Abstract
This project developed and studied The Source, an alternate reality game (ARG) designed to foster interest and knowledge related to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) among youth from populations underrepresented in STEM fields. ARGs are multiplayer games that engage participants across several media such as shared websites, social media, personal communications, and real-world settings to complete activities and collaborate with team members. The Source was a five-week summer program with 144 participants from Chicago aged 13 to 18 years. The Source incorporated six socio-contextual factors derived from three frameworks: Chang’s (ERIC Digest, 2002) recommendations for engaging underrepresented populations in STEM careers, Lave and Wenger’s (Cambridge University Press, 1991) situated learning model, and Barron’s (Human Development, 49(4); 193-224, 2006) learning ecology perspective. These factors aligned with the program’s aims of promoting (1) social community and peer support, (2) collaboration and teamwork, (3) real-world relevance and investigative learning, (4) mentoring and exposure to STEM professionals, (5) hands-on activities to foster transferable skill building, and (6) interface with technology. This paper presents results from 10 focus groups and 10 individual interviews conducted with a subset of the 144 youth participants who completed the game. It describes how these six factors were realized through The Source and uses them as a lens for considering how The Source functioned pedagogically. Qualitative findings describe youth’s perception of The Source’s potential influence on STEM interest, engagement, and identity formation. Despite limitations, study results indicate that underrepresented youth can engage in an immersive, narrative, and game-based experience as a potential mechanism for piquing and develo** STEM interest and skills, particularly among underrepresented youth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Äyrämö S (2011) ‘Narrative’ in serious or learning game design research. Place for theory, analysis and practice. Proceedings from the 2nd ENN Conference, Kolding
Aschbacher PR, Li E, Roth EJ (2010) Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. J Res Sci Teach 47(5):564–582. doi:10.1002/Tea.20353
Barron B (2006) Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: a learning ecology perspective. Hum Dev 49(4):193–224
Bonous-Hammarth M (2000) Pathways to success: affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education 69:92–111
Bonsignore E, Hansen D, Kraus K, Ahn J, Visconti A, Fraistat A, & Druin A (2012) Alternate reality games: platforms for collaborative learning. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2012
Brown CS, Leaper C (2010) Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles 63(11–12):860–870
Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JAM, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD (2004) Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 591(1):98–124
Chang JC (2002) Women and minorities in the science, mathematics and engineering pipeline. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED467855.pdf
Chess S, Booth P (2013) Lessons down a Rabbit Hole: Alternate Reality Gaming in the Classroom. New Media & Society 16:1002–1017
City of Chicago (2009) Income map, earnings map, and wages data. Retrieved from http://www.citydata.com/income/income-Chicago-Illinois.html (accessed on 20 november 2014)
Fisher CB, Wallace SA, Fenton RE (2000) Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence 29(6):679–695
Gee JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment 1(1):20
Gee JP (2007) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Gersten R, Fuchs LS, Compton D, Coyne M, Greenwood C, Innocenti MS (2005) Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education. Exceptional Children 71(2):149–164
Greene KM, Lee B, Constance N, Hynes K (2013) Examining Youth and Program Predictors of Engagement in Out-of-School Time Programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42(10):1557–1572
Hanus MD, Fox J (2015) Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education 80:152–161
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Hooker S, Brand B (2009) Success at Every Step: How 23 Programs Support Youth on the Path to College and beyond. American Youth Policy Forum, Washington, D. C.
Jagoda P, Gilliam M, McDonald P, Russell C (2015) Worlding through play: alternate reality games, large-scale learning, and The Source. American Journal of Play 8(1):74
Kim J, Lee E, Thomas T, & Dombrowski C (2009) Storytelling in New Media: the Case of Alternate Reality Games, 2001-2009. First Monday 14(6). doi:10.5210/fm.v14i6.2484
Lester JC, Spires HA, Nietfeld JL, Minogue J, Mott BW, Lobene EV (2014) Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: A narrative-centered learning perspective. Information Sciences 264:4–18
Koch M, Georges A, Gorges T, Fujii R (2012) Engaging youth with STEM professionals in afterschool programs. Meridian 13(1):1–18 Retrieved from http://ced.ncsu.edu/meridian/index.php/meridian/article/view/15
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Martin A, Chatfield T, & Thompson B (2006) Alternate reality games white paper. Retrieved from http://archives.igda.org/arg/resources/IGDA-AlternateRealityGames-Whitepaper-2006.pdf
Maton KI, Hrabowski FA III (2004) Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: a strengths-based approach. Am Psychol 59(6):547–556
Mayo MJ (2009) Video Games: A Route to Large-Scale STEM Education? Science 323(5910):79–82
McGonigal J (2011) Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York
Mosatche HS, Matloff-Nieves S, Kekelis L, Lawner EK (2013) Effective STEM programs for adolescent girls: three approaches and many lessons learned. Afterschool Matters 17:17–25
NSF (2010) Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: identifying and develo** our nation’s human capital. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/nsb1033.pdf
NSF (2013) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Retrieved from Arlington, VA: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_digest.pdf
OAVE (2012) Investing in America’s future: a blueprint for transforming career and technical education. Retrieved from Washington, D.C
Pellegrino JW, & Hilton ML (2012) Education for life and work: develo** transferable knowledge and skills in the twenty-first century. Retrieved from Washington, D.C
Razak AA, & Connolly TM (2013) Using games as a context for interdisciplinary learning: A case study at a Scottish primary school. Paper presented at the Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Berlin
Ryan M (2004) “Introduction” in Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
Salen K (2007) Gaming Skills: A Game Design Study in Action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 16:301–322
Strauss A, Corbin J (1993) Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of Qualitative Research 17:273–285
Subotnik RF, Orland M, & Rayhack K (2009) Identifying and develo** talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): an agenda for research, policy, and practice. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness (pp. 1313–1326): Springer
Subotnik RF, & Tai RH (2011) Successful education in the STEM disciplines: an examination of selective specialized science mathematics and technology-focused high schools. Paper presented at the National Research Council Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools
Squire K (2003) Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation 2(1):49–62
Squire K (2008) Open-ended video games: A model for develo** learning for the interactive age. In: Salen K (ed) The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 167–198
Tyler-Wood T, Ellison A, Lim O, Periathiruvadi S (2012) Bringing Up Girls in Science (BUGS): The Effectiveness of an Afterschool Environmental Science Program for Increasing Female Students' Interest in Science Careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21(1):46–55. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9279-2
Weisman SA, Gottfredson DC (2001) Attrition from after school programs: characteristics of students who drop out. Prev Sci 2(3):201–205
Zimmerman E (2009) Gaming literacy: game design as a model for literacy in the twenty-first century. The Video Game Theory Reader 2:23–31
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. DRL-1342159. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilliam, M., Jagoda, P., Fabiyi, C. et al. Alternate Reality Games as an Informal Learning Tool for Generating STEM Engagement among Underrepresented Youth: a Qualitative Evaluation of the Source. J Sci Educ Technol 26, 295–308 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9679-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9679-4