Abstract
Late blight is a devastating disease for tomato especially in areas with high humidity and low temperature caused by Phytophthora infestans. A late blight resistance gene, Ph-3, has been widely used in tomato breeding program as it confers incomplete dominant resistance to a wide range of P. infestans isolates of tomato. This gene was derived from a wild ancestor species of cultivated tomato, Solanum pimpinellifolium accession L3708, and located in a resistance (R) gene cluster. Although this gene was cloned a few years ago, and some markers have been developed and used, the effectiveness of these markers was not evaluated with a diverse cultivars panel. Based on the comparative analysis of the Ph-3 locus sequences from L3708, cultivar Heinz1706 and S. pimpinellifolium accession LA1589, we developed a robust co-dominant PCR-based marker Ph-3-GLR/S for the Ph-3 locus. We performed a comparison about efficiency and accuracy of Ph-3-GLR/S with two cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers Ph3.gsm/HincII and TG328 developed previously. Ph-3-GLR/S exhibited robust co-dominant patterns compared to Ph3.gsm/HincII. For certain accessions, TG328 and Ph-3-GLR/S yielded the contrast genoty** result. To clarify this discrepancy, disease resistance evaluation by detached leaf inoculation supported the consistency between Ph-3-GLR/S genoty** and resistance phonotype, showing Ph-3-GLR/S was more accurate than TG328. All these findings indicated that our marker Ph-3-GLR/S could serve as a highly specific and robust co-dominant marker for marker-assisted selection of Ph-3.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11032-019-0953-z/MediaObjects/11032_2019_953_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11032-019-0953-z/MediaObjects/11032_2019_953_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11032-019-0953-z/MediaObjects/11032_2019_953_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2
AVDRC (1994) Tomato pathology. In: AVRDC 1993 Progress Report. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan(ROC), pp 201–203
Chunwongse J, Chunwongse C, Black L, Hanson P (2002) Molecular map** of the Ph-3 gene for late blight resistance in tomato. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2002.11511493
Dianese EC, de Fonseca MEN, Goldbach R, Kormelink R, Inoue-Nagata AK, Resende RO, Boiteux LS (2010) Development of a locus-specific, co-dominant SCAR marker for assisted-selection of the Sw-5 (Tospovirus resistance) gene cluster in a wide range of tomato accessions. Mol Breed 25:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-009-9313-8
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Feng L, Yang Y, **e B, Feng D, Yang C (2004) Identification of physiological races of Phytophthora infestans on tomato in eighteen provinces of China. Acta Hortic Sin 31:758–761. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2004.06.013
Fesenko I, Kuklev M, Karlov G (2013) Development of a breeder-friendly functional co-dominant DNA marker for the I2 locus covering resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Mol Breed 31:495–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9787-7
Foolad MR, Panthee DR (2012) Marker-assisted selection in tomato breeding. Crit Rev Plant Sci 31:93–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.616057
Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Report 13:207–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9787-7
Gardner RG, Panthee DR (2010) ‘Plum regal’ fresh-market plum tomato hybrid and its parents, NC 25P and NC 30P. HortScience 45:824–825
Hanson P, Lu S, Wang J, Chen W, Kenyon L, Tan C, Tee KL, Wang Y, Hsu YY, Schafleitner R (2016) Conventional and molecular marker-assisted selection and pyramiding of genes for multiple disease resistance in tomato. Sci Hortic 201:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1015/j.scienta.2016.02.020
Huang T, Liu B, Liu S, Li P, Zhang Y, Sun Z (2011) A new tomato hybrid Wanxia resistant to tomato late blight. Acta Hortic Sin 38:1413–1414. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2011.07.029
Jones DA, Thomas CM, Hammondkosack KE, Balintkurti PJ, Jones JDG (1994) Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science 266:789–793. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7973631
Kim B, Hwang IS, Lee HJ, Oh CS (2017) Combination of newly developed SNP and InDel markers for genoty** the Cf-9 locus conferring disease resistance to leaf mold disease in the tomato. Mol Breed 37:59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0663-3
Kong F, Li D, Xu X, Jiang J, Li J (2015) Creation of multi-resistant and storage tolerant tomato material. China Veget 9:20–25
Kruijt M, Kip DJ, Joosten M, Brandwagt BF, de Wit P (2005) The Cf-4 and Cf-9 resistance genes against Cladosporium fulvum are conserved in wild tomato species. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18:1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-18-1011
Laugé R, Goodwin PH, de Wit PJ, Joosten MH (2010) Specific HR-associated recognition of secreted proteins from Cladosporium fulvum occurs in both host and non-host plants. Plant J 23:735–745. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00843.x
Li M (2017) The winter control of tomato late blight. China Veget 2:85–86
Lin T, Zhu G, Zhang J, Xu X, Yu Q, Zheng Z, Zhang Z, Lun Y, Li S, Wang X (2014) Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet 46:1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3117
Meyers BC, Kozik A, Griego A, Kuang H, Michelmore RW (2003) Genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR–encoding genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15:809–834. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.009308
