and maintenance of the experimental plot. Aureliano Troncoso, Francisco Alfaro, and Jessica Yañez for their valuable help in the collection of data and Dr. Francisco Matus for his pertinent suggestions. E. Jorquera-Fontena was funded by CONICYT (Chile) through Ph.D. scholarship and FONDEF D06I1100, and by Universidad de La Frontera (Temuco, Chile) through Project FRO0601. N. Franck acknowledges FONDECYT grant 1130509.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jorquera-Fontena, E., Alberdi, M., Reyes-Díaz, M. et al. Rearrangement of leaf traits with changing source-sink relationship in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) leaves. Photosynthetica 54, 508–516 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-0207-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-0207-9