Abstract
Rock permeability is a key parameter in evaluating the CO2 storage capacity and injectivity in geologic CO2 sequestration projects. To investigate the influences of confining pressure and testing temperature on rock permeability, seepage tests were carried out on four cylindrical sandstone specimens using a newly developed triaxial permeability measurement system. In this study, the confining pressure was loaded and unloaded stepwise between 10 and 30 MPa at different temperatures (25–90 °C). The experimental results showed that as the effective confining pressure increased in the loading process, sandstone permeability decreased nonlinearly. As the effective confining pressure decreased in the unloading process, permeability increased nonlinearly. Elevated temperature decreased the sandstone permeability, and the percentage reduction in permeability decreased with increasing temperature. Micropore space closure and thermal expansion were evidence of the permeability changes as the confining pressure and testing temperature were varied. The experimental results obtained in the seepage tests under the different confining pressures and elevated testing temperatures provide a reference for evaluating rock permeability in underground engineering.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11004-020-09860-7/MediaObjects/11004_2020_9860_Fig10_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadi MH, Molladavoodi H (2018) Rock failure analysis under dynamic loading based on a micromechanical damage model. Civil Eng J 4(11):2801–2812. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-03091199
Alam AKMB, Niioka M, Fujii Y, Fukuda D, Kodama J (2014) Effects of confining pressure on the permeability of three rock types under compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.006
Bachu S (2008) CO2 storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34(2):254–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001
Bachu S, Adams JJ (2003) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution. Energy Convers Manag 44(20):3151–3175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00101-8
Chen D, Pan Z, Ye Z, Hou B, Wang D, Yuan L (2016) A unified permeability and effective stress relationship for porous and fractured reservoir rocks. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 29:401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.034
Cinar Y, Riaz A, Tchelepi HA (2009) Experimental study of CO2 injection into saline formations. SPE J 14(4):1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.2118/110628-MS
David C, Wong TF, Zhu W, Zhang J (1994) Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: Implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure Appl Geophys 143(1–3):425–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874337
Davy CA, Skoczylas F, Barnichon JD, Lebon P (2007) Permeability of macro-cracked argillite under confinement: gas and water testing. Phys Chem Earth 32(8):667–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.055
De Silva GPDD, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA, Dai DX, Yang SQ (2017) An experimental evaluation of unique CO2, flow behaviour in loosely held fine particles rich sandstone under deep reservoir conditions and influencing factors. Energy 119:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.144
Ding QL, Ju F, Song SB, Yu BY, Ma D (2016) An experimental study of fractured sandstone permeability after high-temperature treatment under different confining pressures. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 34:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.034
Dong JJ, Hsu JY, Wu WJ, Shimamota T, Hung JH, Yeh EC, Wu YH, Sone H (2010) Stress-dependence of the permeability and porosity of sandstone and shale from TCDP Hole-A. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(7):1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.019
Ekeleme AC, Agunwamba JC (2018) Experimental determination of dispersion coefficient in soil. Emerg Sci J 2(4):213–218. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2018-01145
Esmailzadeh A, Behnam S, Mikaeil R, Naghadehi MZ, Saeie S (2017) Relationship between texture and uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Civil Eng J 3(7):480–486. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2017-00000106
Forcellini D, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2018) Response site analyses of 3D homogeneous soil models. Emerg Sci J 2(5):238–250. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2018-01148
Guo X, Zou G, Wang Y, Wang Y, Gao T (2017) Investigation of the temperature effect on rock permeability sensitivity. J Petrol Sci Eng 156:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.045
He YL, Yang LZ (2004) Testing study on variational characteristics of rockmass permeability under loading-unloading of confining pressure. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(3):415. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.03.010
Huang YH, Yang SQ, Tian WL (2019) Crack coalescence behavior of sandstone specimen containing two pre-existing flaws under different confining pressures. Theor Appl Fract Mech 99:118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.013
Huang YH, Yang SQ, Bu YS (2020a) Effect of thermal shock on the strength and fracture behavior of pre-flawed granite specimens under uniaxial compression. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102474
Huang YH, Yang SQ, Hall MR (2020b) Fracture and strain field evolution in faulted brine-saturated sandstone. J Test Eval 48(2):1206–1225. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170524
Huang YH, Yang SQ, Li WP, Hall MR (2020c) Influence of super-critical CO2 on the strength and fracture behavior of brine-saturated sandstone specimens. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01933-2
Ju Y, Wang JG, Wang HJ, Zheng JT, Ranjith PG, Gao F (2016) CO2 permeability of fractured coal subject to confining pressures and elevated temperature: Experiments and modeling. Sci China Technol Sci 12:1931–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0478-5
Klinkenberg LJ (1941) The permeability porous media to liquids gases. American Petroleum Institute Drilling and Production-Practice. American Petroleum Institute, New York, pp 21–34
Li XC, Koide H, Ohsumi T (2003) CO2 aquifer storage and the related rock mechanics issues. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 22(6):989–994. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.06.019