Moreau P, Thoquet P, Olivier J, Laterrot H, Grimsley N (1998) Genetic map** of Ph-2, a single locus controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 11:259–269. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.4.259
Nicholas KB (1997) GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBnet News 4:14
Panthee DR, Gardner RG (2010) ‘Mountain merit’: a late blight-resistant large-fruited tomato hybrid. HortScience 45:1547–1548
Park Y, Hwang J, Kim K, Kang J, Kim B, Xu S, Ahn Y (2013) Development of the gene-based SCARs for the Ph-3 locus, which confers late blight resistance in tomato. Sci Hortic 164:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.013
Peirce L (1971) Linkage tests with Ph conditioning resistance to race 0, Phytophthora infestans. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 21:30
Robbins MD, Masud MA, Panthee DR, Gardner RG, Francis DM, Stevens MR (2010) Marker-assisted selection for coupling phase resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus and Phytophthora infestans (late blight) in tomato. HortScience 45:1424–1428
Rychlik W, Yuryev A (2007) OLIGO 7 primer analysis software. In: PCR Primer Design. Humana Press, New York, pp 35–59
Schultz D, Donahoo RS, Perez FGM, Tejeda S, Roberts PD, Deahl KL (2010) A survey of tomato and potato fields in Florida reveals unique genotypes of Phytophthora infestans between 2005 and 2007. HortScience 45:1064–1068
Seah S, Williamson VM, Garcia BE, Mejía L, Salus MS, Martin CT, Maxwell DP (2007) Evaluation of a co-dominant SCAR marker for detection of the Mi-1 locus for resistance to root-knot nematode in tomato germplasm. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 57:37–40
Simons G, Groenendijk J, Wijbrandi J, Reijans M, Groenen J, Diergaarde P, Van der Lee T, Bleeker M, Onstenk J, de Both M (1998) Dissection of the Fusarium I2 gene cluster in tomato reveals six homologs and one active gene copy. Plant Cell 10:1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.6.1055
Thomas CM, Jones DA, Parniske M, Harrison K, Balint-Kurti PJ, Hatzixanthis K, Jones J (1997) Characterization of the tomato Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum identifies sequences that determine recognitional specificity in Cf-4 and Cf-9. Plant Cell 9:2209–2224. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.12.2209
Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11119
Truong HTH, Tran HN, Choi HS, Park PH, Lee HE (2013) Development of a co-dominant SCAR marker linked to the Ph-3 gene for Phytophthora infestans resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Eur J Plant Pathol 136:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0157-4
Van der Hoorn RA, Kruijt M, Roth R, Brandwagt BF, Joosten MH, De Wit PJ (2001) Intragenic recombination generated two distinct Cf genes that mediate AVR9 recognition in the natural population of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10493–10498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181241798
Wang Y, Chen C, Hoffmann A, Hsu Y, Lu S, Wang J, Hanson P (2016) Evaluation of the Ph-3 gene-specific marker developed for marker-assisted selection of late blight-resistant tomato. Plant Breed 135:636–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12395
Zhang C, Liu L, Zheng Z, Sun Y, Zhou L, Yang Y, Cheng F, Zhang Z, Wang X, Huang S (2013) Fine map** of the Ph-3 gene conferring resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 126:2643–2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2162-1
Zhang C, Liu L, Wang X, Vossen J, Li G, Li T, Zheng Z, Gao J, Guo Y, Visser RG (2014) The Ph-3 gene from Solanum pimpinellifolium encodes CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Theor Appl Genet 127:1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2303-1
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. **shuai Shu for providing the tomato race T1,2,4 of P. infestans and to **aoling Yu for guidance on the detached leaf inoculation. We also thank Prof. Tingting Huang for kindly providing the seeds of Wanxia.
Funding
This project was supported by the grants of the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0101902), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-23-A-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Fig. S1
BLASTN results with Ph-3 CDS and sequences from downstream of CDS as queries from SGN database. Blue line indicates the locations of selected polymorphisms. a, The matched subject sequences (sbjcts) with the highest identity from chromosome 9 of Heinz1706 and contigs of LA1589 by querying with CDS sequence (2556 bp). b, The matched sbjcts with the highest identity from Ph-3 corresponding locus of Heinz1706 and contigs of LA1589 by querying with CDS downstream sequence (1866 bp) (PNG 1508 kb)
Fig. S2
BLASTN result with sequence of unexpected 1 kb amplicon as query, produced by PCR with newly developed marker Ph-3-GLR/S in HG70 (PNG 230 kb)
Table S1
List of tomato cultivars/lines used in this study and their genotypes at the Ph-3 gene locus (DOC 104 kb)
Table S2
List of sbjcts from SGN blast result querying by Ph-3 sequence (DOC 50 kb)
Table S3
List of sbjcts from SGN blast result queried by 1-kb amplicon sequence from HG70 (DOC 43 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, Z., You, Z., Munir, S. et al. Development of a highly specific co-dominant marker for genoty** the Ph-3 (tomato late blight resistance) locus by comparing cultivated and wild ancestor species. Mol Breeding 39, 45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-0953-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-0953-z