Abstract
This research suggests that consumer emotional intelligence (CEI) is an important construct in explaining why some consumers react destructively to conflicts in consumer-brand relationships whereas others approach them constructively. The results of the study show that (1) when encountering transgressions in relationships with brands, consumers low in CEI are more likely to respond to transgressions destructively than those who are high in CEI; (2) the effects of CEI on destructive responses are greater if a transgression affects consumers’ self interests rather than society’s interests; and (3) low CEI consumers are more likely to attribute negative intentions to the company and are therefore more likely to respond destructively than high CEI consumers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–16.
Amitay, O. A., & Mongrain, M. (2007). From emotional intelligence to intelligent choice of partner. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 325–343.
Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On emotional quotient inventory (Eq-I): technical manual. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.
Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence. Psicothema, 18, 13–25.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Barone, M. D., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.
Beverland, M. B., Chung, E., & Kates, S. M. (2009). Exploring consumers' conflict styles: grudges and forgiveness following marketer failure. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 438–443.
Bonifield, C., & Cole, C. (2007). Affective responses to service failure: anger, regret, and retaliatory versus conciliatory responses. Marketing Letters, 18, 85–99.
Byron, K., Terranova, S., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (2007). Nonverbal emotion recognition and sales persons: liking ability to perceived and actual success. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(11), 2600–2619.
Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children's reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 742–753.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of co** in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219–239.
Girard, M., & Mullet, E. (1997). Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 4(4), 209–220.
Gregoire, Y., Laufer, D., & Tripp, T. M. (2010). A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(6), 738–758.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kidwell, B., Hardesty, D. M., & Childers, T. L. (2008). Consumer emotional intelligence: conceptualization, measurement, and the prediction of consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 154–166.
Kidwell, B., Hardesty, D. M., Murtha, B. R., & Sheng, S. (2011). Emotional intelligence in marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 78–95.
Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Côté, S., Beers, M., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5(1), 113–118.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267–298.
Miller, S. L., Maner, J. K., & Becker, D. V. (2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: threat cues shape the psychological boundary between "us" and "them.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 62–77.
Monga, A., Chen, H., Tsiros, M., & Srivastava, M. (2012). How buyers forecast: buyer–seller relationship as a boundary condition of the impact bias. Marketing Letters, 23, 31–45.
Parker, J. D. A., Keefer, K. V., & Wood, L. M. (2011). Toward a brief multidimensional assessment of emotional intelligence: psychometric properties of the emotional quotient inventory—short form. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 762–777.
Paulssen, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2009). Customer co** in response to relationship transgressions: an attachment theoretic approach. In D. J. MacInnis, C. W. Park, & J. R. Priester (eds.). Handbook of Brand Relationships Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
**, R. A., Jr. (1993). The effects of satisfaction and structural constraints on retailer exciting, voice, loyalty, opportunities, and neglect. Journal of Retailing, 69(3), 320–352.
Prentice, R. (2004). Teaching ethics, heuristics, and biases. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 1(1), 57–74.
Reuber, A., & Fischer, E. (2010). Organizations behaving badly: when are discreditable actions likely to damage organizational reputation? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 39–50.
Rusbult, C. E., & Zembrodt, I. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3), 274–293.
Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: when saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 983–992.
Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). Cause-related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.
Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisement. Journal of Advertising, 19(2), 40–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, H., Sung, Y. & Drumwright, M.E. Consumer emotional intelligence and its effects on responses to transgressions. Mark Lett 27, 223–233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9342-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9342-x