Log in

Joint Reliability Function of Coherent Systems with Shared Heterogeneous Components

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider two coherent systems having shared components. We assume that in the two systems there are three different types of components; components of type one that just belong to the first system, components of type two that lie only in the second system and components of type three that are shared by the two systems. We use the concept of joint survival signature to assess the joint reliability function of the two systems. Using this concept, some representations for the joint reliability function of the system lifetimes are obtained under two different scenarios of component failures. In the first scenario, we assume that the components of the systems fail according to different counting processes such as non-homogeneous Poisson processes. In the second scenario, it is assumed that the component lifetimes of each type are exchangeable while the three types of component lifetimes can be independent or dependent. To illustrate the theoretical results, two systems with shared components are studied numerically and graphically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashrafi S., Zarezadeh S., Asadi M (2018) Reliability modeling of coherent systems with shared components based on sequential order statistics. J Appl Probab 55(3):845–861

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N., Volterman W (2015) Exact nonparametric inference for component and system lifetime distributions based on joint signatures. IEEE Trans Reliab 65(1):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow R. E., Proschan F (1975) Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. Probability models Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

  • Bieniek M., Burkschat M., Rychlik T (2020) Comparisons of the expectations of system and component lifetimes in the failure dependent proportional hazard model. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 22:173–189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coolen F.P., Coolen-Maturi T. (2012) Generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components. In: Complex systems and dependability. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–130

  • Coolen-Maturi T., Coolen F.P.A., Balakrishnan N. (2021) The joint survival signature of coherent systems with shared components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 207:Article 107350

  • Eryilmaz S. (2015) Systems composed of two types of nonidentical and dependent components. Nav Res Logist 62:388–394

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S. (2016a) Reliability of systems with multiple types of dependent components. IEEE Trans Reliab 65(2):1022–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S., Tuncel A (2016b) Generalizing the survival signature to unrepairable homogeneous multi-state systems. Naval Res Logist 63(8):593–599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S. (2017) The concept of weak exchangeability and its applications. Metrika 80(3):259–271

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S., Coolen F. P., Coolen-Maturi T (2018a) Marginal and joint reliability importance based on survival signature. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 172:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S., Coolen F. P., Coolen-Maturi T (2018b) Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components. Naval Res Logist 65(1):86–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz S (2019) \((k_{1}, k_{2},\dots , k_{m})\)-out-of-n system and its reliability. J Comput Appl Math 346:591–598

  • Fang R., Li X., Li L (2016) Generalized multivariate Gumbel distributions-Dependence, aging properties and applications. J Syst Sci Complex 29(6):1752–1772

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gertsbakh I., Shpungin Y. (2011) Network reliability and resilience. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Gurler S., Bairamov I (2009) Parallel and k-out-of-n:G systems with nonidentical components and their mean residual life functions. Appl Math Modell 33:1116–1125

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X., Coolen F P (2018) Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O: J Risk Reliab 232(6):627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X., Aslett L. J., Coolen FP (2019) Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 189:416–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X., Coolen F. P. A., Coolen-Maturi T., Zhang Y (2020) A new study on reliability importance analysis of phased mission systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 69:522–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y., Shi Y., Bai X., Liu B (2018) Stress-strength reliability analysis of system with multiple types of components using survival signature. J Comput Appl Math 342:375–398

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal J. L, Mathonet P, Navarro J, Paroissin C (2017) Joint signature of two or more systems with applications to multi-state systems made up of two-state components. Eur J Oper Res 263(2):559–570

  • Mazzolini A, Gherardi M, Caselle M, Lagomarsino M.C, Osella M (2018) Statistics of shared components in complex component systems. ar**v:https://doi.org/1707.08356. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021023

  • Navarro J., Samaniego F. J., Balakrishnan N., Bhattacharya D (2008) On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability. Naval Res Logist (NRL) 55(4):313–327

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J., Samaniego F. J., Balakrishnan N (2010) The joint signature of coherent systems with shared components. J Appl Probab 47(1):235–253

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J., Samaniego F. J., Balakrishnan N (2013) Mixture representations for the joint distribution of lifetimes of two coherent systems with shared components. Adv Appl Probab 45(4):1011–1027

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Parzen E. (1999) Stochastic processes. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

  • Samaniego F. J. (1985) On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 34(1):69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego FJ. (2007) System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Samaniego F. J., Navarro J. (2016) On comparing coherent systems with heterogeneous components. Adv Appl Probab 48(1):88–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zarezadeh S, Mohammadi L, Balakrishnan N (2018) On the joint signature of several coherent systems with some shared components. Eur J Oper Res 264(3):1092–1100

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for several helpful suggestions. JN was supported in part by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain under grant PID2019-103971GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Asadi’s research work was performed in IPM Isfahan branch and was in part supported by a grant from IPM (No. 98620215).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Navarro.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashrafi, S., Asadi, M. & Navarro, J. Joint Reliability Function of Coherent Systems with Shared Heterogeneous Components. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 24, 1485–1502 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09867-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09867-5

Keywords

Navigation