Abstract
Site amplification is one of the most important factors controlling damage in urban areas through strong earthquakes. Local site effects play an important role in earthquake-resistant design and should be considered for site response analyses. In this study, ground response analyses in Erbaa, Turkey, a settlement in the North Anatolian Fault Zone, using one-dimensional equivalent linear analysis and empirical approaches based on shear wave velocity profiles are evaluated and compared. The ground response analyses were performed with consideration of shear wave velocity, and modulus reduction and dam** behavior for different confining pressure and plasticity index-dependent models. The results of ground response analyses and amplification values from empirical equations using shear wave velocity are illustrated in terms of amplification and predominant period maps of the seismically active Erbaa settlement area. The comparison has been made in these produced maps of the study area in order to evaluate different site response analyses.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig12_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig13_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig14_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig15_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig16_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig17_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig18_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig19_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig20_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig21_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig22_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig23_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig24_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig25_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-016-2274-4/MediaObjects/11069_2016_2274_Fig26_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akın M (2009) Seismic Microzonation of Erbaa (Tokat-Turkey) Located Along Eastern Segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, PhD Dissertation, Middle East Technical University
Akin M, Kramer SL, Topal T (2009) Comparison of measured and estimated shear wave velocities in a seismically active area (Erbaa, Turkey). Fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, California
Akin KM, Kramer SL, Topal T (2011a) Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (V s) and penetration resistance (SPT-N) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey). Eng Geol 119(1–2):1–17
Akin KM, Topal T, Kramer SL (2011b) Seismic microzonation of Erbaa, Tokat, Turkey based on analytical hierarchical process (AHP). Environ Eng Geosci 18:191–207
Akin KM, Topal T, Kramer SL (2013) A newly developed seismic microzonation model of Erbaa (Tokat, Turkey) located on seismically active eastern segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). Nat Hazards 65(3):1411–1442
Aktimur T, Ates S, Yurdakul E, Tekirli E, Kecer M (1992) Niksar-Erbaa ve Destek Dolayinin Jeolojisi. MTADergisi, 114 (in Turkish)
Allen CR (1969) Active faulting in Northern Turkey, Division of Geological Science, California Institute of Technology, Contr. No. 1577
Ambraseys NN (1970) Some characteristic features of the North Anatolian fault zone. Tectonophysics 9:143–165
Ansal A, Tonuk G (2007) Source and site factors in microzonation. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering, 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures, pp 73–92
Ansal A, Tonuk G, Demircioglu M, Bayraklı Y, Sesetyan K, Erdik M (2006) Ground motion parameters for vulnerability assessment. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper Number: 1790
ASTM D 5778-95 (2000) Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA
Athanasopoulos GA (1995) Empirical correlations Vs-NSPT for soils of Greece: a comparative study of reliability. In: Cakmak AS (ed) Proceedings of 7th ınternational conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (Chania, Crete). Computational Mechanics, Southampton, pp 19–36
Bang E, Kim D (2007) Evaluation of shear wave velocity profile using SPT-based uphole method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:741–758
Barka AA, Akyüz SH, Cohen HA, Watchorn F (2000) Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Taşova-Erbaa pull-apart basins, North Anatolian Fault Zone: their significance for the motion of the Anatolian block. Tectonophysics 322:243–264
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):99–138
Borcherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:29–61
Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site depending response spectra for design methodology and justifications. Earthquake Spectra 10(4):617–654
Borcherdt RD, Wentworth CM, Janssen A, Fumal T, Gibbs J (1991) Methodology for predictive GIS map** of special study zones for strong ground shaking in the San Francisco bay region. In: Proceedings of fourth ıntern’l. conference on seisimc zonation vol 3, pp 545–552
Cabalar AF, Cevik A (2009) Genetic programming-based attenuation relationship: an application of recent earthquakes in Turkey. Comput Geosci 9:1884–1896
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD, and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):139–171
Castro RR, Anderson JG, Singh SK (1990) Site response, attenuation and source spectra of S-waves along the Guerrero, Mexico subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1481–1503
Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material dam** curves. PhD Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Dikmen U (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72
Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficient and site classification system used in recent building code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16(1):41–67
EPRI (1993) Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions. Vol. 1: method and guidelines for estimating earthquake ground motion in eastern North America, Rpt. No. EPRI TR-102293, Palo Alto, California
Erdik M, Doyuran V, Gülkan P, Akkas N (1985) A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117:295–344
Erdik M, Demircioglu M, Sesetyan K, Durukal E (2005) Assessment of earthquake hazard for Bakirkoy, Gemlik, Bandırma, Tekirdag and Korfez. WB MEER project-A3 component, microzonation and Hazard Vulnerability Studies for Disaster Mitigation in Pilot Municipalities, Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Ergin M, Ozalaybey S, Aktar M, Yakin MN (2004) Site amplification at Avcilar, Istanbul. Tectonophysics 391:335–346
Fujiwara T (1972) Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. Proceedings of the fourth European symposium on earthquake engineering, London, pp 125–132
Fumal TE, Tinsley JC (1985) Map** shear wave velocities of near surface geological materials. In: Ziony TI (ed) Predicting areal limits of earthquake induced landsliding. In evaluation of earthquake hazards in the Los Angeles region—an earth science perspective, USGS Paper 1360, pp 127–150
General Directorate of Disaster Affairs (2008) www.deprem.gov.tr/indexen.html, 01.02. 2008
Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):719–730
Hasançebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213
Humphrey JR, Anderson JG (1992) Shear wave attenuation and site response in Guerrero, Mexico. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:1622–1645
Imai T (1977) P and S wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proceeding of IX international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, pp 127–132
Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium of penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 57–72
Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1970) Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil. Tsuchito-Kiso 18(1):17–22 (in Japanese)
Imai T, Fumoto H, Yokota K (1975) The relation of mechanical properties of soil to P- and S- wave velocities in Japan. In: Proceedings of 4th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, pp 89–96 (in Japanese)
Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in situ penetration test results. Chamber of Civil Engineers of Turkey. Teknik Dergi 7(2), 1187-1199 (in Turkish)
Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT-N value for south of Tehran soils. In: Proceedings of 4th ınternational conference on civil engineering (Tehran, Iran) (in Persian)
Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Razmkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. J Seismol Earthq Eng 4:25–35
**an Z (1987) Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of SPT and depth. Selected Papers from the Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, pp 92–100
Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1984) Use of measured shear-wave velocity for predicting geologic site effects on strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, Vol. II, 777–783
Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Vassiliou J (1992) Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of greek soil formations. In: Second hellenic conference on geotechnical engineering vol 2, pp. 239–246 (in Greek)
Kanai K (1966) Conference on cone penetrometer the ministry of public works and settlement (Ankara, Turkey) (presented by Y Sakai, 1968)
Kayabalı K (1996) Soil liquefaction evaluation using shear wave velocity. Eng Geol 44(1):121–127
Ketin I (1969) Kuzey Anadolu Fayı Hakkında. MTA Dergisi 72:1–25 (in Turkish)
Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A, Erkan A (2001) In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp 259–265
Kim DS, Bang ES, Seo WS (2004) Evaluation of shear wave velocity profile using SPT-Uphole method. International site characterization, ISC-2 Porto, Portugal, pp 339–344
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, USA
Kramer SL, Stewart JP (2004) Geotechnical aspects of seismic hazards. In: Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC Press, Chapter 4
Lee SH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 13:519–532
Matsuoka M, Wakamatsu K, Fujimoto K, Midorikawa S (2006) Average shear-wave velocity map** using Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map. J Struct Mech Earthq Eng JSCE 23(1):57–68
Midorikawa S (1987) Prediction of isoseismal map in the Kanto plain due to hypothetical earthquake. J Struct Eng 33B:43–48
Moehle J (1994) Preliminary report on the seismological and engineering aspects of January 17, 1994 Northridge Erathquake. University of Calif, at Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UCB/EERC-94/01
Ohba S, Toriumi I (1970) Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. Proceedings of the annual meeting, A. I. J. (in Japanese)
Ohsaki Y, Iwasaki R (1973) On dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soil Found 13:61–73
Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6:167–187
Ohta T, Hara A, Niwa M, Sakano T (1972) Elastic shear moduli as estimated from N-value. In: Proceedings of 7th annal convention of Japan society of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 265–268
