Log in

1p/19q-driven prognostic molecular classification for high-grade oligodendroglial tumors

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subjectivity in pathological diagnosis of anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AOA) and uncertainty in designation of glioblastoma with oligodendroglioma component (GBMO) were two major dilemmas which puzzled neuro-pathologists and neurosurgeons. The present study was designed to project a molecular classification scheme based on the status of chromosome 1p and 19q. Patients (n = 117) with histological diagnosis of primary high-grade oligodendroglial tumors (HGOs) enrolled in the study. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes 1p and 19q was performed. Univariate analysis showed that higher tumor grade, 1p/19q maintenance and 1q/19p co polysomy were confirmed as risk factors in HGOs (P < 0.01). Accordingly, patients with HGOs were divided into four subtypes which conferred remarkably distinct prognosis based on the number of risk factors (0 risk factor: HGOs-1, 1 risk factor: HGOs-2, 2 risk factors: HGOs-3, 3 risk factors: HGOs-4). Cox regression model revealed that the tumor grade was no longer independently associated with survival, while the molecular classification scheme showed a marked prognostic significance (HR = 0.359, 95 % CI 0.261–0.494, P < 0.001 for progression-free survival (PFS); HR = 0.393, 95 % CI 0.283–0.546, P < 0.001 for overall survival (OS)). The classification scheme incorporating traditional pathology with molecular information can be served as a supplement of the current WHO classification system and contribute to the personalized treatment decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuller CE, Schmidt RE, Roth KA et al (2003) Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in morphologically ambiguous gliomas with hybrid oligodendroglial/astrocytic features. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:1118–1128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kros JM, Gorlia T, Kouwenhoven MC et al (2007) Panel review of anaplastic oligodendroglioma from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 26951: assessment of consensus in diagnosis, influence of 1p/19q loss, and correlations with outcome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66:545–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JS, Perry A, Borell TJ, Lee HK et al (2000) Alterations of chromosome arms 1p and 19q as predictors of survival in oligodendrogliomas, astrocytomas, and mixed oligoastrocytomas. J Clin Oncol 18:636–645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang H, Ren X, Cui X et al (2013) 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1/2 mutation identified a subtype of anaplastic oligoastrocytomas with prognosis as favorable as anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. Neuro Oncol 15:775–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klink B, Schlingelhof B, Klink M et al (2010) Glioblastomas with oligodendroglial component—common origin of the different histological parts and genetic subclassification. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 33:37–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinto LW, Araujo MB, Vettore AL et al (2008) Glioblastomas: correlation between oligodendroglial components, genetic abnormalities, and prognosis. Virchows Arch 452:481–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K et al (2010) Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17:510–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V et al (2012) Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 22:425–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E et al (2010) Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17:98–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McLendon R, Friedman A, Bigner D et al (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455:1061–1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wick W, Hartmann C, Engel C et al (2009) NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. J Clin Oncol 27:5874–5880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ambros PF, Ambros IM (2001) Pathology and biology guidelines for resectable and unresectable neuroblastic tumors and bone marrow examination guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol 37:492–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Snuderl M, Eichler AF, Ligon KL et al (2009) Polysomy for chromosomes 1 and 19 predicts earlier recurrence in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas with concurrent 1p/19q loss. Clin Cancer Res 15:6430–6437

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tortosa A, Vinolas N, Villa S et al (2003) Prognostic implication of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Cancer 97:1063–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller CR, Dunham CP, Scheithauer BW et al (2006) a clinicopathologic and genetic study of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 24:5419–5426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park CK, Lee SH, Han JH et al (2009) Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in WHO grade III glioma patients treated with radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 9:450

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hegi ME, Janzer RC, Lambiv WL et al (2012) Presence of an oligodendroglioma-like component in newly diagnosed glioblastoma identifies a pathogenetically heterogeneous subgroup and lacks prognostic value: central pathology review of the EORTC_26981/NCIC_CE.3 trial. Acta Neuropathol 123:841–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips HS, Kharbanda S, Chen R et al (2006) Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell 9:157–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Theeler BJ, Yung WK, Fuller GN et al (2012) Moving toward molecular classification of diffuse gliomas in adults. Neurology 79:1917–1926

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Wick W et al (2010) Patients with IDH1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH1-mutated glioblastomas, and IDH1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age: implications for classification of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 120:707–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burger PC, Minn AY, Smith JS et al (2001) Losses of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma. A study of paraffin-embedded sections. Mod Pathol 14:842–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ren X, Jiang H, Cui X et al (2013) Co-polysomy of chromosome 1q and 19p predicts worse prognosis in 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglial tumors: fISH analysis of 148 consecutive cases. Neuro Oncol 15:1244–1250

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang H, Ren X, Wang J et al (2014) Short-term survivors in glioblastomas with oligodendroglioma component: a clinical study of 186 Chinese patients from a single institution. J Neurooncol 116:395–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang H, Ren X, Zhang Z, et al. (2014) Polysomy of chromosomes 1 and 19: an underestimated prognostic factor in oligodendroglial tumors. J Neurooncol. doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1526-y

  26. Cowell JK, Barnett GH, Nowak NJ et al (2004) Characterization of the 1p/19q chromosomal loss in oligodendrogliomas using comparative genomic hybridization arrays (CGHa). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support by Bei**g Natural Science Foundation (7122061). The author appreciates Dr. Lin Luo for pathology diagnosis, the pathology department, Bei**g Neurosurgical Institute, and Dr. Guang Li, Pathology department, Bei**g Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Lin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11060_2014_1593_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 195 kb) Kaplan–Meier plots of the series of 117 HGOs showing the association of 1p/19q codeletion with progression-free survival A and overall survival B; 1q/19p copolysomy with progression-free survival C and overall survival D; tumor grade with progression-free survival E and overall survival F

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 42 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (DOC 31 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (DOC 31 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (DOC 31 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (DOC 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, H., Zhang, Z., Ren, X. et al. 1p/19q-driven prognostic molecular classification for high-grade oligodendroglial tumors. J Neurooncol 120, 607–614 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1593-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1593-0

Keywords

Navigation