Li ZQ, **an XF, Long QM (2009) Experiment study of coal permeability under different temperature and stress. J China Univ Min Technol 38(4):523–527. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-1964.2009.04.012
Liu ZB, Shao JF, Hu DW, **e SY (2016) Gas permeability evolution with deformation and cracking process in a white marble under compression. Transp Porous Media 111(2):441–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0603-9
Ma D, Duan H, Li X, Li Z, Zhou Z, Li T (2019a) Effects of seepage-induced erosion on nonlinear hydraulic properties of broken red sandstones. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 91:102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.102993
Ma D, Wang J, Cai X, Ma X, Zhang J, Zhou Z, Tao M (2019b) Effects of height/diameter ratio on failure and damage properties of granite under coupled bending and splitting deformation. Eng Fract Mech 220:106640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106640
Perera MSA, Ranjith PG, Choi SK, Airey D (2012) Investigation of temperature effect on permeability of naturally fractured black coal for carbon dioxide movement: an experimental and numerical study. Fuel 94(1):596–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.026
Rathnaweera TD, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA (2015) Effect of salinity on effective CO2, permeability in reservoir rock determined by pressure transient methods: an experimental study on Hawkesbury sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(5):2093–2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0671-0
Rathnaweera TD, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA (2016) Experimental investigation of geochemical and mineralogical effects of CO2 sequestration on flow characteristics of reservoir rock in deep saline aquifers. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19362
Scheidegger AE (1958) The physics of flow through porous media. Soil Sci 86(6):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195812000-00015
Shakir AO, Ali HAAR (2019) The effect of lining material on the permeability of clayey soil. Civil Eng J 5(3):662–678. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091277
Shi Y, Wang CY (1988) Generation of high pore pressures in accretionary prisms: inferences from the Barbados subduction complex. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 93(B8):8893–8910. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb093ib08p08893
Tian X, Cheng L, Cao R, Wang Y, Zhao W, Yan Y, Liu H, Mao W, Zhang M, Guo Q (2015) A new approach to calculate permeability stress sensitivity in tight sandstone oil reservoirs considering micro-pore-throat structure. J Petrol Sci Eng 133:576–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.05.026
Wang HL, Xu WY, Cai M, **ang ZP, Kong Q (2017) Gas permeability and porosity evolution of a porous sandstone under repeated loading and unloading conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(6):2071–2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1215-1
**ao W, Li T, Li M, Zhao J, Zheng L, Li L (2016) Evaluation of the stress sensitivity in tight reservoirs. Petrol Explor Dev 43(1):115–123. https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2016.01.13
Xu C, Lin C, Kang Y, You L (2018) An experimental study on porosity and permeability stress-sensitive behavior of sandstone under hydrostatic compression: characteristics, mechanisms and controlling factors. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(8):2321–2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1481-6
Yang SQ, Huang YH, Tian WL, Zhu JB (2017a) An experimental investigation on strength, deformation and crack evolution behavior of sandstone containing two oval flaws under uniaxial compression. Eng Geol 217:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.004
Yang SQ, Xu P, Li YB, Huang YH (2017b) Experimental investigation on triaxial mechanical and permeability behavior of sandstone after exposure to different high temperature treatments. Geothermics 69:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.04.009
Yu J, Xu W, Jia C, Wang R, Wang H (2019) Experimental measurement of permeability evolution in sandstone during hydrostatic compaction and triaxial deformation. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(7):5269–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1425-0
Zhang DM, Yang YS, Chu YP, Zhang X, Xue YG (2018) Influence of loading and unloading velocity of confining pressure on strength and permeability characteristics of crystalline sandstone. Results Phys 9:1367–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.043
Zhao Y, Qu F, Wan Z, Zhang Y, Liang W, Meng Q (2010) Experimental investigation on correlation between permeability variation and pore structure during coal pyrolysis. Transp Porous Media 82(2):401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9436-8
Zhou H, Hu D, Zhang F, Shao J, Feng X (2016) Laboratory investigations of the hydro-mechanical-chemical coupling behaviour of sandstone in CO2 storage in aquifers. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(2):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0752-8
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019QNA04). The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which have greatly improved this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: List of Symbols
Appendix: List of Symbols
- D :
-
Diameter of specimen
- H :
-
Height of specimen
- m :
-
Mass of specimen
- ρ :
-
Density of specimen
- T :
-
Temperature
- Q :
-
Flow rate
- μ :
-
Gas viscosity
- A :
-
Cross-section area
- P 1 :
-
Injection pressures
- P 2 :
-
Downstream pressure
- p 0 :
-
Atmospheric pressure
- σ 1 :
-
Axial stress
- σ 3 :
-
Confining pressure
- σ e :
-
Effective confining pressure
- D k :
-
Damage rate of permeability
- D σ :
-
Damage rate induced by stress
- D T :
-
Damage rate induced by temperature
- k :
-
Permeability
- k 0 :
-
Initial permeability
- k 1 :
-
Final permeability
- k L :
-
Permeability in the loading process
- k un :
-
Permeability in the unloading process
- k L1 :
-
Permeability in the next loading process
- a, b, c, d:
-
Fitting parameters
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, YH., Yang, SQ. & Teng, SY. Temperature Dependence of the Permeability of Sandstone Under Loading and Unloading Conditions of Confining Pressure. Math Geosci 53, 551–570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09860-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09860-7