Ohta Y, Goto N, Kagami H, Shiono K (1978) Shear wave velocity measurement during a standard penetration test. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6:43–50
Okamoto T, Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Kusuonoki K (1989) Comparison of surface versus subsurface wave source for P–S logging in sand layer. In: Proceedings of 44th annal conference JSCE, vol 3, pp 996–997 (in Japanese)
Ozel O, Sasatani T (2004) A site effect study of the Adapazari basin, Turkey, from strong and weak-motion data. J Seismol 8(4):559–572
Pavlenko OV (2008) Characteristics of soil response in near-fault zones during the 1999 Chi–Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 165(9–10):1789–1812
Pitilakis K (2004) Site effects. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Springer, Netherlands, pp 139–197
Pitilakis KD, Anastasiadis A, Raptakis D (1992) Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference earthquake engineering, Rotherdam, pp 1275–1280
Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis KT, Vassilikou T, Jongmans D (1999) Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using field and laboratory tests, and moderate strong ground motions. J Earthq Eng 3:381–409
Raptakis DG, Anastasiadis SAJ, Pitilakis KD, Lontzetidis KS (1995) Shear wave velocities and dam** of Greek natural soils. In: Proceedings of 10th European conference of earthquake engineering, Vienna, pp 477–482
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention (MO), pp 481–544
Seed HB, Sun JH (1989) Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985 for Earthquake-Resistant Design Criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
Seed RB, Dickenson SE, Riemer MF, Bray JD, Sitar N, Mitchell JK, Idriss IM, Kayen RE, Kropp AK, Harder LF, Power MS (1990) Preliminary report on the principle geotechnical aspects of the October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, Report No. UCB/EERC-90/05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109:458–482
Şengör AMC, Görür N, Şaroğlu F (1985) Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study, Strike-slip deformation, basin formation, and sedimentation, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min. Spec. Pub. 37 (in honor of J.C. Crowell), pp 227–264
Şengör AMC, Tüysüz O, İmren C, Sakınç M, Eyidoğan H, Görür N, Le Pichon X, Rangin C (2005) The North Anatolian fault: a new look. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:37–112
Shibata T (1970) Analysis of liquefaction of saturated sand during cyclic loading. Disaster Prevention Res Inst Bull 13:563–570
Sisman H (1995) An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity, and SPT and pressuremeter test results. MSc Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical Engineering Department, Ankara, 75 pp (in Turkish)
Stein RS, Barka AA, Dieterich JH (1997) Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys J Int 128:594–604
Sykora DE, Stokoe KH (1983) Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:125–136
Takemiya H, Adam M (1997) Seismic wave amplification due to topography and geology in Kobe during Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake. J Struct Mech Earthq Eng 14(2):129–138
Tatar O, Piper JDA, Park RG, Gürsoy H (1995) Paleomagnetic study of block rotations in the Niksar overlap region of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, central Turkey. Tectonpysics 244:251–266
TCEGE (1999) Manual for zonation on seismic geotechnical hazards. Publication of the Japanese Geotechnical Society, Revised Version
Tezcan SS, Kaya E, Bal İE, Özdemir Z (2002) Seismic amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul. Eng Struct 22:661–667
Tonouchi K, Sakayama T, Imai T (1983) S wave velocity in the ground and the dam** factor. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 26–27:327–333
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1999) Engineer manual, EM1110-2-6050, engineering and design: response spectra and seismic analysis for concrete hydraulic structures, 30 June 1999, Washington, DC 20314-1000
Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117:87–107
Westaway R (2003) Kinematics of the middle east and eastern mediterranean updated. Turkish J Earth Sci 12:5–46
EduPro Civil Systems, Inc. ProShake version 1.12, Ground Response Analyses Program, Sammamish, Washington, USA
Yılmaz I (1998) Köklüce regülatörü-Erbaa HES iletim hattı güzergahındaki alüvyal zeminlerin şişme ve oturma sorunlarının jeomühendislik değerlendirmesi: Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas (in Turkish)
Yokota K, Imai T, Konno M (1991) Dynamic deformation characteristics of soilsdetermined by laboratory tests. OYO Tee Rep 3:13
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (TUBITAK-CAYDAG No: 107Y068), the Research Foundation of Middle East Technical University (BAP No: 2009-03-09-01) and the Research Foundation of the Prime Ministry State Planning Organization (DPT No: CUBAP M-359/DPT 2006 K-120220). The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Orhan Tatar from Cumhuriyet University for his support during the DPT project. The Fulbright program gave the opportunity to make this research mutually and internationally possible in USA. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akin, M.K., Kramer, S.L. & Topal, T. Dynamic soil characterization and site response estimation for Erbaa, Tokat (Turkey). Nat Hazards 82, 1833–1868 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2274-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2274-4